•  
  •  
 

Abstract

ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA) is a free trade area formed in 2009. One of its implementations is the reduction of import duties on salt commodities in 2011. Its implementations has an impact on trade creation (TC) members and trade diversion (TD) on salt commodities product. The objective of this study is to analyze the occurrence TC and TD on salt commodity. Import demand elasticity and substitution elasticity approach for TC and TD estimation models was developed by the World Bank. The result is no all AANZFTA’s members get profit in the form of TC but just TD with dominated by Australia (99%) and other member (1%).

Bahasa Abstract

ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area (AANZFTA) adalah kawasan perdagangan bebas terbentuk pada tahun 2009. Awal pembentukannya adalah adanya penurunan tarif bea masuk komoditas garam. Kebijakan tersebut berdampak terhadap trade creation (TC) dan trade diversion (TD). Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis terjadinya TC dan TD pada komoditas garam. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah elastisitas permintaan impor dan elastisitas substitusi untuk estimasi model TC dan TD yang dikembangkan oleh Bank Dunia. Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah adanya keuntungan berupa TC dan TD yang didominasi oleh Australia (99%) dan anggota lainnya (1%).

References

[1] Amjadi, A., Schuler, P., Kuwahara, H., & Quadros, S. (2011). User’s manual: version 2.01, World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). Washington, DC: World Bank. Diakses 1 Desember 2017 dari http://wits.worldbank.org/data/public/ WITS User Manual.pdf.

[2] AANZFTA. (2016). Agreement establishing the AANZFTA. ASEAN–Australia-New Zealand. Diakses 1 Desember 2016 dari aanzfta.asean.org.

[3] El-Agraa, A. M. (Ed.) (1988). International economic integration (2nd edition). New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[4] Greenaway, D. (1983). International trade policy: From tariff to new protection. Washington: Macmilan.

[5] Indonesia, R. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Perindustrian Republik Indonesia Nomor: 88/M-IND/PER/10/2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Perindustrian Nomor 134/MIND /PER/10/2009 tentang Peta Panduan (Road Map) Pengembangan Klaster Industri Garam. Diakses 1 Desember 2017 dari http://jdih.kemenperin.go.id/site/download peraturan/ 1862.

[6] ITC. (2017). International trade statistics. International Trade Centre. Diakses 1 Desember 2017 dari http://www.intracen.org/itc/market-info-tools/ statistics-import-product-country/.

[7] Khorana, S., Kimbugwe, K., & Perdikis, N. (2009). Assessing the welfare effects of the East African Community Customs Union’s transition arrangements on Uganda. Journal of Economic Integration, 24(4), 685–708. doi: https: //doi.org/10.11130/jei.2009.24.4.685.

[8] Laird, S., & Yeats, A. (1990). Quantitative methods for tradebarrier analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

[9] Leamer, E. E.,&Stern, R. M. (1970). Quantitative international economics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

[10] Lefond, S. J. (1969). Handbook of world salt resources. New York; Plenum Press.

[11] Mahmood, H., & Gul, S. (2014). Assesing the impact of FTA: A case study of Pakistan- Malaysia FTA. MPRA Paper, 55802. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Diakses 6 Agustus 2017 dari https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55802/.

[12] Makochekanwa, A. (2014). Welfare implications of COMESA-EAC-SADC Tripartite free trade area. African Development Review, 26(1), 186-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12074.

[13] Mbithi, M. L., Gor, S. O., & Osoro, K. O. (2015). Impact of economic partnership agreements: the case of EAC’s manufactured imports from EU. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 3(2), 67-80.

[14] Mehta, R.,& Parikh, A. (2005). Impact of trade liberalization on import demands in India: A panel data analysis for commodity groups. Applied Economics, 37(16), 1851-1863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500217945.

[15] Mobariz, A. S. (2016). WTO accession of Afghanistan: Costs, benefits and post-accession challenges. South Asia Economic Journal, 17(1), 46–72. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1177/1391561415621823.

[16] Nwali, C. S., & Arene, C. J. (2015). Effects of economic partnership agreements on agricultural trade between Nigeria and the EU. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 3(2, Special Issue), 63-74.

[17] Nopirin. (2010). Ekonomi internasional (Edisi ke-3). Yogyakarta: BPFE.

[18] Oluwusi, O. O. (2016). The impact of regional integration on Nigeria’s imports: A case of ECOWAS common external tariff on agro-processing (Thesis). Stellenbosch, South Africa: Stellenbosch University. Diakses 1 Desember 2017 dari http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/100242.

[19] Ousmane, A. (2015). The impact of economic partnership agreements between ECOWAS and the EU on Niger. Business and Economics Journal, 6(2), 1-9. doi: 10.4172/2151- 6219.1000145.

[20] Othieno, L., & Shinyekwa, I. (2011). Trade, revenue and welfare effects of the East African Community Customs Union principle of asymmetry on Uganda: An application of WITSSMART simulation model. Research Series, 79. Economic Policy Research Centre. Diakses 6 Agustus 2017 dari http: //ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/150480/files/series79.pdf.

[21] Plummer, M. G., Cheong, D., & Hamanaka, S. (2010). Methodology for impact assessment of Free Trade Agreements. Asian Development Bank. Diakses 15 Desember 2017 dari https://www.adb.org/publications/ methodology-impact-assessment-free-trade-agreements.

[22] Salim, Z., & Munadi, E. (Eds.) (2016). Info komoditas garam. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia bekerja sama dengan Al Mawardi Prima Anggota IKAPI DKI Jaya. Diakses 1 Desember 2017 dari http://bppp.kemendag.go. id/media content/2017/08/Isi BRIK Garam.pdf.

[23] Samuel, G. M. (2015). Uganda’s trade and revenue effects with the EAC countries, DRC and Sudan. Modern Economy, 6(3), 338-357. doi: 10.4236/me.2015.63031.

[24] Vu, H. T. (2016). Assessing potential impacts of the EVFTA on Vietnam’s pharmaceutical imports from the EU: an application of SMART analysis. SpringerPlus, 5, 1503. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3200-7.

Download

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.