Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter June 6, 2017

Magneto-elastic SV-wave at the interface of pre-stressed surface with voids under rotation

  • Rajneesh Kakar EMAIL logo and Shikha Kakar
This article has been retracted. Retraction note.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the behaviour of reflection of SV- wave at a free surface under the effects of magnetic field, initial stress, rotation and voids. When a SV- wave is incident on the free surface of an elastic half space, two damped P-waves and a SV-wave is reflected. Among of these waves, P-waves are only affected by magnetic field and rotation whereas SV-wave is influenced by rotation, initial stress and magnetic field. Numerical computations are performed for the developed amplitude ratios of P-, SV- and magneto-elastic waves. This study would be useful for magneto-elastic acoustic device field and further study about nature of seismic waves.

1 Introduction

Seismic waves are energy waves that travel through the Earth’s layers, and are a result of an earthquake, explosion, or a volcano that gives out low-frequency acoustic energy. Earthquakes create distinct types of waves with different velocities. In geophysics the refraction or reflection of seismic waves is used for research into the structure of the Earth’s interior. Seismic waves are further divided into surface waves and body waves. Body waves travel through the interior of the Earth and surface waves travel across the surface. Body waves create ray paths refracted by the varying density and modulus (stiffness) of the Earth’s interior. The density and modulus, in turn, vary according to temperature, composition, and phase.

Primary waves (P-waves) are compressional waves that are longitudinal in nature. P waves are pressure waves that travel faster than other waves through the earth to arrive at seismograph stations firstly, hence the name “Primary”. These waves can travel through any type of material, including fluids, and can travel at nearly twice the speed of Secondary waves. In air, they take the form of sound waves, hence they travel at the speed of sound. Typical speeds are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water and about 5000 m/s in granite.

Secondary waves (S-waves) are shear waves that are transverse in nature. Following an earthquake event, S-waves arrive at seismograph stations after the faster-moving P-waves and displace the ground perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Depending on the direction of propagation, the wave can take on different surface characteristics; for example, in the case of horizontally polarized S waves, the ground moves alternately to one side and then the other. S-waves can travel only through solids, as fluids (liquids and gases) do not support shear stresses. S-waves are slower than P-waves, and speeds are typically around 60% of that of P-waves in any given material.

A material that contains cavities and pores/voids is called a porous material. Soils, rocks, bones and man-made materials like cement and ceramics are examples of such materials. Porosity is one of the major factors that influence the chemical reactivity of solids.

Seismic wave research is of much importance in order to understand and predict earthquakes and tsunamis. It also reveals information about Earth’s composition and features. Physical and numerical modelling of seismic waves is used for better prediction of earthquakes and engineering practices. Latest techniques and advancements in seismic wave analysis are useful in many fields like seismology, acoustics and aeronautics.

Problems related to reflection of plane waves under the effects of initial stress, magnetic field, rotation and voids in homogenous and isotropic free surface have applications in many fields like Geophysics, Geology, Optics, Earthquake engineering and geography.

The general equations of reflection and refraction of elastic at a plane half space was firstly developed by Knott [1]. Latterly, Jafferey [2] and Gutenberg [3] made some modifications but none of them considered initially stressed half space. Most of the mediums in real life problems are initially stressed like earth. Biot [4] was the first who discussed propagation of plane wave at initially stressed medium. Dey and Addy [5] investigated the reflection of Plane waves under initial stresses at a free surface. Cowin and Nnziato [6] developed a non-linear theory of elastic materials with voids by taking voids volume as additional kinematics variable. Latterly, in (1983) they formulated a liner theory of elastic materials with voids by considering a limiting case of vanishing volume (when volume tends to zero). Puri and Cowin [7] proposed plane waves in linear elastic materials with voids. Ibrahim et al. [8] discussed the effects of voids and rotation on P wave in a thermoelastic half-space under Green-Naghdi theory. Abo-Dahab and Baljeet Singh [9] investigated the rotational and voids effects on the reflection of P waves from stress-free surface of an elastic half-space under magnetic field, initial stress and without energy dissipation. Latterly, Abo-Dahab [10] discussed the effects of voids and rotation and initial stress on plane waves in generalized thermoelasticity. Chattopadhyay et al. [11] discussed the reflection and transmission of a three dimensional plane qP wave through a layered fluid medium between two distinct triclinic half-spaces. Abo-Dahab et al. [12] studied the rotation effect of reflection of plane elastic waves at a free surface under initial stress, magnetic field and temperature field.

