Abstract
This paper investigates the interplay of constructed action and the clause in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). Constructed action is a form of gestural enactment in which the signers use their hands, face and other parts of the body to represent the actions, thoughts or feelings of someone they are referring to in the discourse. With the help of frequencies calculated from corpus data, this article shows firstly that when FinSL signers are narrating a story, there are differences in how they use constructed action. Then the paper argues that there are differences also in the prototypical structure, linkage type and non-manual activity of clauses, depending on the presence or non-presence of constructed action. Finally, taking the view that gesturality is an integral part of language, the paper discusses the nature of syntax in sign languages and proposes a conceptualization in which syntax is seen as a set of norms distributed on a continuum between a categorial-conventional end and a gradient-unconventional end.
References
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith, Martine Zwets. 2013. Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 55. 119-139.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith, Zed Sevcikova Sehyr. 2015a. Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18. 167-204.10.1075/sll.18.2.01corSearch in Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Jordan Fenlon, Adam Schembri. 2015b. Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics 1. 684-707.10.1515/opli-2015-0025Search in Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Han Sloetjes, Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In: Crasborn, Onno, Eleni Efthimiou, Thomas Hanke, Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd, Inge Zwitserlood (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora, 1 June, Marrakech, Marocco. Paris: ELRA 2008. 39-43.Search in Google Scholar
Cuxac, Christian. 2000. La Langue des Signes Française. Les Voies de l’Iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., A. Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. Introduction. In: Dixon, R. M. W., A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, 1-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In: Dixon, R. M. W., A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1-48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. S. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and Basic Linguistic Theory. In: Ameka, F. K. Ameka, A. Dench, N. Evans (eds.), Catching Language: Issues in Grammar Writing, 207-234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1999. Do signers gesture? In: Messing, Lynn S., Ruth Campbell (eds.), Gesture, speech and sign, 133-159. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524519.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511576737Search in Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay, Trevor Johnston. 2014. Elaborating who’s what: A study of constructed action and clause structure in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34. 193-215.10.1080/07268602.2014.887405Search in Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2008 How complex are isolating languages? In: Miestamo, Matti, Kaius Sinnemäki, Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change, 109-131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.94.08gilSearch in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007a. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11. 119-132.10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007b. Coordination. In: Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions, 1-51. Volume 2. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001Search in Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86. 663-687.10.1353/lan.2010.0021Search in Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle. 2013. Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). PhD thesis. Sydney: Macquarie University, Australia.Search in Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle, Lindsay Ferrara. Showing the story: Enactment as performance in Auslan narratives. In: Gawne, L., J. Vaughan (eds.), Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Melbourne: University of Melbourne 2013. 372-397.Search in Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle, Trevor Johnston. 2014. Points, depictions, gestures and enactment: Partly lexical and non-lexical signs as core elements of single clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). Pre-publication manuscript.10.1080/07268602.2014.887408Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2008. Fixed and free: Order of the verbal predicate and its core arguments in declarative transitive clauses in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21. 83-123.Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2009. Tavu ja lause: tutkimuksia kahden sekventiaalisen perusyksikön olemuksesta suomalaisessa viittomakielessä (Syllable and sentence: Studies on the nature of two sequential basic units in FinSL). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2010. Suomalaisen viittomakielen pääsanaluokat (The main parts of speech in FinSL). In: Jantunen, Tommi (ed.), Näkökulmia viittomaan ja viittomistoon (Perspectives on sign and lexicon), 57-78. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2013. Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36. 303-332.10.1017/S0332586513000292Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2015a. Gesture in (Finnish) Sign Language. Paper presented at the Language-gesture connection -seminar in the University of Oulu, Finland, October 22, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2015b. How long is the sign? Linguistics 53. 