Profit Sharing Agreement Between Eti Country and Petuanan Area In the context of Capacity Building

Article Sidebar

Fulltext (English)
Published Mar 8, 2022
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i1.53321

Main Article Content

Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela
Faculty of Law, Pattimura University
Merry Tjoanda
Faculty of Law, Pattimura University
Ronald Fadly Sopamena
Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Abstract

In Eti Village, which is located in the West Seram sub-district, West Seram Regency, there is still an agreement for marine and plantation products sharing between the Petuanan Region and the State Government of Eti Village as the parent country in the context of capacity building. This Profit Sharing Agreement is known as the ngase system and has been implemented from 1979 to 2021This study aims to identify and analyze the profit sharing agreement from the Petuanan Area to the Parent State in the context of capacity building, and also the legal consequences of the revenue sharing agreement from the Petuanan Area to the Parent State in the context of capacity building. In accordance with the problems and objectives of this research, the type of research used is sociolegal research, namely a combination research method between doctrinal law research methods and empirical legal research methods. Based on the author's study, the ngase system is a profit-sharing agreement in oral form which is applied in the Eti Country and applies as an agreement so that it has binding legal consequences.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pariela, M. V. G., Tjoanda, M., & Sopamena, R. F. (2022). Profit Sharing Agreement Between Eti Country and Petuanan Area In the context of Capacity Building. Law Research Review Quarterly, 8(1), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i1.53321
Issue
Vol 8 No 1 (2022): Various Legal Issues and Its Complexity to Global Perspective
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Author Biographies

Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Pattimura, Ambon Indonesia. Some of his publications such as Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Waralaba (SASI 23 (1), 35-45, 2019), Perlindungan pengetahuan tradisional secara sui generis untuk menyongsong masyarakat ekonomi Asean (SASI 24 (1), 1-10, 2018), and Wanprestasi Manajer Investasi Terhadap Investor Reksadana (SASI 23 (2), 129-135, 2018).

Merry Tjoanda, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Merry Tjoanda is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Pattimura, Ambon Indonesia. Some of her recent publications such as Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Obat Herbal Atas Pencantuman Nomor Izin Edar Fiktif (TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2 (7), 660–677, 2022), Fungsi Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Penegakan Kode Etik Notaris (PAMALI: Pattimura Magister Law Review 2 (2), 161–171, 2022), and Sub Contractors in Government Procurement Contract of Goods and Services (Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 11 (1), 44-58, 2022).

Ronald Fadly Sopamena, Faculty of Law, Pattimura University

Ronald Fadly Sopamena is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Pattimura, Ambon Indonesia. Some of his recent publications such as Choice of Law in International Business Contracts (Balobe Law Journal 2 (2), 45–50, 2022), Salinan Akta Perjanjian dalam Kredit Perbankan (Bacarita Law Journal 2 (2), 54-61, 2022), and Meningkatkan Pemahaman Masyarakat Atas Hak-Hak Konsumen (AIWADTHU: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum 2 (1), 35–41, 2022).

References

Alif, M. (2015). Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Tanah Pertanian Menurut Undang-undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1960 Di Kecamatan Soyo Jaya Kabupaten Morowali (Studi Kasus Di Desa Bau). Legal Opinion, 3(2), 4. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/LO/article/view/5871.

Benyamin & Thabrani. (1987). Tanya Jawab Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Agraria.

M. Tjoanda, M.V.G Pariela, Y. Hetharie, R. F. S. (2021). Covid-19 sebagai Bentuk Overmacht dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kredit. SASI, 95. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/447

M.V.G. Pariela. (n.d.). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba. SASI, 43. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/issue/view/9

Prodjodikoro, W. (2012). Azaz-Azaz Hukum Perjanjian.

R. Subekti. (1987). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.

Sopamena, R. F. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451

Syah, D. (2020). Suatu Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Bagi Hasil Atas Tanah Pertanian Antara Pemilik Tanah dengan Petani. Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA, 1(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47652/metadata.v1i3.10

Urip Santoso. (2013). Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif.

Y. Hetharie. (n.d.). Perjanjian Nominee sebagai Sarana Penguasaan Hak Milik atas Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. SASI, 30.