Characteristic features of the federal state economic function content (considering economic function of the Federal Republic of Germany)

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 157, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 25-27

Citation information:
Larina, O., & Kukanov, V. (2016). Characteristic features of the federal state economic function content (considering economic function of the Federal Republic of Germany). Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4(1)), 25-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0007


Olga Larina
D.Sc. (Law),
Professor,
Head of the Faculty of Theory and History of State and Law,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
lelyc@mail.ru

Vitaliy Kukanov
PhD Student (Law),
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
legis-group@mail.ru

Characteristic features of the federal state economic function content (considering economic function of the Federal Republic of Germany)

Abstract. The purpose of the study is to develop theoretical principles concerning the content of the economic function of a modern federal state. The economic policy of the Federal Republic of Germany in terms of state budget stabilization as one of the objectives of sustainable development is considered as the main element of the economic function and the form of the federal states’ competence. The main types of the competences (rights and obligations) of the German federated states in financial and budget sphere are studied. On the basis of the conducted study, it can be concluded that the current legislation does not allow the federal states to fully implement their tasks. Introduction of the amendment called «debt brake» at the federated states level is a preventive measure aimed at initiating well-timed corrective actions to balance the budget. However, its implementation effectiveness in terms of solving the problem of budgets consolidation remains low due to the absence of the regulations providing a specific procedure for its implementation in German Federal Laws.

Keywords: State Economic Function; Economic Policy; Competence; Financial and Budget Sphere; National Debt; «Debt Break»; Germany; Regional Economics

JEL Classification: K00

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0007

References

  1. German Federal Ministry of Finance (1969, August 19). Act on the Principles of Federation and Lander Budgetary Law.
    Retrieved from http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/EN/Standardartikel/Ministry/Laws/1969-08-19-budgetary-principles-act.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3
  2. Alberto, A., Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2006). Reply to Blankart and Koester’s Political Economics versus Public Choice. Two View of Political Economy. Kyklos, 59(2), 201-208.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00331.x
  3. German Bundestag (2012, November). Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. Berlin.
    Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/blob/284870/ce0d03414872b427e57fccb703634dcd/basic_law-data.pdf
  4. Benz, A. (2000). Two types of Multi-level Governance: Intergovernmental Relations. German and EU Regional Policy; Regional and Federal Studies, 10(3), 21-44.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560008421130
  5. Benz, A. (2009). Intergovernmental Relations in German Federalism – joint decision-making and the dynamics of horizontal cooperation.
    Retrieved from http://www.forumfed.org/libdocs/2009/2009-03-27-Zaragoza-Benz.pdf
  6. Berlit, U. (2010). Die Umsetzung der Schuldenbremse in den Landern – erste Ansatze und Probleme. In M. Junkernheinrich et al. Jahrbuch fur offentliche Finanzen (pp. 311-342). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.
  7. Buscher, D. (2010). Der Bundesstaat in Zeiten der Finanzkrise: Ein Beitrag zur Reform der deutschen Finanz- und Haushaltsordnung (Foderalismusreform). Berlin : Duncker & Humblot.
  8. The European Union (2012, October 26). Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 326(47).
    Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN
  9. Cserne, P. (2007). Constitutional Courts and the Limits of Economic Policy: Reflexions on the Hungarian.
    Retrieved from http://www.eui.eu/Documents/MWP/Conferences/ConstitutionsMarkets/
    CserneConstitutionsMarkets.pdf
  10. Deutsche Bank Research. (2011). German finances: Federal level masks importance of Lander.
    Retrieved from http://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000273969/German+finances%3A+Federal+level+masks+importance+of+L%C3%A4nder.pdf
  11. Hesse, K. (1962). Der unitarische Bundesstaat. Karlsruhe: C. F. Muller.
  12. Hildebrandt, A. (2009). Die finanzpolitische Handlungsfahigkeit der Bundeslander. Determinanten, institutionelle Defizite und Reformoptionen (German Edition). Wiesbaden: Taschenbuch.
  13. Hintze, O. (1962). Wesen und Wandlung des modernen Staates. In G. Oesterreich et al. Staat und Verfassung. Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Allgemeinen Verfassunsgeschichte (рр. 470-496). Gottingen: Publisher.
  14. Kuptsova, O. B. (2015). Providing conditions for the development of all forms of ownership as part of the content of the economic functions of the state. Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii (Legal science and practice: Herald of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the MIF of Russia), 1(29), 21-24 (in Russ.).
  15. Manuel, K. M. (2014). Definitions of «Inherently Governmental Function» In Federal Procurement Law and Guidance.
    Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42325.pdf
  16. Milyukov, A. M. (2006). The economic function of the Russian state and the role of customs authorities in its implementation. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis). Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service. Vladimir (in Russ.).
  17. Pashkov, A. V. (2012). Economic Policy: the concept and content. Istoricheskiye, filosofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kulturologiya i iskustvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki (Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Theory and practice), 5(2), 133-138 (in Russ.).
  18. Reinert, E. S. (1999). The role of the state in economic growth. Journal of Economic Studies, 26(4/5), 268-326.
    Retrieved from http://www.othercanon.org/uploads/state-paper-pdf.pdf
  19. Petho, S. (2010). The birth of the modern state and its function changes.
    Retrieved from http://www.southeast-europe.org/pdf/04/DKE_04_A_E_PETHO_S_KRANCZICKI.pdf
  20. Petrunya, Ju. E. (2012). The economic policy of the state: the reality and the illusion of public choice. Izvestiya JuZGU. Seriya Ekonomika. Sociologiya. Menedzhment (News SWSU. Economy Series. Sociology. Management), 1, 8-17 (in Russ.).
  21. Pierson, C. (2004). The modern state (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis e-Library.
  22. Samson, S. (2014). The Role of Government in Economy. 5th Central European Conference in Regional Science. CERS, 792-804.
    Retrieved from http://www3.ekf.tuke.sk/cers/files/zbornik2014/PDF/Samson.pdf
  23. Scharpf, F. W. (2010). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
  24. Seitz, H. (2008). Die Bundesbestimmtheit der Landerausgaben. Wirtschaftsdienst, 5, 340-348.
  25. Sokolova, I. L. (2007). The economic function of the modern federal state. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis). Russian State Trade and Economic University, Moscow (in Russ.).
  26. Tanzi, V. (2009, August 13). The Economic Role of the State Before and After the Current Crisis. Plenary session of the 65th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Cape Town.
    Retrieved from http://www.iipf.org/speeches/Tanzi_2009.pdf
  27. Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing Federal Systems. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  28. Wiesner, A. (2006). Politik unter Einigungszwang. Eine Analyse foderaler Verhandlungsprozesse. Frankfurt am Mine. New York: Campus.
  29. Vanchikova, Е. N, Chimitdorzhiyeva, E. T., & Gantamarov, Z. V. (2012). Methodical approach to the assessvent of spatial social and economic development of the region. Izvestiya JuZGU. Seriya Ekonomika. Sociologiya. Menedzhment (News SWSU. Economy Series. Sociology. Management), 2, 12-18 (in Russ.).
  30. Zagaynov, L. I. (1968). The economic functions of the Soviet state. Moscow: Yurid. Lit. (in Russ.).

Received 8.12.2015