Abstract
This paper presents a novel real-time hybrid battery state of charge (SoC) and state of health (SoH) estimation technique with less computational effort for optimal operation in renewable energy integrated microgrid applications. The proposed SoC estimation technique utilizes battery terminal voltage and current information along with stress factors like battery charge–discharge rates and temperature effects to accurately estimate the SoC. In addition, it considers the open-circuit voltage (OCV) and SoC relation to dynamically recalibrate the SoC during idle conditions. The proposed SoH estimation technique uses a modified coulomb counting method and variation of battery capacity at different charge–discharge rates to precisely estimate the SoH of the battery. Simulation studies are carried out by considering the aging factor, temperature effect, and charge–discharge rates to analyze the performance of the proposed techniques under various dynamic conditions. A LabVIEW-based application is developed, and experimental verification in terms of estimation accuracy, real-time monitoring is carried out to verify the efficacy of the proposed technique. A comparative analysis with state-of-the-art estimation techniques is presented for validating the effectiveness and usefulness in real-time applications.
Funding source: Ministry of New and Renewable Energy India
Award Identifier / Grant number: 24/29/2016-SWES (R&D)
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Alramlawi, M, Li, P. Design optimization of a residential PV-battery microgrid with a detailed battery lifetime estimation model. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2020;56:2020–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2020.2965894.Search in Google Scholar
2. Torre, SDL, González-González, JM, Aguado, JA, Martín, S. Optimal battery sizing considering degradation for renewable energy integration. IET Renew Power Gener 2019;13:572–7. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5489.Search in Google Scholar
3. May, GJ, Davidson, A, Monahov, B. Lead batteries for utility energy storage: a review. J Energy Storage 2018;15:145–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2017.11.008.Search in Google Scholar
4. Neto, PBL, Saavedra, OR, Ribeiro, LADS. A dual-battery storage bank configuration for isolated microgrids based on renewable sources. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2018;9:1618–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2018.2800689.Search in Google Scholar
5. Thirugnanam, K, Kerk, SK, Yuen, C, Liu, N, Zhang, M. Energy management for renewable microgrid in reducing diesel generators usage with multiple types of battery. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2018;65:6772–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2018.2795585.Search in Google Scholar
6. McKeon, BB, Furukawa, J, Fenstermacher, S. Advanced lead- acid batteries and the development of grid-scale energy storage systems. Proc IEEE 2014;102:951–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2014.2316823.Search in Google Scholar
7. Masaud, TM, El-Saadany, EF. Correlating optimal size, cycle life estimation, and technology selection of batteries: a two-stage approach for microgrid applications. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2020;11:1257–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2019.2921804.Search in Google Scholar
8. Zhao, B, Zhang, X, Chen, J, Wang, C, Guo, L. Operation optimization of standalone microgrids considering lifetime characteristics of battery energy storage system. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2013;4:934–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2013.2248400.Search in Google Scholar
9. Elsayed, AT, Lashway, CR, Mohammed, OA. Advanced battery management and diagnostic system for smart grid infrastructure. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016;7:897–905.10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741171Search in Google Scholar
10. Shahriari, M, Farrokhi, M. Online state-of-health estimation of VRLA batteries using state of charge. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2013;60:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2012.2186771.Search in Google Scholar
11. Gangatharan, S, Rengasamy, M, Elavarasan, RM, Das, N, Hossain, E, Sundaram, VM. A novel battery supported energy management system for the effective handling of feeble power in hybrid microgrid environment. IEEE Access 2020;8:217391–415. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.202010.1109/access.2020.3039403.Search in Google Scholar
