Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The prognostic importance of PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and KI-67 expressions in invasive breast carcinoma

SUMMARY

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain expressions with prognostic clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer.

METHODS:

Lumpectomy and mastectomy materials from 85 patients operated at the Department of Pathology, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 expressions were examined. Immunohistochemical staining results were compared with clinicopathological parameters and found to be associated with prognosis.

RESULTS:

A statistically significant correlation was found between PD-L1 and large tumor size, high histological grade, multifocality, and lymphovascular invasion. A statistically significant correlation was found between the loss of PTEN and large tumor size and histological grade. There was a statistically significant correlation between PHH3 and advanced age, large tumor size, and high histological grade. A statistically significant correlation was found between Ki-67 and large tumor size, high histological grade, and lymphovascular invasion.

CONCLUSION:

PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 are regarded as potential biomarkers that can be used to predict the prognosis of breast cancer and to develop targeted therapies.

Keywords
Carcinoma, ductal; Breast; Immunohistochemistry; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Ki-67 antigen

INTRODUCTION

Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer in women11. Depowski PL, Rosenthal SI, Ross JS. Loss of expression of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(7):672-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880371
https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.388037...
. The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune response markers are good prognostic features in breast tumors22. Beckers RK, Selinger CI, Vilain R, Madore J, Wilmott JS, Harvey K, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer is associated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved outcome. Histopathology. 2016;69(1):25-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12904
https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12904...
. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is a surface membrane antigen expressed by various cells of the immune system, including T lymphocytes33. Tsang JY, Au WL, Lo KY, Ni YB, Hlaing T, Hu J, et al. PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating PD-1+ lymphocytes associated with outcome in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162(1):19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-...
. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in breast tumors and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, but not in healthy breast tissue44. Muenst S, Schaerli AR, Gao F, Däster S, Trella E, Droeser RA, et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(1):15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-...
. PTEN is a novel tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome band 10q23. The main function of PTEN is to inhibit the PI3K/AKT pathway, which plays a role in cell proliferation and cell survival55. Li S, Shen Y, Wang M, Yang J, Lv M, Li P, et al. Loss of PTEN expression in breast cancer: association with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32043-54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16761
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1676...
. Loss of PTEN function plays a role in the progression of several cancers66. Lee C, Kim JS, Waldman T. PTEN gene targeting reveals a radiation-induced size checkpoint in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):6906-14. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-176
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04...
.

Many prognostic factors in breast cancer are directly or indirectly related to proliferation. One of the best known methods for immunohistochemical measurement of proliferation is Ki-6777. Şahin S, Işık Gönül İ, Çakır A, Seçkin S, Uluoğlu Ö. Clinicopathological significance of the proliferation markers Ki67, RacGAP1, and topoisomerase 2 alpha in breast cancer. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24(7):607-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896916653211
https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896916653211...
. Studies have revealed that Ki-67 correlates strongly with biomarkers such as hormone receptor status, HER2 status, tumor staging, and axillary lymph node status88. Wiesner FG, Magener A, Fasching PA, Wesse J, Bani MR, Rauh C, et al. Ki-67 as a prognostic molecular marker in routine clinical use in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2009;18(2):135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02...
. Phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) has long been known as a marker of cellular proliferation in various cancers99. Hao Q, Dai C, Deng Y, Xu P, Tian T, Lin S, et al. Pooling analysis on prognostic value of PHH3 expression in cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2279-88. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167569
https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167569...
.

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of the expressions in PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 immunohistochemical stains with prognostic clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer.

METHODS

Case selection

Lumpectomy and mastectomy materials from 85 patients (with invasive ductal carcinoma and lobular carcinoma) treated and operated at the Department of Pathology, Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine between 2014 and 2019 were included in the study. The blocks that best reflected the tumor and were most suitable for immunohistochemical examination were selected.

