Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Chagas disease and perceived quality of life: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT

Background:

Chagas disease (ChD) is a neglected tropical disease that is caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and can negatively impact quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess and compare QoL between individuals with and without ChD.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was performed within a concurrent cohort study (REDS). The participants were derived from two blood donation centers: São Paulo capital and Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Participants with ChD were identified in blood donations by serological diagnosis between 2008 and 2010, and those without ChD were donors with negative serology identified during the same period. QoL was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics between the groups, and mean, standard deviation, and beta regression were used to compare QoL.

Results:

In total, 611 individuals participated in the study (328 with ChD and 283 without ChD). Participants with ChD had lower QoL in the physical (p=0.02) and psychological (p<0.01) domains than did individuals without CD.

Conclusions:

Individuals with ChD had worse QoL perceptions. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of ChD on individuals' QoL, while also highlighting potential opportunities for improving the care and treatment of those affected.

Keywords:
Chagas disease; Quality of life; Neglected diseases; Blood donor

INTRODUCTION

Chagas disease (ChD) is a neglected tropical disease that is caused by Trypanosoma cruziand is endemic to continental Latin American countries; the highest numbers of infected individuals is found in Argentina (1,505,235), Brazil (1,156,821), and Mexico (876,458), while the highest prevalence is found in Bolivia (607,186 cases/6.1%)11. World Health Organization (WHO). Chagas Disease in Latin America: An epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Weekly Epidemiological Record [Internet]. 2015; 90: 33-43; [cited 2021 Nov 5] Available from: Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/242316
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/2...
,22. Echeverría LE, Marcus R, Novick G, Sosa-Estani S, Ralston K, Zaidel EJ, et al. WHF IASC Roadmap on Chagas Disease. Global Heart. 2020;15(1):26.. Owing to immigration and globalization, ChD affects individuals in regions other than Latin America, such as North America and Europe33. Santos E, Facão MF. Chagas cardiomyopathy and heart failure: From epidemiology to treatment. Rev Port Cardiol.2020;39(5):279-89..

Healthcare for individuals with ChD needs to be longitudinal and comprehensive, considering the potential of the disease to affect multiple systems, such as the cardiovascular, digestive, and central nervous systems22. Echeverría LE, Marcus R, Novick G, Sosa-Estani S, Ralston K, Zaidel EJ, et al. WHF IASC Roadmap on Chagas Disease. Global Heart. 2020;15(1):26.,44. Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas Disease. The Lancet. 2010;375(9723): 1388-402.. Among these complications, cardiovascular disease is the most prevalent and can lead to disability and death44. Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas Disease. The Lancet. 2010;375(9723): 1388-402.,55. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: An update of current clinical knowledge and management: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e169-e209.. Approximately 30% of individuals with ChD have cardiac manifestations and manifest worse health outcomes without the necessary care from health services22. Echeverría LE, Marcus R, Novick G, Sosa-Estani S, Ralston K, Zaidel EJ, et al. WHF IASC Roadmap on Chagas Disease. Global Heart. 2020;15(1):26.,55. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: An update of current clinical knowledge and management: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e169-e209.. However, the access of patients with ChD to adequate medical care remains an important challenge for health systems66. Damasceno RF, Sabino EC, Ferreira AM, Ribeiro ALP, Moreira HF, Prates TEC, et al. Challenges in the care of patients with Chagas disease in the Brazilian public health system: A qualitative study with primary health care doctors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008782..

Complications from ChD can lead to death, and it is estimated that 10,000-14,000 patients with ChD die each year worldwide77. Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marcondes de Rezende J. American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease). Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26(2):275-91.. In addition to mortality, health service costs increase, and quality of life (QoL) is compromised88. Lee BY, Bacon KM, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ. Global economic burden of CD: A computational simulation model. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:342-48.

