Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 21, 2021

Comparison between acidic electroless deposited Cu, Ni coating and a physical vapor deposited (PVD) Al coating on an acrylonitrile– butadiene–styrene (ABS) substrate

  • Aysegul Gultekin Toroslu

    Dr. Ayşegül Gültekin Toroslu, born 1972, is a technical expert at the Ministry of National Education. She studied tolerance analysis of design stages to reduce cost in production and took her Doctoral degree at Gazi University in 2005. Her scientific focus is on mechanical design, CAD/ CAM applications and material properties, manufacture, design and structure.

    EMAIL logo
    and Zafer Tekiner

    Prof. Dr. Zafer Tekiner, born 1970, works for the Department of Manufacturing Engineering at the Technology Faculty of Gazi University. His scientific focus is on manufacturing, CAD/CAM applications, material properties, design and structure.

From the journal Materials Testing

Abstract

The coating is used to provide protection or functional properties to the surfaces of the substrate. In this study, acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene plastic was coated with copper/ nickel by using an acidic electrolysis deposition method and with aluminum using the physical vapor deposition method. It has been investigated to find out which of these coating methods can be used as an outdoor lighting reflector. Therefore, these two coating methods were compared using sodium carbonate test, scratch test, surface roughness and reflection efficiency tests. In addition, copper/nickel deposited and aluminum deposited on acrylonitrile– butadiene–styrene plastic surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The surface roughness and reflection efficiency of acrylonitrile–butadiene– styrene plastic coated with aluminum applying the plasma vapor deposition method was more efficient than copper/ nickel coated acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene obtained by applying a non-electric bath method. It has been determined that the samples with electroless copper/nickel coating have a better outdoor resistance than the aluminum coated samples. On the other hand, it was also determined that the surface roughness and reflection efficiency of the aluminum coated samples was better with the plasma vapor deposition method than that of the electroless copper and nickel coated samples. The results show that aluminum coating with the physical vapor deposition method on acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene plastic is more suitable for reflector technology in terms of light efficiency.


Dr. Aysegul Gultekin Toroslu Ministry of National Education Ankara, Turkey

About the authors

Dr. Aysegul Gultekin Toroslu

Dr. Ayşegül Gültekin Toroslu, born 1972, is a technical expert at the Ministry of National Education. She studied tolerance analysis of design stages to reduce cost in production and took her Doctoral degree at Gazi University in 2005. Her scientific focus is on mechanical design, CAD/ CAM applications and material properties, manufacture, design and structure.

Prof. Dr. Zafer Tekiner

Prof. Dr. Zafer Tekiner, born 1970, works for the Department of Manufacturing Engineering at the Technology Faculty of Gazi University. His scientific focus is on manufacturing, CAD/CAM applications, material properties, design and structure.

References

1 L. Dapeng, C. Yang: Acidic electroless copper deposition on aluminum-seeded ABS plastics, Surface & Coatings Technology 203 (2009), pp. 3559-3568 DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.05.02610.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.05.026Search in Google Scholar

2 J. J. Kuzmik: Electroless plating: fundamentals and applications (Reprint Edition). In: Mallory GO, Hajdu JB (eds). The American Electroplaters and Surface Finishers Society, Orlanda, FL, pp. 377–399Search in Google Scholar

3 R. Asthana, A. Kumar, N. Dahotre: Coatings and surface Engineering, Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science, 1st Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK (2006), pp. 313-39510.1016/B978-075067716-5/50007-8Search in Google Scholar

4 K. Bewilogua, G. Bräuer, A. Dietz, J. Gäbler, G. Goch: Surface technology for automotive engineering, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009), No. 2, pp. 608-627 DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.00110.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.001Search in Google Scholar

5 C. M. Lampert: Advanced optical materials for energy efficiency and solar conversion, Solar and Wind Technology 4 (1987), No. 3, pp. 347-379 DOI:10.1016/0741-983X(87)90067-110.1016/0741-983X(87)90067-1Search in Google Scholar

6 N. N.: European workshop on large area coating, Materials Testing 37 (1995), No. 10, pp. 420-421 DOI: 10.1515/mt-1995-37101210.1515/mt-1995-371012Search in Google Scholar

7 Y. Song, D. Shan, R. Chen, E. H. Han: Corrosion characterization of Mg–8Li alloy in NaCl solution, Corrosion Science 51 (2009), pp. 1087-1094 DOI:10.1016/j.jma.2015.12.00210.1016/j.jma.2015.12.002Search in Google Scholar

8 M. Heinze, G. Paller: Tribology under plastics processing conditions, Materials Testing 34 (1992), No. 1-2, pp. 17-20 DOI:10.1515/mt-1992-341-21010.1515/mt-1992-341-210Search in Google Scholar

9 A. Atrens, G.-L. Song, M. Liu, Z. Shi, F. Cao, M. S. Dargusch: Review of recent developments in the field of magnesium corrosion, Advanced Engineering Materials 17 (2015), pp. 400-453 DOI:10.1002/adem.20140043410.1002/adem.201400434Search in Google Scholar

10 G. R. Li, L. S. Wang, W. W. Zhang, G. J. Yang, X. F. Chen, W. X. Zhang: Tailoring degradation-resistant thermal barrier coatings based on the orientation of spontaneously formed pores: from retardation to self-improvement, Composites Part B: Engineering 181 (2020), pp. 100-112 DOI:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10756710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107567Search in Google Scholar

11 Y. Wang, Z. Gu, J. Liu, J. Jiang, N. Yuan, J. Pu, J. Ding: An organic/inorganic composite multilayer coating to improve the corrosion resistance of AZ31B Mg alloy, Surfacing and Coating Technology 360 (2019), pp. 276-284 DOI:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.12510.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.125Search in Google Scholar

12 W. Yu, R. Sun, Z. Guo, Z. Wang, Y. He, G. Lu, P. Chen, K. Chen: Novel fluoridated hydroxyapatite/MAO composite coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy for biomedical application, Applied Surface Science 464 (2019), pp. 708-715 DOI:10.1016/J.APSUSC.2018.09.14810.1016/J.APSUSC.2018.09.148Search in Google Scholar

13 A. Francis, Y. Yang, A. R. Boccaccini: A new strategy for developing chitosan conversion coating on magnesium substrates for orthopedic implants, Applied Surface Science 466 (2019), pp. 854-862 DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.00210.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.002Search in Google Scholar

14 C. Hu, M. Xu, J. Zhang, B. Hu, G. Yu: High corrosion resistance of electroless Ni/Ni-B coating from fluoride-free baths on AZ31 magnesium alloy, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 770 (2019), pp. 48-57 DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.30610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.306Search in Google Scholar

15 S. Nigam, S. S. Mahapatra, S. K. Patel: Study of various aspects of copper coating on ABS plastic by electric arc spraying, Materials Today: Proceedings 5, Elsevier Ltd. (2018), pp. 8446-8453 DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.54010.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.540Search in Google Scholar

16 B. Navin, P. Panjan, I. Milos: PVD coatings as an environmentally clean alternative to electroplating and electroless processes, Surface and Coatings Technology (1999), pp. 476-487 DOI:10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00145-010.1016/S0257-8972(99)00145-0Search in Google Scholar

17 U. Schulz, N. Kaiser: Vacuum coating of plastic optics, Progress in Surface Science 81 (2006), No. 8, pp. 387-401 DOI:10.1016/j.progsurf.2006.07.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2006.07.001Search in Google Scholar

18 A. G. Bruzzone, H. L. Costa, P. M. Lonardo, D. A. Lucca: Advances in engineered surfaces for functional performance, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 57 (2008), No.2, pp. 750-769 DOI:10.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.00310.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.003Search in Google Scholar

19 T. Mooney: Galvanic series including electroless nickel, Metal Finishing 93 (1995), No. 4, pp. 62-63 DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00145-010.1016/S0257-8972(99)00145-0Search in Google Scholar

20 J. R. Henry: Electroless (autocatalytic) plating, Metal Finishing 99 (2001), No. 1, pp. 424-435 DOI:10.1016/S0026-0576(01)85302-210.1016/S0026-0576(01)85302-2Search in Google Scholar

21 R. C. Agarwala, V. Agarwala: X- Electroless alloy/composite coatings: A review, Sadhana 28, No. 3-4, (2003), pp. 475-493 DOI:10.1007/BF0270644510.1007/BF02706445Search in Google Scholar

22 T. Fend, B. Hoffschmidt, G. Jorgensen, H. Küster, D. Krüger: Comparative assessment of solar concentrator materials, Solar Energy 74 (2003), No. 2, pp. 149-155 DOI:10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00116-610.1016/S0038-092X(03)00116-6Search in Google Scholar

23 L. Grigore: Metallic microstructures by electroplating on polymers: an alternative to LIGA technique, Materials Science and Engineering: B 74 (2000), No. 1-3, pp. 299-303 DOI:10.1016/S0921-5107(99)00580-210.1016/S0921-5107(99)00580-2Search in Google Scholar

24 D. Poitras, L. Martinu: Interphase in plasmadeposited films on plastics: Effect on the spectral properties of optical filters, Applied Optics 39 (2000), No. 7, pp. 1168-1173 DOI:10.1364/AO.39.00116810.1364/AO.39.001168Search in Google Scholar

25 ASTM C 1624-05: Standard test method for adhesion strength and mechanical failure modes of ceramic coatings by quantitative single point scratch testing, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2015) DOI:10.1520/C1624-05R1510.1520/C1624-05R15Search in Google Scholar

26 ASTM E1787– 16: Standard test method for anions in caustic soda and caustic potash (sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide) by ion chromatography, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2016) DOI:10.1520/E1787-1610.1520/E1787-16Search in Google Scholar

27 ASTM D7127– 17: Standard test method for measurement of surface roughness of abrasive blast cleaned metal surfaces using a portable stylus instrument, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2017) DOI:10.1520/D3359-1710.1520/D3359-17Search in Google Scholar

28 ASTM D3359– 09. Standard test methods for measuring adhesion by tape test, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA (2017) DOI:10.1520/D3359-09E0210.1520/D3359-09E02Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-10-21

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2021-0028/html
Scroll to top button