Abstract
Asemic typography offers an opportunity to consider the distinction between typography in its traditional role for graphic design and how the addition of motion changes its engagement and audience comprehension for motion graphics. These differences enable a consideration of the specific problematics created by chronological development on-screen as a formal differentiator between static and kinetic typography.
References
Betancourt, M. 2017. Semiotics and title sequences: Text-image composites in motion graphics. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315206851Search in Google Scholar
Brownie, B. 2015. Transforming type: New directions in kinetic typography. New York: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474246187Search in Google Scholar
Federici, F. 2015. Is asemic writing a zero-point writing? (Asemic draft in progress n.3). Utsang 15. https://www.utsanga.it/federici-is-asemic-writing-zero-point-writing/ (accessed 10 April 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1975. The birth of the clinic. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
Golden, W. 1962. Type is to read. In C. P. Golden, K. Weihs & R. Stunsky (eds.), The visual craft of William Golden, 13–35. New York: George Braziller.Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, E. & A. Miller. 1996. Design writing research: Writing on graphic design. New York: Phaidon.Search in Google Scholar
Tschichold, J. 1998. The new typography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
