Download fulltext HTML
Susanti Tasri, E., & Karimi, K. (2019). Emission Study and Pollution Haven Hypothesis in Economic Development of Developed Country. KnE Social Sciences, 3(14), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i14.4313

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i14.4313

statistics

  • 658 Abstract Views
  • 306 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • E Susanti Tasri
    No author data available.
  • K Karimi
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Mar 31, 2019

Emission Study and Pollution Haven Hypothesis in Economic Development of Developed Country

KnE Social Sciences / The First Economics, Law, Education and Humanities International Conference (The First ELEHIC) / Pages 260–270

Abstract

This study aims to study at the emission level of CO2 in the group numbers of developed countries and attempt to look at the pollution haven hypothesis, whether it is happen in the group of developed countries. By using panel data analysis in this study, it finds that the significant variable inflluenced CO2 in developed countries are GDP, FDI and Population. In this research, FDI has a negative effect in emission level of CO2 and GDP and Population have the positive one. From this study, it founds that in the developed countries that has been studied has proven that there is no pollution haven hypothesis. This is supported by the finding of a negative relationship between FDI and CO2 emissions, and this relationship is at a significant level. Econometrically, this research model is considered good with the R-squared value level is 0,998.


 


 


Keywords: CO2 emission, FDI, GDP, Population

References
[1] Copeland, B. R. A. Taylor, M.S. (2004). ”Trade, Growth And The Environment.”Journal Of Economic Literature 42 No.1, P.771


[2] Rukmana, Didi. (2012). Ekonomi Lingkungan Dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Arus Timur.Makassar.


[3] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a NorthAmerican Free Trade Agreement. Working Paper 3914. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER.


[4] Arsyad, Lincolin. (2010). Ekonomi Pembangunan Edisi Ke-5. Upp Stim Ykpn. Yogyakarta


[5] Rratnaningsih, m., apriliani, a. T., sudharto,d., &suparmoko. (2006). Pdrb hijau (produk domestik regional bruto hijau). Yogyakarta: bpfe_yogyakarta.


[6] IEA statistic, 2016, http://www.iea.org/t&c


[7] HTTP.www.WRI


[8] Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). The Green Solow Model. Journal Economic Growth, 15(2010), 127 – 153.


[9] Kirkulak, Berna, Bin Qiu & Wei Yin. (2011). The Impact of FDI on air quality: evidence from China. Journal of Chinese economic and foreign trade studies. Vol. 4 No.2


[10] Tasri, susanti evi, kaimi, handra, 2016, Application model of green economic growth and economic gap, Int. J. Green Economics, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2016


[11] Munasinghe, M. (2002). The Sustainomic Trans-Disclipnary Meta-Framework For Making Development..More Sustainable:Applications To Energy Issues. International Of Sustainable Development Vol. 4 No. 2: Pp 6-54.


[12] Alguacil, Ma Taresa & Coadros, Ana & Orts., Vicente (2002). Foreign Direct Invesment, Exports And Domestic Performance In Mexico: A Causality Analysis. Economic Letters, ElsevierVol. 77 (3), Pages 371-376,November


[13] Eskeland, G. S., & Harrison, A. E. (1997).Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis (Working Paper 1744). Washington DC: World Bank.


[14] Dean, M.J, Lovely, E. M. and Wang, H. (2008). ”Are Foreign Investors Attracted ToWeak Enviromental Regulations? Evaluating The Evidance From China.” Journal Of Development Economics Vol. 90 No. 1 Pp 1-13.


[15] Pan, S.B. and Yu, M.Z. (2005),Causality test on the FDI and environment pollution in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai, Journal of International Trade, No. 12, pp. 74-9 (Chinese)