Immunohistochemical staining

Thin sections at a thickness of 4 microns were taken from the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. The sections were stained with primary antibodies PD-L1, PTEN, PHH3, and Ki-67 according to the manufacturers’ instructions using a Leica Bond-Max fully automated immunohistochemistry machine. Staining was performed using a standard compact polymer technology kit for immunohistochemistry.

Sections were stained with PD-L1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, clone: E1L3N; diluted 1:200). Placental sections were used as positive controls for PD-L1. Membranous and cytoplasmic staining were considered positive33. Tsang JY, Au WL, Lo KY, Ni YB, Hlaing T, Hu J, et al. PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating PD-1+ lymphocytes associated with outcome in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162(1):19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-...
. The total percentage of positive cells and their staining intensities (0–3) were determined. The modified Histo-score (H-score) was used [PD-L1 staining intensity (0–3)xpercentage of positive cells, between 0 and 300]. PD-L1 expression was dichotomized into two groups, using a cutoff score of 100 (H-score 0–99: negative/low expression, and 100–300: positive expression)44. Muenst S, Schaerli AR, Gao F, Däster S, Trella E, Droeser RA, et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(1):15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-...
.

Sections were stained with anti-PTEN antibody (Dako, Monoclonal Mouse anti-PTEN, clone 6H2.1; diluted 1:40). Colon tumor sections were used as positive controls for PTEN. Both cytoplasmic and nuclear staining were observed with PTEN. The staining intensity for PTEN was scored 0–31010. Panzan MQ, Mattar R, Maganhin CC, Simões Rdos S, Rossi AG, Motta EL, et al. Evaluation of FAS and caspase-3 in the endometrial tissue of patients with idiopathic infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10...
. The percentage of positively stained tumor cells was calculated. The total PTEN index was calculated using the following formula: H score=(Percentage of positive cells)x(Immunostaining intensity). The H-score ranged from 0 to 300, and case with a score of less than 90 was considered PTEN loss1111. Beg S, Siraj AK, Prabhakaran S, Jehan Z, Ajarim D, Al-Dayel F, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in Middle Eastern triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):541-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-...
.

Sections were stained with PHH3 (Cell Marque Corp. Rocklin, rabbit polyclonal antibody; diluted 1:200). Tonsil sections were used as positive controls. The percentage of positively stained tumor cells in the region with the highest PHH3 concentration was determined1212. Skaland I, Janssen EA, Gudlaugsson E, Klos J, Kjellevold KH, Søiland H, et al. Validating the prognostic value of proliferation measured by phosphohistone H3 (PPH3) in invasive lymph node-negative breast cancer patients less than 71 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-...
.

Ki-67 (Dako Autostainer/Autostainer Plus, monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human Ki-67 antigen clone MIB-1) was applied to formalin-fixed tissues. In determining the score, the entire section taken from the invasive border of the tumor was examined, and at least 1000 cells with the highest staining in the 40x objective were evaluated and averaged1313. Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N. Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update. Pathology. 2017;49(2):166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11...
. The percentage of tumor cells that showed only nuclear staining with Ki-67 determined the Ki-67 score1313. Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N. Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update. Pathology. 2017;49(2):166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11...
.

Statistical analysis

To analyze the data, descriptive statistics were given with frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to investigate whether prognostic factor measures in the study differed according to immunohistochemical staining positivity. When evaluating PD-L1, PHH3, Ki-67, and PTEN positivity, the Mann-Whitney U test was used because the number in the positive groups was small and the measurements did not have a parametric distribution. Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s exact test were applied to examine the relationships between the proportional values of prognostic factors according to PD-L1, PHH3, Ki-67, and PTEN positivity status. The SPSS 25.0 program was used for statistical analysis (p<0.05).

RESULTS

Clinicopathological features

The study covered 85 cases of invasive breast carcinoma. Of the patients aged between 35 and 88 years (mean 58.33±12.50 years), 82 (96.4%) were female and 3 (3.6%) were male. Of the cases diagnosed with breast carcinoma, 77 (90.5%) had invasive ductal carcinoma and 8 (9.5%) had invasive lobular carcinoma. According to tumor size, patients were divided into two groups: <2 cm in 34 (40%) patients and ≥2 cm in 51 (60%) patients.

