BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS

Year 2014, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 0 - , 11.02.2015

Kübra Yeşildal Yeter Mehmet Evcil

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.59445
Cited By: 1

Abstract

 Purpose: The present study evaluated fiber post bond strength in root dentin using various root canal sealers and resin cements.

Material and Methods: After root canal preparation, teeth were divided into 5 distinct groups [(Sealapex (calcium hydroxide-based); AH Plus (resin-based); Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based); BC Sealer (bioceramic-based) and No Sealer (control)] according to root canal sealer used. After root filling, post space preparations were done. Five main groups were sub-divided into 3 groups (self-etch, etch-and-rinse, and self-adhesive) corresponding to the resin systems applied. After post cementation, 3 slices were obtained from different regions (coronal, middle, apical) for push-out testing. SEM images of specimens were obtained to evaluate for debonding failures. Differences in bond strength were evaluated by ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD methods.

Results: It was observed that in Tubli-Seal, BC Sealer and Sealapex groups the bond strength was significantly decreased (p < 0.01). No significant difference (p > 0.05) in bond strength values was observed between the AH Plus and control groups. It was also observed that the bond strength values were similar (p >0.05) in different resin cement systems.

Conclusion: Root canal sealers affect bond strength between fiber posts and the root canal dentin, whereas different resin cement systems have no effect on the bond strengths.

Keywords: Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer

Keywords

Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer

References

  • Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent1996; 75: 375-80.
  • Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17: 338-42.
  • Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
  • Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod2004; 30: 289-301.
  • Solomon CS, Osman YI. Aesthetic restoration of the compromised root: a case report. SADJ 2003; 58: 370, 373-6, 381.
  • Kıvanç BH. Application of posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2006; 18-23.
  • Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 262-5.
  • Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 488-94.
  • Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int2003; 34: 199-201.
  • Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 400-5.
  • Kurtz JS, Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region. Am J Dent 2003; 16 Spec No: 31A-36A.
  • Demiryurek EO, Kulunk S, Yuksel G, Sarac D, Bulucu B. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010; 36: 497- 501.
  • Ahmetoğlu F., Şimşek N., Yıldırım G., Polat T. Post materials in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014; 24: 153-7.
  • Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? J Endod 2008; 34: 1006-10.
  • Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont2003; 16: 403-8.
  • Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005; 31: 584-9.
  • Rathke A, Haj-Omer D, Muche R, Haller B. Effectiveness of bonding fiber posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 604-10.
  • Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 557-63.
  • Dimitrouli M, Gunay H, Geurtsen W, Luhrs AK. Push-out strength of fiber posts depending on the type of root canal filling and resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 273-81.
  • Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Junior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self- adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 314-20.
  • Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Pereira Cda C. Effect of root-canal sealer on the bond strength of fiberglass post to root dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2011; 69: 95-100.
  • Davis ST, O'Connell BC. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 468-73.
  • Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J2002; 35: 372-8.
  • Ozcan E, Capar ID, Cetin AR, Tuncdemir AR, Aydinbelge HA. The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 166-70.
  • Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 752-8.
  • Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay F, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 353-61.
  • Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007; 35: 827-35.
  • Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent1999; 1: 57-67.
  • Baldissara P, Zicari F, Valandro LF, Scotti R. Effect of root canal treatments on quartz fiber posts bonding to root dentin. J Endod2006; 32: 985-8.
  • Teixeira CS, Pasternak-Junior B, Borges AH, Paulino SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 430-5.
  • Caicedo R, Alongi DJ, Sarkar NK. Treatment- dependent calcium diffusion from two sealers through radicular dentine. Gen Dent 2006; 54: 178-81.
  • Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 251-8.
  • Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 326-33.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS

Year 2014, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 0 - , 11.02.2015

Kübra Yeşildal Yeter Mehmet Evcil

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.59445
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The present study evaluated fiber post bond strength in root dentin using various root canal sealers and resin cements.

Material and Methods: After root canal preparation, teeth were divided into 5 distinct groups [(Sealapex (calcium hydroxide-based); AH Plus (resin-based); Tubli-Seal (eugenol-based); BC Sealer (bioceramic-based) and No Sealer (control)] according to root canal sealer used. After root filling, post space preparations were done. Five main groups were sub-divided into 3 groups (self-etch, etch-and-rinse, and self-adhesive) corresponding to the resin systems applied. After post cementation, 3 slices were obtained from different regions (coronal, middle, apical) for push-out testing. SEM images of specimens were obtained to evaluate for debonding failures. Differences in bond strength were evaluated by ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD methods.

Results: It was observed that in Tubli-Seal, BC Sealer and Sealapex groups the bond strength was significantly decreased (p < 0.01). No significant difference (p > 0.05) in bond strength values was observed between the AH Plus and control groups. It was also observed that the bond strength values were similar (p >0.05) in different resin cement systems.

