Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter (O) August 11, 2022

Crystal structure of bis(μ2-2-oxido-2-phenylacetato-κ3 O,O′:O′)-bis(N-oxido-benzamide-κ2 O,O′)-bis(propan-2-olato-κ1 O)dititanium(IV), C36H38N2O12Ti2

  • Yu Youzhu ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Wang Hui , Li Leilei , Guo Yuhua , Feng Jing and Li Yichao

Abstract

C36H38N2O12Ti2, monoclinic, P21/n (no. 14), a = 10.3151(7) Å, b = 15.8747(11) Å, c = 11.5020(8) Å, β = 98.471(3)°, V = 1862.9(2) Å3, Z = 2, R gt(F) = 0.0386, wR ref(F 2) = 0.1075, T = 296(2) K.

CCDC no.: 2192008

The molecular structure is shown in the figure. Table 1 contains crystallographic data and Table 2 contains the list of the atoms including atomic coordinates and displacement parameters.

Table 1:

Data collection and handling.

Crystal: Yellowish block
Size: 0.22 × 0.21 × 0.17 mm
Wavelength: Mo Kα radiation (0.71073 Å)
μ: 0.49 mm−1
Diffractometer, scan mode: Bruker APEX-II
θ max, completeness: 28.4°, >99%
N(hkl)measured, N(hkl)unique, R int: 20724, 4653, 0.020
Criterion for I obs, N(hkl)gt: I obs > 2 σ(I obs), 3841
N(param)refined: 241
Programs: Bruker [1, 2], SHELX [3], Diamond [4]
Table 2:

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2).

Atom x y z U iso*/U eq
C1 0.45626 (18) 0.69315 (10) 0.39588 (14) 0.0392 (4)
C2 0.36042 (17) 0.61868 (10) 0.39164 (14) 0.0360 (3)
H2 0.2960 0.6304 0.4442 0.043*
C3 0.28918 (18) 0.60399 (11) 0.26875 (15) 0.0416 (4)
C4 0.1622 (2) 0.63159 (15) 0.2392 (2) 0.0677 (6)
H4 0.1182 0.6562 0.2955 0.081*
C5 0.0997 (3) 0.6221 (2) 0.1228 (3) 0.0995 (11)
H5 0.0150 0.6423 0.1012 0.119*
C6 0.1626 (4) 0.5835 (2) 0.0419 (3) 0.1034 (12)
H6 0.1202 0.5765 −0.0346 0.124*
C7 0.2873 (4) 0.55510 (19) 0.0719 (2) 0.0895 (10)
H7 0.3296 0.5285 0.0160 0.107*
C8 0.3516 (3) 0.56565 (15) 0.18523 (18) 0.0605 (6)
H8 0.4373 0.5467 0.2050 0.073*
C9 0.40037 (17) 0.35817 (10) 0.25850 (15) 0.0381 (4)
C10 0.4490 (2) 0.32279 (11) 0.15463 (17) 0.0464 (4)
C11 0.3691 (3) 0.31484 (14) 0.04697 (18) 0.0609 (6)
H11 0.2827 0.3335 0.0378 0.073*
C12 0.4191 (4) 0.27905 (17) −0.0464 (2) 0.0811 (8)
H12 0.3654 0.2731 −0.1183 0.097*
C13 0.5444 (4) 0.25259 (18) −0.0349 (3) 0.0914 (10)
H13 0.5763 0.2285 −0.0988 0.110*
C14 0.6253 (3) 0.26097 (17) 0.0704 (3) 0.0873 (9)
H14 0.7119 0.2428 0.0779 0.105*
C15 0.5772 (2) 0.29670 (15) 0.1659 (2) 0.0640 (6)
H15 0.6318 0.3029 0.2373 0.077*
C16 0.2324 (5) 0.4475 (3) 0.7661 (3) 0.1440 (19)
H16A 0.2677 0.3915 0.7648 0.216*
H16B 0.1661 0.4487 0.8164 0.216*
H16C 0.3013 0.4861 0.7951 0.216*
C17 0.1744 (3) 0.47213 (19) 0.6457 (2) 0.0745 (7)
H17 0.1064 0.4308 0.6174 0.089*
C18 0.1134 (4) 0.5562 (2) 0.6367 (5) 0.1316 (16)
H18A 0.1711 0.5959 0.6808 0.197*
H18B 0.0320 0.5542 0.6677 0.197*
H18C 0.0973 0.5731 0.5557 0.197*
H1 0.217 (2) 0.3328 (13) 0.2246 (18) 0.044(5)*
N1 0.27581 (15) 0.35972 (10) 0.26548 (13) 0.0411 (3)
O1 0.24168 (11) 0.39634 (8) 0.36442 (10) 0.0379 (3)
O2 0.47699 (12) 0.38863 (8) 0.34421 (11) 0.0419 (3)
O3 0.27218 (13) 0.46692 (9) 0.57341 (10) 0.0463 (3)
O4 0.43525 (12) 0.54754 (7) 0.43393 (9) 0.0358 (3)
O5 0.42037 (14) 0.76294 (8) 0.36059 (14) 0.0578 (4)
O6 0.57385 (12) 0.67569 (8) 0.44142 (11) 0.0452 (3)
Ti1 0.38148 (3) 0.43352 (2) 0.48073 (2) 0.03263 (10)

