Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 14, 2019

Reference range of fetal myocardial area by three-dimensional ultrasonography and its applicability in fetuses of pre-gestational diabetic women

  • José Francisco Melo Júnior , Nathalie Jeanne Bravo-valenzuela , Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza , Alberto Borges Peixoto , Rosiane Mattar , Wellington P. Martins , Gabriele Tonni and Edward Araujo Júnior EMAIL logo

Abstract

Objective

To determine the reference range for the myocardial area in healthy fetuses using three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography and validate these results in fetuses of pregnant women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

This cross-sectional retrospective study included 168 healthy pregnant women between gestational weeks 20 and 33+6 days. The myocardial area was measured using spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) in the four-chamber view. Polynomial regression models were used, and the goodness of fit of the models were evaluated by the coefficient of determination (R2). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was determined using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Validation was performed in 30 pregnant women with pre-gestational DM.

Results

There was a strong correlation (R2=0.71, P<0.0001) between myocardial area and gestational age. There was good intra- and inter-observer reproducibility, with a CCC of 0.86 and 0.83, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the mean myocardial area between healthy fetuses and fetuses of women with pre-gestational DM (0.11 cm2, P=0.55).

Conclusion

The reference range was determined for the myocardial area in fetuses, and there was no significant difference in this variable between healthy fetuses and the fetuses of women with pre-gestational DM.


Corresponding author: Prof. Edward Araujo Júnior, PhD, Department of Obstetrics, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo-SP, Brazil, Tel./Fax: +55-11-37965944

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Tabib A, Shirzad N, Sheikhbahaei S, Mohammadi S, Qorbani M, Haghpanah V, et al. Cardiac malformations in fetuses of gestational and pre gestational diabetic mothers. Iran J Pediatr 2013;23:664–8.Search in Google Scholar

2. Thorsson AV, Hintz RL. Insulin receptors in the newborn. Increase in receptor affinity and number. N Engl J Med 1977;297:908–12.10.1056/NEJM197710272971704Search in Google Scholar

3. Zielinsky P, Piccoli AL Jr. Myocardial hypertrophy and dysfunction in maternal diabetes. Early Hum Dev 2012;88:273–8.10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.02.006Search in Google Scholar

4. Akbariasbagh P, Shariat M, Akbariasbagh N, Ebrahim B. Cardiovascular malformations in infants of diabetic mothers: a retrospective case-control study. Acta Med Iran 2017;55:103–8.Search in Google Scholar

5. Bethune M, Bell R. Evaluation of the measurement of the fetal fat layer, interventricular septum and abdominal circumference percentile in the prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:586–90.10.1002/uog.885Search in Google Scholar

6. Sklansky M, Miller D, Devore G, Kung G, Pretorius D, Wong P, et al. Prenatal screening for congenital heart disease using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and a novel ‘sweep volume’ acquisition technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:435–43.10.1002/uog.1858Search in Google Scholar

7. Gonçalves LF, Lee W, Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Schoen ML, Falkensammer P, et al. Four-dimensional ultrasonography of the fetal heart with spatiotemporal image correlation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1792–802.10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00913-XSearch in Google Scholar

8. Yagel S, Benachi A, Bonnet D, Dumez Y, Hochner-Celnikier D, Cohen SM, et al. Rendering in fetal cardiac scanning: the intracardiac septa and the coronal atrioventricular valve planes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:266–74.10.1002/uog.2843Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Nardozza LM, Rolo LC, Araujo Júnior E, Hatanaka AR, Rocha LA, Simioni C, et al. Reference range for fetal interventricular septum area by means of four-dimensional ultrasonography using spatiotemporal image correlation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33:110–5.10.1159/000345650Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Rolo LC, Nardozza LM, Araujo Júnior E, Hatanaka AR, Rocha LA, Simioni C, et al. Reference ranges of atrioventricular valve areas by means of four-dimensional ultrasonography using spatiotemporal image correlation in the rendering mode. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:50–5.10.1002/pd.4009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Rolo LC, Rizzo G, Pietrolucci ME, Hatanaka AR, Rocha LA, Simioni C, et al. Viewing rate and reference ranges for papillary muscle areas of the fetal heart using four-dimensional ultrasound in the rendering mode. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:1153–60.10.1002/pd.4444Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Gonçalves LF, Lee W, Espinoza J, Romero R. Examination of the fetal heart by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound with spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:336–48.10.1002/uog.2724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Paladini D. Standardization of on-screen fetal heart orientation prior to storage of spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) volume datasets. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29:605–11.10.1002/uog.4049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size I: methodology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:29–34.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13006.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Martins WP, Nastri CO. Interpreting reproducibility results for ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:479–80.10.1002/uog.13320Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001Search in Google Scholar

17. Dervisoglu P, Kosecik M, Kumbasar S. Effects of gestational and pregestational diabetes mellitus on the foetal heart: a cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;38:408–12.10.1080/01443615.2017.1410536Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Garcia-Flores J, Jañez M, Gonzalez MC, Martinez N, Espada M, Gonzalez A. Fetal myocardial morphological and functional changes associated with well-controlled gestational diabetes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;154:24–6.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Elmekkawi SF, Mansour GM, Elsafty MS, Hassanin AS, Laban M, Elsayed HM. Prediction of fetal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in diabetic pregnancies compared with postnatal outcome. Clin Med Insights Womens Health 2015;8:39–43.10.4137/CMWH.S32825Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:429–34.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07060429.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Turan S, Turan O, Baschat AA. Three- and four-dimensional fetal echocardiography. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009;25:361–72.10.1159/000236148Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Arslan D, Oran B, Vatansev H, Cimen D, Guvenc O. The usefulness of plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels and tissue doppler echocardiography for heart function in term infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26:1742–8.10.3109/14767058.2013.798288Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Barros FS, Moron AF, Rolo LC, Rocha LA, Martins WP, Tonni G, et al. Fetal myocardial wall area: constructing a reference range by means of spatiotemporal image correlation in the rendering mode. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;37:44–50.10.1159/000363653Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Avnet H, Mazaaki E, Shen O, Cohen S, Yagel S. Evaluating spatiotemporal image correlation technology as a tool for training nonexpert sonographers to perform examinations of the fetal heart. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:111–9.10.7863/ultra.15.01072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Aman J, Hansson U, Ostlund I, Wall K, Persson B. Increased fat mass and cardiac septal hypertrophy in newborn infants of mothers with well-controlled diabetes during pregnancy. Neonatology 2011;100:147–54.10.1159/000323741Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Balli S, Pac FA, Ece İ, Oflaz MB, Kibar AE, Kandemir Ö. Assessment of cardiac functions in fetuses of gestational diabetic mothers. Pediatr Cardiol 2014;35:30–7.10.1007/s00246-013-0734-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-10-17
Accepted: 2019-01-14
Published Online: 2019-02-14
Published in Print: 2019-05-27

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2018-0342/html
Scroll to top button