Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 12, 2019

Free Space Optical Communication System under Different Weather Conditions

  • Mohammad Yawar Wani , Hitesh Pathak , Karamjit Kaur EMAIL logo and Anil Kumar

Abstract

Free space optical communication systems (FSO’s) have surfaced as admired means of communication in the past few years. High speed of operation, low bandwidth requirements and system reliability are the major factors responsible for their wide range of applications. These communication systems use air as a medium of transmission. Since there is no component like fiber or cable, but air is only medium, the variations in atmospheric conditions play a vital role in performance of these networks. The reason behind is that the conditions like presence of humidity, haze, snowfall, rain, dust or smoke changes the attenuation coefficient of medium. The raised attenuation levels results in increased losses and need to be carefully monitored. The present work analyzes the influence of rain on the performance of FSO network in terms of quality of transmission. The paper discusses the impact of rainfall on attenuation coefficient of air. Then impact of this attenuation on network transmission is presented in terms of BER and Q-factor. In order to demonstrate the impact, BER and Q-value is calculated for 10 Gbps FSO link for clear weather and rainfall conditions.

References

1. Kolka Z, Wilfert O, Kvicala R, Fiser O. Complex model of terrestrial FSO links. Proc SPIE. 2007;6709:67091 j.10.1117/12.732421Search in Google Scholar

2. Davis CC, Smolyaninov II. Effect of atmospheric turbulence on bit-error rate in an on-off-keyed optical wireless system. Proc SPIE. 2002;4489:126–37.10.1117/12.453236Search in Google Scholar

3. Kaur K, Singh H. Analysis of single-mode fiber link performance for attenuation in long-haul optical networks. J Opt Commun. 2017;38:27–32.10.1515/joc-2016-0027Search in Google Scholar

4. Ijaz M, Ghassemlooy Z, Pesek J, Fiser O, Le Minh H, Bentley E. Demonstrating of mist and smoke constriction in free space optical correspondences connect under controlled research facility conditions. J Lightwave Technol. 2013;31:1720–6.10.1109/JLT.2013.2257683Search in Google Scholar

5. Ghassemlooy Z, Perez J, Leitgeb E. On the execution of FSO interchanges interfaces under dust storm conditions. In: Procedures of the twelfth International Conference on Telecommunications (ConTEL ‘13), IEEE, Zagreb, Croatia, June 2013:53–8.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rammprasath K, Ruler S. Breaking down the cloud weakening on the execution of free space optical correspondence. In: Proceedings of the second International Conference on Correspondence and Signal Processing (ICCSP‘13), Melmaruvathur, India, April 2013:791–4.Search in Google Scholar

7. Al-Gailani SA, Mohammad AB, Shaddad RQ, Jamaludin MY. Single and multiple handset simulation modules for nothing space optical direct in tropical Malaysian climate. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC‘13), Langkawi, Malaysia, April 2013:613–16.10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560203Search in Google Scholar

8. Rahman AK, Anuar MS, Aljunid SA, Junita MN. Investigation of rain constriction result in free space optic transmission. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Malaysia Conference on Photonics Telecommunication Technologies (NCTT-MCP‘08), IEEE, Putrajaya, Malaysia, August 2008:64–70.10.1109/NCTT.2008.4814239Search in Google Scholar

9. Suriza AZ, Rafiqul IM, Wajdi AK, Naji AW. Impacts of rain force minor departure from rain weakening forecast for Free Space Optics (FSO) joins. In: Proceedings of the International Meeting on Computer and Communication Engineering (ICCCE‘12), IEEE, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 2012:680–5.Search in Google Scholar

10. International Station Meteorological Climate Summary. Ver. 4.0, Federal Climate Complex Asheville, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kim I, Korevaar E. Availability of Free Space Optics (FSO) and Hybrid FSO/RF systems In: Proc. SPIE Optical Wireless Communication IV, Vol. 530, Denver, CO, August 21–22, 2001:84–95.10.1117/12.449800Search in Google Scholar

12. Willebrand H, Ghuman SB. Free-space optics: Enabling optical connectivity in today’s network, Sams Publishing, Indiana, USA, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

13. Fadhil HA, Amphawan A, Shamsuddin HAB, Hussein Abd T, Al-Khafaji HMR, Aljunid SA, Ahmed N. Optimization of free space optics parameters: an optimum solution for bad weather conditions In: G Model Ijleo-52845© 2013 Elsevier Gmbh.10.1016/j.ijleo.2012.11.059Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-10
Accepted: 2019-03-25
Published Online: 2019-04-12
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2019-0064/html
Scroll to top button