9. Costa HS, Lima MMO, Figueiredo PHS, Chaves AT, Nunes MCP, Rocha MOC. The prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with Chagas heart disease. Qual Life Res. 2018;28:67-72.
-1010. Quintino ND, Sabino EC, Silva JLP, Ribeiro ALP, Ferreira AM, Davi GL. et al. Factors associated with quality of life in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008144.. In addition to the economic cost and impairment of QoL, ChD mainly affects vulnerable people and communities with limited access to health services, limited educational opportunities, and low income1010. Quintino ND, Sabino EC, Silva JLP, Ribeiro ALP, Ferreira AM, Davi GL. et al. Factors associated with quality of life in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008144.

11. Quintino N, David G, Sabino E, Silva JL, Ribeiro AL, Ferreira A. et al. Level of literacy and clinical outcomes in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30 Supplement 5.

12. Ferreira AM, Sabino EC, Oliveira LC, Oliveira CDL, Cardoso CS, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Impact of the social context on the prognosisof Chagas disease patients: Multilevel analysis of a Brazilian cohort. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2020;14:e0008399.

13. Monsalve-Lara J, Lilioso M, Valença-Barbosa C, Thyssen PJ, Miguel DC, Limeira C, et al. The risk of oral transmission in an area of a Chagas disease outbreak in the Brazilian northeast evaluated through entomological, socioeconomic and schooling indicators. Acta Tropica. 2021; 215:105803.
-1414. Montanaro VVA, Hora TF , Silva CM, Santos CVV , Lima MIR, Oliveira EMJ, et al. Epidemiology of concurrent Chagas disease and ischemic stroke in a population attending a multicenter quaternary rehabilitation network in Brazil. Neurological Sciences. 2019;40(12):2595-601.. Thus, it is of great importance that health policies act on the social determinants of health to contain the social costs of ChD1515. Olivera MJ, Buitrago G. Economic costs of Chagas disease in Colombia in 2017:A social perspective. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;196-201..

Coping strategies for improving the QoL of patients with ChD are rarely used in the context of health services1616. Cavalcanti MAF, Nascimento EGC, Alchieri JC, Andrade CM. Manifestations and strategies of coping with Chagas Disease that interfere in the quality of life of the individual: a systematic review. Ciênc. saúde colet. 2019;24(4):1405-16.. Notably, for such strategies to be sustainable, they must address the social determinants of health, early diagnosis, and timely treatment1717. Fernández MDP, Gaspe MS, Gürtler RE. Inequalities in the social determinants of health and Chagas disease transmission risk in indigenous and creole households in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(184).. Studies have shown that pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and bone marrow cell transplantation effectively control disease evolution and positively affect QoL1818. Cardoso CS, Ribeiro ALP, Oliveira CDL, Oliveira LC, Ferreira AM, Bierrenbach AL, et al. Beneficial effects of benznidazole in Chagas disease: NIH SaMi-Trop cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2018;12:e0006814.

19. Mediano MF, Mendes FS, Pinto VL, Silva GM, Silva PS, Carneiro FM, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with Chagas heart failure: a single-arm pilot study. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016;49(03):319-28.

20. Vilas-Boas F, Feitosa GS, Soares MB, Pinho-Filho JA, Mota AC, Almeida AJ, et al. Bone marrow cell transplantation in Chagas’ disease heart failure: report of the first human experience. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;96(4):325-31.
-2121. Santos RR, Rassi S, Feitosa G, Grecco OT, Rassi Jr A, Cunha AB, et al. Cell therapy in Chagas cardiomyopathy (Chagas Arm of the Multicenter Randomized Trial of Cell Therapy in Cardiopathies Study). Circulation. 2012;125(20):2454-61.. Therefore, evaluating the QoL of these individuals is important for planning ChD coping strategies for subsequent organization1010. Quintino ND, Sabino EC, Silva JLP, Ribeiro ALP, Ferreira AM, Davi GL. et al. Factors associated with quality of life in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008144.. Thus, this study aimed to assess and compare QoL between individuals with and without ChD.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was conducted within a follow-up cohort from the “Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II),” which has been previously described in detail2222. Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VMC, Lorenzo Oliveira CDL, Antunes AP, Menezes MM. et al. Ten-Year Incidence of Chagas Cardiomyopathy Among Asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-Seropositive Former Blood Donors. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1105-15.

