Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 6, 2021

A novel Confidential Consortium Blockchain framework for peer to peer energy trading

  • Nihar Ranjan Pradhan ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Akhilendra Pratap Singh , Kaibalya Prasad Panda and Diptendu Sinha Roy

Abstract

The vital dependence of peer to peer (P2P) energy trading frameworks on creative Internet of Things (IoT) has been making it more vulnerable against a wide scope of attacks and performance bottlenecks like low throughput, high latency, high CPU, memory use, etc. This hence compromises the energy exchanging information to store, share, oversee, and access. Blockchain innovation as a feasible solution, works with the rule of untrusted members. To alleviate this threat and performance issues, this paper presents a Blockchain based Confidential Consortium (CoCo) P2P energy trading system that works on the trust issues among the energy exchanging networks and limits performance parameters. It reduces the duplicate validation by creating a trusted network on nodes, where participants identities are known and controlled. A Java-script-based smart contract is sent over the Microsoft CoCo system with Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) consensus protocol. Also, a functional model is designed for the proposed framework and the performance bench-marking has been done considering about latency, throughput, transaction rate control, success and fail transaction, CPU and memory usage, network traffic. Additionally, it is shown that PoET’s performance is superior to proof of work (PoW) for multi-hosting conditions. The measured throughput and latency moving toward database speeds with more flexible, business-specific confidentiality models, network policy management through distributed governance, support for non-deterministic transactions, and reduced energy consumption.


Corresponding author: Nihar Ranjan Pradhan, National Institute of Technology Meghalaya, Shillong 793003, Meghalaya, India, E-mail: .

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Singh, AP, Pradhan, NR, Luhach, AK, Agnihotri, S, Jhanjhi, NZ, Verma, S, et al.. A novel patient-centric architectural framework for blockchain-enabled healthcare applications. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2021;17:5779–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3037889.Search in Google Scholar

2. Celesti, A, Amft, O, Villari, M. Guest editorial special section on cloud computing, edge computing, internet of things, and big data analytics applications for healthcare industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2019;15:454–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2018.2883315.Search in Google Scholar

3. Pradhan, NR, Singh, AP, Kumar, N, Hassan, M, Roy, D. A flexible permission ascription (FPA) based blockchain framework for peer-to-peer energy trading with performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2021.3096832. In press.Search in Google Scholar

4. Pradhan, NR, Singh, AP. Smart Contracts for Automated Control System in Blockchain Based Smart Cities. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments 2021;13:253–67. https://doi.org/10.3233/ais-210601.Search in Google Scholar

5. Pradhan, NR, Singh, AP. Research issues of information security using blockchain technique in multiple media WSNs: a communication technique perceptive. In: Smart sensor networks using AI for industry 4.0. Boca Raton, London: CRC Press; 2021:65–76 pp.10.1201/9781003145028-4Search in Google Scholar

6. Pradhan, NR, Singh, AP, Kumar, V. Blockchain-enabled traceable, transparent transportation system for blood bank. In: Advances in VLSI, communication, and signal processing. lecture notes in electrical engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2021, vol 683.10.1007/978-981-15-6840-4_25Search in Google Scholar

7. Morstyn, T, Teytelboym, A, Mcculloch, MD. Bilateral contract networks for peer-to-peer energy trading. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019;10:2026–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2017.2786668.Search in Google Scholar

8. Grafana. Open source analytics and monitoring solution for every database. Available from: https://www.grafana.com/ [Accessed 3 Apr 2021].Search in Google Scholar

9. Devine, MT, Cuffe, P. Blockchain electricity trading under demurrage. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019;10:2323–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2019.2892554.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hyperledger Sawtooth Documentation. Ethereum client. Available from: https://www.Sawtooth.hyperledger.org/en/stable/ [Accessed 3 Apr 2021].Search in Google Scholar

11. Sadiq, A, Javed, MU, Khalid, R, Almogren, A, Shafiq, M, Javaid, N. Blockchain based data and energy trading in Internet of electric vehicles. IEEE Access 2021;9:7000–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048169.Search in Google Scholar

12. Aggarwal, S, Kumar, N, Gope, P. An efficient blockchain-based authentication scheme for energy-trading in V2G networks. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2021;17:6971–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3030949.Search in Google Scholar

13. Thakkar, P, Nathan, S, Viswanathan, B. Performance benchmarking and optimizing hyperledger fabric blockchain platform. In: 26th international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems (MASCOTS), 2018. Milwaukee, WI, USA: IEEE; 2018:264–76 pp.10.1109/MASCOTS.2018.00034Search in Google Scholar

14. Aitzhan, NZ, Svetinovic, D. Security and privacy in decentralized energy trading through multi-signatures, blockchain and anonymous messaging streams. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 2018;15:840–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2016.2616861.Search in Google Scholar

15. Afzal, M, Huang, Q, Amin, W, Umer, K, Raza, A, Naeem, M. Blockchain enabled distributed demand side management in community energy system with smart homes. IEEE Access 2020;8:37428–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975233.Search in Google Scholar

16. Houtan, B, Hafid, AS, Makrakis, D. A survey on blockchain-based self-sovereign patient identity in healthcare. IEEE Access 2020;8:90478–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2994090.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-31
Accepted: 2021-11-04
Published Online: 2021-12-06

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0391/html
Scroll to top button