Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 18, 2017

Semiotics of textscapes and cultures

  • Peter Stockinger EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

This article presents a general outline of a theoretical and methodological framework for analyzing textscapes. Textscapes are signifying perceptual surfaces that form the interface with the meaning universe of a semiotic eco-system (of, for instance, the life-world of a social actor such as a person, a social group, a community, etc.). In this sense, textscape descriptions and comparisons are of central importance for a semiotics of cultures understood as a text- or discourse-based approach to the description of meaning systems that possess a constitutive and normative status for a semiotic eco-system. The description of such meaning configurations composing the doxa (visions, beliefs, values and norms, know-how, etc.) of a social actor has to rely on a structured approach for dealing adequately with textscapes as the principal data to be studied. Research tasks include the identification of relevant textscapes, the techniques for collecting and conserving them, the analysis of corpora of textscapes or the experimentation with textscapes. In order to illustrate our purpose, we will study two examples of textscapes in a broad sense, understood as signifying 3D-surfaces of the lifeworld of social actors: a typical European open market in Vienna and a middle-class European kitchen. A third example in Hong Kong studies a modern urban communicational textscape.

Résumé

Dans cet article, nous présentons un cadre théorique et méthodologique pour l’analyse de « textscapes » ou « paysages textuels ». D’une manière analogue à l’expression « paysage », les paysages textuels forment des surfaces perceptives et sensibles signifiantes qui constituent l’interface avec l’univers de sens d’un écosystème sémiotique (comme, par exemple, avec le monde de vie d’un acteur social tel qu’une personne, un groupe social, une communauté, etc.). En ce sens, les descriptions et les comparaisons de paysages textuels sont d’une importance capitale pour une sémiotique de cultures s’intéressant plus particulièrement à l’analyse de systèmes de sens qui possèdent, pour un écosystème sémiotique donné, un statut régulateur et normatif. Afin d’illustrer notre propos, nous allons étudier deux exemples de paysages textuels au sens large, entendus comme des surfaces 3D signifiantes du monde de vie des acteurs sociaux: le paysage textuel d’un marché ouvert, typiquement européen, et le paysage textuel d’une cuisine de classe moyenne. Un troisième exemple concret que nous allons examiner est celui d’un paysage textuel de communication urbaine à Hong Kong, en Chine.

References

Almeida-Topor, Hélène d’. 2006. Le goût de l’étranger: Les saveurs venues d’ailleurs depuis la fin du XVIIIème siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

Amossy, Ruth & Anne Herschberg-Pierrot. 1997. Stéréotypes et clichés: Langue discours, société. Paris: Editions Nathan.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Le sens pratique. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 1981. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Boston: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv26071r6Search in Google Scholar

Ferraris, Maurizio. 2013. Documentality: Why it is necessary to leave traces. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 2014 [1979]. The theory of affordances. In Jen J. Gieseking, William Mangold, Cindi Katz, Setha Low & Susan Saegert (eds.), The people, place, and space reader, 56–60. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1976. Sémiotique et sciences sociales. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien & Joseph Courtés. 1979. Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Klaus P. 1995. Kultur und Kulturwissenschaft. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn (eds). 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607660Search in Google Scholar

Huxley, Julian S. 1955. Guest editorial: Evolution, cultural, and biological. Yearbook of Anthropology no. (1955). 2–25.10.1086/yearanth.0.3031134Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri. 2005 [1984]. On the semiosphere, Wilma Clark (trans.). Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 205–229.10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.09Search in Google Scholar

Schütz, Alfred & Thomas Luckmann. 2003. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Spechtenhauser, Klaus (ed.). 2006. The kitchen: Lifworld, usage, perspectives. Zürich & Basel: ETH (Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule)/Birkhäuser.Search in Google Scholar

Stockinger, Peter. 1992. Multimedia and knowledge based systems. Special issue, S: European Journal for Semiotic Studies 5(3). 387–424.Search in Google Scholar

Stockinger, Peter. 1999. Les nouveaux produits d’information: Conception et sémiotique du document. Paris: Hermes Science.Search in Google Scholar

Stockinger, Peter. 2005. Les sites web: Conception, description, et évaluation. Paris: Hermes Science.Search in Google Scholar

Stockinger, Peter (ed.). 2011. Introduction to audiovisual archives. New York & Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-ISTE.10.1002/9781118562048Search in Google Scholar

Stockinger, Peter. 2012. Audiovisual archives: Digital text and discourse analysis. New York & Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-ISTE.10.1002/9781118561997Search in Google Scholar

Tietmeyer, Elisabeth, Claudia Hirschberger, Karoline Noack & Jane Redlin (eds.). 2010. Die Sprache der Dinge. Kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf die materielle Kultur. Münster: Waxmann.Search in Google Scholar

Torop, Peeter. 2005. Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 159–170.10.12697/SSS.2005.33.1.06Search in Google Scholar

Watzlawick, Paul J., Helmick Beavin & Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of communication. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-7-18
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2017-0083/html
Scroll to top button