Nottingham histological grade was found: 12.9% in grade 1, 56.5% in grade 2, and 30.6% in grade 3. Tumor metastasis to the axillary lymph node was detected: 1–3 lymph nodes in 17 (20.0%), 4–9 lymph nodes in 15 (17.6%), and 10 or more lymph nodes in 13 (15.3%) patients. Of the patients, 30% were found with stage 1, 31.8% with stage 2, 20.2% with stage 3, and 17.9% with stage 4.

Immunohistochemical staining with clinicopathological parameters

PD-L1 expression and its relationship to clinicopathological factors

Table 1 shows the relationship between PD-L1 and prognostic factors. In sections prepared from invasive breast cancer blocks, 21 (24.7%) of 85 patients expressed PD-L1. Tumor cells and/or lymphocytes showed membranous staining in 13 (15.3%) cases, cytoplasmic staining in 3 (3.5%) cases, and cytoplasmic and membranous staining in 21 (24.7%) cases (Figures 1A–D); 48 (56.5%) cases were scored as skor 0, 20 (23.5%) as skor 1, 12 (14.1%) as skor 2, and 5 (5.9%) as skor 3. No significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and age, gender, tumor location, surgical procedure of patients, lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion, stage, and HER2 score.

Table 1.
PD-L1 and PTEN by prognostic factors.
Figure 1.
(A) Negative expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (B) Mild expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (C) Moderate expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (D) Severe expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (E) Intense expression of PTEN in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (F) Moderate-intense expression of PTEN in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (G) Mild-intense expression of PTEN in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (H) Negative expression of PTEN in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (J) Low nuclear PHH3 expression in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (K) High nuclear PHH3 expression in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (L) Low nuclear Ki-67 expression in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x. (M) High nuclear Ki-67 expression in tumor cells, immune peroxidase, 400x.

PTEN expression and its relationship with clinicopathological factors

The relationship between PTEN-1 and prognostic factors is given in Table 1. Loss of PTEN expression was observed in 42 (49.4%) of 85 cases with invasive breast carcinoma. It was found that there was no staining in 14 (16.4%) cases, weak staining in 24 (28.2%) cases, moderate staining in 30 (35.2%) cases, and strong staining in 17 (20%) cases (Figures 1E–H). No significant correlation was found between loss of PTEN expression and age, gender, histological type, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, histological grade, stage, ER, PR, HER2 score, and Ki-67 expression.

PHH3 expression and its relationship with clinicopathological factors

Table 2 shows the relationship between PHH-3 and prognostic factors. PHH3 stained positive in 36 (42.3%) cases and negative in 49 (47.7%) cases (Figures 1J and K). It was observed that the PHH3 group did not differ by pathological T, N, M grading and staging (p=0.06; p=0.12; p=0.51; p=0.35, respectively). No significant correlation was found between loss of PHH3 expression and gender, tumor localization, lymphovascular invasion, HER2 score, and stage.

Table 2.
PHH3 and Ki-67 by prognostic factors.

Ki-67 expression and its relationship with clinicopathological factors

The relationship between PHH-3 and prognostic factors is shown in Table 2. Ki-67 expression was <20% in 57 (67%) cases and ≥20% in 28 (33%) cases (Figures 1L and M). The values of the Ki-67 group differed by tumor size, which was larger than 2 cm (p=0.01). Patient’s age, gender, tumor localization, histological type of tumor, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes did not differ in Ki-67 groups below or above 20%.

