Risk and reliability assessment in chemical process industries using Bayesian methods

References

Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document (Volume III)-Chapter 1, Appendix A, PRA Key Assumptions and Ground Rules, Electric Power Research Institute, Inc., USA, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Agena Ltd. AgenaRisk software package, 2007. http://www.AgenaRisk.com.Search in Google Scholar

Almond RG. An extended example for testing graphical belief. Technical Report 6, Statistical Sciences, Inc., 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson-Cook C. Opportunities and issues in multiple data type meta-analyses. Qual Eng 2009; 21: 241–253.10.1080/08982110903022533Search in Google Scholar

Anderson-Cook CM, Graves T, Hengartner N, Klamann R, Wiedlea ACK, Wilson AG, Anderson G, Lopez G. Reliability modelling using both system test and quality assurance data. Military Oper Res 2008; 13: 5–18.10.5711/morj.13.3.5Search in Google Scholar

Apeland S, Aven T, Nilsen T. Quantifying uncertainty under a predictive, epistemic approach to risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2002; 75: 93–102.10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00122-3Search in Google Scholar

Arroyo G, Sucar L, Villavicencio A. Probabilistic temporal reasoning and its application to fossil power plant operation. Expert Syst Appl 1998; 15: 317–324.10.1016/S0957-4174(98)00038-4Search in Google Scholar

Atwood CL, Gentillon CD. Bayesian treatment of uncertainty in classifying data: two case studies. In: Proceedings of the ESREL ‘96/PSAM-III International Conference on Probability Safety Assessment and Management, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Atwood CL, Kelly DL. The binomial failure rate common-cause model with WinBUGS. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009; 94: 990–999.10.1016/j.ress.2008.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Aven T. Foundations of risk analysis – a knowledge and decision-oriented perspective. Chichester, England: Wiley, 2003.10.1002/0470871245Search in Google Scholar

Aven T, Kvaløy JT. Implementing the Bayesian paradigm in risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2002; 78: 195–201.10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00161-8Search in Google Scholar

Bearfield G, Marsh W. Generalising event trees using Bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 2005; 3688: 52–66.10.1007/11563228_5Search in Google Scholar

Berger JO. Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, 2nd ed., New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2Search in Google Scholar

Berry DA. Statistics: a Bayesian perspective. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Bier VM. Statistical methods for the use of accident precursor data in estimating the frequency of rare events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1993; 41: 267–280.10.1016/0951-8320(93)90079-ESearch in Google Scholar

Bier VM, Yi W. The performance of precursor-based estimators for rare event frequencies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1995a; 50: 241–251.10.1016/0951-8320(95)00097-6Search in Google Scholar

Bier VM, Yi W. A Bayesian method for analyzing dependencies in precursor data. Int J Forecast 1995b; 11: 25–41.10.1016/0169-2070(94)02011-DSearch in Google Scholar

Bobbio A, Portinale L, Minichino M, Ciancamerla E. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2001; 71: 249–260.10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00077-6Search in Google Scholar

Boudali H, Dugan JB. A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2005; 87: 337–349.10.1016/j.ress.2004.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Boudali H, Dugan JB. A continuous-time Bayesian network reliability modeling, and analysis framework. IEEE Trans Reliab 2006; 55: 86–97.10.1109/TR.2005.859228Search in Google Scholar

Bouissou M, Martin F, Ourghanlian A. Assessment of a safety critical system including software: a Bayesian belief network for evidence sources. In: Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS’99), Washington, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Boyen X, Koller D. Tractable for complex stochastic processes. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI), Madison, Wisconsin, 1998: 33–42.Search in Google Scholar

Bucci P, Kirschenbaum J, Mangan LA, Aldemir T, Smith C, Wood T. Construction of event-tree/fault-tree models from a Markov approach to dynamic system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008; 93: 1616–1627.10.1016/j.ress.2008.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Bunea C, Charitos T, Cooke RM, Becker G. Two-stage Bayesian models – application to ZEDB project. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2005; 90: 123–130.10.1016/j.ress.2004.10.016Search in Google Scholar

Cai B, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Fan Q, Liu Z, Tian X. A dynamic Bayesian networks modeling of human factors on offshore blowouts. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2013; 26: 639–649.10.1016/j.jlp.2013.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Casella G. Illustrating empirical Bayes methods. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 1992; 16: 107–125.10.1016/0169-7439(92)80050-ESearch in Google Scholar

