Constructive dialogue, disruptive criticism and the complex dynamics of academic life

Authors

  • Gabriele Pallotti Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.26060

Keywords:

Methodology, linguistic complexity, epistemology, complex dynamics systems theory, ethics, SLA theories

Abstract

In her article ‘Issues of narrowness and staticity in ISLA’, Han presents a radical criticism of previous ISLA research, listing a number of faults and limitations that can be ascribed to a narrow and static view on the phenomena of interest. In this reply, I argue that many of these accusations are unwarranted and that they exacerbate academic debate rather than promoting constructive dialogue among different approaches. Han’s proposal for a ‘new way’ of doing research is inspired by some polemical versions of Complex Dynamic System Theory, which easily dismiss the contribution of other methodologies while remaining rather vague on the level of concrete solutions. It is argued that every approach is to some extent reductionist, that narrowness and staticity are inevitable, and that instead of being the target of violent reproach they should become the object of rational discussions about when, what and to what degree one should simplify.

Author Biography

  • Gabriele Pallotti, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia

    Gabriele Pallotti is a professor of Language teaching methodology at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. His research focuses on interlanguage development, linguistic complexity, morphology, L2 interaction, methodology and epistemology in applied linguistics. He co-ordinates the project Observing interlanguage and is the associate editor of the Eurosla Studies Series (Language Science Press).

References

Berthele, R. and Udry, I. (eds.) (2021) Individual Differences in Early Instructed Language Learning: The Role of Language Aptitude, Cognition and Motivation. Berlin: Language Science Press.

Borges, J. L. (1954) Historia universal de la infamia. Buenos Aires: Emecé.

Bulté, B. and Housen, A. (2020) A critical appraisal of the CDST approach to investigating linguistic complexity in L2 writing development. In G. G. Fogal and M. H. Verspoor (eds.) Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development (vol. 54) 207–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.54.09bul

Bygate, M. (ed.) (2018) Learning Language Through Task Repetition. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11

Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. and Schumann, J. (1978) The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second Language Acquisition: A Book of Readings 207–30. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Douglas Fir Group, The (2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 100(S1): 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301

Han, Z.-H. (2023) Issues of narrowness and staticity in ISLA. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 7(1): 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.19454

Hatch, E. (ed.) (1978) Second Language Acquisition: A Book of Readings. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Hulstijn, J. (2020) Proximate and ultimate explanations of individual differences in language use and language acquisition. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 9(1–2): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19027.hul

Jordan, G. (2004) Theory Construction in Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kersten, K. and Winsler, A. (eds.) (2022) Understanding Variability in Second Language Acquisition, Bilingualism and Cognition: A Multi-Layered Perspective. New York: Routledge.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(4): 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017) Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega and Z. Han (eds.) Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman 11–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Lenzing, A., Pienemann, M. and Nicholas, H. (2022) Lost in translation? On some key features of dynamical systems theorizing invoked in SLA research. In K. Kersten and A. Winsler (eds.) Understanding Variability in Second Language Acquisition, Bilingualism and Cognition 39–79. New York: Routledge.

Lowie, W. (2017) Lost in state space? Methodological considerations in Complex Dynamic Theory approaches to second language development research. In L. Ortega and Z. Han (eds.) Language Learning and Language Teaching (vol. 48) 123–41. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.07low

Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M. (2015) Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic re-evaluation. Language Learning 65(1): 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12093

Michel, M. C., Révész, A., Shi, D. and Li, Y. (2019) The effects of task demands on linguistic complexity and accuracy across task types and L1/L2 speakers. In Z. (Edward) Wen and M. J. Ahmadian (eds.) Task-Based Language Teaching 133–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.07mic

Pallotti, G. (2019) Assessing tasks: The case of interactional difficulty. Applied Linguistics 40(1): 176–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx020

Pallotti, G. (2022) Cratylus’ silence: On the philosophy and methodology of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory in SLA. Second Language Research 38(3): 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658321992451

Penris, W. and Verspoor, M. (2017) Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In S. Pfenniger and J. Navracsics (eds.) Future Research Directions for Applied Linguistics 215–42. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Schmidt, R. (1983) Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson and E. Judd (eds.) Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Schumann, J. (1978) The Pidginisation Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W. and van Dijk, M. (2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2): 214–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x

Wong Fillmore, L. (1979) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behaviour 203–28. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50017-2

Yu, H. and Lowie, W. (2020) Dynamic paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: A longitudinal case study of Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics 41(6): 855–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz040

Zhang, P. and Graham, S. (2020) Learning vocabulary through listening: The role of vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency. Language Learning 70(4): 1017–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12411

Published

2023-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pallotti, G. (2023). Constructive dialogue, disruptive criticism and the complex dynamics of academic life. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 7(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.26060

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>