Mining, Materiality and Memory: Lingering Legacies in Longyearbyen
A Case Study of the Peculiar Afterlife of Longyearbyen’s Old Power Plant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.21643Keywords:
mining, materiality, memory, heritage, fragments, LongyearbyenAbstract
When the old power plant at Longyearbyen on Svalbard in the Arctic was decommissioned in 1983, the building was earmarked for demolition. However, the presence of asbestos made the cost of removal too high and the building remained closed for more than 35 years. Now, its fate is once again being examined. Ideas for its potential future include establishment as an industrial memorial, a site for cultural events, a tourist attraction and/or a monument “of fossilised time”. Questions of which past is to be remembered, which uses are acceptable, which materiality is to be kept – and in what condition – all permeate the project, which is called FOSSIL. This paper examines different aspects of the project from both a material perspective (Identity of Place) and a human perspective (place-identity), bringing up questions of politics of memory, museumification, and the desired and undesired facets of heritage that the project engages with as it shapes the power plant’s (re)incarnation.
References
ARTICA and Krunglevi?ius, I. 2022. “Interview with Artica Listens 2021 Artist Ignas Krunglevi?ius.” [video] ARTICA, 22 January [first published 17 November 2021]. Online: https://www.articasvalbard.no/videos/interview-ignas-krungleviius / https://vimeo.com/644369089
Brode-Roger, D. Under review. “The Svalbard Treaty and Identity of Place: Impacts and Implications for Longyearbyen, Svalbard.”
Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
DeSilvey, C. 2017. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hodder, I. 2014 “The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View.” New Literary History 45: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0005
Holm, K. 2006. Longyearbyen – Svalbard: Historisk Veiviser. Narvik, Norway: Kari Holm Press.
Kruse, F., G. Nobles, M. de Jong, R. van Bodegom, G. van Oortmerssen, J. Kooistra, M. van den Berg, H. Küchelmann, M. Schepers, E. Leusink, B. Cornelder, H. Kruijer and M. Dee. 2020. “Human–Environment Interactions at a Shortlived Arctic Mine and the Long-Rerm Response of the Local Tundra Vegetation.” Polar Record 57: Article e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247420000418
LPO Arkitekter. 2021. FOSSIL: Det gamle kraftverket i Longyearbyen “Formidlingsprosjektet”. Longyearbyen, Norway: LPO.
____ and Svalbard Social Science Initiative. 2020. People About Longyearbyen as a Physical Framework. Longyearbyen, Norway: LPO.
Lovdata. 1992. “Forskrift om kulturminner på Svalbard.” LOV-1992-01-24-34. Online: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SFO/forskrift/1992-01-24-34 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1010438
Malpas, J. 2017. “Placing Understanding/Understanding Place.” Sophia 56 (3): 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0546-9
Olsen, B. J. 2010. In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Lanham. MD: AltaMira Press.
Pétursdóttir, T. 2012. “Small Things Forgotten Now Included, or What Else Do Things Deserve?” International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 577–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10761-012-0191-0
Staalesen, A. 2021. “Hungry for More Oil, Norway Aims for €36 Billion Investments in New Fields.” Arctic Today, 28 July. Online: https://www.arctictoday.com/hungry-for-more-oil-norway-aimsfor- e36-billion-investments-in-new-fields/