Chiacchio F, Compagno L, D’Urso D, Manno G, Trapani N. Dynamic fault trees resolution: a conscious trade-off between analytical and simulative approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96: 1515–1526.10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.014Search in Google Scholar

Chib S, Greenberg E. Hierarchical analysis of SUR models with extensions to correlated serial errors and time-varying parameter models. J Economet 1995; 68: 339–360.10.1016/0304-4076(94)01653-HSearch in Google Scholar

Cooke R, Goossens L. The accident sequence precursor methodology for the European Post-Seveso era. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1990; 27: 117–130.10.1016/0951-8320(90)90035-LSearch in Google Scholar

Crowl DA, Louvar JF. Chemical process safety: fundamentals with application. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Droguett EL, Groen F, Mosleh A. The combined use of data and expert estimates in population variability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2004; 83: 311–321.10.1016/j.ress.2003.10.007Search in Google Scholar

Duan R, Zhou H. A new fault diagnosis method based on fault tree and Bayesian networks. Energy Procedia 2012; 17: 1376–1382.10.1016/j.egypro.2012.02.255Search in Google Scholar

Eckerman I. The Bhopal saga: causes and consequences of the world’s largest industrial disaster. India: Universities Press (India), 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Ferdous R, Khan FI, Veitch B, Amyotte PR. Methodology for computer-aided fault tree analysis. Process Saf Environ Protect 2007; 85: 70–80.10.1205/psep06002Search in Google Scholar

Ferdous R, Khan F, Veitch B, Amyotte PR. Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis. Process Saf Environ Protect 2009; 87: 217–226.10.1016/j.psep.2009.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Ferson S. Bayesian methods in risk assessment. Unpublished Report prepared for the Bureau de Recherches Geologiqueset Minieres (BRGM), New York, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995.10.1201/9780429258411Search in Google Scholar

Graves TL, Hamada MS, Klamann SR, Koehler AC, Martz HF. A fully Bayesian approach for combining multi-level information in multi-state fault tree quantification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2007; 92: 1476–1483.10.1016/j.ress.2006.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Data with Data Tables. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Guide to the Collection and Representation of Electronic, Sensing Component, and Mechanical Equipment Reliability Data for Nuclear Generating Stations. IEEE Standard 500-1984. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Guikema SD. Formulating informative, data-based priors for failure probability estimation in reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2007; 92: 490–502.10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Guo J, Wilson AG. Bayesian Methods for Estimating the Reliability of Complex Systems Using Heterogeneous Multilevel Information. Iowa State University Department of Statistics, Technical Report 2010-10, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Hamada M, Martz HF, Reese CS, Graves T, Johnson V, Wilson AG. A fully Bayesian approach for combining multilevel failure information in fault tree quantification and optimal follow-on resource allocation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2004; 86: 297–305.10.1016/j.ress.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Hamada MS, Wilson AG, Reese C, Martz MF. Bayesian reliability. New York: Springer, 2008.10.1007/978-0-387-77950-8Search in Google Scholar

Hofer E. On two-stage Bayesian modeling of initiating event frequencies and failure rates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1999; 66: 97–99.10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00016-2Search in Google Scholar

Hu J, Zhang L, Ma L, Liang W. An integrated method for safety pre-warning of complex system. Saf Sci 2010; 48: 580–597.10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Jackson C, Mosleh A. Bayesian inference with overlapping data for systems with continuous life metrics. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2012; 106: 217–231.10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes ET, Bretthorst GL. Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511790423Search in Google Scholar

Jensen FV. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. New York, NY: Springer, 2001.10.1007/978-1-4757-3502-4Search in Google Scholar

Jiang X, Yuan Y, Liu X. Bayesian inference method for stochastic damage accumulation modeling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013; 111: 126–138.10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.006Search in Google Scholar

Johnson V, Graves T, Hamada M, Reese CS. In: Bernardo JM, Bayarri MJ, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Heckerman D, Smith AFM, West M, editors. A Hierarchical model for estimating the reliability of complex systems, Bayesian Statistics 7. London: Oxford University Press, 2003: 199–213.Search in Google Scholar