This study is about the reflection of SV waves under initial stress, magnetic field, rotation and voids at free surface of elastic solid half space. Biot’s equations for initially stressed half space and modified voids equation by Cowin and Nunziato [13] are used. Governing equations are solved in x1x2−plane analytically by applying free surface boundary conditions in order to get reflection co-efficients for P, SV and voids wave.

2 Formulation and solution of the problem

Governing equations with initial stress and magnetic field for a rotating isotropic and homogenous elastic medium are as follows:

  1. The equation of motion:

    (1)τij,j+Fi=ρ(u¨i+ΩjujΩiΩ2ui2εijkΩju˙k)

    where, F=μ0(J_×H_)

  2. The equation for voids:

    (2)αφ,iiω0φυφ˙βui,i=ρκφ¨
  3. Constitutive relations:

    (3)τij=P(δij+ϖij)+λεkkδij+2μεij+βδijφ,whereεij=12(ui,j+uj,i),ϖij=12(ui.juj,i)

We take the linearized Maxwell equations governing the electromagnetic field for a perfectly conducting medium as:

εijkHk,j=ε0εijkJjE˙kεijkEk,j=μ0H˙iHi,i=0,Ei,i=0,Ei=μ0εijku˙jHk,

where H=H0+h, h is induced magnetic force and εo is electric permeability. H0=(0, 0, H0). i.e. taken along x3−axis and the material lies in x1x2−plane. Thus, H=H0+h=(h1, h2, h3+H0).

then magnetic force is as follows

F=μ0H02(e,1ε0μ0u¨1,e,2ε0μ0u¨2,0)andh¯(x1,x2,x3)=(0,0,e)

where e=u1.1+u2,2 and rotation Ω=Ω(0, 0, 1)

In these equations, Fi represents magnetic force, J is current density, H is magnetic vector field vector and μo is magnetic permeability. φ is the so-called volume fraction field. α, β, ω0, υ and κ are new material constants characterizing the presence of voids. Where εijk is the Levi-Civita tensor, τij are components of stress, ρ is the mass density and ui is the displacement vector. λ and μ are Lame’s constants and ui is displacement component. Comma followed by index shows partial derivative with respect to coordinate. Also Einstein summation convention over repeated indexes is used.

Here we consider a half space which is homogenous and isotropic elastic solid. The x1x2−plane is chosen to coincide with the free surface with initial compressive stress P in x1−direction. A plane wave is incident at “0” on the boundary surface in x1x2−plane, making an angle θ0, with the normal to the boundary as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Schematic of the problem.
Figure 1:

Schematic of the problem.

Using equations (3) in (1), we have

(4a)(λ+2μ+μoH02)u1,11+(λ+μ+Ρ2+μoH02)u2,12+(μΡ2)u1,22=(ρ+μo2εoH02)u¨1ρΩ2u1+2ρΩu˙2βφ,1
(4b)(λ+2μ+μoH02)u2,22+(λ+μ+Ρ2+μoH02)u1,12+(μΡ2)u2,11=(ρ+μo2εoH02)u¨2ρΩ2u22ρΩu˙1βφ,2

The modified voids equation is as follow:

(4c)α(φ,11+φ,22)ω0φυφ˙β(u1,1+u2,2)=ρκφ¨.

By Helmholtz’s theorem,

u=Gradϕ+Curlψ

(5)u1=ϕ,1+ψ,2andu2=ϕ,2ψ,1,   ψ=ψ(0,0,1)

By using (5) in equation (4a), we have

(6a)γ12ϕ=γ22ϕt22ρΩψtρΩ2ϕβφ

By using (5) in equation (4b), we have

(6b)γ32ψ=γ22ψt2+2ρΩϕtρΩ2ψ

where γ1=λ+2μ+μoH02,γ2=ρ+μo2εoH02,γ3=μ12P

Using (5) in (4c) we have

(6c)α(2φ)=ω0φ+υφ˙+β(2ϕ)+ρκφ¨

The solutions of (6a), (6b) and (6c) can be taken as

(7a)ϕ(x1,x2,t)=ϕ0exp[ik(Sinθx1+Cosθx2ct)]
(7b)ψ(x1,x2,t)=ψ0exp[ik(Sinθx1+Cosθx2ct)]
(7c)φ(x1,x2,t)=φ0exp[ik(Sinθx1+Cosθx2ct)]

Using (7a)–(7c) in (6a), (6b) and (9b), we have

(8a)k2(γ1c2γ2ρΩ2k2)ϕ0βφ0+2ikcρΩψ0=0
(8b)2icρΩϕ0+k(c2γ2γ3+ρΩ2k2)ψ0=0
(8c)βk2ϕ0+(k2(ρκc2α)+iυkcω0)φ0=0

