Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (O) February 13, 2024

An LSC approach for tritium determination in gaseous mixtures optimized with respect to handling, reaction parameters and miniaturization towards microfluidic analysis

  • Alexandra Becker ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Holger Lippold ORCID logo , Jantje Pauline Bäcker , Detlev Belder ORCID logo and Cornelius Fischer ORCID logo
From the journal Radiochimica Acta

Abstract

The handling and analysis of gaseous tritium is of interest for hydrogen isotope separation experiments. In this work, we present an easy-to-handle setup for catalytic oxidation to HTO, recovering all of the initially dosed gaseous tritium as determined by LSC, using CuO as a catalyst at a reaction temperature of 900 °C. Aiming to reduce cocktail waste, the LSC determination was downscaled to a microfluidic setup. The performance was evaluated based on the counting efficiency, which was shown to decrease significantly, as the sample volume was reduced to µl amounts, while no changes were observed over a wide range of sample-to-cocktail ratios.


Corresponding author: Alexandra Becker, Department of Reactive Transport, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Resource Ecology, Research Site Leipzig, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Award Identifier / Grant number: 443871192 – GRK 2721 “Hydrogen Isotopes 1,2,3H"

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Jürgen Wendel and Stefan Welte (Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe, Germany) for helping with their expertise in handling gaseous tritium.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: A. B., H. L. and C. F. wrote the manuscript. A. B. conducted the experiments. J. P. B. designed the microfluidic setup. C. F. and D. B. conceptualized the methodology and supervised the investigations. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This project is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – Project-ID 443871192 – GRK 2721 “Hydrogen Isotopes 1,2,3H”.

  5. Data availability: The research data associated with this publication is available upon request in the RODARE repository under the DOI 10.14278/rodare.2671.

References

1. Santschi, P. H., Hoehn, E., Lueck, A., Farrenkothen, K. Tritium as a Tracer for the Movement of Surface Water and Groundwater in the Glatt Valley, Switzerland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 21, 909; https://doi.org/10.1021/es00163a010.Search in Google Scholar

2. Terzer-Wassmuth, S., Araguas-Araguas, L. J., Copia, L., Wassenaar, L. I. High Spatial Resolution Prediction of Tritium ((3)H) in Contemporary Global Precipitation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10271; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14227-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Morgenstern, U., Stewart, M. K., Stenger, R. Dating of Streamwater Using Tritium in a Post Nuclear Bomb Pulse World: Continuous Variation of Mean Transit Time with Streamflow. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 2289; https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2289-2010.Search in Google Scholar

4. Schlosser, P., Stute, M., Dörr, H., Sonntag, C., Münnich, K. O. Tritium/3He Dating of Shallow Groundwater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1988, 89, 353; https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(88)90122-7.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kovari, M., Coleman, M., Christescu, I., Smith, R. Tritium Resources Available for Fusion Reactors. Nucl. Fusion 2018, 58, 026010; https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa9d25.Search in Google Scholar

6. Fliege, A., Ed. Tritium, KfK 5055; Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH: Karlsruhe, 1992; pp. 84–86.Search in Google Scholar

7. Saljoughian, M., Williams, P. G. Recent Developments in Tritium Incorporation for Radiotracer Studies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000, 6, 1029; https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612003399969.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Edao, Y., Iwai, Y., Sato, K., Hayashi, T. Performance of Tritium Analysis System Using Inorganic-Based Hydrophobic Platinum Catalyst. Fusion Eng. Des. 2017, 124, 818; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.116.Search in Google Scholar

9. Nishikawa, M., Takeishi, T., Munakata, K., Kotoh, K., Enoeda, M. Oxidation of Tritium in Packed Bed of Noble Metal Catalyst for Detritiation from System Gases. J. Nucl. Mater. 1985, 135, 1; https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3115(85)90431-3.Search in Google Scholar

10. Cohen, A. E., Nobe, K. Catalytic Combustion of Carbon Monoxide on Copper Oxide. Effect of Water Vapor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1966, 5, 214; https://doi.org/10.1021/i260019a002.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kawabata, H., Yanagi, T., Tabuchi, T., Shinagawa, M. Fundamental Study on Decontamination of Tritium from Gaseous Phases by Copper Oxide. Radioisotopes 1979, 28, 542; https://doi.org/10.3769/radioisotopes.28.9_542.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Whitesides, G. M. The Origins and Future of Microfluidics. Nature 2006, 442, 368; https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05058.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Shrimal, P., Jadeja, G., Patel, S. A Review in Novel Methodologies for Drug Nanoparticle Preparation: Microfluidic Approach. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2020, 153, 728; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.11.031.Search in Google Scholar

14. Haeberle, S., Zengerle, R. Microfluidic Platforms for Lab-on-a-Chip Applications. Lab Chip 2007, 7, 1094; https://doi.org/10.1039/b706364b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Wang, T., Yu, C., Xie, X. Microfluidics for Environmental Applications. Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. 2022, 179, 267; https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2020_128.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Hong, J. W., Quake, S. R. Integrated Nanoliter Systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1179; https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt871.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Yogarah, N., Tsai, S. S. H. Detection of Trace Arsenic in Drinking Water: Challenges and Opportunities for Microfluidics. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1, 426; https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ew00099h.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gao, Z. X., Li, H. F., Liu, J., Lin, J. M. A Simple Microfluidic Chlorine Gas Sensor Based on Gas-Liquid Chemiluminescence of Luminol-Chlorine System. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 622, 143; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.05.067.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Ohira, S., Toda, K. Micro Gas Analysis System for Measurement of Atmospheric Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide. Lab Chip 2005, 5, 1374; https://doi.org/10.1039/b511281h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Yew, M., Ren, Y., Koh, K. S., Sun, C., Snape, C. A Review of State-of-the-Art Microfluidic Technologies for Environmental Applications: Detection and Remediation. Global Challenges 2019, 3, 1800060; https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Niculescu, A. G., Chircov, C., Birca, A. C., Grumezescu, A. M. Fabrication and Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.\ 2021, 22, 2011; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2023-11-29
Accepted: 2024-01-05
Published Online: 2024-02-13
Published in Print: 2024-04-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2023-0262/html
Scroll to top button