DISCUSSION

The increase in the incidence of breast cancer in recent years has led to studies on the development of new methods of diagnosis and treatment1414. Bae SB, Cho HD, Oh MH, Lee JH, Jang SH, Hong SA, et al. Expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with better prognosis in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(3):242-51. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.242
https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.24...
. Many studies have shown the expression of PD-L1 in both tumor cells and TIL in breast carcinoma. In studies, PD-L1 expression in all breast cancer subtypes varies from 0 to 83%, and most studies show PD-L1 expression below 50%1515. Stovgaard ES, Dyhl-Polk A, Roslind A, Balslev E, Nielsen D. PD-L1 expression in breast cancer: expression in subtypes and prognostic significance: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(3):571-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05130...
. In this study, we identified PD-L1 positivity in 21 (24%) of 85 breast cancer patients and found that it was associated with poor prognostic parameters such as high histological grade, large tumor size, ER and PR negativity, and high Ki-67 expression. Thus, we obtained similar results to recent studies1414. Bae SB, Cho HD, Oh MH, Lee JH, Jang SH, Hong SA, et al. Expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with better prognosis in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(3):242-51. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.242
https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.24...
,1616. Ghebeh H, Mohammed S, Al-Omair A, Qattan A, Lehe C, Al-Qudaihi G, et al. The B7-H1 (PD-L1) T lymphocyte-inhibitory molecule is expressed in breast cancer patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: correlation with important high-risk prognostic factors. Neoplasia. 2006;8(3):190-8. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733.
https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733...
,1717. Li M, Li A, Zhou S, Xu Y, Xiao Y, Bi R, et al. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-y
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-...
.

In a study by Ming Li et al., PD-L1 was found to be positive in 38.6% of patients, and PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with high histological grade, recurrence, and distant metastasis1717. Li M, Li A, Zhou S, Xu Y, Xiao Y, Bi R, et al. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-y
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-...
. Hazem et al. identified PD-L1 positivity in 34% of cases and found that PD-L1 expression was associated with large tumor size, histological grade, HER2 positivity, and ER and PR negativity1616. Ghebeh H, Mohammed S, Al-Omair A, Qattan A, Lehe C, Al-Qudaihi G, et al. The B7-H1 (PD-L1) T lymphocyte-inhibitory molecule is expressed in breast cancer patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: correlation with important high-risk prognostic factors. Neoplasia. 2006;8(3):190-8. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733.
https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733...
. In this study, similar to the literature, PD-L1 expression increased with the increasing histological grade of the tumor44. Muenst S, Schaerli AR, Gao F, Däster S, Trella E, Droeser RA, et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(1):15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-...
,1818. Hou Y, Nitta H, Wei L, Banks PM, Lustberg M, Wesolowski R, et al. PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive T cells are associated with favorable survival in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Breast J. 2018;24(6):911-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112...
. Moreover, in agreement with the literature, PD-L1 expression was found to be higher in ER- and PR-negative cases1818. Hou Y, Nitta H, Wei L, Banks PM, Lustberg M, Wesolowski R, et al. PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive T cells are associated with favorable survival in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Breast J. 2018;24(6):911-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112...
.

Recent studies have shown that PTEN has a regulatory role in breast carcinoma and may be a predictive and prognostic marker1919. Pérez-Tenorio G, Alkhori L, Olsson B, Waltersson MA, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE, et al. PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss correlate with similar prognostic factors and are not mutually exclusive in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(12):3577-84. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1609
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06...
. Shaham et al. found that the loss of PTEN was significantly associated with large tumor size, high grade, and triple-negative breast cancer1111. Beg S, Siraj AK, Prabhakaran S, Jehan Z, Ajarim D, Al-Dayel F, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in Middle Eastern triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):541-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-...
. In our study of 85 patients, the loss of PTEN was observed in 49.4% of patients. This result from our study was evaluated in accordance with the loss of PTEN expression reported in the literature as 8–86%1111. Beg S, Siraj AK, Prabhakaran S, Jehan Z, Ajarim D, Al-Dayel F, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in Middle Eastern triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):541-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-...
,2020. Panigrahi AR, Pinder SE, Chan SY, Paish EC, Robertson JF, Ellis IO. The role of PTEN and its signalling pathways, including AKT, in breast cancer; an assessment of relationships with other prognostic factors and with outcome. J Pathol. 2004;204(1):93-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1611
https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1611...
. In this study, the loss of PTEN expression was associated with large tumor size and low histological grade. The low histological grade was probably due to the fact that only a small number of cases were studied. Although a higher loss of PTEN expression was observed in the group with LN metastases in this study, this was statistically insignificant.

