Framing Indigenous–Settler Relations within British Columbia's Modern Treaty Context: A Discourse Analysis of the Maa-nulth Treaty in Mainstream Media

Authors

  • Vanessa Sloan Morgan Queen's University
  • Heather Castleden Queen's University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2014.5.3.5

Abstract

Media plays an integral role in (re)producing our social construction of reality. When viewed in light of Canada’s colonial legacy, media’s power has undoubtedly been implicated in circumscribing Indigenous peoples and Indigenous–settler relations. Employing a discourse analysis of mainstream media covering the recent (2011) implementation of a comprehensive land claims agreement in British Columbia, this study investigates how media has framed contemporary Indigenous–settler relations within the Canadian state. Findings indicate that mainstream media predominantly relies on stereotypes of Indigenous peoples and tends to neglect historical and current political complexities, thereby perpetuating stagnant Indigenous–settler relations. Concluding with empirically derived recommendations, this article points to education reform to create more robust mainstream media able to address stagnated (re)constructions of Indigenous–settler relations.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-16

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2014)

Section

Research

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Vanessa Sloan Morgan, Heather Castleden

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

In keeping with IIPJ's Open Access policy, IIPJ has a shared approach to copyright. A shared approach means that authors do not have to waive all of their rights to the work published in IIPJ. By submitting to IIPJ, the author(s) grant(s) IIPJ the right to:

  1. Copy edit the article,
  2. Display the article in perpetuity, and
  3. Enforce the conditions of the Creative Commons license associated with the article.

All articles published in IIPJ carry the Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivatives license (click here for the human-readable summary and here for the legal code).

This means that the article can be copied or redistributed without written permission from the author(s) or IIPJ if the following conditions are met:

  1. IIPJ is appropriately credited as the original source. The reference should include the article's DOI (Digital Object Identifier), which helps us track the dissemination of articles published in IIPJ.
  2. The article is not being used for a commercial purpose. Users must be able to access the reprinted or republished article without paying any fee.
  3. The article is not altered from its original form. This means it cannot be edited, transformed, remixed, or truncated in any way. This policy protects our authors from having their work or intent misrepresented.

Any reprints, republications, or distributions that do not meet all of these conditions must be approved in writing by the author(s) of the article and IIPJ.

IIPJ will not grant permission to any publisher that requires authors or IIPJ to waive any of their rights to the article.

Authors who wish to reprint, republish, or distribute their article published in IIPJ for any commercial purpose must obtain written permission from IIPJ and provide appropriate attribution.

IIPJ will consider accepting articles that have been previously published. However, authors submitting articles of this nature must:

  1. Indicate that the article was previously published,
  2. Provide details of all previous publications (that is, source, publication date, format, etc.),
  3. Describe how their IIPJ submission differs from the original publication, and
  4. Provide written permission to republish the article from the copyright holder(s) if applicable.