Conclusion: Root canal sealers affect bond strength between fiber posts and the root canal dentin, whereas different resin cement systems have no effect on the bond strengths.

Keywords: Bond strength; fiber post; push-out; resin cement; root canal sealer.

Keywords

bağlanma dayanımı; fiber post; kök kanal patı; push-out; rezin siman

References

  • Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent1996; 75: 375-80.
  • Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17: 338-42.
  • Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
  • Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod2004; 30: 289-301.
  • Solomon CS, Osman YI. Aesthetic restoration of the compromised root: a case report. SADJ 2003; 58: 370, 373-6, 381.
  • Kıvanç BH. Application of posts in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2006; 18-23.
  • Purton DG, Love RM. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 262-5.
  • Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive and photoelastic properties of two prefabricated endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 488-94.
  • Qualtrough AJ, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int2003; 34: 199-201.
  • Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 400-5.
  • Kurtz JS, Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS, Bowles WR. Bond strengths of tooth-colored posts, effect of sealer, dentin adhesive, and root region. Am J Dent 2003; 16 Spec No: 31A-36A.
  • Demiryurek EO, Kulunk S, Yuksel G, Sarac D, Bulucu B. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010; 36: 497- 501.
  • Ahmetoğlu F., Şimşek N., Yıldırım G., Polat T. Post materials in restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2014; 24: 153-7.
  • Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary? J Endod 2008; 34: 1006-10.
  • Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont2003; 16: 403-8.
  • Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Lambrechts P, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Geometric factors affecting dentin bonding in root canals: a theoretical modeling approach. J Endod 2005; 31: 584-9.
  • Rathke A, Haj-Omer D, Muche R, Haller B. Effectiveness of bonding fiber posts to root canals and composite core build-ups. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 604-10.
  • Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Chieffi N, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 557-63.
  • Dimitrouli M, Gunay H, Geurtsen W, Luhrs AK. Push-out strength of fiber posts depending on the type of root canal filling and resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 2011; 15: 273-81.
  • Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Carlini-Junior B, Ferraz CC. Effect of root canal sealers on bond strength of fibreglass posts cemented with self- adhesive resin cements. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 314-20.
  • Cecchin D, Farina AP, Souza MA, Pereira Cda C. Effect of root-canal sealer on the bond strength of fiberglass post to root dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 2011; 69: 95-100.
  • Davis ST, O'Connell BC. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 468-73.
  • Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J2002; 35: 372-8.
  • Ozcan E, Capar ID, Cetin AR, Tuncdemir AR, Aydinbelge HA. The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts. Aust Dent J 2012; 57: 166-70.
  • Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 752-8.
  • Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, Monticelli F, Raffaelli O, Cardoso PC, Tay F, Ferrari M. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 353-61.
  • Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007; 35: 827-35.
  • Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent1999; 1: 57-67.
  • Baldissara P, Zicari F, Valandro LF, Scotti R. Effect of root canal treatments on quartz fiber posts bonding to root dentin. J Endod2006; 32: 985-8.
  • Teixeira CS, Pasternak-Junior B, Borges AH, Paulino SM, Sousa-Neto MD. Influence of endodontic sealers on the bond strength of carbon fiber posts. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 430-5.
  • Caicedo R, Alongi DJ, Sarkar NK. Treatment- dependent calcium diffusion from two sealers through radicular dentine. Gen Dent 2006; 54: 178-81.
  • Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008; 10: 251-8.
  • Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009; 117: 326-33.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Kübra Yeşildal Yeter

Mehmet Evcil This is me

Publication Date February 11, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 24 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yeşildal Yeter, K., & Evcil, M. (2015). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.59445
AMA Yeşildal Yeter K, Evcil M. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. February 2015;24(3). doi:10.17567/dfd.59445
Chicago Yeşildal Yeter, Kübra, and Mehmet Evcil. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24, no. 3 (February 2015). https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.59445.
EndNote Yeşildal Yeter K, Evcil M (February 1, 2015) COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24 3
IEEE K. Yeşildal Yeter and M. Evcil, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, vol. 24, no. 3, 2015, doi: 10.17567/dfd.59445.
ISNAD Yeşildal Yeter, Kübra - Evcil, Mehmet. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 24/3 (February 2015). https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.59445.
JAMA Yeşildal Yeter K, Evcil M. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24. doi:10.17567/dfd.59445.
MLA Yeşildal Yeter, Kübra and Mehmet Evcil. “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 3, 2015, doi:10.17567/dfd.59445.
Vancouver Yeşildal Yeter K, Evcil M. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ROOT CANAL SEALERS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015;24(3).

Cited By

Kanal Dolgu Patlarının Cam Fiber Postun Bağlanma Dayanımına Etkisi
Selcuk Dental Journal
Şeref Nur Mutlu
https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.412880
 Download Cover Image

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.