PHH3 expression has been shown to be stronger than classic prognostic factors such as axillary lymph node status, tumor size, histological grade, and ER and PR negativity1212. Skaland I, Janssen EA, Gudlaugsson E, Klos J, Kjellevold KH, Søiland H, et al. Validating the prognostic value of proliferation measured by phosphohistone H3 (PPH3) in invasive lymph node-negative breast cancer patients less than 71 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-...
,2121. Klintman M, Strand C, Ahlin C, Beglerbegovic S, Fjällskog ML, Grabau D, et al. The prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI), phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), cyclin B1, cyclin A, and Ki67, alone and in combinations, in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081902
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.008...
. Ivar et al. showed that low PHH3 expression is associated with an excellent prognosis. PHH3 was associated with age, tumor size, grade, tubular formation, nuclear atypia, mitotic activity index, and ER and PR negativity1212. Skaland I, Janssen EA, Gudlaugsson E, Klos J, Kjellevold KH, Søiland H, et al. Validating the prognostic value of proliferation measured by phosphohistone H3 (PPH3) in invasive lymph node-negative breast cancer patients less than 71 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-x.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-...
. In this study, high PHH3 expression was associated with advanced age, large tumor size, high histological grade, ER and PR negativity, and high Ki-67 expression. This result suggests that nuclear PHH3 expression may be a poor prognostic factor for breast cancer patients.

The percentage of cells staining positive for Ki-67 has been used as a measure of proliferation and as a prognostic factor2222. Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Ravdin PM, Hayes MM, Gelmon KA. Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):174-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70262-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70...
. Wiesner et al. found that Ki-67 correlated strongly with other biomarkers such as negative ER and PR, HER2 status, tumor staging, and histological grade88. Wiesner FG, Magener A, Fasching PA, Wesse J, Bani MR, Rauh C, et al. Ki-67 as a prognostic molecular marker in routine clinical use in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2009;18(2):135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02...
. In this study, high Ki-67 expression was found to be associated with large tumor size, high histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, and ER and PR negativity.

Our study has several limitations. Our cases were few in number, and some of the blocks had technical difficulties, such as failure to obtain optimal staining during immunohistochemical staining.

CONCLUSION

As a result of this study, expressions of PD-L1, PHH3, Ki-67, and loss of PTEN were found to be associated with poor prognostic factors. We believe that these biomarkers, in addition to being used for prognosis in breast cancer, can be used for therapeutic purposes and may contribute to the development of appropriate immunotherapies through a better understanding of the immunological basis of the tumor.

