Keywords
Hypertension, Diabetes, Ghana, Differential Pricing, LMIC, Non-Communicable Diseases, Universal Health Coverage
Hypertension, Diabetes, Ghana, Differential Pricing, LMIC, Non-Communicable Diseases, Universal Health Coverage
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), especially cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and cancer, have emerged as the leading cause of premature deaths globally. Eighty-six per cent of these deaths are estimated to occur in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC), where they pose a serious public health threat1. The increase in the prevalence of NCDs is largely due to demographic changes from population growth and ageing. The epidemiologic transition in LMICs, characterized by a growth in the burden of disease from infectious diseases to NCDs, has largely been driven by a number of factors, including the consumption of processed foods high in fat, salt and sugar, a decrease in physical activity with sedentary lifestyles, obesity and a rise in the use of tobacco and alcohol2.
For many patients, the high cost of medicines constitutes a major barrier to access innovative patented medicines, but also to the World Health Organization (WHO) list of essential medicines, 92% of which are off-patent3. As the prevention and control of NCDs often requires life-long treatments, novel initiatives, which improve access and affordability, are needed. Health financing reforms and enhanced normative guidance are required for current financing strategies, such as health insurance (with or without co-payment), out-of-pocket expenditure, financing pools and pre-payment, in order to enhance patient access to medicines and overall health outcomes. Essential medicines used to treat NCDs tend to have limited availability and affordability, especially in public sector settings in LMICs, thus negatively impacting control of NCDs4–6. Approximately 90% of individuals in LMICs are estimated to use their own funds to purchase medicines, resulting in out-of-pocket expenditures for medicines being the highest expenditure after food, resulting in challenges with affordability, posing major burdens on government budgets5. A significant proportion of morbidity and mortality due to NCDs can be prevented if medicines are made accessible and affordable6.
The lack of available data on pharmaceutical expenditure, specifically on the types of medicines procured or sold, public and private sector spending, and the degree of access by key population subgroups was recently highlighted by an article in the Lancet7. It recommended that Governments and health systems create and maintain information systems for routine monitoring of data bearing on the affordability of essential medicines, as well as price and availability, in the public and private sectors7. The aim of this paper is to discuss differential pricing for the treatment of NCDs, as a financing scheme to help achieve Universal Health Care.
Differential pricing is one of the approaches to achieve the goal of Universal Health Care (UHC). UHC is defined as the ability to access quality, needed health services, while ensuring that the use of these services does not expose the user to financial hardship. UHC is now a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) goal: “Achieve UHC, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health care services and access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential medicines and vaccines for all.” The concept of UHC ensures a “system-wide effective coverage combined with universal financial protection,” thus avoiding exorbitant out-of-pocket costs8. Out-of-pocket financing for chronic disorders poses a real barrier to increasing access to medicines for poor populations9.
Differential pricing, an approach used to price medicines based on the purchasing power of payers in different socioeconomic segments, within countries or between countries, has been shown to be beneficial and lead to improvement of access and affordability10,11. Thus far, the use of differential pricing has generally been limited to vaccines, contraceptives, antimalarials and antiretrovirals in the context of the Global Fund and Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative, where price reductions were achieved through such strategies as high-volume purchasing, reliable and adequate financing, public advocacy, negotiation, and market competition12,13. Some of the challenges in the roll out of differential pricing stand out, as this approach doesn’t completely address non-price barriers to access, such as challenges related to regulation and weak supply chain and health systems. With regards to supply chain challenges, frequent stockouts, inability to forecast accurately, inefficient distribution systems, or leakage of medicines for private resale, can all impact access9. Therefore in order to improve access and affordability using differential pricing as a financing scheme, it is important that an integrated approach be utilized which includes robust partnerships between multiple stakeholders (governments, donors, biopharmaceutical companies, UN agencies, non-governmental organizations), as well as targeted efforts to strengthen supply chain and health systems.
The WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of non-communicable diseases was endorsed by the 66th World Health Assembly to strengthen national efforts to address the burden of NCDs1. The goal of the WHO Global Action Plan is to improve availability of essential medicines in both public and private facilities and reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 25% by the year 20251. In 2015, NCDs were included in the SDGs, thus recognizing NCDs as a challenge for sustainable development (SDG target number 3).
One of the objectives of the WHO Global Action Plan is to “Implement other cost-effective interventions and policy options to strengthen and orient health systems to address non-communicable diseases and risk factors through people-centered health care and universal health coverage”13. Through differential pricing, the cost of medicines in populations with limited access in LMICs can become more affordable and, when coupled with needed health system improvements, has the potential to dramatically increase access to medicines for specific conditions among lower income segments of the population.
These key commitments on the part of the international community are critical in helping achieve improved access for patients living with NCDs in LMICs.
