Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton March 30, 2022

A cross-linguistic comparison of the propositional content of laughter in American English and Central Thai

  • Elizabeth Hanks

    Elizabeth Hanks is a PhD student in applied linguistics at Northern Arizona University. Her research focuses on corpus linguistics, psycholinguistics, and pragmatics.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Intercultural Pragmatics

Abstract

Research suggests that laughter can serve several communicative functions beyond indicating mirth, and as such, may hold propositional meaning. The present study analyzes cross-linguistic differences in the propositional content of laughter in American English and Central Thai television shows. A framework for classifying laughter by propositional content was first developed by drawing on existing literature and bottom-up analysis of the laughter found in American English and Thai shows. The framework includes categories of positive valency, negative valency, and humor, along with subcategories of disbelief, support, expressive, and pride. A multi-modal corpus of laughter was then created by compiling all laughter instances in the first 100 min of three American English television shows and three Thai television shows. The meanings of all 848 laughter instances in the corpus were categorized by propositional content of laughter. Results show that humor laughter and negative-support laughter are more frequent in American English, and positive-support laughter and negative-pride laughter are more frequent in Central Thai. These findings provide further evidence that laughter contains propositional content because they indicate that laughter use is subject to cross-linguistic variation that aligns with existing linguistic patterns and cultural values.


Corresponding author: Elizabeth Hanks, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, E-mail:

About the author

Elizabeth Hanks

Elizabeth Hanks is a PhD student in applied linguistics at Northern Arizona University. Her research focuses on corpus linguistics, psycholinguistics, and pragmatics.

References

Allport, Gordon. 1961. Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle. 2000 [350 BCE]. Nicomachean ethics. (Roger Crisp, ed., trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802058Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beom, Khisu. 2010. Face threatening/supporting strategies in Korean and American TV presidential debates: A cultural comparative study. Intercultural Communication Studies 19(2). 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. 1900. Le rire: Essai sur la signification du comique. Paris: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Berlyne, Daniel. 1960. McGraw-Hill series in psychology: Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, Toronto, & London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bonin, Francesca, Nick Campbell & Carl Vogel. 2014. Time for laughter. Knowledge-Based Systems 71. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.04.031.Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Gregory, Daniel Fessler, Riccardo Fusaroli, Edward Clint, Dorsa Amir, Brenda Chávez, Kaleda Denton, Cinthya Díaz, Lealaiauloto Togiaso Duran, Fanćovićová Jana, Michal Fux, Erni Farida Ginting, Youssef Hasan, Anning Hu, Shanmukh V. Kamble, Tatsuya Kameda, Kiri Kuroda, Norman P. Li, Francesca R. Luberti, Raha Peyravi, Pavol Prokop, Katinka J. P. Quintelier, Hyun Jung Shin, Stefan Stieger, Lawrence S. Sugiyama, Ellis A. van den Hende, Hugo Viciana-Asensio, Saliha Elif Yildizhan, Jose C. Yong, Tessa Yuditha & Yi Zhou. 2018. The perception of spontaneous and volitional laughter across 21 societies. Psychological Science 29(9). 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618778235.Search in Google Scholar

Cedar, Payung. 2006. Thai and American responses to compliments in English. The Linguistics Journal 1(2). 6–28.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guo-Hai, David Watkins & Rod A. Martin. 2013. Sense of humor in China: The role of individualism, collectivism, and facework. Psychologia 56(1). 57–70. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2013.57.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven. 1992. Caveat orator: Audience disaffiliation in the 1988 presidential debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech 78(1). 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639209383980.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven. 2001. Answers and evasions. Language in Society 30(3). 403–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404501003037.Search in Google Scholar

Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Don’t make me laugh: Responsive laughter in (dis) affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 100. 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1872. The expression of emotions in animals and man. London: Murray.10.1037/10001-000Search in Google Scholar

Derakhshan, Ali & Zohreh Eslami. 2020. The effect of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on EFL learners’ comprehension of implicature. Applied Research on English Language 9(1). 25–52. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2019.118062.1476.Search in Google Scholar

Dietrich, Susanne, Hermann Ackermann, Diana P. Szameitat & Kai Alter. 2006. Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: How to disentangle lexical and prosodic information? Progress in Brain Research 156. 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56016-9.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2020. Laughter through tears: Unprofessional review comments as humor on the ShitMyReviewersSay Twitter account. Intercultural Pragmatics 17(5). 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-5001.Search in Google Scholar

Edmonson, Munro. 1987. Notes on laughter. Anthropological Linguistics 29(1). 23–34.Search in Google Scholar

Ellwood, Constance & Ikuko Nakane. 2009. Privileging of speech in EAP and mainstream university classrooms: A critical evaluation of participation. TESOL Quarterly 43(2). 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00165.x.Search in Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2013. Thai language. In Encyclopedia Britannica Online . Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Thai-language.Search in Google Scholar

Exline, Julie Juola & Anne L. Geyer. 2004. Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity 3(2). 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500342000077.Search in Google Scholar