Jones B, Jenkinson I, Yang Z, Wang J. The use of Bayesian network modelling for maintenance planning in a manufacturing industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2010; 95: 267–277.10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.007Search in Google Scholar

Kafka P. Probabilistic safety assessment: quantitative process to balance design, manufacturing and operation for safety of plant structures and systems. Nucl Eng Des 1996; 165: 333–350.10.1016/0029-5493(96)01207-1Search in Google Scholar

Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K. Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2009; 22: 600–606.10.1016/j.jlp.2009.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K. Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach. Process Saf Environ Protect 2010; 88: 191–199.10.1016/j.psep.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan S. The two-stage Poisson-type problem in probabilistic risk analysis. Risk Anal 1985; 5: 227–230.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00173.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kelly DL, Smith CL. Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment – the current state of the art. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009; 94: 628–643.10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96: 925–932.10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013a; 109: 5–17.10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.009Search in Google Scholar

Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Protect 2013b; 91: 46–53.10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005Search in Google Scholar

Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Saf Sci 2013c; 57: 108–117.10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022Search in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. J Loss Prev Process Ind 1998; 11: 261–277.10.1016/S0950-4230(97)00051-XSearch in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Analytical simulation and PROFAT II: a new methodology and a computer automated tool for fault tree analysis in chemical process industries. J Hazard Mater 2000; 75: 1–27.10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00169-2Search in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using ORA procedure. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2001; 14: 43–59.10.1016/S0950-4230(00)00006-1Search in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Abbasi SA. A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2002; 15: 467–475.10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00050-5Search in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Iqbal A, Ramesh N, Abbasi SA. SCAP: a new methodology for safety management based on feedback from credible accident-probabilistic fault tree analysis system. J Hazard Mater 2001; 87: 23–56.10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00276-XSearch in Google Scholar

Khan FI, Husain T, Abbasi SA. Design and evaluation of safety measures using a newly proposed methodology “SCAP”. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2002; 15: 129–146.10.1016/S0950-4230(01)00026-2Search in Google Scholar

Kim MC, Seong PH. A quantitative model of system-man interaction based on discrete function theory. J Korean Nucl Soc 2004; 36: 430–449.Search in Google Scholar

Kim MC, Seong PH. A computational method for probabilistic safety assessment of I&C systems and human operators in nuclear power plants. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; 91: 580–593.10.1016/j.ress.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar

Kirchsteiger C. Impact of accident precursors on risk estimates from accident databases. J Loss Prev Process Ind 1997; 10: 159–167.10.1016/S0950-4230(96)00047-2Search in Google Scholar

Kjaerulff UB, Madsen AL. Bayesian networks and influence diagrams. New York: Springer, 2008.10.1007/978-0-387-74101-7Search in Google Scholar

Kleindorfer P, Oktem UG, Pariyani A, Seider WD. Assessment of catastrophe risk and potential losses in industry. Comput Chem Eng 2012; 47: 85–96.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.033Search in Google Scholar

Knegtering B, Pasman H. The safety barometer: how safe is my plant today? Is instantaneously measuring safety level utopia or realizable? J Loss Prev Process Ind 2013; 26: 821–829.10.1016/j.jlp.2013.02.012Search in Google Scholar

Kujath MF, Amyotte PR, Khan FI. A conceptual offshore oil and gas process accident model. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2010; 23: 323–330.10.1016/j.jlp.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Labeau PE, Smidts C, Swaminathan S. Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2000; 68: 219–254.10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00017-XSearch in Google Scholar

Lahiri P, Park DH. Nonparametric Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of mean residual life at age t. J Stat Plan Infer 1992; 29: 125–136.10.1016/0378-3758(92)90127-ESearch in Google Scholar

Langseth H, Portinale L. Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2007; 92: 92–108.10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.037Search in Google Scholar

Langseth H, Nielsen TD, Rumí R, Salmerón A. Inference in hybrid Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009; 94: 1499–1509.10.1016/j.ress.2009.02.027Search in Google Scholar

Li X, Shi Y, Wei J, Chai J. Empirical Bayes estimators of reliability performances using LINEX loss under progressively type-II censored samples. Math Comput Simul 2007; 73: 320–326.10.1016/j.matcom.2006.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Lindley DV. Introduction to probability and statistics from a Bayesian viewpoint. Part 2: inference. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1965.10.1017/CBO9780511662973Search in Google Scholar

Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 2000: 325–337.10.1023/A:1008929526011Search in Google Scholar

Luo P, Hu Y. System risk evolution analysis and risk critical event identification based on event sequence diagram. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013; 114: 36–44.10.1016/j.ress.2013.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Marquez D, Neil M, Fenton N. Improved reliability modeling using Bayesian networks and dynamic discretization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2010; 95: 412–425.10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.012Search in Google Scholar

Martins MR, Maturana MC. Application of Bayesian belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013; 110: 89–109.10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.008Search in Google Scholar

Martz HF, Almond RG. Using higher-level failure data in fault tree quantification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1997; 56: 29–42.10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00134-2Search in Google Scholar

Martz HF, Hamada MS. Uncertainty in counts and operating time in estimating Poisson occurrence rates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2003; 80: 75–79.10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00267-3Search in Google Scholar

Martz HF, Picard RR. Uncertainty in Poisson event counts and exposure time in rate estimation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1995; 48: 181–190.10.1016/0951-8320(95)00019-XSearch in Google Scholar

Martz HF, Wailer RA. Bayesian reliability analysis of complex series/parallel systems of binomial subsystems and components. Technometrics 1990; 32: 407–416.10.1080/00401706.1990.10484727Search in Google Scholar

Mastran DV. Incorporating component and system test data into the same assessment: a Bayesian approach. Op Res 1976; 24: 491–499.10.1287/opre.24.3.491Search in Google Scholar

Mastran DV, Singpurwalla ND. A method for reliability estimation of logical structures. Eng Fracture Mech 1976; 8: 229–237.10.1016/0013-7944(76)90088-6Search in Google Scholar

Meel A, Seider WD. Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory. Chem Eng Sci 2006; 61: 7036–7056.10.1016/j.ces.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Meel A, Seider WD. Real-time risk analysis of safety systems. Comput Chem Eng 2008; 32: 827–840.10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Meel A, O’Neill LM, Levin JH, Seider WD, Oktem U, Keren N. Operational risk assessment of chemical industries by exploiting accident databases. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2007; 20: 113–127.10.1016/j.jlp.2006.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Montani S, Portinale L, Bobbio A, Codetta-Raiteri D. Radyban: a tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008; 93: 922–932.10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.013Search in Google Scholar

Mosleh A, Bier VM, Apostolakis G. Methods for the Elicitation and Use of Expert Opinion in Risk Assessment: Phase 1–4 Critical Evaluation and Directions for Future Research. NUREG/CR-4962, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy KP. Software packages for graphical models/Bayesian networks, 2004. http://people.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Software/bnsoft.html.Search in Google Scholar

Neil M, Marquez D. Availability modelling of repairable systems using Bayesian networks. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2012; 25: 698–704.10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Neil M, Tailor M, Marquez D, Fenton N, Hearty P. Modelling dependable systems using hybrid Bayesian networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008; 93: 933–939.10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Offshore Reliability Data Handbook, OREDA-97, SINTEF Industrial Management, Norway, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Oktem UG, Wong R, Oktem C. Risk and regulation [Special Issue on Close Calls, Near-Misses and Early Warnings]. LSE Publication, 12-13, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver RM, Yang HJ. Bayesian updating of event tree parameters to predict high risk incidents. In: Oliver RM, Smith JQ, editors. Influence Diagrams, Diagrams, Belief Nets and Decision Analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Papazoglou IA, Nivolianitou Z, Aneziris O, Christou M. Probabilistic safety analysis in chemical installations. J Loss Prev Process Ind 1992; 5: 181–191.10.1016/0950-4230(92)80022-ZSearch in Google Scholar

Pariyani A, Seider WD, Oktem UG, Soroush M. Improving process safety and product quality using large databases. In 20th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering (ESCAPE), 2010.10.1016/S1570-7946(10)28030-6Search in Google Scholar

Pariyani A, Seider WD, Oktem UG, Soroush M. Dynamic risk analysis using alarm databases to improve process safety and product quality: part I – data compaction. AIChE J 2012a; 58: 812–825.10.1002/aic.12643Search in Google Scholar