23. Ribeiro AL, Sabino EC, Marcolino MS, Salemi VM, Ianni BM, Fernandes F, et al. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in Trypanosoma cruzi seropositive and seronegative former blood donors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2013;7(2):e2078.
-2424. Buss LF, Bes TM, Pereira A, Natany L, Oliveira CDL, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Deriving a parsimonious cardiac endpoint for use in epidemiological studies of Chagas disease: results from the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II) cohort. Rev Inst Med Trop S. Paulo. 2021;63:e31.. Participants were recruited from a list of blood donors from the Hemominas Foundation (Montes Claros, MG, Brazil and the Pró-Sangue Foundation (São Paulo, SP) from July 2008 to October 2010. Donors who tested positive for T. cruzi were considered to have the disease, and donors who were negative were considered to be without the disease; the two groups were matched according to sex, age group, and blood center location.

During the first visit, participants underwent serology, electrocardiogram (ECG), and echocardiography tests and answered a questionnaire that included clinical and sociodemographic variables. To validate a diagnosis of Chagas cardiomyopathy, participants underwent expert evaluation (trigger)2222. Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VMC, Lorenzo Oliveira CDL, Antunes AP, Menezes MM. et al. Ten-Year Incidence of Chagas Cardiomyopathy Among Asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-Seropositive Former Blood Donors. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1105-15..

Subsequently, at the second visit between 2018 and 2019, 10 years later, participants were re-evaluated. At this stage, demographic, clinical, lifestyle, health condition, disease treatment, and QoL information were collected. To assess QoL, the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF instrument was used; this instrument has been validated in Brazil, and the results showed that the characteristics were satisfactory in terms of internal consistency, discriminant validity, criterion validity, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability. Furthermore, the WHOQOL-BREF has demonstrated adequate psychometric performance for validity and reliability in the Brazilian population2525. Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, et al. Aplicação da versão em português do instrumento abreviado de avaliação da qualidade de vida “WHOQOL-bref”. Rev Saude Publica. 2000;34(2):178-83..

The WHOQOL-BREF comprises 26 questions: two general QoL questions and 24 questions distributed across four domains: physical, psychological, social relations, and environment. QoL was assessed using a five-point Likert-type scale, where a higher score indicates a better the perception of QoL in the last 15 days. The inclusion criteria for QoL assessment were the ability to understand the questions of the instrument and conduct the self-assessment. In this study, five interviewers conducted the interviews; these interviewers were previously trained to achieve 80% inter-rater agreement when applying the scales, using a senior interviewer as a reference.

The dependent variable in this study was QoL. The independent variables were sociodemographic (age, income, number of people in the household, sex, skin color, knowledge of how to read and write, and education), behavioral (smoking, physical activity, and alcoholic beverage consumption), and clinical (presence of comorbidities, ECG changes, and echocardiogram changes) characteristics. The clinical variable, presence of cardiomyopathy, was classified using the following criteria: left ventricular ejection fraction <50% and/or QRS interval ≥120 ms2424. Buss LF, Bes TM, Pereira A, Natany L, Oliveira CDL, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Deriving a parsimonious cardiac endpoint for use in epidemiological studies of Chagas disease: results from the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II) cohort. Rev Inst Med Trop S. Paulo. 2021;63:e31.,2626. Nunes MCP, Buss LF, Silva JLP, Martins LNA, Oliveira CDL, Cardoso CS, et al. Incidence and Predictors of Progression to Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Trypanosoma Cruzi Seropositive Individuals. Circulation. 2021; 9:144(19):1553-66..

Statistical Analysis

Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical variables are summarized using means, standard deviations, and absolute and relative frequencies. Violin plots were used to depict the distribution of QoL among the ChD groups. To assess QoL, the results for each domain were transformed into a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100. Unadjusted comparisons between cases and controls were performed using logistic regression models. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical variables were entered as predictors in the univariate models, while the Chagas score was the response variable.