Filani, Ibukun. 2021. The stand-up comedian as an egocentric communicator. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(1). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Fraley, Barbara & Arthur Aron. 2004. The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships 11(1). 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00071.x.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1928. Humour. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9. 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

Gavioli, Laura. 1995. Turn‐initial versus turn‐final laughter: Two techniques for initiating remedy in English/Italian bookshop service encounters. Discourse Processes 19(3). 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544923.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Matthew & David Sloan Wilson. 2005. The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: A synthetic approach. The Quarterly Review of Biology 80(4). 395–430. https://doi.org/10.1086/498281.Search in Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Jonathan, Chiara Mazzocconi & Ye Tian. 2020. Laughter as language. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1). 104. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1152.Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip. 1991/1992. Current speaker initiation of two‐party shared laughter. Research on Language & Social Interaction 25(1–4). 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351819109389360.Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in interaction, vol. 18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519888Search in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip & Elizabeth Holt (eds.). 2013. Studies of laughter in interaction. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472542069.ch-001Search in Google Scholar

Gregg, A. 1928. An observational study of humor in three year olds. New York: Columbia University Unpublished MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut. 2001. Questions and strategic orientation in verbal conflict sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 33(12). 1815–1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00083-7.Search in Google Scholar

Guodong, Liang & Han Jing. 2005. A contrastive study on disagreement strategies for politeness between American English & Mandarin Chinese. Asian EFL Journal 7(1). 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Gurtler, Leo. 2002. Humor in educational contexts. Paper presented at American Psychological Association’s 110th annual convention. Chicago, IL, United States: McCormick Place.Search in Google Scholar

Haakana, Markku. 1999. Laughing matters: A conversation analytical study of laughter in doctor-patient interaction. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Haakana, Markku. 2002. Laughter in medical interaction: From quantification to analysis, and back. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2). 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00185.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1967 [1651]. Hobbes’s leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2010. The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1513–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, Elizabeth. 2011. On the nature of “laughables”: Laughter as a response to overdone figurative phrases. Pragmatics 21(3). 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.05hol.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkinson, Christopher. 2021. Realizations of oppositional speech acts in English: A contrastive analysis of discourse in L1 and L2 settings. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(2). 163–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-2002.Search in Google Scholar

Hough, Julian, Ye Tian, Laura de Ruiter, Betz Simon, Spyros Kousidis, David Schlangen & Jonathan Ginzburg. 2016. DUEL: A multi-lingual multimodal dialogue corpus for disfluency, exclamations and laughter. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’16), 1784–1788. Portorož, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1985. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Maxwell Atkinson& John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction), 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.021Search in Google Scholar

Juyaso, Arthit. 2015. Thai time: Using pronouns like a pro (Part 1: How to say ‘I’ in Thai). ExpatDen. Available at: https://www.expatden.com/thai/thai-time-using-pronouns-like-a-pro-part-1-how-to-say-i-in-thai/.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1987 [1790]. Critique of judgment. (Werner S. Pluhar, trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Knutson, Thomas, Rosechongporn Komolsevin, Pat Chatiketu & Val Smith. 2003. A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 27(1). 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(02)00060-3.Search in Google Scholar

Kuiper, Nicholas A., Melissa Grimshaw, Catherine Leite & Gillian Kirsh. 2004. Humor is not always the best medicine: Specific components of sense of humor and psychological well-being. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 17(1–2). 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2004.002.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Roger Garside & Michael Bryant. 1994. CLAWS4: The tagging of the British national corpus. In Proceedings of COLING 1994: The 15th international conference on computational linguistics, 622–628.10.3115/991886.991996Search in Google Scholar

Leonardi, Giuseppe, Iris Nomikou, Katharina J. Rohlfing & Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi. 2016. Vocal interactions at the dawn of communication: The emergence of mutuality and complementarity in mother-infant interaction. In 2016 joint IEEE international conference on development and learning and epigenetic robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), 288–293. Cergy-Pontoise, France: IEEE.10.1109/DEVLRN.2016.7846835Search in Google Scholar

Levisen, Carsten. 2019. Laughter interjections. Scandinavian Studies in Language 10(1). 110–130. https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v10i1.114674.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Debra & Arthur, Graesser. 1988. Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11(1). 35–60. https://doi.org/10.7146/sss.v10i1.114674.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod & Thomas Ford. 2018. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Cambridge & London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maslow, Abraham. 1968. Toward a psychology of being. New York: Simon and Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzocconi, Chiara, Ye Tian & Jonathan Ginzburg. 2020. What’s your laughter doing there? A taxonomy of the pragmatic functions of laughter. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2020.2994533.Search in Google Scholar

McCann, Robert M., James M. Honeycutt & Shaughan A. Keaton. 2010. Toward greater specificity in cultural value analyses: The interplay of intrapersonal communication affect and cultural values in Japan, Thailand, and the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 39(3). 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2010.534862.Search in Google Scholar

McComas, Henry Clay. 1923. The origin of laughter. Psychological Review 30(1). 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073921.Search in Google Scholar