93-124.10.1515/ling-2014-0032Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2016. Clausal coordination in Finnish Sign Language. Studies in Language 40. 204-234.10.1075/sl.40.1.07janSearch in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi. 2017. Elliptical phenomena in Finnish Sign Language. In: van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, in preparation for publication with Oxford University Press, to appear in summer 2017.Search in Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi, Outi Pippuri, Tuija Wainio, Anna Puupponen, Jorma Laaksonen. Annotated video corpus of FinSL with Kinect and computer-vision data. In: Efthimiou, Eleni, Fotinea Stavroula-Evita, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining, 28 May, Portoroz, Slovenia. Paris: ELRA 2016. 93-100.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. 2016. Auslan Corpus annotation guidelines. Macquarie University (Sydney) & La Trobe University (Melbourne). February 2016 version.Search in Google Scholar
Karppa, Matti, Ville Viitaniemi, Marcos Luzardo, Jorma Laaksonen, Tommi Jantunen. SLMotion: An extensible sign language oriented video analysis tool. In: Calzolari, Nicoletta, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), 28-30 May, Reykjavik, Iceland. Paris: ELRA 2014. 1886-1891.Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2008. Some reflections on the relationship between ‘gesture’ and ‘sign’. Gesture 8. 348-366.10.1075/gest.8.3.05kenSearch in Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silwa. 2014. Creating multimodal utterances: The linear integration of gestures into speech. In Müller, Cienki, Fricke, Ladewig, McNeill, Bressem (eds.), Body-Language-Communication, 1662-1677. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110302028.1662Search in Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discource referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K., Melanie Metzger. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30. 657-697.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00061-7Search in Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Search in Google Scholar
Lukasczyk, Ulrika. 2008. SANOTTUA, AJATELTUA JA TEHTYA. Referointi kolmessa suomalaisella viittomakielella tuotetussa fiktiivisessa kertomuksessa (Said, thought, and done: Referencing in three fictive FinSL narratives). MA thesis. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.Search in Google Scholar
Luzardo, Marcos, Ville Viitaniemi, Matti Karppa, Jorma Laaksonen, Tommi Jantunen. Estimating head pose and state of facial elements for sign language video. In: Crasborn, Onno, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel, 31 May, Reykjavik, Iceland. Paris: ELRA 2014. 105-112.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
McNeil, David. 2000. Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62. 56-119.10.1353/lan.1986.0014Search in Google Scholar
Okrent, Arinka. 2002. A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In: Meier, Richar P., Kearsy Cormier, David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009Search in Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1990. The Relation Between Space and Grammar in ASL Verb Morphology. In Lucas, Ceil (ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, 118-132. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet Press.Search in Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna. 2018. The relationship between the movements and positions of the head and the torso in Finnish Sign Language. To appear in Sign Language Studies 18.10.1353/sls.2018.0000Search in Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna, Tommi Jantunen, Ritva Takkinen, Tuija Wainio, Outi Pippuri. Taking non-manuality into account in collecting and analyzing Finnish Sign Language video data. In: Crasborn, Onno, Eleni Efthimiou, Stavroula-Evita Fotinea, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel, 31 May, Reykjavik, Iceland. Paris: ELRA 2014. 143-148.Search in Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna, Tuija Wainio, Birgitta Burger, Tommi Jantunen. 2015. Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data: A study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls. Sign Language & Linguistics 18. 41-89.10.1075/sll.18.1.02puuSearch in Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna, Tommi Jantunen, Johanna Mesch. The alignment of head nods with syntactic units in Finnish Sign Language and Swedish Sign Language. In: Proc. Speech Prosody 2016, 31 May-3 June, Boston, USA. 168-172.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-35Search in Google Scholar
Salonen, Juhana, Ritva Takkinen, Anna Puupponen, Outi Pippuri, Henri Nieminen. Creating the corpus of Finland’s sign languages. In: Efthimiou, Eleni, Fotinea Stavroula-Evita, Thomas Hanke, Julie Hochgesang, Jette Kristoffersen, Johanna Mesch (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining, 28 May, Portoroz, Slovenia. Paris: ELRA 2016. 179-184.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910Search in Google Scholar
Suomalaisen viittomakielen perussanakirja [The basic dictionary of FinSL]. 1998. Helsinki: KL Support Oy.Search in Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610578.001Search in Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Search in Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.176Search in Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam. 2006. Past and current trends in sign language research. Language & Communication 26. 168-192.10.1016/j.langcom.2005.10.004Search in Google Scholar
© 2017
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
