Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 16, 2023

A Comparative Study of the Performance of Handmade Papers Used for Mounting in China, Korea, and Japan

Eine vergleichende Studie der Eigenschaften von handgeschöpften Papieren für die Montierungen von Malerei und Kalligrafie auf Papier in China, Korea und Japan
  • Dongyoung Yoo ORCID logo , Chengquan Qiao ORCID logo and Decai Gong EMAIL logo

Abstract

The properties of handmade paper used for mounting and conservation of paintings and calligraphy on paper is crucial to the quality and lifespan of such objects. Mounting papers from China, Korea, and Japan vary greatly in performance due to different papermaking methods and fibre materials. In this study, eight types of handmade paper widely used in China, Korea, and Japan were selected for comprehensive comparative analysis investigating their pH as well as optical, mechanical, and ageing properties. The study showed that traditional hanji, improved hanji, and thin Mino paper made of pure kozo fibres performed best in terms of mechanical properties. Among the additives mixed with kozo fibres, clam shell powder was identified as a substance that improves pH and stability of optical properties. Xuan paper Mianliao was found to be a suitable material for mounting hand scrolls and hanging scrolls due to its softness and ageing properties. Traditional hanji, improved hanji, and thin Mino paper are less flexible than xuan paper Mianliao and are considered more suitable for uses other than for mounting scrolls. This study will provide a reference for improving the quality of handmade paper and a theoretical basis for the selection of such papers for the conservation of paintings and calligraphy on paper.

Zusammenfassung

Die Eigenschaften von handgeschöpften Papieren, die für die Montierung und Restaurierung von Malerei und Kalligrafie auf Papier verwendet werden, sind entscheidend für die Qualität und Erhaltung solcher Objekte. Papiere aus China, Korea und Japan weisen aufgrund ihrer unterschiedlichen Herstellungsmethoden und Rohmaterialien große Unterschiede in ihren Eigenschaften auf. In dieser Studie wurden acht unterschiedliche handgeschöpfte Papiere, die in China, Korea und Japan viel Verwendung finden, für eine umfassende vergleichende Analyse ausgewählt, bei der ihr pH-Wert sowie ihre optischen, mechanischen und Alterungseigenschaften untersucht wurden. Die Studie zeigte, dass traditionelles Hanji, verbessertes Hanji und dünnes Mino-Papier aus reinen Kozo-Fasern hinsichtlich ihrer mechanischen Eigenschaften am besten abschnitten. Unter den Zusatzstoffen, die mit Kozo-Fasern gemischt werden, wurde Muschelschalenpulver als eine Substanz identifiziert, die den pH-Wert und die Stabilität der optischen Eigenschaften verbessert. Xuan-Papier Mianliao erwies sich aufgrund seiner Weichheit und seiner Alterungseigenschaften als geeignetes Material für die Montierung von Handrollen und hängenden Schriftrollen. Traditionelles Hanji, verbessertes Hanji und dünnes Mino-Papier sind weniger flexibel als Xuan-Papier Mianliao und eignen sich eher für andere Verwendungszwecke. Diese Studie liefert eine Referenz für die Verbesserung der Qualität von handgeschöpftem Papier und eine theoretische Grundlage für die Auswahl solcher Papiere für die Restaurierung von Malereien und Kalligrafien auf Papier.


Corresponding author: Decai Gong, Department of Science and Technology History and Archaeology, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, China, E-mail:

References

Fan, H.-M., F.-Y. Li, Y.-F. Liao, D.-L. Zeng, G. Ge, and J.-A. Liu. 2023. “Research on the Durability of Cultural Paper Based on the National Test Standard of Dry Heat/Wet Heat Aging Process.” China Pulp and Paper 42 (1): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2023.01.009.Search in Google Scholar

Gong, L., J.-P. Zhang, X.-L. Chen, W.-J. He, and Q. Chen. 2018. Guidelines for the Restoration of Chinese Painting and Calligraphy. Nanjing: Yilin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, K.-T. 2006. The Structure of Paper Sheets and Its Properties. Beijing: China Light Industry Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ilvessalo-Pfäffli, M.-S. 1995. Fiber Atlas: Identification of Papermaking Fibers. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-662-07212-7Search in Google Scholar