Pariyani A, Seider WD, Oktem UG, Soroush M. Dynamic risk analysis using alarm databases to improve process safety and product quality: part II – Bayesian analysis. AIChE J 2012b; 58: 826–841.10.1002/aic.12642Search in Google Scholar

Pasman HJ, Rogers WJ. Risk assessment by means of Bayesian networks: a comparative study of compressed and liquefied H2 transportation and tank station risks. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012; 37: 17415–17425.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.051Search in Google Scholar

Pasman H, Rogers W. Bayesian networks make LOPA more effective, QRA more transparent and flexible, and thus safety more definable! J Loss Prev Process Ind 2013; 26: 434–442.10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.016Search in Google Scholar

Pasman HJ, Jung S, Prem K, Rogers WJ, Yang X. Is risk analysis a useful tool for improving process safety? J Loss Prev Process Ind 2009; 22: 769–777.10.1016/j.jlp.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Pearl J. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Peng X, Yan Z. Estimation and application for a new extended Weibull distribution. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2014; 121: 34–42.10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Peng W, Huang H, Xie M, Yang Y, Liu Y. A Bayesian approach for system reliability analysis with multilevel pass-fail, lifetime and degradation data sets. IEEE Trans Reliab 2013; 62: 689–699.10.1109/TR.2013.2270424Search in Google Scholar

Phimister JR, Oktem UG, Kleindorfer P, Kunrether H. Near-miss incident management in the chemical process industry. Risk Anal 2003; 23: 445–459.10.1111/1539-6924.00326Search in Google Scholar

Pörn K. On empirical Bayesian inference applied to Poisson probability models. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Linköping. Dissertation no. 234, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Pulkkinen U, Simola K. Bayesian models and ageing indicators for analysing random changes in failure occurrence. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2000; 68: 255–268.10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00020-XSearch in Google Scholar

Quigley J, Walls L. Mixing Bayes and empirical Bayes inference to anticipate the realization of engineering concerns about variant system designs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96: 933–941.10.1016/j.ress.2011.02.011Search in Google Scholar

Quigley J, Hardman G, Bedford T, Walls L. Merging expert and empirical data for rare event frequency estimation: pool homogenisation for empirical Bayes models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96: 687–695.10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Rathnayaka S, Khan F, Amyotte P. SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: methodology and model description. Process Saf Environ Protect 2011a; 89: 151–164.10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002Search in Google Scholar

Rathnayaka S, Khan F, Amyotte P. SHIPP methodology: predictive accident modeling approach. Part II: validation with case study. Process Saf Environ Protect 2011b; 89: 75–88.10.1016/j.psep.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Rathnayaka S, Khan F, Amyotte P. Accident modeling approach for safety assessment in an LNG processing facility. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2012; 25: 414–423.10.1016/j.jlp.2011.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Reese CS, Wilson AG, Guo JQ, Hamada MS, Johnson VE. A Bayesian model for integrating multiple sources of lifetime information in system-reliability assessments. J Qual Technol 2011; 43: 127–141.10.1080/00224065.2011.11917851Search in Google Scholar

Robert CP. The Bayesian choice. New York: Springer, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Røed W, Aven T. Bayesian approaches for detecting significant deterioration. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009; 94: 604–610.10.1016/j.ress.2008.06.017Search in Google Scholar

Saleh JH, Saltmarsh EA, Favarò FM, Brevault L. Accident precursors, near misses, and warning signs: critical review and formal definitions within the framework of discrete event systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013; 114: 148–154.10.1016/j.ress.2013.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Sarhan A. Bayes estimation of the general hazard rate model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1999; 66: 85–91.10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00009-5Search in Google Scholar

Sarhan AM. Reliability estimations of components from masked system life data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2001; 74: 107–113.10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00072-2Search in Google Scholar

Sarhan A. Non-parametric empirical Bayes procedure. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2003; 80: 115–122.10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00003-6Search in Google Scholar

Shi Y, Shi X, Xu Y. Approximate confidence limits of reliability performances for cold standby series system. J Appl Math Comput 2005; 19: 439–445.10.1007/BF02935817Search in Google Scholar

Simon C, Weber P. Imprecise reliability by evidential networks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 2009a; 223: 119–131.10.1243/1748006XJRR190Search in Google Scholar