The WHO recently launched the #beatNCDS campaign, which aims to assist countries to achieve nine global voluntary NCD targets to reduce premature deaths from cancers, heart and lung diseases, and diabetes by 25% by 2025. In order to successfully achieve these goals, it is essential that access to medicines be improved by health financing reforms.
The Access and Affordability Initiative (AAI) is a multilateral collaboration between multiple stakeholders with the aim of improving access to and availability of essential medicines for the treatment of NCDs and strengthening of health systems. It brings together four major biopharmaceutical companies – Merck, Sharp and Dohme Corp. (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., U.S.A., Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi – and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who have initiated a public private partnership with the Ministries of Health in Ghana and the Philippines. AAI is one of the initiatives supporting Access Accelerated, a global partnership of a coalition of biopharmaceutical companies to address the barriers to access for NCDs in LMICs. Access Accelerated was launched at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos by twenty-two leading biopharmaceutical companies to advance access to NCD prevention and care in low and lower-middle income countries14.
Through this novel initiative a prospective cohort of patients with hypertension and diabetes were followed in Ghana and the Philippines at multiple sites, allowing these countries, with the support of the Ministry of Health, as well as academic institutions, to study the effect of within-country differential pricing of innovative medicines and health systems strengthening on access to innovative medicines, clinical outcomes, including disease control, complications and adherence, for diabetes and hypertension. Health system strengthening activities included the development of clinical guidelines, training on supply chain and clinical management, strengthening of supply chain management. Each of the participating companies independently and made decisions involving the AAI. The initiative will provide a unique opportunity to determine whether this type of public private collaboration can improve access to affordable medicines in the developing world and thereby help to achieve SDG3. Additional evidence will be needed to determine the generalizability of such an intervention in other LMIC to tackle the issue of access to treatment.
The AAI study will help provide essential data on access to medicines, affordability of treatment, clinical outcomes, as well as out-of-pocket expenditure by rural and urban populations in both Ghana and the Philippines. This information system will be shared with the respective Ministries of Health in both countries and will assist in providing important policy recommendations to these respective Ministries.
Given the growing cost to the health system of poorly managed NCDs and of the limited availability of financial resources, targeted, cost-effective interventions are needed. Additional evidence will be required to examine the ability to implement differential pricing as a means to improve access to and affordability of medicines for the treatment of NCDs in a variety of contexts. “To explore viable health financing mechanisms and innovative economic tools supported by evidence” is a policy recommendation in the updated WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs15.
The AAI presents one example of such an exploration through differential pricing of innovative medicines for the control of NCDs, coupled with health systems strengthening and may reveal an innovative means to improve access to critically needed medicines and thereby help curb the disturbing trends of excess morbidity and mortality from NCDs in LMICs.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors. Publication in Gates Open Research does not imply endorsement by the Gates Foundation.
No data are associated with this article.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1055800].
Funding for this study was provided by MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi (each a Participant Company) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (collectively, the Funders) through the New Venture Fund (NVF).
The NVF is a not-for-profit organization exempt as a public charity under section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and assumes financial management of the study as a fiduciary agent and primary contractor for the Funders
Consistent with anti-trust laws that govern industry interactions, each Participant Company independently and voluntarily will continue to develop its own marketing and pricing strategies reflecting, among other factors, the Company’s product portfolios and the patients it serves. For the avoidance of doubt, the Participant Companies committed not to: (i) discuss any price or marketing strategy that may involve any Project-related product; or (ii) make any decision with respect to the presence, absence or withdrawal of any Participant Company in or from any therapeutic area; or (iii) discuss the launching, maintaining or withdrawing of any product in any market whatsoever. Each Participant Company is solely responsible for its own compliance with applicable anti-trust laws.
The Funders were kept apprised of progress in developing and implementing the study programs in Ghana and the Philippines, but had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, or in study report writing.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
Gates Open Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for the Open Letter provided in sufficient detail?
Yes
Does the article adequately reference differing views and opinions?
Partly
Are all factual statements correct, and are statements and arguments made adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Is the Open Letter written in accessible language?
Partly
Where applicable, are recommendations and next steps explained clearly for others to follow?
Partly
References
1. Moon S, Jambert E, Childs M, von Schoen-Angerer T: A win-win solution?: A critical analysis of tiered pricing to improve access to medicines in developing countries.Global Health. 2011; 7: 39 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Is the rationale for the Open Letter provided in sufficient detail?
Yes
Does the article adequately reference differing views and opinions?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct, and are statements and arguments made adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Is the Open Letter written in accessible language?
Partly
Where applicable, are recommendations and next steps explained clearly for others to follow?
Partly
Competing Interests: I am a friend and colleague of Dr. Linda Meta Mobula, though we have not formally collaborated on any research to date.
Reviewer Expertise: Implementation science approaches to strengthen non-communicable disease care delivery
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Version 2 (revision) 24 Dec 19 |
read | read | |
Version 1 23 Feb 18 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with Gates Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)