To compare QoL domains, univariate and multivariate inflated beta regression models belonging to the Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) were constructed2727. Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser C (Applied Stat. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2005;54:507-54.. The beta regression model is suitable for modelling outcome variables measured on a percentage scale. Wald-type and Likelihood Ratio tests were performed. The logit link function was adopted for all models, in which the exponential of the regression parameters was interpreted in terms of the odds ratio (OR). Therefore, an OR<1 indicates a lower QoL, whereas an OR>1 indicates better QoL. Multivariate models for QoL included explanatory variables that were statistically significant in the exploratory analysis and those with clinical relevance. Multicollinearity was tested, and highly correlated variables were not included in the models.

The goodness-of-fit model was evaluated using quantile residual plots, Q-Q plots, and summary statistics. Multiple imputations were used to assess differential bias due to 155 missing values for monthly family income. The predictive mean-matching imputation model was used to impute missing monthly family income values conditional on disease group, age, education, donation center, ejection fraction, and the four QoL domains. Additionally, a single missing value in the ejection fraction was imputed using the same configuration. The results of 50 multiply imputed datasets were combined using Rubin’s rules. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses. For the analyses, R software version 4.2.2 was used with the packages haven (data importing), tidyverse (data manipulation), ggplot2 (graphs), gamlss (model fitting), and mice (multiple imputation).

Ethical Considerations

This project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of São Paulo under opinion numbers 6023 and CAAE:00580612.8.0000.0065 on March 7th, 2012. This study was also approved by the Brazilian National Ethics Committee (CONEP No. 1312/2006) on December 20th, 2012.

RESULTS

A total of 611 participants responded to the interview (328 with ChD and 283 without ChD). The population selection flowchart is shown in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1:
Flowchart of the study design and constitution of the groups.

The sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Among all participants, a majority (51.8% with ChD and 50.9% without ChD) were women. The mean age for participants with and without ChD was 56.2 (±9.9) years and 58.4 (±9.6) years, respectively. Mean monthly income was US$22.97 (±15.49) vs. US$32.07 (±22.37) (p<0.001). In addition, the educational level and percentage of participants who “know how to read and write” (79.6% vs. 92.6%, p<.0.001) was lower in participants with ChD. Most participants in both groups were black/mixed (64.4% vs. 54.1%, p=0.034) (Table 1).

TABLE 1:
Sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of participants with and without Chagas disease (ChD) 2018-2019.

A majority in both groups did not engage in physical activity (54.6% with ChD and 52.7% without ChD) or drink alcohol in the days prior to answering the questionnaire (65.6% and 57.4%, respectively). Moreover, cardiomyopathy was significantly (p<0.001) more frequent in participants with ChD (29.1% vs. 4.9%), as were major ECG alterations (39.6% vs. 22.6%; p<0.001). The main comorbidities among both groups were systemic arterial hypertension (39.8% and 36.9%, respectively) and diabetes mellitus (13.1% and 13.5%, respectively) (Table 1). The use of polypharmacy (use of ≥5 medications) was 2.5% and 2.1%, respectively.

QoL assessment results are shown in Table 2. All QoL domains of participants with ChD had a lower mean when compared to those without ChD. The most compromised QoL domain was the environment in both groups, with means of 64.52 and 66.8 for participants with and without ChD, respectively. For all OR values <1, participants with ChD had a lower QoL than those without ChD (reference). Without controlling for confounders, a significant difference was observed in three of the four domains evaluated: physical (p=0.001), psychological (p=0.001), and environmental (p=0.010). In the multivariate models, after multiple imputations, statistically significant differences were observed in the physical (p=0.018) and psychological (p=0.007) domains. Figure 2 shows the violin plots of the distribution of QoL by domain between the two groups.

TABLE 2:
Results of quality of life domains as assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF in participants with and without Chagas disease (ChD).

FIGURE 2:
Violin plot of quality of life as assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF domain in participants with and without Chagas disease (ChD).

DISCUSSION

This study revealed that participants with ChD had a lower QoL in the physical and psychological domains than those without ChD. These differences can be explained by the clinical characteristics of individuals with ChD, who exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy and other chronic diseases. The current findings corroborate those of other investigations concerning QoL assessment in patients with ChD. One study also used the WHOQOL-BREF and found that the physical domain was the most compromised2828. Santos-Filho JCL, Vieira MC, Xavier IGG, Maciel ER, Rodrigues Junior LF, Curvo EOVC, et al. Quality of life and associated factors in patients with chronic Chagas disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23(11):1213-22.. Similar to the present study, another study used different instruments to compare QoL (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and Short-Form-36) reported significantly worse QoL scores for the Physical and Role-Emotional domains in the group with ChD compared to the group without CHD2929. Oliveira BG, Abreu MNS, Abreu CDG, Rocha MOC, Ribeiro AL. Health-related quality of life in patients with Chagas disease. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011;44(2):150-56.. Thus, these results can be useful for planning care strategies for individuals with ChD, focusing on the aspects of daily life assessed in this domain.

A potential explanation for the lower QoL perception in the physical domain among patients with ChD could be linked to a low ejection fraction and higher QRS interval, which indicate cardiomyopathy. However, it is noteworthy that we could not determine the extent of heart disease in these patients, as our investigation assessed only the presence or absence of cardiomyopathy. ChD is a chronic, neglected condition that affects a population with a lower income and that resides in remote locations or rural areas1313. Monsalve-Lara J, Lilioso M, Valença-Barbosa C, Thyssen PJ, Miguel DC, Limeira C, et al. The risk of oral transmission in an area of a Chagas disease outbreak in the Brazilian northeast evaluated through entomological, socioeconomic and schooling indicators. Acta Tropica. 2021; 215:105803.,1212. Ferreira AM, Sabino EC, Oliveira LC, Oliveira CDL, Cardoso CS, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Impact of the social context on the prognosisof Chagas disease patients: Multilevel analysis of a Brazilian cohort. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2020;14:e0008399.,3030. Lilioso M, Folly-Ramos E, Rocha FL, Rabinovich J, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Harry M, et al. High Triatoma brasiliensis densities and Trypanosoma cruzi prevalence in domestic and peridomestic habitats in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil: the Source for Chagas Disease Outbreaks? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017; 96: 1456-59.. These factors can lead to greater difficulty in accessing health services and obtaining specialized care such as would be provided by a cardiologist. These factors lead to worsening of the disease and consequently reflect the low QoL of these individuals. In a 2018 study, Santos-Filho et al. observed that participants with the cardiodigestive form of ChD, including heart failure, had lower QoL scores than those with other clinical forms of ChD2828. Santos-Filho JCL, Vieira MC, Xavier IGG, Maciel ER, Rodrigues Junior LF, Curvo EOVC, et al. Quality of life and associated factors in patients with chronic Chagas disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23(11):1213-22..

Numerous barriers exist regarding access to ChD diagnosis and treatment3131. Navarro M, Berens-Riha N, Hohnerlein S, Seiringer P, Saldern CV, Garcia S, et al. Cross-sectional, descriptive study of Chagas disease among citizens of Bolivian origin living in Munich, Germany. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013960.. The diagnosis of T. cruzi infection and timely follow-up capable of identifying the onset or progression of cardiomyopathy can mitigate morbidity, improve survival, and positively impact QoL3232. Bern C, Messenger LA, Whitman JD, Maguire JH. Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33: e00023-19.. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of training health professionals in the general knowledge of ChD, including screening, diagnosis, and adequate treatment3333. Granados PS, Pacheco GJ, Patlán EN, Betancourt J, Fulton L. Assessing the effectiveness of Chagas disease education for healthcare providers in the United States. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:743.. Early diagnosis and timely treatment, in addition to preventing disease worsening, can reduce healthcare costs.

In addition to the economic impact on the health system, the cost of treating ChD is substantial and further results in a decrease in QoL; the World Health Organization emphasizes decreased productivity due to premature death and absenteeism of affected workers3434. World Health Organization. Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases- First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. World Heal Organ. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010. [cited 2021 Nov 5] Available from: Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44440
https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/4...
. Considering the significant impact of the three pillars, namely high costs for the health system, decreased quality of life, and reduced productivity on both individuals and the economy, it is crucial for healthcare managers to prioritize investment in case-tracking strategies. Early diagnosis is key to timely ChD treatment, which would help mitigate the negative consequences.

Participants with ChD manifested a worse perception of QoL in the environment domain compared to those without ChD. This finding may be related to the higher family incomes of these individuals. The environment domain assesses aspects related to physical safety, physical environment, financial resources, new information/skills, recreation and leisure, home environment, healthcare, and transportation. Thus, a higher income may indicate greater access to these aspects.

Moreover, the current study population comprised participants from two municipalities of varying sizes located in the same southeastern region of the country, where no specialized Chagas center is available. Consequently, limited access to healthcare services, along with other factors such as transportation and social assistance, may prevent participants from receiving comprehensive care for ChD and other conditions. In addition, participants who reside in the capital, São Paulo, may be more vulnerable owing to physical security and greater air and noise pollution. In contrast, for participants from Montes Claros (MG), the problems previously presented were not part of their routine, but social, recreational, and leisure activities were limited.

Another important finding was the sociodemographic characteristics of participants. Scientific findings of lower levels of education and poverty in individuals with ChD are common1111. Quintino N, David G, Sabino E, Silva JL, Ribeiro AL, Ferreira A. et al. Level of literacy and clinical outcomes in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30 Supplement 5.. Although the study population was recruited from blood centers, the findings did not differ from those in the literature. Participants with ChD had less education, lower income, and a lower ability (20%) to read or write. An awareness that these characteristics are common in individuals with ChD demands simple communication from health professionals so that the patient understands the information and can follow the prescribed recommendations and treatments. Therefore, it is of great importance to assess health literacy to determine the self-care capacity of individuals with ChD. As evidenced by a 2020 study by Quintino et al., patients with ChD with low health literacy had worse QoL scores and unfavorable clinical outcomes1111. Quintino N, David G, Sabino E, Silva JL, Ribeiro AL, Ferreira A. et al. Level of literacy and clinical outcomes in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30 Supplement 5..

The aim of this study was to show that ChD negatively impacted QoL. If used in health management, this information can be useful in organizing the care of patients with ChD. As a limitation, we can point out information bias, considering that only participants who were able to answer the WHOQOL-BREF participated in the QoL assessment. This may have influenced the assessed QoL, as individuals with a worse state of health were not able to answer the instrument with a self-assessment of QoL. Another limitation is that the patients were not assessed for the presence of digestive complications, which can also compromise QoL.

CONCLUSION

In view of these findings, it is evident that individuals with ChD had a worse perception of QoL than those without ChD, demonstrating that ChD negatively impacted QoL. This further demonstrates that access to essential services may affect positive perceptions of QoL. Therefore, to reduce complications or negative impacts on perceived QoL in patients with ChD, improved healthcare, such as screening, early diagnosis, and timely treatment, are needed; furthermore, greater investments are needed in health education programs and preventive care, especially in endemic areas.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the REDS project team and patients from the REDS and Heart Institute. We also thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from the USA by supporting the Sami-Trop cohort study with a post-doctorate grant.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    World Health Organization (WHO). Chagas Disease in Latin America: An epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Weekly Epidemiological Record [Internet]. 2015; 90: 33-43; [cited 2021 Nov 5] Available from: Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/242316
    » https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/242316
  • 2
    Echeverría LE, Marcus R, Novick G, Sosa-Estani S, Ralston K, Zaidel EJ, et al. WHF IASC Roadmap on Chagas Disease. Global Heart. 2020;15(1):26.
  • 3
    Santos E, Facão MF. Chagas cardiomyopathy and heart failure: From epidemiology to treatment. Rev Port Cardiol.2020;39(5):279-89.
  • 4
    Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas Disease. The Lancet. 2010;375(9723): 1388-402.
  • 5
    Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, Bern C, Bolger AF, Echeverría LE, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: An update of current clinical knowledge and management: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e169-e209.
  • 6
    Damasceno RF, Sabino EC, Ferreira AM, Ribeiro ALP, Moreira HF, Prates TEC, et al. Challenges in the care of patients with Chagas disease in the Brazilian public health system: A qualitative study with primary health care doctors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008782.
  • 7
    Rassi Jr A, Rassi A, Marcondes de Rezende J. American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas Disease). Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012;26(2):275-91.
  • 8
    Lee BY, Bacon KM, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ. Global economic burden of CD: A computational simulation model. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:342-48.
  • 9
    Costa HS, Lima MMO, Figueiredo PHS, Chaves AT, Nunes MCP, Rocha MOC. The prognostic value of health-related quality of life in patients with Chagas heart disease. Qual Life Res. 2018;28:67-72.
  • 10
    Quintino ND, Sabino EC, Silva JLP, Ribeiro ALP, Ferreira AM, Davi GL. et al. Factors associated with quality of life in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008144.
  • 11
    Quintino N, David G, Sabino E, Silva JL, Ribeiro AL, Ferreira A. et al. Level of literacy and clinical outcomes in patients with Chagas disease: SaMi-Trop Project. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30 Supplement 5.
  • 12
    Ferreira AM, Sabino EC, Oliveira LC, Oliveira CDL, Cardoso CS, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Impact of the social context on the prognosisof Chagas disease patients: Multilevel analysis of a Brazilian cohort. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2020;14:e0008399.
  • 13
    Monsalve-Lara J, Lilioso M, Valença-Barbosa C, Thyssen PJ, Miguel DC, Limeira C, et al. The risk of oral transmission in an area of a Chagas disease outbreak in the Brazilian northeast evaluated through entomological, socioeconomic and schooling indicators. Acta Tropica. 2021; 215:105803.
  • 14
    Montanaro VVA, Hora TF , Silva CM, Santos CVV , Lima MIR, Oliveira EMJ, et al. Epidemiology of concurrent Chagas disease and ischemic stroke in a population attending a multicenter quaternary rehabilitation network in Brazil. Neurological Sciences. 2019;40(12):2595-601.
  • 15
    Olivera MJ, Buitrago G. Economic costs of Chagas disease in Colombia in 2017:A social perspective. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;196-201.
  • 16
    Cavalcanti MAF, Nascimento EGC, Alchieri JC, Andrade CM. Manifestations and strategies of coping with Chagas Disease that interfere in the quality of life of the individual: a systematic review. Ciênc. saúde colet. 2019;24(4):1405-16.
  • 17
    Fernández MDP, Gaspe MS, Gürtler RE. Inequalities in the social determinants of health and Chagas disease transmission risk in indigenous and creole households in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(184).
  • 18
    Cardoso CS, Ribeiro ALP, Oliveira CDL, Oliveira LC, Ferreira AM, Bierrenbach AL, et al. Beneficial effects of benznidazole in Chagas disease: NIH SaMi-Trop cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2018;12:e0006814.
