바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The moderating effect of need for cognition on the informational role of accessibility experiences

Abstract

In forming judgments and inferences based on memory, people not only rely on the content information retrieved from memory but also use their subjective ease or difficulty experience of retrieval as a source of information (Schwarz and Clore, 2007). The present study examines the moderating role of an individual’s need for cognition in his or her use of retrieval ease as information in forming product attitudes after self-generating reasons in favor of a product. In doing so, the present study also tests for two possible mediating mechanisms: perceived availability- vs. validity-based mechanism. The results show that retrieval ease (experienced in self-generating reasons) influences product attitudes when people are low on need for cognition but not when they are high on need for cognition. In addition, the ease effect on product attitudes (that was contingent upon need for cognition) was found to be mediated by the perceived availability of reasons. Several implications for practice and future research are also discussed.

keywords
Ease-of-retrieval, Need-for-cognition, Availability, Validity

Reference

1.

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1999). How often did I do it? Experienced ease of retrieval and frequency estimates of past behavior. Acta Psychologica, 103, 77-89.

2.

Ask, K., Greifeneder, R., & Reinhard, M. (2012). On the ease of (dis)believing: the role of accessibility experiences in credibility judgments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 779-784.

3.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

4.

Broemer, P. (2004). Ease of imagination moderates reactions to differently framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 103-119.

5.

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.

6.

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307.

7.

Caruso, E. M. (2008). Use of experienced retrieval ease in self and social judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 148-155.

8.

Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended Thought (pp.212-252). New York: Guilford Press.

9.

Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Dijksterhuis, A., Macrae, C. N., & Haddock, G. (1999). When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 766-774.

11.

Florack, A., & Zoabi, H. (2003) Risikoverhalten bei Aktiengeschäften: Wenn Anleger nachdenklich werden [Risk Behavior in Share Transactions: When Investors Think about Reasons], Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34(2), 65-78.

12.

Grayson, C. E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Beliefs influence information processing strategies: Declarative and experiential information in risk assessment. Social Cognition, 17(1), 1-18.

13.

Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107-141.

14.

Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H. (2007). Relying on accessible content versus accessibility experiences: The case of processing capacity. Social Cognition, 25(6), 853-881.

15.

Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, intensity, and importance: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771-782.

16.

Haddock, G. (2002). It’s easy to like or dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility experiences and the favourability of attitude judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 257-267.

17.

Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2008). It's the difference that counts: Expectancy/experience discrepancy moderates the use of ease of retrieval in attitude judgments. Social Cognition, 26(4), 447-468.

18.

Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

19.

Hirt, E. R., Kardes, F. R., & Markman, K. D. (2004). Activating a mental simulation mind-set through generation of alternatives: Implications for debiasing in related and unrelated domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 374-383.

20.

Janssen, J., Muller, P. A., & Greifeneder, R. (2011). Cognitive processes in procedural justice judgments: The role of ease-of-retrieval, uncertainty, and experience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 726-750.

21.

Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2009). Predicting future affective states: How ease of retrieval and faith in intuition moderate the impact of activated content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 467-476.

22.

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863.

23.

Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Schwarz, N., & Simonson, I. (2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347-356.

24.

Ofir, C. (2000). Ease of recall vs recalled evidence in judgment: Experts vs laymen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(1), 28-42.

25.

Petrocelli, J., & Dowd, K. (2009). Ease of counterfactual thought generation moderates the relationship between need for cognition and punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1179-1192.

26.

Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722-741.

27.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion (pp.1-24). Springer New York.

28.

Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.

29.

Raghubir, P., & Menon, G. (1998). AIDS and me, never the twain shall meet: The effects of information accessibility on judgments of risk and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 52-63.

30.

Rothman, A. J., & Hardin, C. D. (1997). Differential use of the availability heuristic in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 123-138.

31.

Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1053- 1064.

32.

Ruder, M., & Bless, H. (2003). Mood and the reliance on the ease of retrieval heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 20-32.

33.

Schwarz, N. (2010). Meaning in context: Metacognitive experiences. In B. Mesquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp.105-125). New York: Guilford.

34.

Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., & Klumpp, G. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195-202.

35.

Schwarz, N., Cho, H., & Xu, J. (2005). Diverging inferences from identical inputs: The role of naive theories. Paper presented at the meetings of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Wurzburg, Germany.

36.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In A. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385-407). New York, NY: Guilford.

37.

Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1700-1712.

38.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.

39.

Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170-177.

40.

Wänke, M., & Bless, H. (2000). The effects of subjective ease of retrieval on attitudinal judgments: The moderating role of processing motivation. In H. Bless and J. P Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 143-161). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

logo