12. Coleman, M, Lee, CK, Zhu, C, Hurley, WG. State-of-charge determination from EMF voltage estimation: using impedance, terminal voltage, and current for lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2007;54:2550–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2007.899926.Search in Google Scholar
13. Micea, MV, Ungurean, L, Carstoiu, GN, Groza, V. Online state-of-health assessment for battery management systems. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2011;60:1997–2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2011.2115630.Search in Google Scholar
14. Yue, L, Shen, Z, Ray, A, Rahn, CD. Realtime estimation of lead-acid battery parameters: a dynamic data-driven approach. J Power Sources 2014;268:758–64.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.099Search in Google Scholar
15. Ying, SS, Su, DT, Yang, JL, Rong, WH. Electrochemistry theorem based state of charge estimation of the lead acid batteries for electric vehicles. WSEAS Trans Syst 2008;7:1092–103.Search in Google Scholar
16. Krivik, P, Vaculik, S, Baca, P, Kazelle, J. Determination of state of charge of lead acid battery by EIS. J Energy Storage 2019;21:581–5.10.1016/j.est.2018.12.020Search in Google Scholar
17. Tong, S, Kelein, MP, Park, JW. Online optimization of battery open circuit voltage for improved state of charge and state of health estimation. J Power Sources 2015;293:416–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.157.Search in Google Scholar
18. Anbuky, AH, Pascoe, PE. VRLA battery state-of-charge estimation in telecommunication power systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2000;47:565–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/41.847897.Search in Google Scholar
19. Krivik, P. Methods of SoC determination of lead acid battery. J Energy Storage 2018;15:191–5.10.1016/j.est.2017.11.013Search in Google Scholar
20. Kumar, KSR, Sastry, VV, Sekhar, OC, Mohanta, DK, Rajesh, D, Varma, MPC. Design and fabrication of Coulomb counter for estimation of SOC of battery. In: 2016 IEEE International conference on power electronics. Trivandrum: Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES); 2016:1–6 pp.10.1109/PEDES.2016.7914473Search in Google Scholar
21. Gao, Y, Liu, K, Zhu, C, Zhang, X, Zhang, D. Co-estimation of state-of-charge and state-of- health for lithium-ion batteries using an enhanced electrochemical model. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2022;69:2684–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2021.3066946.Search in Google Scholar
22. Krüger, E, Tran, QT, Mamadou, K. Normalized least mean squares observer for battery parameter estimation. In: 2015 IEEE Eindhoven powertech. Eindhoven; 2015:1–6 pp.10.1109/PTC.2015.7232752Search in Google Scholar
23. Song, Q, Mi, Y, Lai, W. A novel variable forgetting factor recursive least square algorithm to improve the anti-interference ability of battery model parameters identification. IEEE Access 2019;7:61548–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2903625.Search in Google Scholar
24. Huang, C, Wang, Z, Zhao, Z, Wang, L, Lai, CS, Wang, D. Robustness evaluation of extended and unscented kalman filter for battery state of charge estimation. IEEE Access 2018;6:27617–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2833858.Search in Google Scholar
25. Mastali, M, Arenas, JV, Fraser, R, Fowler, M, Afshar, S, Stevens, M. Battery state of charge estimation using Kalman Filtering. J Power Sources 2013;239:294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.131.Search in Google Scholar
26. Afshar, S, Morris, K, Khajepour, A. State-of-charge estimation using an EKF-based adaptive observer. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 2019;27:1907–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2018.2842038.Search in Google Scholar
27. Vasebi, A, Bathaee, SMT, Partovibakhsh, M. Predicting state of charge of lead-acid batteries for hybrid electric vehicles by extended Kalman filter. Energy Convers Manag 2008;49:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2007.05.017.Search in Google Scholar
28. Liu, G, Xu, C, Li, H, Jiang, K, Wang, K. State of charge and online model parameters co-estimation for liquid metal batteries. Appl Energy 2019;250:677–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.032.Search in Google Scholar
29. Liu, K, Tang, X, Widanage, WD. Light-weighted battery state of charge estimation based on the sigma-delta technique. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020;53:12446–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1325.Search in Google Scholar
