Abstract
In this paper Power factor correction coefficient based transmission pricing is proposed to analyze an individual customer’s effect due to green energy transactions in existing power system. In this novel approach power factor correction coefficient is calculated for each customer under every transaction. This power factor correction coefficient is then added in conventional embedded cost distance based MW-mile and MVA-mile method for transmission pricing calculation for both active and reactive power flow through transmission line. This new proposed transmission pricing method calculate transmission charges for each customer and also help an ISO (independent system operator) to decide whether transaction increases or decreases the transmission cost. On the basis of performance of transaction an ISO can penalize or reward them. Proposed analysis is implemented on a 3-area IEEE-30 bus system with seven tie-lines in MATLAB environment. To show the effectiveness of the proposed method the results are compared with and without power factor correction based transmission pricing for each customer.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Soares, T, Pereira, F, Morais, H, Vale, Z. Cost allocation model for distribution networks considering high penetration of distributed energy resources. Elec Power Syst Res 2015;124:120–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.03.008.Search in Google Scholar
2. Garg, NK, Palwalia, DK, Sharma, H. Transmission pricing practices: a case study. Iraq J Electr Electron Eng 2017;13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.37917/ijeee.13.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
3. Sun, H, Yu, DC, Zheng, Q. A novel comprehensive pricing model for transmission networks. In: Power engineering society winter meeting, 2000. IEEE; 2000, vol 2:1186–90 pp.10.1109/PESW.2000.850115Search in Google Scholar
4. Benetti, MA, Sperandio, M. Transmission pricing: right insights for suitable cost allocation methods. In: Nojavan S, Zare K, editors. Electricity markets. Springer, Cham; 2020: 61–90 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36979-8_4.Search in Google Scholar
5. Chen, Z, Jing, Z, Xie, W. Pricing mechanism of power transmission in multi-level grid. Electr Power Constr 2018;7:4.Search in Google Scholar
6. Ruderer, D, Zöttl, G. Transmission pricing and investment incentives. Util Pol 2018;55:14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.08.005.Search in Google Scholar
7. Rudnick, H, Palma, R, Fernández, JE. Marginal pricing and supplement cost allocation in transmission open access. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1995;10:1125–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.387960.Search in Google Scholar
8. Ma, Y, Gou, S, Zhang, W, Wang, G, Zhang, Z. Comparison of cost allocation models for transmission and distribution by voltage levels based on postage stamp method and peak load liability method. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;621:1–8.10.1088/1755-1315/621/1/012041Search in Google Scholar
9. Soares, T, Cruz, M, Matos, M. Cost allocation of distribution networks in the distributed energy resources era. In: 2019 International conference on smart energy systems and technologies (SEST); 2019:1–6 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST.2019.8849089.Search in Google Scholar
10. Vishnu, CH, Reddy, GR, Anjaneyulu, V. Allocation of transmission cost using power flow tracing methods. Int J Eng Res Appl 2016;6:17–22.Search in Google Scholar
11. Pal, K, Pandit, M, Shrivastava, L. Incentive charge calculation for counter flow effect. Int J Power Energy Convers 2014;5:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpec.2014.059985.Search in Google Scholar
12. Patel, N, Chaudhary, RB. Transmission pricing: deregulated system and pricing methods. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
13. Pal, K, Pandit, M, Shrivastava, L. Incentive charge calculation for open access transmission system. In: Third IEEE international conference on power systems. Kharagpur, India: IIT; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/icpws.2009.5442775.Search in Google Scholar
14. Singh, AK, Ozveren, CS. A novel application of senstivity factor (ptdf) for transmission pricing evaluation in a deregulated power market. Gazi Univ J Sci 2020;33:1. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.460211.Search in Google Scholar
15. Pan, J, Teklu, Y, Rahman, S, Jun, K. Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2000;15:1218–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.898093.Search in Google Scholar
16. Kishore, CM, Venkaiah, C. Implementation of modified MW-mile method for transmission cost allocation by incorporation of transmission losses considering power factor. In: 2016 National Power Systems Conference (NPSC), Bhubaneswar; 2016:1–4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/npsc.2016.7858839.Search in Google Scholar
17. Andukury, M, Sarada, K. Cost allocation of transmission line using a new approach of MW mile method. Indian J Sci Technol 2016;9. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i28/92598.Search in Google Scholar
18. Kharbas, B, Fozdar, M, Tiwari, H. Comparative assessment of MW-mile and MVA-mile methods of transmission tariff allocation and revenue reconciliation. In: 2013 IEEE power & energy society general meeting; 2013:1–5 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESMG.2013.6672407.Search in Google Scholar
19. Kumar, N, Reddy, YRV, Das, D, Padhy, NP. Allocation of transmission charge by using MVA-Mile approaches for restructured Indian power utility. In: 2011 IEEE power and energy society general meeting; 2011:1–6 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2011.6039507.Search in Google Scholar
20. Vidhya, P, Ashok Kumar, R, Asokan, K. A novel MVA – mile method based cost allocation scheme for competitive power system by employing SSSC controller. Middle East J Sci Res 2016;24:3230–42.Search in Google Scholar
21. Karimi, M, Kheradmandi, M, Pirayesh, A. Risk-constrained transmission investing of generation companies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2019;34:1043–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2875509.Search in Google Scholar
22. Karimi, M, Pirayesh, A, Kheradmandi, M. Participation of generating companies in transmission investment in electricity markets. IET Gener, Transm Distrib 2018;12:632–4. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0413.Search in Google Scholar
23. Wang, Y, Wang, G, Zuo, Y, Fan, L, Wei, J. Comprehensive evaluation of power grid enterprises’ credit rating under the reform of transmission and distribution price. In: AIP Conference Proceedings; 2017; vol. 1820:040004-1–5 pp. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977276.Search in Google Scholar
24. Ding, Y. Impact of transmission and distribution price reform on assets and management of power grid enterprises. In: 9th international conference on social science and education research (SSER 2019); 2019:612–17 pp.Search in Google Scholar
25. https://al-roomi.org/multimedia/Power_Flow/30BusSystem/IEEE30BusSystemDATA2.pdf, last.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
