Abstract
The most successful games today do not use a pay-for-product model, but involve complex and aggressive modes of monetizing their content (downloadable content, skins, in game currencies and markets, seasonal passes, etc.). While this has already been scrutinized, there are further consequences for games themselves and the economization of play. In my paper, I show how this strategy creates a conceptually novel situation, where playing can be considered to constitute reproductive labor-power and behavioral capital. In other words, playing here represents not only consumption but also the very production of such consumption, insofar as the main reason behind the massive success of these games is precisely their massive pool of players and data concerning their activity. Firstly, I analyse PUBG: Battlegrounds as an example of the most successful model of monetizing games and maintaining a large number of players and interaction. I focus both on the economic incentives as well as on the gameplay that is generated or tailored towards aggressive monetization. Later, I set a theoretical context for my analysis stemming from ludocapitalist discourse (itself combining Marx with poststructuralism) and the concept of surveillance capitalism. I conclude my text with a systematization and definition of my original concept of behavioral capital and an attempt to formulate art critique and usage of games as a form of cultural production exposing several examples from contemporary art.
Funding source: Focal images: Violence and Inhumanism in contemporary art and media culture
Award Identifier / Grant number: GAČR 22-17984S
-
Research funding: The study was funded by the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR), project No. 22-17984S: Focal images: Violence and Inhumanism in contemporary art and media culture.
References
Active Player. 2023. PlayerUnknown’s BattleGrounds (PUBG) Active Player. https://activeplayer.io/pubg/ (accessed 1 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Bailes, Jon. 2019. Ideology and the virtual city: An exploration of modern society and the critical value of popular culture. London: Zero.Search in Google Scholar
Berardi, Franco “Bifo.” 2012. The uprising: On poetry and finance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Boutang, Yann Moulier. 2011. Cognitive capitalism. London: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Alfie. 2015. Enjoying it: Candy crush and capitalism. London: Zero.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2017. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone.10.5380/dp.v14i1.48108Search in Google Scholar
Chul-Han, Byung. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. 2005. Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics 1(1). 51–74. https://doi.org/10.2752/174321905778054845.Search in Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi. 2009. Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11smj29Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 2013a. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350251984Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 2013b. Thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Dyer-Witheford, Nick. 1999. Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.10.22230/cjc.2000v25n3a1169Search in Google Scholar
Dyer-Witheford, Nick & Greig de Peuter. 2009. Games of empire: Global capitalism and video games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Endnotes. 2023. The history of subsumption. Endnotes. https://endnotes.org.uk/articles/6 (accessed 1 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Epic Games. 2017. Fortnite. Cary, NC: Epic Games.Search in Google Scholar
Freehold Games. 2015. Caves of Qud. Freehold Games, LLC.Search in Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Search in Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2009. Neoliberalism: Or the bureaucratization of the world. In Hugh Gusterson & Catherine Besteman (eds.), The insecure American: How we got here and what we should do about it, 79–96. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Greene, Brendan. 2017. PUBG: Battlegrounds. Seongnam: Krafton.Search in Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael & Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Infinity Ward. 2003. Call of duty. Santa Monica, CA: Activision.Search in Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822378419Search in Google Scholar
Janoščík, Václav. 2022. The k-thing today. Sublationmag. https://www.sublationmag.com/post/the-k-thing-today (accessed 1 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Janoščík, Václav. 2023. Bonus Level [zine]. Bratislava: Galeria Médium.Search in Google Scholar
Lambic Studios. 2019. The stillness of the wind. Fellow Traveller.Search in Google Scholar
Lazzarato, Maurizio. 1996. Immaterial labor. In Paolo Virno & Michael Hardt (eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics, 142–157. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Liquipedia. 2022. PUBG global championship. Liquipedia. https://liquipedia.net/pubg/PUBG_Global_Championship/2022 (accessed 1 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Massive Entertainment. 2016. Tom Clancy’s: The division. Saint-Mandé: Ubisoft.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1973. Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 2014. Fragment on machines. In Avanessian Armen & Robin MacKay (eds.), #ACCELERATE: The accelerationist reader, 51–66. Falmouth/Berlin: Urbanomic/Merve.Search in Google Scholar
McGonigal, Jane. 2011. Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
miHoYo. 2020. Genshin impact. Shanghai: Shanghai Miha Touring Film Technology.Search in Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. 1991. Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. London: Pluto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Oreilly, David. 2019. Everything. San Francisco, CA: Double Fine.Search in Google Scholar
Respawn Entertainment. 2019. Apex legends. Redwood, CA: Electronic Arts.Search in Google Scholar
Riot Games. 2009. League of legends. Los Angeles, CA: Riot Games.Search in Google Scholar
Roessel, Lies van & Jan Švelch. 2021. Who creates microtransactions: The production context of video game monetization. In Olli Sotamaa & Jan Švelch (eds.), Game production studies, 197–216. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1hp5hqw.13Search in Google Scholar
Simondon, Gilbert. 2007. L’individuation psychique et collective. Paris: Aubier.Search in Google Scholar
Srnicek, Nick. 2016. Platform capitalism. London: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. 1978. Intellectual and manual labor: A critique of epistemology. Boston: Humanities Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15867-6Search in Google Scholar
Tendershoot. 2019. Hypnospace outlaw. Manchester: No More Robots.Search in Google Scholar
Valve. 1999. Counter-strike. Bellevue, WA: Valve Software.Search in Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