Source of material

All reagents and solvents employed in this work were commercially available and used without further purification.

Firstly, a mixture of mandelic acid (5 mmol, 0.761 g) and benzohydroxamic acid (1 mmol, 0.137 g) were placed in a Teflon-lined stainless vessel (15 mL), in which isopropanol (1 mL) and acetonitrile (5 mL) were added. After stirring for 5 min, Ti(O i Pr)4 (1.63 mmol, 0.5 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was sealed and heated at 373 K for 72 h under autogenous pressure. After cooling to room temperature at a rate of 5 K h−1, yellowish block crystals were obtained and washed with acetonitrile. The yield was 0.106 g (27%, based on mandelic acid).

Experimental details

H atoms were subsequently treated as riding atoms with distances C—H = 0.98 (CH3), 0.99 (CH) and 0.95 (ArH) Å.

Comment

In recent years, titanium oxo clusters (TOCs) have attracted much attention because their atomically precise molecular structures are ideal models for titanium dioxide (TiO2) [5], [6], [7]. Moreover, most reported TOCs exhibit photocatalytic activities, such as photocatalytic degradation, hydrogen production, and water oxidation [8], [9], [10]. The solvothermal synthetic approach using Ti(OR)4 as the titanium source have proven to be effective for construction TOCs, and a lot of TOCs with various nuclearities and diverse structures have been reported [11, 12]. Introduction of dye-functional ligands can enlarge the light-absorption range and reduce band gap values of TOCs, which is of great importance for photocatalytic applications. Generally, the dye-functional ligands for TOCs are characterized with C(sp2)–O or N(sp2)–O atoms as coordinative sites [13]. For example, catechol is a prevalent dye-functional ligand featuring C(sp2)–O as coordinative sites for construction TOCs with narrow band gap values [14]. To be noted, only a few TOCs protected by ligand with type of N(sp2)–O atom as coordinative site have been reported [15]. Herein, benzohydroxamic acid with N(sp2)–O atom was selected as dye-functional ligand to construct the title TOC.

The X-ray crystal diffraction revealed that the title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic system. There is one six-coordinated Ti4+ ion, two one deprotonated benzohydroxamate, one mandelate and one isopropoxide groups in the asymmetric unit. The dinuclear title complex is furnished by an inversion center (see the figure). Thus the two Ti4+ present the same coordination environments featuring the octahedral TiO6 mode. The six coordinated oxygen atoms belong to two mandelate ligands, one deprotonated benzohydroxamate and one isopropoxide groups respectively. Two μ 2–O-type atoms link the two Ti4+ ions together wtith the distance of 3.211 Å which is very close to the reported 3.222 Å of the TOC based on mandelic acid, and the average bond length of Ti–O is 1.956, almost the same as 1.963 Å of the reported structure [16].


