Contenido principal del artículo

Laura Ros García
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
España
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-4256
Vol. 50 (2023), Artículos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/verba.50.8241
Recibido: 01-02-2022 Aceptado: 25-04-2022 Publicado: 09-08-2023
Derechos de autoría Cómo citar

Resumen

Este artículo aborda la interacción de la negación con las nominalizaciones deverbales. Se examina qué tipos de nominalizaciones son compatibles con la negación y se pone el foco de estudio en las nominalizaciones eventivas. Se muestra cómo la interpretación que emerge con la construcción <no + nominalización deverbal eventiva> se corresponde, de forma paralela a lo que ocurre en el dominio verbal, con la lectura de eventualidad inhibida. Tras ello, se pone de manifiesto cómo la construcción denota una eventualidad que posee propiedades tanto estativas como eventivas.

Citado por

Detalles del artículo

Referencias

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals: Nominalization and ergativity, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.42

Alexiadou, Artemis; Grimshaw, Jane. 2008. Verbs, nouns and affixation. En Florian Schäfer (ed.), Working Papers of the SFB 732 Incremental Specification in Context 1, 1-16.

Arkadiev, Peter. 2015. Negative events: Evidence from Lithuanian. En Peter Arkadiev, Ivan Kapitonov, Yury Lander, Ekaterina Rakhilina y Sergei Tatevosov (eds.), Donum semanticum: Opera linguistica et logica in honorem Barbarae Partee a discimulis amicisque Rossicis oblata, Moscú: LRC Publishing, 7-20.

Arkadiev, Peter. 2016. Long-distance genitive of negation in Lithuanian. En Axel Holvoet y Nicole Nau (eds.), Argument realization in Baltic, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins, 36-82. https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.01ark

Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to abstract objects in discourse, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1715-9

Asher, Nicholas. 2000. Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphor. En James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi y Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, Nueva York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-150.

Bach, Emmon. 1986. On time, tense and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics. En Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, Nueva York: Academic Press, 63-81.

Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1986. Tempo, aspetto e azione nel verbo italiano. Il sistema dell’indicativo, Florencia: Accademia della Crusca.

Borer, Hagit. 2003. Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. En John Moore y Maria Polinsky (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory, Stanford (ca): CSLI Publications, 31-67.

Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense, vol. III: Taking form, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. En Roderick Arnold Jacobs y Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, Waltham (ma): Ginn and Company, 232-286.

Cooper, Robin. 1999. Austinian propositions, Davidsonian events and perception complements. En Jonathan Ginzburg, Zurab Khasidashvili, Carl Vogel, Jean-Jaques Levy y Enric Vallduví (eds.), The Tbilisi symposium on language, logic and computation: Selected papers, Stanford (ca): CSLI Publications, 19-34.

De Swart, Henriëtte. 1993. Adverbs of quantification: A generalized quantified approach, Nueva York: Garland Press.

De Swart, Henriëtte. 1996. Meaning and use of not...until.... Journal of Semantics 13(3), 221-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/13.3.221

De Swart, Henriëtte; Molendijk, Arie. 1999. Negation and the temporal structure of narrative discourse. Journal of Semantics 16(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/16.1.1

Fábregas, Antonio. 2016. Las nominalizaciones, Madrid: Visor Libros.

Fábregas, Antonio; Marín, Rafael. 2012. The role of Aktionsart in deverbal nouns: State nominalizations across languages. Journal of Linguistics 48(1), 35-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226711000351

Fábregas, Antonio; Marín, Rafael; McNally, Louise. 2012. From psych verbs to nouns. En Violeta Demonte y Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change and state: A cross-categorial views of event structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 162-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693498.003.0007

Fábregas, Antonio; González Rodríguez, Raquel. 2020. On inhibited eventualities. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38(3), 729-773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09461-y

Felser, Claudia. 1999. Verbal complement clauses: A minimalist study of direct perception constructions, Ámsterdam/Filadelfia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.25

Fradin, Bernard. 2011. Remarks on state denoting nominalizations. Recherches linguistiques de Vicennes 40, 73-99. https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.1946

Godard, Danièle; Jayez, Jacques. 1994. Types nominaux et anaphores: le cas des objets et des événements. Cahiers Chronos 1, 41-58.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure, Cambridge (ma): The MIT Press.

Higgginbotham, James. 1983. The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. Journal of Philosophy 80(2), 100-127. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil198380289

Higgginbotham, James. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. En James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi y Achille C. Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, Nueva York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49-79.

Hoepelman, Jaap; Rohrer, Christian. 1980. On the mass-count distinction and the French imparfait and passé simple. En Christian Rohrer (ed.), Time, tense and quantifiers, Tubinga: Niemeyer, 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111346069.85

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation, Stanford (ca), CSLI Publications.

Kamp, Hans; Reyle Uwe. 1983. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kratzer, Angelika. 2002. Facts: Particulars or information units? Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020807615085

Levin, Beth; Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity, Cambridge (ma): The MIT Press.

Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English nouns: The ecology of nominalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676288

Maienborn, Claudia. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen, Berlín: Akademia Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050082271

Maienborn, Claudia. 2005. On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31(3), 275-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2005.31.3.275

Marín, Rafael. 2011. Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos. En Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed.), Sobre estados y estatividad, Múnich: Lincom Europa, 26-44.

Marín, Rafael; McNally, Louise. 2011. Inchoativity, change of state and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29, 467-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9127-3

Marín, Rafael; Villoing, Florence. 2012. Nominalisations: noveaux aspects. En Rafael Marín y Florence Villoing (eds.), Nominalisations: noveaux aspects, Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses du Septentrion, 7-19.

Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas. En Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, vol. 2, 1575-1630.

Mourelatos, Alexander P. D. 1981 [1978]. Events, processes and states. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 415-434 (reproducido en Philip J. Tedeschi y Annie Zaenen (eds.), Tense and aspect. Series in syntax and semantics, Volume 14, Nueva York: Academic Press, 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1982.84.3.02a00930

Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics, Cambridge (ma): The MIT Press.

Picallo, M. Carme. 1991. Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3(3), 279-316. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.279

Picallo, M. Carme. 1999. La estructura del sintagma nominal: las nominalizaciones y otros sustantivos con complementos argumentales. En Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, vol. 1, 363-393.

Przepiórkowski, Adam. 1999. On negative eventualities, negative concord and negative yes/no questions. En Tanya Matthews y Devon Strolovitc (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, Ithaca (NY): CLC Publications, 237-254. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2828

Rae y Asale 2009 = Real Academia Española; Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, vols. 1 y 2.

Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon: A first phase syntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319

Sánchez López, Cristina. 1999. La negación. En Ignacio Bosque y Violeta Demonte (dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, vol. 2, 2561-2634.

Stockwell, Robert P.; Schachter, Paul; Partee, Barbara H. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English, Nueva York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc.

Weiser, Stéphanie. 2008. The negation of action sentences. Are there negative events? En Sylvia Blaho, Camelia Constantinescu y Erik Schoorlemmer (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XV, 357-364.