Abstract
Water-holding capacity (WHC) is an important indicator of pork quality, but the existing detection methods of WHC are either expensive or time-consuming. In this study, a new method of pork WHC detection was developed by a composite film. The preparation method, mechanical properties and service life of the composite film were studied. The result showed that composite film was 0.46 ± 0.06 mm thick and had a service life of 21 days, tensile strength of 7.72 ± 0.11 MPa and the elongation at break of 28.54 ± 0.15%. Thirty groups of pork samples were randomly selected to build the model and another twenty groups were used to verify the model accuracy. Results showed that the accuracy of composite film coupled with Fisher discriminant model to detect the WHC of pork is 90%. This study demonstrates the high value of composite film as a detection tool to classify WHC of pork.
Funding source: Comparative Analysis of Quality Superiority of “Yangguang Pork”
Award Identifier / Grant number: NX2019008
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This work was financially supported by Comparative Analysis of Quality Superiority of “Yangguang Pork” (NX2019008).
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Gault, N. The relationship between water-holding capacity and cooked meat tenderness in some beef muscles as influenced by acidic conditions below the ultimate pH. Meat Sci 1985;15:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(85)90071-3.Search in Google Scholar
2. Hughes, JM, Oiseth, SK, Purslow, PP, Warner, RD. A structural approach to understanding the interactions between colour, water-holding capacity and tenderness. Meat Sci 2014;98:520–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.022.Search in Google Scholar
3. Huff-Lonergan, E, Lonergan, S. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 2005;71:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022.Search in Google Scholar
4. Wu, W, Fu, Y, Therkildsen, M, Li, X, Dai, R. Molecular understanding of meat quality through application of proteomics. Food Rev Int 2015;31:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2014.961073.Search in Google Scholar
5. Offer, G, Trinick, J. On the mechanism of water holding in meat: the swelling and shrinking of myofibrils. Meat Sci 1983;8:245–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(83)90013-x.Search in Google Scholar
6. Apple, JK, Yancey, JW. The quandaries of measuring meat quality. J Anim Sci 2016;94:64–5. https://doi.org/10.2527/msasas2016-138.Search in Google Scholar
7. Fang, Z, Zhao, Y, Warner, R, Johnson, S. Active and intelligent packaging in meat industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 2017;61:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
8. Kamruzzaman, M, Makino, Y, Oshita, S. Parsimonious model development for real-time monitoring of moisture in red meat using hyperspectral imaging. Food Chem 2016;196:1084–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.051.Search in Google Scholar
9. Rao, W, Wang, Z, Shen, Q, Li, G, Song, X, Zhang, D. LF-NMR to explore water migration and water–protein interaction of lamb meat being air-dried at 35 °C. Dry Technol 2018;36:366–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2017.1339084.Search in Google Scholar
10. Weeranantanaphan, J, Downey, G, Allen, P, Sun, D. A review of near infrared spectroscopy in muscle food analysis: 2005–2010. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 2011;19:61–104. https://doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.924.Search in Google Scholar
11. Wang, X, Muhoza, B, Wang, X, Feng, T, Xia, S, Zhang, X. Comparison between microwave and traditional water bath cooking on saltiness perception, water distribution and microstructure of grass crap meat. Food Res Int 2019;125:108521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108521.Search in Google Scholar
12. Qiao, J, Wang, N, Ngadi, M, Gunenc, A, Monroy, M, Gariepy, C, et al.. Prediction of drip-loss, pH, and color for pork using a hyperspectral imaging technique. Meat Sci 2007;76:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.031.Search in Google Scholar
13. Bowker, BC, Zhuang, H. Relationship between water-holding capacity and protein denaturation in broiler breast meat. Poultry Sci 2015;94:1657–64. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev120.Search in Google Scholar
14. Monroy, M, Prasher, SO, Ngadi, M, Wang, N, Karimi, Y. Pork meat quality classification using visible/near-infrared spectroscopic data. Biosyst Eng 2010;107:271–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.09.006.Search in Google Scholar