Eliminating ϕ0, ψ0 and φ0 from equations (8a)–(8c), we have

(9)C1V3+C2V2+C3V+C4=0

where

V=c2C1=k3γ2(ρκγ2k24Ω2ρ3κk2)C2=k3γ2(αk2γ2ω0γ2ρκk2γ3β2k2γ2+4αρ2Ω2k3+4ω0ρ2Ω2kc)+(ρΩ2k+k3γ1)(ρκγ2k24Ω2ρ3κk2)C3=k3γ2(ω0γ3ω0k2β2k3γ3)+(ρΩ2k+k3γ1)(αk2γ2ω0γ2ρκk2γ3β2k2γ2+4αρ2Ω2k3+4ω0ρ2Ω2kc)C4=(ρΩ2k+k3γ1)(ω0γ3ω0k2β2k3γ3)

It is obvious from (9) that it has three roots (phase velocities) for reflected waves.

2.1 Reflection coefficients

There are three reflected waves, P-wave, SV-wave and voids wave. Thus, if a SV- wave falls on boundary x2=0 from the solid half space we have one reflected SV- wave and two reflected compressional waves travelling with two different velocities. Accordingly if the wave normal of the incident SV- wave makes an angle θ0 with the positive x2−axis and those of reflected SV, P and voids wave make angles θ1, θ2 and θ3 with the same direction. The displacement potential and the void take the following form

(11a)ψ=A0exp[i{k0(x1Sinθ0+x2Cosθ0)ωt}]+j=13Ajexp[i{kj(x1Sinθjx2Cosθj)ωt}],
(11b)ϕ=ζ0A0exp[i{k0(x1Sinθ0+x2Cosθ0)ωt}]+j=13ζjAjexp[i{kj(x1Sinθjx2Cosθj)ωt}],
(11c)φ=η0A0exp[i{k0(x1Sinθ0+x2Cosθ0)ωt}]+j=13ηjAjexp[i{kj(x1Sinθjx2Cosθj)ωt}],

where

ζj=k(γ3ρΩ2k2γ2cj2)2iΩρciandηj=βkj2ζjkj2(ρκcj2α)+iυkcjω0

where, A0 is the amplitude of the incident SV wave and A1, A2 and A3 are the amplitudes of reflected SV, P and voids waves, respectively.

2.2 Boundary conditions

Since the boundary at x2=0 is adjacent to vacuum, it is free from surface tractions, therefore

τij+Ρ(δij+ϖij)+τ¯ij=0,   atx2=0

where, Maxwell’s stresses are as follows:

(12a)τ¯ij=μ0H0[Hihj+HjhiHkhkδij],τ12+Ρϖ12=0,   atx2=0   τ¯12=0
(12b)τ22+P+τ¯22=0,   atx2=0

Also it is assumed that there is no change in volume traction, φ, along x2-direction, thus

(12c)φx2=0,   atx2=0

Using equations (11a–11c) in (12a–12c), we get

AijZj=Di,   (i,j=1,2,3)

where

A1j=[Cos2θjζjSin2θj](kjk0)2A2j=[λζj+μ(2ζjCos2θjSin2θj)+μ0H02+βηjkj2](kjk0)2A3j=ηjCosθj(kjk0)

and

D1=[Cos2θ0ζ0Sin2θ0]

D2=[λζ0+μ(2ζ0Cos2θ0Sin2θ0)+μ0H02+βη0k02]

D3=η0Cosθ0,

Z1=RC1=A1A0,Z2=RC2=A2A0,Z3=RC3=A3A0,

2.3 Numerical results and discussion

With the view of computational work, we take the following physical constants.

λ=5.65×1010Nm2,μ=2.46×1010Nm2,ρ=2.66×103Kgm3,α=1.28×1010Nm2,   β=220.90×1010Nm2.

Using these values the modulus of the reflection coefficients for the SV-wave and P-wave have been calculated for different angles of incidence.

Figure 2: shows the variation of reflection coefficient RC1 of the P wave with the variation of κ, ω, α, H0, P, ε0, ω0 and Ω with respect to the angle of incidence θ. It is observed that is RC1 vanish at θ0=0,π4,π2;. This means that there is no reflection when angle of incident wave is 0,π4 and π2;. Moreover, for 0<θ0<π4, reflection coefficient has increasing behavior in first half and decreasing behavior in second half. Similar behavior is for π4<θ0<π2. But for π4<θ0<π2 increasing and decreasing behavior of reflection coefficient is faster. It is also observed that, reflection coefficient decreases as κ, α and Ω increases. When α, κ and Ω→∞, there is will be no reflection. Reflection coefficient increases with the increase in ω, H0, P, ε0 and ω0. It is noted that decrease in RC1 is faster w.r.t. κ as compared to α and Ω.

Figure 3: shows the variation of reflection co-efficient RC2 of the wave due to voids with the variation of κ, ω, α, H0, P, ε0, ω0 and Ω with respect to the angle of incidence θ. Behavior of RC2 is almost same as RC1. RC2 increases with the increase in H0, P, ω, ε0and ω0 whereas it decrease with the increase in κ, α and Ω i.e. when α, κ and Ω→∞, there will be no reflection.

Figure 4: shows the variation of reflection co-efficient RC3 of the SV wave with the variation of κ, ω, α, H0, P, ε0, ω0 and Ω with respect to the angle of incidence θ. Behavior of RC3 is different from RC1 and RC2. RC1 and RC2 have two normal curves whereas RC3 has only one. RC3 is zero for only θ0=0,π2;. Its behavior is increasing in first half and decreasing in second half for 0<θ0<π2.RC3 is increasing with the increase in H0, P, ε0 and ω0 whereas it has decreasing behavior with the increase in α, κ, ω and Ω. It is observed that increase in RC3 w.r.t. H0 is faster as compared to P, ε0 and ω0 and decrease in RC3 w.r.t κ, Ω and ω is faster as compared to α and Ω.

Note: It is observed that all three reflection coefficients RC1, RC2 and RC3 increase as magnetic field H0 increases and increase statically with the increase in electric permeability ε0. It is also observed that all three reflection coefficients RC1, RC2 and RC3 decrease as rotation Ω increases. Moreover, the effects of ε0 on reflection coefficients are negligible whereas effect of α on reflection coefficients is small.

The results are shown in graphs (Figures 24).

Figure 2: Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc1 of the compressional (P) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.
Figure 2:

Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc1 of the compressional (P) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.

Figure 3: Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc2 of the compressional (P) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.
Figure 3:

Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc2 of the compressional (P) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.

Figure 4: Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc3 of the SV- (SV) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.
Figure 4:

Variation of the reflection coefficient Rc3 of the SV- (SV) wave with variation of κ, H0, ω, P, α, ω0, ε0, and Ω with respect to angle of incidence θ.

3 Conclusion

The reflection of SV wave at free surface under initial stress, rotation and magnetic field with voids is studied. Expressions for reflection coefficients for P-wave, SV-wave and wave due to voids are derived. Numerical results for a chosen material, aluminum, for different parameters are given and illustrated graphically. It is observed that initial stresses, voids and magnetic field affects significantly to the reflection coefficients κ, α and ω0 and the rotational effects reduces the amplitude of reflected waves. In the absence of voids the results reduce to well known isotropic medium.


Corresponding author: Professor Rajneesh Kakar, PhD, NBS Gurukul, Chotti Baradari, 163/1, Jalandhar-144022, India

References

[1] Knott CG. Phil. Mag. 1899, 48, 64–97.10.1080/14786449908621305Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jeffreys H. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1930, 26, 101–106.10.1017/S0305004100015085Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gutenberg R. Bult. Seis. Soc. Amer. 1944, 34, 85–102.10.1785/BSSA0340020085Search in Google Scholar

[4] Biot MA. Mechanics of Incremental Deformations, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, 1965.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dey S, Addy SK. Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 1977, 12, 372–381.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Nunziato JW, Cowin SC. Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. 1979, 72 (2), 175–201.10.1007/BF00249363Search in Google Scholar

[7] Puri P, Cowin SC. J. Elasticity. 1985, 15 (2), 167–183.10.1007/BF00041991Search in Google Scholar

[8] Elsirafy IH, Abo-Dahab SM, Singh B. Mech. Solids. 2011, 17 (3), 243–253.10.1177/1081286511408759Search in Google Scholar

[9] Abo-Dahab SM, Singh B. Appl. Math. Modelling. 2013, 37, 8999–9011.10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.033Search in Google Scholar

[10] Abo-Dahab SM. J. Comput. Theoret. Nanoscience. 2014, 11 (2), 464–471.10.1166/jctn.2014.3381Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chattopadhyay A, Kumari P, Sharma VK. Int. J. Geomech. 2014, 14 (2), 182–190.10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000311Search in Google Scholar

[12] Abo-Dahab SM, Gohaly A, El-Malki, F. J. Comput. Theoret. Nanoscience. 2015, 12 (2), 244–256.10.1166/jctn.2015.3725Search in Google Scholar

[13] Cowin SC, Nunziato JW. J. Elasticity. 1983, 13 (2), 125–147.10.1007/BF00041230Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-6
Published in Print: 2016-12-20

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2017-0002/html
Scroll to top button