Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Apr 05, 2024)

Date Submitted: Oct 27, 2023
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 27, 2023 - Dec 22, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

Assessing the quality of COVID-19 messages on Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences' website: A content analysis

  • Arash Salahshoori; 
  • Marzieh Araban; 
  • Akbar Babaei Heydarabadi; 
  • Naser Hatamzadeh; 
  • Mehrnoush Jasemzadeh; 
  • Hashem Mohamadian

Background:

Considering that every person in society receives their health information through the websites of medical sciences universities, the quality of the information is expected to be favorable.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of public messages related to COVID-19 available on the Website of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

Methods:

In this descriptive study, 20 news messages were produced on the main website of Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences (WEBDA); Faculties and sub-units were randomly selected and evaluated with the help of a researcher-made checklist. Data analysis was performed using SPSS25 software, as well as Fleiss' Kappa coefficient and descriptive statistics methods.

Results:

Of the messages, 73.4% (80/109) were concerned with the prevention, and 34.9% (38/109) were concerned with the management and control of COVID-19. 89% (97/109) of messages were targeted at the public, while 14.7% (16/109) were addressed to people in contact with the patient. 42% (46/109) of the content of messages related to social distancing, 38.5% (42/109) to hand hygiene, and 16.5% (18/109) to vaccination. 92.7% (101/109) of messages did not mention any specific group at all. In terms of message approach, 45% (49/109) 45% of messages had a news tone; 23% (26/109) persuasive tone; and 9.2% (10/109) had a threatening tone. Also, the most and least attention of the messages was on physical health (46.8% (51/109)) and spiritual health (2.8% (3/109)), respectively.

Conclusions:

Most of the messages were not up to par in terms of content type, scientific documents and evidence, scientific strength and accuracy, fluency, simplicity of the message, and the appearance of content design. To effectively educate the public on health-related issues, decision-makers should consider employing experts in message design to provide reliable educational content. This will ensure that the target audience receives accurate and informative information that can help them improve their health and well-being. The tool used in this study offers a reliable and valid means to assess the quality of health-related messages addressing diverse topics. This tool presents an exciting opportunity to evaluate health messages objectively.

Clinicaltrial:


 Citation

Please cite as:

Salahshoori A, Araban M, Babaei Heydarabadi A, Hatamzadeh N, Jasemzadeh M, Mohamadian H

Assessing the quality of COVID-19 messages on Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences' website: A content analysis

DOI: 10.2196/54031

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54031

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement