Software as a Service (SaaS) as Cloud Computing: Security and Risk vs. Technological Complexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v4i2.633Keywords:
Technological Complexity, Cloud Computing, SaaS, Security IssuesAbstract
The software delivery model known as Software as a service (SaaS) has evolved from cutting-edge innovation to an essential technology for many companies. However, due to the extensive range of cloud services that companies offer as part of their SaaS offerings, it is indispensable to thoroughly comprehend the dangers associated with using these services. This article describes those dangers and recommendations for the most effective methods of control that are open to managers. This study's objective is to investigate the factors of Technological Complexity, Security and Risk, and Technical Support within an organization to determine how these factors can influence an organization's end-use intention regarding cloud technology. The availability of technical support, the complexity of use, and the organization's training have been highlighted as the most crucial factors of this aim. The findings suggest that complexity negatively influences intention to use, although training and assistance are vital, with a similar weight. Shared or collective knowledge is essential in the adoption of cloud computing technologies.
Downloads
References
Achar, S. (2015). Requirement of Cloud Analytics and Distributed Cloud Computing: An Initial Overview. International Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Physical Sciences, 2, 12–18. Retrieved from https://upright.pub/index.php/ijrsps/article/view/70
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bueno, S., & Salmerón, J. (2008). TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interacting with Computers, 20(6), 515-523.
Burda, D., and Teuteberg, F. (2014). The role of trust and risk perceptions in cloud archiving. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25(2), 172-187.
Buyya, R., Yeo, C., Venugopa, S., Broberg, J., and Brandic, I. (2009). Cloud computing and emerging platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the fifth utility. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(6), 599-616.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295–336.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitűd, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fortes, N., Pereira, J. H., & Costa, J. F. D. (2016). A adogăo de serviços cloud computing pelas empresas portuguesas: O papel dos esforços de marketing. RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologías de Informaçăo, 18, 33-48.
Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Information Technology, Journal of Enterprise Information, 28(1), 107-130.
Hashizume, K., Rosado, D. G., Fernández-Medina, E. & Fernandez, E. B. (2013). An analysis of security issues for cloud computing. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 4(5), https://doi.org/10.1186/1869-0238-4-5
Martens, B. & Teuteberg, F., (2012). Decision-making in cloud computing environments: A cost and risk-based approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(4), 871-893.
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses. Omega, 27(4), 467-484.
Sá, F., & Rocha, Á. (2012). Definiçao da arquitetura de informaçao em organismo da administraçao pública local. RISTI - Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologías de Informagăo, 10, 51-64.
Torres, J. (2011). Empresas en la Nube. Ventajas y retos del Cloud Computing. Barcelona: Libros de Cabecera.
Tsai, M., Lee, W. & Wu, H. (2010). Determinants of RFID adoption intention: evidence from Taiwanese retail chains. Information Management, 47, 255-261.
Vaquero, L. M., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Lindner, M. (2009). A break in the clouds: Towards a cloud definition. Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50-55.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information systems research, 11(4), 342–365.
Vouk, M. (2008). Cloud computing - issues, research, and implementations. Journal Computer Information Technology, 16, 235- 246.
Wang, C., Chow, S., Wang, Q., Ren, K. & Lou, W., (2013). Privacy-preserving public auditing for secure cloud storage. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 62(2), 362-375.
Workman, M. (2007). Advancements in Technology: New Opportunities to Investigate Factors Contributing to Differential Technology and Information Use. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(2), 318–342.
--0--
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Engineering International is an Open Access journal. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.
