Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (no longer under consideration since Jan 12, 2023)

Date Submitted: Jun 29, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 29, 2022 - Jul 13, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Illness representation of COVID-19 affected responses to the Living with the Virus Policy: A cross-sectional study in a Chinese general population

  • Yanqiu Yu; 
  • Rachel Hau Yin Ling; 
  • Joyce Hoi Yuk Ng; 
  • Mason M.C. Lau; 
  • Tsun Kwan Mary Ip; 
  • Joseph Tak Fai Lau

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a global trend for countries to adopt the Living with the Virus (LWV) policy regarding COVID-19. Little is known about the public’s supportiveness and emotional responses (e.g., anticipated panic) related to this policy. Such responses may be associated with illness representations of COVID-19 (i.e., how people think and feel about COVID-19). This novel topic was investigated in this study to facilitate policy making and health communication.

Objective:

This novel topic was investigated in this study to facilitate policy making and health communication.

Methods:

A random, population-based telephone survey interviewed 500 adults aged ≥18 of the Hong Kong general adult population from March to April 2022.

Results:

The prevalence of the public’s support and anticipated panic regarding the LWV policy, which were negatively correlated with each other, was 39.6% and 24.2%, respectively. The illness perception constructs of consequences, timeline, identity, illness concern, and emotional representations were negatively associated with supportiveness and positively associated with anticipated panic regarding the LWV policy. Illness coherence (comprehensiveness) was significantly associated with policy support but not with anticipated panic. Moderation analyses showed that the above significant associations were invariant between those with and without previous COVID-19 infection. The associations between personal control/treatment control and supportiveness/anticipated panic were statistically non-significant.

Conclusions:

Policy makers need to be sensitized about the public’s supportive/unsupportive attitude and potential worry (panic) when adopting the LWV policy. Such attitudes/emotional responses may be affected by people’s illness representations on COVID-19. In general, those who found COVID-19 involving a milder nature and less negative emotions would be more supportive and anticipated less panic under the LWV policy. Clinical Trial: NA


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yu Y, Ling RHY, Ng JHY, Lau MM, Ip TKM, Lau JTF

Illness representation of COVID-19 affected responses to the Living with the Virus Policy: A cross-sectional study in a Chinese general population

JMIR Preprints. 29/06/2022:40617

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.40617

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40617

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement