Rhosia and the Circum-Russian Politosphere of the 10th Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2023.3.836Keywords:
Rurikids, polity, chronotope, Rus’, Rhosia, Leo VI the Wise, The Tactica, Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, De Administrando Imperio, Hasdai ibn ShaprutAbstract
This review considers the concept of the Rurikid polity of the tenth century proposed by Aleksei S. Shchavelev, Senior Researcher at the Center for Eastern Europe in the Ancient and Medieval World, Department of the History of Byzantium and Eastern Europe, Institute of General History, Russian Academy of Sciences. Also, the reviewer examines its chronology and spatial structure, the genealogy of the early Rurikids, and the dynamics of their territorial power. The concept of “polity” replaces the previous notions of “Ancient Russia”, “Kievan Rus’”, and “Ancient Russian State” irrelevant for pre-Christian Times. The basis for the reconstruction of the Rurikid polity in the tenth century was not so much The Primary Chronicle whose chronology is being criticized more and more harshly, as The Tactica by Byzantine Emperor Leo VI the Wise (866–912), the treatise De Administrando Imperio by Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (905–959), letters from Hasdai ibn Shaprut (905–975), advisor to the Caliph of Cordoba, etc. This polity emerged following stochastic fluctuations in ethno-social, event, and personal history.
References
Afinogénov, D. (2004). Le manuscript Coislin gr. 305: la version primitive de la Chronique de Georges le Moine. In Revue des études byzantines. Vol. 62, pp. 239–246. DOI 10.3406/rebyz.2004.2294.
Amal’rik, A. A. (2018). Normanny i Kievskaya Rus’ [Normans and Kievan Rus] / publ. by O. L. Gubarev. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 280 p.
Downham, C. (2007). Viking Kings of Britain and Ireland. The Dynasty of Ívarr to A. D. 1044. Edinburgh, Dunedin Academic Press. 261 p.
Dzibel’, G. V. (2021). O proiskhozhdenii etnonima rus’ i roda Ryurikovichei: vzglyad na slavyano-finno-skandinavskoe kul’turnoe pogranich’e IX–XI vv. s pozitsii antropologii rodstva [On the Origin of Ethnonym Rus’ and of the Rurikid Lineage: A Look at the Slavo-Finno-Scandinavian Frontier of the 9th–11th Centuries from the Point of View of Kinship Studies]. In Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. No. 4, pp. 79–98. DOI 10.31857/S086954150016700-0.
Kuleshov, V. S. (2021). Eshche raz o proiskhozhdenii etnosotsionima rus’ [Once again on the Origins of the Ethnonym-Socionym Rus’]. In Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. No. 4, pp. 106–110. DOI 10.31857/S086954150016702-2.
Maksimovich, K. A. (2021). *Rodiči – ruotsi – rus’: kriticheskie zametki k novoi etimologii starogo etnonima [*Rodiči – Ruotsi – Rus’: Critical Notes to the New Etymology of an Old Ethnonym]. In Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. No. 4, pp. 99–105. DOI 10.31857/S086954150016701-1.
Shchavelev, A. S. (2020). Khronotop derzhavy Ryurikovichei (911–987) [The Chronotope of the Rurikid Polity (911–987)] / ed. by E. A. Melnikova. Moscow, Aquilon. 560 p.