Simon C, Weber P. Evidential networks for reliability analysis and performance evaluation of systems with imprecise knowledge. IEEE Trans Reliab 2009b; 58: 69–87.10.1109/TR.2008.2011868Search in Google Scholar

Simon C, Weber P, Evsukoff A. Bayesian networks inference algorithm to implement Dempster Shafer theory in reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2008; 93: 950–963.10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.012Search in Google Scholar

Siu N, Apostolakis G. Modeling the detection rates of fires in nuclear power plants: development and application of a methodology for treating imprecise evidence. Risk Anal 1986; 6: 43–59.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00193.xSearch in Google Scholar

Siu NO, Kelly DL. Bayesian parameter estimation in probabilistic risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1998; 62: 89–116.10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00159-2Search in Google Scholar

Soliman AA. Reliability estimation in a generalized life-model with application to the Burr-XII. IEEE Trans Reliab 2002; 51: 337–343.10.1109/TR.2002.801855Search in Google Scholar

Swaminathan S, Smidts C. Identification of missing scenarios in ESDs using probabilistic dynamics. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 1999; 66: 275–279.10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00024-1Search in Google Scholar

T-book reliability data of components in Nordic nuclear power plants. Vattenfall AB, S-162, Vallingby, Sweden: ATV Office, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Tan Z, Xi W. Bayesian analysis with consideration of data uncertainty in a specific scenario. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2003; 79: 17–31.10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00163-1Search in Google Scholar

Tan Q, Chen G, Zhang L, Fu J, Li Z. Dynamic accident modeling for high-sulfur natural gas gathering station. Process Saf Environ Protect. ISSN 0957-5820, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.03.004. Available online April 10, 2013.10.1016/j.psep.2013.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Targoutzidis A. The effectiveness of Bayesian updating in dynamic and complex systems. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2010; 23: 492–497.10.1016/j.jlp.2010.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Torres-Toledano JG, Sucar LE. Bayesian networks for reliability analysis of complex systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th Ibero-American conference on AI (IBERAMIA 98). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. vol. 1484. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1998: 195–206.Search in Google Scholar

Troffaes MCM, Walter G, Kelly D. A robust Bayesian approach to modeling epistemic uncertainty in common-cause failure models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2014; 125: 13–21. ISSN 0951-8320, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.022.10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.022Search in Google Scholar

Vaurio JK. On analytic empirical Bayes estimation of failure rates. Risk Anal 1987; 7: 329–338.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00468.xSearch in Google Scholar

Vaurio JK. Extensions of the uncertainty quantification of common cause failure rates. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2002; 78: 63–69.10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00110-2Search in Google Scholar

Vaurio JK. Uncertainties and quantification of common cause failure rates and probabilities for system analyses. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2005; 90: 186–195.10.1016/j.ress.2004.10.014Search in Google Scholar

Vaurio JK, Jänkälä KE. Evaluation and comparison of estimation methods for failure rates and probabilities. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; 91: 209–221.10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.001Search in Google Scholar

Vose, D. Risk analysis: a quantitative guide. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Weber P, Jouffe L. Complex system reliability modelling with dynamic object oriented Bayesian networks (DOOBN). Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006; 91: 149–162.10.1016/j.ress.2005.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Weber P, Munteanu P, Jouffe L. Dynamic Bayesian networks modelling the dependability of systems with degradations and exogenous constraints. In: Proceedings of the 11th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing (INCOM’04). Salvador-Bahia, Brazil, April 5–7, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

Weber P, Medina-Oliva G, Simon C, Iung B. Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2012; 25: 671–682.10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Wilson AG, Graves TL, Hamada MS, Reese CS. Advances in data combination, analysis and collection for system reliability assessment. Stat Sci 2006; 21: 514–531.10.1214/088342306000000439Search in Google Scholar

Wilson AG, Anderson-Cook CM, Huzurbazar AV. A case study for quantifying system reliability and uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2011; 96: 1076–1084.10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.012Search in Google Scholar

Yang M, Khan FI, Lye L. Precursor-based hierarchical Bayesian approach for rare event frequency estimation: a case of oil spill accidents. Process Saf Environ Protect 2013; 91: 333–342.10.1016/j.psep.2012.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Zheng X, Liu M. An overview of accident forecasting methodologies. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2009; 22: 484–491.10.1016/j.jlp.2009.03.005Search in Google Scholar