Comparative Study of SVR, Regression and ANN Water Surface Forecasting for Smart Agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.1.9Keywords:
forecasting, smart, agriculture, system, waterAbstract
In the smart agriculture system based on green-based technology of artificial intelligence (AI), flooding can be predicted early by forecasting the water surface and good agricultural irrigation. The process of rising and falling of the water surface in a water basin area can be explained theoretically, but since there are many related variables and the complexity of dependencies between variables, the mathematical model is difficult to construct. Forecasting water surface in the field of irrigation needs too many variable parameters, such as cross-sectional area, depth, volume of rivers and so on. Based on patterns in each period, forecasting can be done using a statistical method and AI. This study uses the support vector regression (SVR) method, regression, multiple linear regression, and algorithm backpropagation, all compared to one another. The results of tests carried out between SVR and multiple linear regression show that SVR is superior. This can be seen from the result of the mean square error (MSE) obtained for each method. SVR 0.03 and for multiple linear regression, 0.05. The result is also supported by the best MSE result in the regression method, which is 0.338, and the best MSE value in artificial neural network (ANN), which is 0.428.
References
Ahir, K., Govani, K., Gajera, R., Shah, M., 2020. Application on virtual reality for enhanced education learning, military training and sports. Augmented Human Research (2020) 5:7.
Burgin, R., Ristschard, G. 2015. Tree-based varying coefficient regression for longitudinal ordinal responses. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 86, 65–80
Cholissodin, I., Riyandani, E. 2016. Analisis Big Data. Fakultas Ilmu Komputer (FILKOM), Universitas Brawijaya (UB), Malang.
Cholissodin, I., Riyandani, E. 2016. Swarm Intelligence Fakultas Ilmu Komputer (FILKOM), Universitas Brawijaya (UB), Malang.
Cholissodin, I., Sutrisno, S., Soebroto, A.A., Hasanah, U., Febiola, Y.I. 2020. AI, Machine Learning & Deep Learning, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Darwiche, M., Mokhiamar, O. 2021. SVR approach for predicting vehicle velocity for comfortable ride while crossing speed humps. Alexandria Engineering Journal, Alexandria University.
Gandhi, M., Kamdar, J., Shah, M., 2020. Preprocessing of non-symmetrical images forEdge detection. Augment Hum Res 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-019-0030-5.
Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic Econometrics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ishak, W.H., Ku-Mahmud, K.R., Norwawi, N. M. 2011. Neural Network Application in Reservoir Water Level Forecasting and Release Decision. International Journal of New Computer Architectures and their Applications (IJNCAA) 1(2): 265-274
Jha, K., Doshi, A., Patel, P., Shah, M., 2019. A comprehensive review on automation in agriculture using artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 2, 1–12.
Kohler, M., et. al. 2015. Estimation of a regression function corresponding to latent variables. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 162:88–109
Kundalia, K., Patel, Y., Shah, M., 2020. Multi-label movie genre detection from aMovie poster using knowledge transfer learning. Augment Hum Res 5 (2020), 11. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41133-019-0029-y. Kurkute, S.R., Deore, B.D., Kasar, Payal, Bham.
Kuo. R.J., et. al. 2002. An intelligent sales forecasting system through integration of artificial neural networks and fuzzy neural networks with fuzzy wight elimination. Neural Networks 15: 909-925.
Lingemann, I. et. al. 2021. Deliverable 2.1.3 Improved Procedures For Medium And Seasonal Water Level Forecast. European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport 1049 Brussels.
Mogili, U.M.R., Deepak, B.B.V.L., 2018. Review on application of drone systems in precision agriculture. International Conference on Robotics and Smart Manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science 133, pp. 502–509.
Ventura, C., et. al. 2013. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks base QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 70, 831e845
Were, K., et. al. 2015. A Comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane Landscape. Ecological Indicators 52:394–403
Shah, D., Dixit, R., Shah, A., Shah, P., Shah, M., 2020a. A comprehensive analysis regarding several breakthroughs based on computer intelligence targeting various syndromes. Augment Hum Res 5, 14 (2020).
Shah, K., Patel, H., Sanghvi, D., Shah, M., 2020b. A comparative analysis of logistic regression, random Forest and KNN models for the text classification. Augment Hum Res 5, 12 (2020).
Shah, G., Shah, A., Shah, M., 2019. Panacea of challenges in real-world application of big data analytics in healthcare sector. Data Inf. Manag., 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42488-019-00010-1. 2007. 4th IEEE. pp. 197–201 Las Vegas, Nevada.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-020-00033-z.
Yang, H., Liusheng, W., Junmin, X. Hongli, Jan. 2007. Wireless Sensor Networks for Intensive Irrigated Agriculture, Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2007. CCNC
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-21 (2)
- 2022-04-19 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 HABITAT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