30. Ouyang, Q, Chen, J, Zheng, J, Hong, Y. SOC estimation-based quasi-sliding mode control for cell balancing in lithium-ion battery packs. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2018;65:3427–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2750629.Search in Google Scholar
31. Feng, L, Ding, J, Han, Y. Improved sliding mode based EKF for the SOC estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 2020;26:2875–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-03368-9.Search in Google Scholar
32. Zhou, D, Zhang, K, Ravey, A, Gao, F, Miraoui, A. Online estimation of lithium polymer batteries state-of-charge using particle filter-based data fusion with multimodels approach. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2016;52:2582–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2016.2524438.Search in Google Scholar
33. Kutluay, K, Cadirci, Y, Ozkazanc, YS, Cadirci, I. A new online state-of-charge estimation and monitoring system for sealed lead-acid batteries in Telecommunication power supplies. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2005;52:1315–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2005.855671.Search in Google Scholar
34. Sato, S, Kawamura, A. A new estimation method of state of charge using terminal voltage and internal resistance for lead acid battery. In: 2002 Proceedings of the power conversion conference-Osaka. Osaka, Japan; 2002:565–70 pp.Search in Google Scholar
35. Zhu, CB, Coleman, M, Hurley, WG. State of charge determination in a lead-acid battery: combined EMF estimation and Ah-balance approach. In: 2004 IEEE 35th annual power electronics specialists conference. Aachen, Germany; 2004:1908–14 pp.Search in Google Scholar
36. Han, J, Kim, D, Sunwoo, M. State-of-charge estimation of lead acid batteries using an adaptive extended Kalman filter. J Power Sources 2009;188:606–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.143.Search in Google Scholar
37. Vasebi, A, Partovibakhsh, M, Bathaee, SMT. A novel combined battery model for state-of-charge estimation in lead-acid batteries based on extended Kalman filter for hybrid electric vehicle applications. J Power Sources 2007;174:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.011.Search in Google Scholar
38. Diao, W, Jiang, J, Zhang, C, Liang, H, Pecht, M. Energy state of health estimation for battery packs based on the degradation and inconsistency. Energy Proc 2017;142:3578–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.248.Search in Google Scholar
39. I-Kun, T, Inamori, M, Morimoto, M. SOH estimation of lead acid battery by artificial deterioration. In: 17th International conference on electrical machines and systems (ICEMS). Hangzhou; 2014:861–4 pp.10.1109/ICEMS.2014.7013589Search in Google Scholar
40. Riviere, E, Sari, A, Venet, P, Meniere, F, Bultel, Y. Innovative incremental capacity analysis implementation for C/LiFePo4 cell state of health estimation in electric vehicles. Batteries 2019;5:37. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries5020037.Search in Google Scholar
41. Kwiecien, M, Badeda, J, Huck, M, Komut, K, Duman, D, Sauer, DU. Determination of SoH of lead-acid batteries by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Appl Sci 2018;8:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060873.Search in Google Scholar
42. Berecibar, M, Garmendia, M, Gandiaga, I, Crego, J, Villarreal, I. State of health estimation algorithm of LiFePO4 battery packs based on differential voltage curves for battery management system application. Energy 2016;103:784–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.163.Search in Google Scholar
43. Tang, X, Gao, F, Liu, K, Liu, Q, Foley, AM. A balancing current ratio based state-of-health estimation solution for lithium-ion battery pack. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2022;69:8055–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2021.3108715.Search in Google Scholar
44. Liu, K, Hu, X, Meng, J, Guerrero, JM, Teodorescu, R. RU Boost-based ensemble machine learning for electrode quality classification in Li-ion battery manufacturing. In: IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics, early access; 2022.10.1109/TMECH.2021.3115997Search in Google Scholar
45. Liu, K, Peng, Q, Li, K, Chen, T. Data-based interpretable modeling for property forecasting and sensitivity analysis of Li-ion battery electrode. Automot. Innov; 2022, 5:121–33 pp.10.1007/s42154-021-00169-7Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