Mintz, Lawrence. 2008. Humour and popular culture. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 281–301. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.281Search in Google Scholar

Mischler, JamesIII. 2008. Expressive phonology as evaluative comment in personal oral narrative: The play frame and language learning. System 36(2). 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John. 2008. Philosophy and religion. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 211–242. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.211Search in Google Scholar

Mulkay, Michael Joseph. 1988. On humour: Its nature and its place in modern society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nwokah, Evangeline E., Hui-Chin Hsu, Olga Dobrowolska & Alan Fogel. 1994. The development of laughter in mother-infant communication: Timing parameters and temporal sequences. Infant Behavior and Development 17(1). 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-6383(94)90019-1.Search in Google Scholar

Pagram, Penporn & Jeremy Pagram. 2006. Issues in e‐learning: A Thai case study. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 26(1). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00175.x.Search in Google Scholar

Paletz, Susannah, Arlouwe Sumer & Ella Miron-Spektor. 2018. Psychological factors surrounding disagreement in multicultural design team meetings. CoDesign 14(2). 98–114.10.1080/15710882.2017.1378685Search in Google Scholar

Plato. 2000 [375 BCE]. The republic (G. R. F. Ferrari, ed.; Tom Griffith, trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Deirdre J. Derrick. 2016. A meta‐analysis of reliability coefficients in second language research. The Modern Language Journal 100(2). 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12335.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2010. Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, Robert F. & Jordan E. Swain. 2002. Humor and its implications for leadership effectiveness. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15(2). 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2002.010.Search in Google Scholar

Provine, Robert. 2000. The science of laughter: Far from mere reactions to jokes, hoots and hollers are serious business: They’re innate – and important – social tools. Psychology Today 33(6). 58–63.Search in Google Scholar

Provine, Robert. 2001. Laughter: A scientific investigation. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humour. Boston & Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Rees-Miller, Janie. 2000. Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 32(8). 1087–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00088-0.Search in Google Scholar

Regan, Pamela C. & Anupama Joshi. 2003. Ideal partner preferences among adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 31(1). 13–20. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.1.13.Search in Google Scholar

Romaniuk, Tanya. 2013. Interviewee laughter and disaffiliation in broadcast news interviews. In Phillip Glenn & Elizabeth Holt (eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction, 201–220. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472542069.ch-010Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. In Gail Jefferson & Emanuel Schegloff (eds.), Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. 470–477. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Savage, Brandon, Heidi Lujan, Raghavendar Thipparthi & DiCarlo Stephen. 2017. Humor, laughter, learning, and health! A brief review. Advances in Physiology Education 41. 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00030.2017.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002Search in Google Scholar

Schröder, Marc. 2003. Experimental study of affect bursts. Speech Communication 40(1–2). 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00078-X.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Peter, Shaun Dugan, Ark Peterson & Wok Leung. 1998. Individualism: Collectivism and the handling of disagreement. A 23 country study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22(3). 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(98)00012-1.Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, David. 2014. Thai: An essential grammar. New York City: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. 1860. The physiology of laughter, 395–402. New York City: Macmillan’s Magazine.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Robert J. 1985. Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(3). 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607.Search in Google Scholar

Stickney, Jeff. 2010. Reconciling forms of Asian humility with assessment practices and character education programs in North America. Ethics and Education 5(1). 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449641003666009.Search in Google Scholar

Suls, Jerry. 1977. Cognitive and disparagement theories of humor: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. In Antony Chapman & Hugh Foot (eds.), It’s a funny thing, humour, 41–45. Oxford: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-021376-7.50012-7Search in Google Scholar

Szameitat, Diana P., Kai Alter, André Szameitat, Chris J. Darwin, Dirk Wildgruber, Susanne Dietrich & Annette Sterr. 2009a. Differentiation of emotions in laughter at the behavioral level. Emotion 9(3). 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015692.Search in Google Scholar

Szameitat, Diana P., Kai Alter, André Szameitat, Dirk Wildgruber, Annette Sterr & Chris J. Darwin. 2009b. Acoustic profiles of distinct emotional expressions in laughter. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(1). 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3139899.Search in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko. 2009. Comprehension of indirect opinions and refusals in L2 Japanese. In Naoko Taguchi (ed.), Pragmatic competence, 249–274. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218558.249Search in Google Scholar

Trouvain, Jürgen & Khiet P. Truong. 2017. Laughter. In Salvator Attardo (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 340–355. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731162-24Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Adrienne & Paula Niedenthal. 2018. Developing a social functional account of laughter. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 12(4). e12383. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12383.Search in Google Scholar

Yim, JongEun. 2016. Therapeutic benefits of laughter in mental health: A theoretical review. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 239(3). 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.239.243.Search in Google Scholar

Yue, Xiaodong, Feng Jiang, Su Lu & Neelam Hiranandani. 2016. To be or not to be humorous? Cross cultural perspectives on humor. Frontiers in Psychology 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01495.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-03-30
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2022-2004/html
Scroll to top button