Micro CT Analysis of Hard Tissue Debris Accumulation Created by SAF vs. ProTaper systems

Authors

  • Diyar Kh Bakr Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University
  • Hussien Al-Hwaizi Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, Baghdad University
  • Raid Salman Conservative Department, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2018.08

Keywords:

Root canal preparation, SAF-system, ProTaper rotary files, Micro CT

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hard tissue debris is deposited routinely during root canal system instrumentation. A new instrument had been marketed with the aim of optimum shaping of all parts of the canal system, however, no information present about the amount of debris removal compared to conventional rotary system. This study investigated the amount of debris accumulated when the canal instrumented by SAF compared with ProTaper by using high resolution computed tomography (micro CT).

Methods: Twenty extracted single canalled teeth were utilized for this study; and randomly divided into 2 groups. In the first group, the root canals were prepared by using protaper rotary system till F2 and the root canal irrigated with 1ml of normal saline after each instrument. The root canals in the second group were prepared using SAF for 4min, with continuous irrigation (normal saline). After rescanning, the percentage value of total canal volume filled with hard tissue debris was calculated.

Results: For protaper instrumentation, a mean of 0.35% of the total canal system volume was filled with hard-tissue debris which was lesser than that of SAF system where a mean of 0.42 % vol. was obtained. However, there was non-significant difference between them (p=0.218) with in favor of the SAF system.

Conclusion: Root canal preparation with SAF-system resulted in more and effective hard tissue debris accumulation compared with protaper rotary files. 

References

1. Peters O, Peters C. Cleaning and shaping of root canal system. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves K, Keiser K. Pathways of the pulp, 9th ed. St Louis, MO Elsevier, 2006.
2. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, Coil JM. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solution in root canals. Endod Topics 2005; 10:77-102.

3. Peters OA, Paque F. Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical use: a review. Quintessence Int 2010; 41:479-88.
4. Paque F, Ganahl D, Peter OA. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2009; 35:1056-9.
5. Peters OA, Schonenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2001; 34:221-30.
6. Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Zary R, Cohen R, Hof R. The self-adjusting file (SAF): part 1- respecting the root canal anatomy: a new concept of endodontic files and its implementation. J Endod 2010; 36:679-90.
7. Siqueira JF Jr, Alves FR, Almeida BM, de Oliveira JC, Rocas IN. Ability of chemo-mechanical preparation with either rotary instruments or self-adjusting file to disinfect oval shaped root canals. J Endod 2010; 36; 1860-5.
8. Paque F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M. Hard-tissue debris accumulation analysis by high-resolution computed tomography scans. J Endod 2009; 35:1044-7.
9. Paque F, Boessler C, Zehnder M. Accumulated hard tissue debris levels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J 2011; 44:148-53.
10. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod; 2006; 32:389-98.
11. Adigüzel Ö, Yiğit-Özer S, Kaya S, Uysal I, Ganidağli-Ayaz S, Akkuş Z. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112:803-8.
12. Paque F, Rechenberg D, Zehnder M. Reduction of hard tissue debris accumulation during rotary root canal instrumentation by etidronic acid in a sodium hypochlorite irrigant. J Endod 2012; 38:692-5.
13. Endal U, Shen Y, Knut A, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. A high-resolution computed tomographic study of changes in root canal isthmus area by instrumentation and root filling. J Endod 2011; 37: 223-7.
14. De-Deus G, Souza EM, Barino B, Maia J, Zamolyi RQ, Reis C. The self-adjusting file optimizes debridment quality in oval-shaped root canals. J Endod 2011; 37:701-5.
15. Paranjpe A, de Gregorio C, Gonzalez A. Efficacy of self-adjusting files system on cleaning and shaping oval canals: a microbiological and microscopic evaluation. J Endod 2012; 38:226-31.
16. Paque F, Al-Jadaa A, Kfir A. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2012; 45:413-8.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-06

How to Cite

1.
Bakr DK, Al-Hwaizi H, Salman R. Micro CT Analysis of Hard Tissue Debris Accumulation Created by SAF vs. ProTaper systems. EDJ [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 6 [cited 2024 Apr. 30];1(1):55-60. Available from: https://edj.hmu.edu.krd/index.php/journal/article/view/27

Issue

Section

Original Articles