바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of Brand Concept, BRQ, and Parent-Extension Similarity on Brand Extension Evaluations

Abstract

This research addressed the moderating role of brand concept in the influence of parent-extension similarity and BRQ level on brand extension evaluation. We predicted brand concept type as a boundary condition of BRQ effect which was explained that high BRQ subjects evaluate more positively toward dissimilar extension than low BRQ subjects, which has been shown by a few prior researches. We made 2(brand concept type: functional/symbolic) × 2(BRQ level: high/low) × 2(similarity level: high/low) between subjects experimental design in order to find that there is significant difference of extension evaluations between high BRQ group and low BRQ group when they encounter dissimilar extension. The result of experiment demonstrated that high BRQ subjects evaluated more positively than low BRQ subjects when they were exposed to a dissimilar extension of functional concept brand(BRQ effect was found), but there was no difference of extension evaluations between high BRQ group and low BRQ group when they were exposed to a dissimilar extension of symbolic concept brand(BRQ effect was not found).

keywords
Brand Extension, Brand Concept, BRQ, BRQ Effect, Parent-Extension Similarity

Reference

1.

여준상 ; 고성현 ; 김영조, (2006) BRQ수준과 점포유형이 서비스실패에 대한 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향, 마케팅논집(Journal of Marketing Studies)

2.

고성현, (2007) 모브랜드-확장제품간 유사성이 브랜드확장 평가에 형향을 미치는데 있어 BRQ의 조절효과, 경영연구

3.

박은아 ; 성영신 ; 김태형 ; 강정석, (2004) 소비자-브랜드 관계가 확장된 브랜드 평가에 미치는 영향, 소비자학연구

4.

Aaker, D. A, (1990) Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing

5.

Aaker,D.A, (1991) Managing brand equity, New York: The free press

6.

Anderson, E, (1992) The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels, Journal of Marketing Research

7.

Barone, M. J, (2000) The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research

8.

Blackston,M, (1993) Beyond brand personality: building brand relationships, Brand Equity and Advertising Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

9.

Boush, D. M, (1991) A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation, Journal of Marketing Research

10.

Fournier,S, (1994) A Consumer-Brand Relationship Framework for Strategic Brand Management, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida

11.

Fournier,S, (1998) Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research

12.

Garbarino, E, (1999) The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships, Journal of Marketing

13.

Graeff,T.R, (1996) Using Promotional Messages to Manage th Effects of Brand and Self-Image on Brand Evaluations, Journal of Marketing

14.

Keller, K. L, (1992) The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions, Journal of Marketing Research

15.

Keller,K.L, (1993) Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing

16.

Kotler,P.H, (1991) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control, 8th ed, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall, Inc

17.

Park, C. W, (1986) Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management, Journal of Marketing

18.

Park, C. W, (1991) Evaluation of Brand Extensions: the Role of product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency, Journal of Consumer Research

19.

Park, J. W, (2001) Role of Consumer Relationships with a Brand in Brand Extensions: Some Exploratory Findings, Advances in Consumer Research

20.

Park, J. W, (2002) Acceptance of Brand Extension: Interactive Influences of Product Category Similarity, Typicality of Claimed Benefits, and Brand Relationship Quality, Advances in Consumer Research

21.

Sherry,J.F, (1987) Self-concept in Consumer Behaviour: a Critical Review, Journal of Consumer Research 9(December)

22.

Smith, D, (1992) The Effect of Brand Extension on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency, Journal of Marketing Research

23.

Yeo, J, (2006) Effects of Parent- Extension Similarity and Self Regulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions, Journal of Consumer Psychology

logo