Abstract
This paper presents the geometric modeling methods based on the class and shape function transformation (CST) technique for the hypersonic vehicle. First, the typical waverider configuration is considered to be the basic shape for the hypersonic vehicle, and then the CST method is applied to describe and build the improved geometric shape. On this basis, the aerodynamic forces and thrust are estimated according to the shock wave and Rayleigh flow theory. Furthermore, the model dynamic features using the CST method are analyzed in comparison to the basic shape. Finally, the simulation results show the effectiveness of this method for the hypersonic vehicle.
Funding source: National Natural Science Foundation of China
Award Identifier / Grant number: 61403191
Funding statement: Funding: This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61403191; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant No. BK20130817; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No. NJ20160052.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the editors and the reviewers for their help and improvements to the quality of our presentation.
References
[1] K. K. Gupta and L. S. Voelker, Aeroelastic simulation of hypersonic flight vehicles, AIAA J. 50 (2012), 717–723.10.2514/1.J051386Search in Google Scholar
[2] D. J. Dalle, S. M. Torrez, and J. F. Driscoll, Sensitivity of Flight Dynamics of Hypersonic Vehicles to Design Parameters. 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Tours, France, 201210.2514/6.2012-5909Search in Google Scholar
[3] C. Peebles, Learning from Experience: Case Studies of the Hyper-X Project. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, 2009.10.2514/6.2009-1523Search in Google Scholar
[4] W. C. Engelund, S. D. Holland, C. E. Cockrell, and R. D. Bittner, Aerodynamic database development for the hyper-x airframe-integrated scramjet propulsion experiments, J. Spacecraft Rockets 38 (2001), 803–810.10.2514/6.2000-4006Search in Google Scholar
[5] K. K. Gupta, L. S. Voelker, and C. F. D. - Based Aeroelastic Analysis of the X-43 Hypersonic Flight Vehicle, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2001.10.2514/6.2001-712Search in Google Scholar
[6] E. A. Morelli, Flight-test experiment design for characterizing stability and control of hypersonic vehicles, J Guid. Control Dynam. 32 (2009), 949–959.10.2514/1.37092Search in Google Scholar
[7] H. Apdin, F. Ferguson, and S. Y. Zhang, An Engineering Method for the Construction and Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicle Configurations. AIAA/CIRA 13th International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies, Capua, Italy, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-3364Search in Google Scholar
[8] C. Whitmer, A. Kelkar, and J. Vogel, Control Centric Parametric Trade Studies for Scramjet-Powered Hypersonic Vehicles. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010.10.2514/6.2010-8283Search in Google Scholar
[9] R. P. Starkey, F. Rankins, and D. Pines, Coupled Waverider/Trajectory Optimization for Hypersonic Cruise. 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-530Search in Google Scholar
[10] K. G. Bowcutt, G. Kuruvila, and T. A. Grandine, Advancements in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Applied to Hypersonic Vehicles to Achieve Closure. 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, OH, 2008.10.2514/6.2008-2591Search in Google Scholar
[11] K. C. Zeng, J. W. Xiang, D. C. Li, and A. Modeling, Analysis of a canard-configured air-breathing hypersonic vehicles, Chin. J. Aeronaut. 26 (2013), 831–840.10.1016/j.cja.2013.06.001Search in Google Scholar
[12] S. G. Frendreis and C. E. Cesniky, 3D Simulation of Flexible Hypersonic Vehicles. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010.10.2514/6.2010-8229Search in Google Scholar
[13] J. A. Samareh, Survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization, AIAA J. 39 (2001), 877–884.10.2514/2.1391Search in Google Scholar
[14] J. E. Hicken and D. W. Zing, Integrated geometry parametrization and grid movement using B-spline meshes. 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Victoria, British Columbia Canada, 2008.10.2514/6.2008-6079Search in Google Scholar
[15] J. A. Samareh, Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on Free-Form Deformation, 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, 2004.10.2514/6.2004-4630Search in Google Scholar
[16] B. M. Kulfan and J. E. Bussoletti, Fundamental Parametric Geometry Representations for Aircraft Component Shapes. 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, VA, 2006.10.2514/6.2006-6948Search in Google Scholar
[17] B. M. Kulfan, Universal parametric geometry representation method, J. Aircraft 44 (2008), 142–158.10.2514/1.29958Search in Google Scholar
[18] R. P. Starkey and M. J. Lewis, A simple analytical model for parametric studies of hypersonic waveriders. AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Norfolk, VA, 1998.10.2514/6.1998-1616Search in Google Scholar
[19] R. P. Starkey, D. D. Liu, and D. H. Baldelli, Rapid Conceptual Design and Analysis of a Hypersonic Air-Breathing Missile, 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Dayton, OH, 2008.10.2514/6.2008-2590Search in Google Scholar
[20] M. H. Straathof and M. J. Tooren, Extension to the class-shape-transformation method based on B-splines, AIAA J. 49 (2011), 780–790.10.2514/1.J050706Search in Google Scholar
[21] V. Sripawadkul, M. Padulo, and M. Guenov, A Comparison of Airfoil Shape Parameterization Techniques for Early Design Optimization. 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, TX, 2010.10.2514/6.2010-9050Search in Google Scholar
[22] B. M. Kulfan, A Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method –“CST”. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2007.10.2514/6.2007-62Search in Google Scholar
[23] M. A. Bolender and D. B. Doma, Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle, J. Spacecraft Rockets 44 (2007), 374–387.10.2514/1.23370Search in Google Scholar
[24] D. J. Dalle, S. M. Torrez, and J. F. Driscoll, Rapid analysis of scramjet and linear plug nozzles, J. Spacecraft Rockets 28 (2012), 545–555.10.2514/1.B34391Search in Google Scholar
[25] C. Birzer and C. J. Doolan, Quasi-one-dimensional model of hydrogen-fueled scramjet combustors, J. Spacecraft Rockets 25 (2009), 1220–1225.10.2514/1.43716Search in Google Scholar
[26] X. Li, Z. H. Wang, and G. Y. Wu, Numerical analysis of shockwave propagation in urban underpass, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 13 (2012), 201–207.10.1515/ijnsns.2011.143Search in Google Scholar
[27] T. Skujins, C. E. Cesnik, and M. X. Oppenheimer, Canard–Elevon interactions on a hypersonic vehicle, J. Spacecraft Rockets 47 (2010), 90–100.10.2514/1.44743Search in Google Scholar
[28] A. G. Kelkar, J. Vogel, and C. Whitmer, Design Tool for Control-Centric Modeling, Analysis, and Trade Studies for Hypersonic Vehicles. 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, San Francisco, CA, 2011.10.2514/6.2011-2225Search in Google Scholar
[29] Y. B. Liu, J. Deng, and Y. P. Lu, Preliminary research on optimal design based on control demands for hypersonic morphing vehicle, IEEE Aero. El. Sys. Mag. 28 (2013), 23–31.10.1109/MAES.2013.6516146Search in Google Scholar
[30] M. A. Bolender and D. B. Doma. Flight Path Angle Dynamics of Air-breathing Hypersonic Vehicles. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, 2006.10.2514/6.2006-6692Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