15. Hu, YH, Guo, KQ, Noguchi, G, Kawano, S, Satake, T. Prediction of water holding capacity of fresh pork using near infrared spectroscopy. Spectrosc Spectr Anal 2009;29:3259–62.Search in Google Scholar
16. Samuel, D, Park, B, Sohn, M, Wicker, L. Visible-near-infrared spectroscopy to predict water-holding capacity in normal and pale broiler breast meat. Poultry Sci 2011;90:914–21. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01116.Search in Google Scholar
17. Elmasry, G, Nakauchi, S. Image analysis operations applied to hyperspectral images for non-invasive sensing of food quality – a comprehensive review. Biosyst Eng 2016;142:53–82.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.11.009Search in Google Scholar
18. Yi, Y, Wei, W, Hong, Z, Seung Chul, Y, Hongzhe, J. Fusion of spectra and texture data of hyperspectral imaging for the prediction of the water-holding capacity of fresh chicken breast filets. Appl Sci 2018;8:640.10.3390/app8040640Search in Google Scholar
19. Bertram, HC, Andersen, HJ, Karlsson, A. Comparative study of low-field NMR relaxation measurements and two traditional methods in the determination of water holding capacity of pork. Meat Sci 2001;57:125–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(00)00080-2.Search in Google Scholar
20. Gai, S, Zhang, Z, Zou, Y, Liu, D. Rapid and non-destructive detection of water-injected pork using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Int J Food Eng 2019;2019:15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3536824.Search in Google Scholar
21. Grau, R. Die Bestimmung der Wasserbindung des Fleisches mittels der Pre-β methode. Fleischwirtschaft 1956;8:733–4.Search in Google Scholar
22. Zapotoczny, P, Kozera, W, Karpiesiuk, K, Pawowski, R. The use of computer-assisted image analysis in the evaluation of the effect of management systems on changes in the color, chemical composition and texture of M. longissimus dorsi in pigs. Meat Sci 2014;97:518–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.010.Search in Google Scholar
23. Jo, C, Nam, KC. Comparison of pH, water holding capacity and color among meats from Korean native chickens. Korean J Poultry Sci 2015;42:101–8.10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.2.101Search in Google Scholar
24. Ye, K, Ding, D, Zhu, X. Modified atmosphere packaging with a small change in gas ratio could maintain pork quality during −3 °C storage. Food Contr 2020;109:106943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106943.Search in Google Scholar
25. Achata, EM, Inguglia, ES, Esquerre, C, Tiwari, BK, Odonnell, CP. Evaluation of Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging as a process analytical tool to classify brined pork samples and predict brining salt concentration. J Food Eng 2019;246:134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.10.022.Search in Google Scholar
26. Wang, X, Wu, R, Cai, Y, Li, C, Wang, Y, Zhu, L, et al.. Nondestructive detection method for beef water-holding capacity using modified test paper. Int J Food Eng 2019;15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijfe-2018-0396.Search in Google Scholar
27. Huntrakul, K, Harnkarnsujarit, N. Effects of plasticizers on water sorption and aging stability of whey protein/carboxy methyl cellulose films. J Food Eng 2020;272:109809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109809.Search in Google Scholar
28. Zamorano, J, Gambaruto, M. Contribution to improving the meat water holding capacity test by the filter paper press method. A comparison of three methods for measuring areas. Meat Sci 1997;46:129–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(97)00011-9.Search in Google Scholar
29. Yuan, Y, Hu, Z, Fu, X, Jiang, L, Xiao, Y, Hu, K, et al.. Poly (lactic acid) plasticized by biodegradable glyceryl lactate. J Appl Polym Sci 2016;133:43460. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43460.Search in Google Scholar
30. Shi, S, Peng, X, Liu, T, Chen, YN, He, C, Wang, H. Facile preparation of hydrogen-bonded supramolecular PVA-glycerol gels with excellent thermoplasticity and mechanical properties. Polymer 2017;111:168–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.051.Search in Google Scholar
31. Brøndum, J, Munck, L, Henckel, P. Prediction of water-holding capacity and composition of porcine meat by comparative spectroscopy. Meat Sci 2000;55:177–85.10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00141-2Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