Corresponding author: Yu Youzhu, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang 455000, Henan, P. R. China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: YPY2019003

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by the Foundation of Anyang Institute of Technology (YPY2019003).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Bruker. APEX2; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bruker. SAINT–Plus; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108767307043930.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Brandenburg, K. DIAMOND. Visual Crystal Structure Information System. Version 3.2i; Crystal Impact: Bonn, Germany, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

5. Fang, W. H., Zhang, L., Zhang, J. Synthetic strategies, diverse structures and tuneable properties of polyoxo-titanium clusters. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 404–421; https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00511c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Yu, Y. Z., Guo, Y., Zhang, Y. R., Liu, M. M., Feng, Y. R., Geng, C. H., Zhang, X. M. A series of silver doped butterfly-like Ti8Ag2 clusters with two Ag ions panelled on a Ti8 surface. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 13423–13429; https://doi.org/10.1039/c9dt02508a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Zhang, G., Liu, C., Long, D.-L., Cronin, L., Tung, C.-H., Wang, Y. Water-soluble pentagonal-prismatic titanium-oxo clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11097–11100; https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b06290.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Fang, W. H., Zhang, L., Zhang, J. A 3.6 nm Ti52 -oxo nanocluster with precise atomic structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7480–7483; https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b03489.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Wang, C., Wang, S. J., Kong, F. G. Calixarene-protected titanium-oxo clusters and their photocurrent responses and photocatalytic performances. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 5034–5041; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00063.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Lu, D. F., Kong, X. J., Lu, T. B., Long, L. S., Zheng, L. S. Heterometallic lanthanide-titanium oxo clusters: a new family of water oxidation catalysts. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 1057–1060; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b03072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Guo, Y.-H., Yu, Y.-Z., Niu, Y.-S., Wang, Z., Shi, W.-Y., Wu, X.-L. Solvothermal synthesis, crystal structure and photocurrent property of a Ti6 -core-based titanium oxo cluster. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2021, 40, 357–362.Search in Google Scholar

12. Liu, Y.-J., Fang, W.-H., Zhang, L., Zhang, J. Recent advances in heterometallic polyoxotitanium clusters. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 404, 213099–213106; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213099.Search in Google Scholar

13. Yu, Y.-Z., Zhang, Y.-R., Geng, C.-H., Sun, L., Guo, Y., Feng, Y.-R., Wang, Y.-X., Zhang, X.-M. Precise and wide-ranged band-gap tuning of Ti6-core-based titanium oxo clusters by the type and number of chromophore ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 16785–16791; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02951.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Wang, Y., Liu, C., Hu, J., Zhu, F., Zhan, J., Du, L., Tung, C. H. Functionalization of titanium-oxide cluster Ti17O24(OiC3H7)20 with catechols: structures and ligand-exchange reactivities. Chem. Eur J. 2019, 25, 14843–14849; https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201902601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Chen, S., Fang, W.-H., Zhang, L., Zhang, J. Synthesis, structures, and photocurrent responses of polyoxo-titanium clusters with oxime ligands: from Ti4 to Ti18. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 8850–8856; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00751.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Yu, Y., Guo, Y., Niu, Y., Liu, N., Zhang, H. Crystal structure of bis(μ2-2-oxido-2-phenylacetate-κ3O:O,O′)-bis(1- isopropoxy-2-oxo-2-phenylethan-1-olato-κ2O,O′)-bis(propan-2- olato-κ1O)dititanium(IV), C44H52O14Ti2. Z. Kristallogr. N. Cryst. Struct. 2021, 236, 467–469.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-22
Accepted: 2022-07-20
Published Online: 2022-08-11
Published in Print: 2022-10-26

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 21.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ncrs-2022-0326/html
Scroll to top button