REFERENCES

  • 1.
    Depowski PL, Rosenthal SI, Ross JS. Loss of expression of the PTEN gene protein product is associated with poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(7):672-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880371
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880371
  • 2.
    Beckers RK, Selinger CI, Vilain R, Madore J, Wilmott JS, Harvey K, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer is associated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved outcome. Histopathology. 2016;69(1):25-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12904
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12904
  • 3.
    Tsang JY, Au WL, Lo KY, Ni YB, Hlaing T, Hu J, et al. PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating PD-1+ lymphocytes associated with outcome in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;162(1):19-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4095-2
  • 4.
    Muenst S, Schaerli AR, Gao F, Däster S, Trella E, Droeser RA, et al. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(1):15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2988-5
  • 5.
    Li S, Shen Y, Wang M, Yang J, Lv M, Li P, et al. Loss of PTEN expression in breast cancer: association with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(19):32043-54. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16761
    » https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16761
  • 6.
    Lee C, Kim JS, Waldman T. PTEN gene targeting reveals a radiation-induced size checkpoint in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):6906-14. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-176
    » https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-176
  • 7.
    Şahin S, Işık Gönül İ, Çakır A, Seçkin S, Uluoğlu Ö. Clinicopathological significance of the proliferation markers Ki67, RacGAP1, and topoisomerase 2 alpha in breast cancer. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24(7):607-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896916653211
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896916653211
  • 8.
    Wiesner FG, Magener A, Fasching PA, Wesse J, Bani MR, Rauh C, et al. Ki-67 as a prognostic molecular marker in routine clinical use in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2009;18(2):135-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.009
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2009.02.009
  • 9.
    Hao Q, Dai C, Deng Y, Xu P, Tian T, Lin S, et al. Pooling analysis on prognostic value of PHH3 expression in cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2279-88. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167569
    » https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S167569
  • 10.
    Panzan MQ, Mattar R, Maganhin CC, Simões Rdos S, Rossi AG, Motta EL, et al. Evaluation of FAS and caspase-3 in the endometrial tissue of patients with idiopathic infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;167(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.021
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.021
  • 11.
    Beg S, Siraj AK, Prabhakaran S, Jehan Z, Ajarim D, Al-Dayel F, et al. Loss of PTEN expression is associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in Middle Eastern triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):541-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-3
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3430-3
  • 12.
    Skaland I, Janssen EA, Gudlaugsson E, Klos J, Kjellevold KH, Søiland H, et al. Validating the prognostic value of proliferation measured by phosphohistone H3 (PPH3) in invasive lymph node-negative breast cancer patients less than 71 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-x
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9980-x
  • 13.
    Penault-Llorca F, Radosevic-Robin N. Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update. Pathology. 2017;49(2):166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2016.11.006
  • 14.
    Bae SB, Cho HD, Oh MH, Lee JH, Jang SH, Hong SA, et al. Expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with better prognosis in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(3):242-51. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.242
    » https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.242
  • 15.
    Stovgaard ES, Dyhl-Polk A, Roslind A, Balslev E, Nielsen D. PD-L1 expression in breast cancer: expression in subtypes and prognostic significance: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174(3):571-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05130-1
  • 16.
    Ghebeh H, Mohammed S, Al-Omair A, Qattan A, Lehe C, Al-Qudaihi G, et al. The B7-H1 (PD-L1) T lymphocyte-inhibitory molecule is expressed in breast cancer patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: correlation with important high-risk prognostic factors. Neoplasia. 2006;8(3):190-8. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733
    » https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.05733
  • 17.
    Li M, Li A, Zhou S, Xu Y, Xiao Y, Bi R, et al. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of triple negative breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3916-y
  • 18.
    Hou Y, Nitta H, Wei L, Banks PM, Lustberg M, Wesolowski R, et al. PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive T cells are associated with favorable survival in HER2-positive invasive breast cancer. Breast J. 2018;24(6):911-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13112
  • 19.
    Pérez-Tenorio G, Alkhori L, Olsson B, Waltersson MA, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE, et al. PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss correlate with similar prognostic factors and are not mutually exclusive in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(12):3577-84. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1609
    » https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1609
  • 20.
    Panigrahi AR, Pinder SE, Chan SY, Paish EC, Robertson JF, Ellis IO. The role of PTEN and its signalling pathways, including AKT, in breast cancer; an assessment of relationships with other prognostic factors and with outcome. J Pathol. 2004;204(1):93-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1611
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1611
  • 21.
    Klintman M, Strand C, Ahlin C, Beglerbegovic S, Fjällskog ML, Grabau D, et al. The prognostic value of mitotic activity index (MAI), phosphohistone H3 (PPH3), cyclin B1, cyclin A, and Ki67, alone and in combinations, in node-negative premenopausal breast cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081902
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081902
  • 22.
    Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Ravdin PM, Hayes MM, Gelmon KA. Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):174-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70262-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70262-1
  • Funding: none.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Nov 2022
  • Date of issue
    2022

History

  • Received
    29 Aug 2022
  • Accepted
    29 Aug 2022
Associação Médica Brasileira R. São Carlos do Pinhal, 324, 01333-903 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel: +55 11 3178-6800, Fax: +55 11 3178-6816 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: ramb@amb.org.br