  • 19
    Mediano MF, Mendes FS, Pinto VL, Silva GM, Silva PS, Carneiro FM, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with Chagas heart failure: a single-arm pilot study. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2016;49(03):319-28.
  • 20
    Vilas-Boas F, Feitosa GS, Soares MB, Pinho-Filho JA, Mota AC, Almeida AJ, et al. Bone marrow cell transplantation in Chagas’ disease heart failure: report of the first human experience. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;96(4):325-31.
  • 21
    Santos RR, Rassi S, Feitosa G, Grecco OT, Rassi Jr A, Cunha AB, et al. Cell therapy in Chagas cardiomyopathy (Chagas Arm of the Multicenter Randomized Trial of Cell Therapy in Cardiopathies Study). Circulation. 2012;125(20):2454-61.
  • 22
    Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VMC, Lorenzo Oliveira CDL, Antunes AP, Menezes MM. et al. Ten-Year Incidence of Chagas Cardiomyopathy Among Asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-Seropositive Former Blood Donors. Circulation. 2013;127(10):1105-15.
  • 23
    Ribeiro AL, Sabino EC, Marcolino MS, Salemi VM, Ianni BM, Fernandes F, et al. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in Trypanosoma cruzi seropositive and seronegative former blood donors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis . 2013;7(2):e2078.
  • 24
    Buss LF, Bes TM, Pereira A, Natany L, Oliveira CDL, Ribeiro ALP, et al. Deriving a parsimonious cardiac endpoint for use in epidemiological studies of Chagas disease: results from the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II) cohort. Rev Inst Med Trop S. Paulo. 2021;63:e31.
  • 25
    Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, et al. Aplicação da versão em português do instrumento abreviado de avaliação da qualidade de vida “WHOQOL-bref”. Rev Saude Publica. 2000;34(2):178-83.
  • 26
    Nunes MCP, Buss LF, Silva JLP, Martins LNA, Oliveira CDL, Cardoso CS, et al. Incidence and Predictors of Progression to Chagas Cardiomyopathy: Long-Term Follow-Up of Trypanosoma Cruzi Seropositive Individuals. Circulation. 2021; 9:144(19):1553-66.
  • 27
    Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser C (Applied Stat. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111); 2005;54:507-54.
  • 28
    Santos-Filho JCL, Vieira MC, Xavier IGG, Maciel ER, Rodrigues Junior LF, Curvo EOVC, et al. Quality of life and associated factors in patients with chronic Chagas disease. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23(11):1213-22.
  • 29
    Oliveira BG, Abreu MNS, Abreu CDG, Rocha MOC, Ribeiro AL. Health-related quality of life in patients with Chagas disease. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2011;44(2):150-56.
  • 30
    Lilioso M, Folly-Ramos E, Rocha FL, Rabinovich J, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Harry M, et al. High Triatoma brasiliensis densities and Trypanosoma cruzi prevalence in domestic and peridomestic habitats in the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil: the Source for Chagas Disease Outbreaks? Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017; 96: 1456-59.
  • 31
    Navarro M, Berens-Riha N, Hohnerlein S, Seiringer P, Saldern CV, Garcia S, et al. Cross-sectional, descriptive study of Chagas disease among citizens of Bolivian origin living in Munich, Germany. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013960.
  • 32
    Bern C, Messenger LA, Whitman JD, Maguire JH. Chagas Disease in the United States: a Public Health Approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33: e00023-19.
  • 33
    Granados PS, Pacheco GJ, Patlán EN, Betancourt J, Fulton L. Assessing the effectiveness of Chagas disease education for healthcare providers in the United States. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:743.
  • 34
    World Health Organization. Working to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases- First WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. World Heal Organ. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2010. [cited 2021 Nov 5] Available from: Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44440
    » https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44440
  • Financial Support: Funding: The SAMI-TROP cohort study is supported by the National Institutes of Health-NIH (grant Nº 5U19AI098461). ALPR is supported in part by CNPq (310790/2021-2 and 465518/2014-1), by FAPEMIG (PPM-00428-17 and RED-00081-16) Dr Ribeiro is supported in part by CNPq (310790/2021-2 and 465518/2014-1), by FAPEMIG (PPM-00428-17 and RED-00081-16).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 Oct 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    04 May 2023
  • Accepted
    29 Sept 2023
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT Caixa Postal 118, 38001-970 Uberaba MG Brazil, Tel.: +55 34 3318-5255 / +55 34 3318-5636/ +55 34 3318-5287, http://rsbmt.org.br/ - Uberaba - MG - Brazil
E-mail: rsbmt@uftm.edu.br