Kim, M. N., J. W. Kim, N. H. Son, and S. W. Jeong. 2021. “Proposal of the Measurement Conditions for Hanji–Determination Folding Endurance.” Journal of Conservation Science 37 (6): 659–700. https://doi.org/10.12654/JCS.2021.37.6.08.Search in Google Scholar

Li, L. 2008. “An Analysis of the Propagation Route of Buddhism to Goguryeo.” Social Science Front 11: 124–6.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Y.-H., H.-B. Liu, J.-S. Tao, and J.-G. Li. 2014. “Research Progress of Paper Tensile Strength Models.” China Pulp and Paper 33 (1): 65–9. https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2014.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, J.-Z. 2015. Conservation Methods and Principles for Ancient Chinese Books. Beijing: National Library Press.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, J.-A., Y.-L. Zhang, H.-H. Wang, Z.-Y. Zhou, Y.-F. Liao, and H.-M. Fan. 2021. “Research on the Suit-able pH Value Range for Paper Document Preservation.” China Pulp and Paper 40 (4): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2021.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Min, H.-X. 2020. “Performance Analysis and Best Select of Xuan Paper Commonly Used in the Restoration of Chinese Calligraphy and Painting.” Collection and Investment 11 (9): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.19897/j.cnki.scytz.2020.09.011.Search in Google Scholar

Ming, X.-G., and X. Mu. 2020. “Selection of Paper for Archives Restoration.” Shandong Archives 239 (6): 36–8.Search in Google Scholar

Park, C. 2006. “Korean Traditional Mounting (Janghwang).” Journal of the Institute of Conservation 30 (1): 115–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03094227.2006.9638438.Search in Google Scholar

Paulsson, M., and A. J. Ragauskas. 1998. “Chemical Modification of Lignin-Rich Paper. Part 9, Effect of Dry Heat and Moist Heat on the Accelerated Yellowing of Untreated and Acetylated High-Yield Pulps.” Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal 13 (3): 191–7. https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-1998-13-03-p191-197.Search in Google Scholar

Takemitsu, O. 1985. “Kakemono: THE Japanese Hanging Scroll.” China Pulp and Paper 9 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03094227.1985.9638465.Search in Google Scholar

Tian, Z.-L., Z.-P. Yan, S.-S. Ren, X.-H. Yi, K. Long, and M. Zhang. 2017. “Research on the Dry Heat Ageing Resistant Properties of Different Papers.” China Pulp and Paper 36 (3): 42–7. https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2017.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

van Gulik, R. 2020. Chinese Pictorial Art as Viewed by the Connoisseur: Notes on the Means and Methods of Traditional Chinese Connoisseurship of Pictorial Art, Based upon a Study of the Art of Mounting Scrolls in China and Japan. Translated by Xiao-shi Wan. Changsha: Hunan art Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J. 1999. Papermaking Raw Materials of China. An Atlas of Micrographs and the Characteristics of Fibres. China: China Light Industry Press Beijing.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, W.-J., L.-M. Wu, C.-Z. Yi, and G. Chen. 2016. “Studies on Xuan Paper for Restoration of Chinese Painting and Calligraphy.” Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology 28 (1): 33–7. https://doi.org/10.16334/j.cnki.cn31-1652/k.2016.01.005.Search in Google Scholar

Yao, J.-J., R.-H. Zhang, J.-F. Xiao, C. Luo, H. Huang, Y. Yan, B. Ning, and Y. Tang. 2021. “Study on the Durability of Kaihua Handmade Paper.” Paper Science and Technology 40 (5): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.19696/j.issn1671-4571.2021.5.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, M. 2013. “Comparative Study on the Origin and Development of Repair Manual Paper in China, Japan and South Korea.” Archives Science Study 27 (3): 55–9, https://doi.org/10.16065/j.cnki.issn1002-1620.2013.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, N., D.-Q. Zheng, W.-J. He, and M. Hai-Xia. 2019. “Study on the Properties of Restoration Paper Used in Suzhou Style Mounting.” China Pulp and Paper 38 (10): 79–84. https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2019.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-25
Accepted: 2023-08-10
Published Online: 2023-11-16
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/res-2023-0010/html
Scroll to top button