Abstract
The article explores the exhaustion of narrative as a cognitive instrument in trying to make sense of the “disconnective futures” of the Anthropocene and runaway technological imaginaries. Having its point of departure in the organic ties between narrative form and modern historical understanding, the article’s argument begins by sketching how the modern idea of a historical process entails constant crises of uncertainty, on the one hand, and functions simultaneously as the manager of the very crises it brings about, on the other. The means of this crisis management consists of crafting historical narratives which tame uncertainty and smooth ruptures in time into deeper continuities. It is this narrative crisis management of establishing connections between past, present, and futures, which breaks down when encountering the temporal disconnections of the Anthropocene and technological prospects. Narrative crisis management was created to attend to crises of uncertainty, but it is inadequate to cope with disconnective futures which are not merely uncertain, but unfathomable. Based on a distinction between uncertainty and unfathomability, the article argues that efforts to project narrative connections over disconnective futures produce cognitive failures, and concludes on a note of potential resolutions, hinting at the development of non-narrative and yet historically-minded cognitive instruments attuned to making sense of temporal disconnections.
References
Abbott, H. Porter. 2011. Narrativity. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/narrativity (accessed 20 February 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Adriaansen, Robbert-Jan. 2021. Social media and multimodal historical representation: Depicting Auschwitz on Instagram. In Stefan Berger, Nicola Brauch & Chris Lorenz (eds.), Analysing historical narratives: On academic, popular and educational framings of the past, 191–208. New York & Oxford: Berghahn.10.2307/j.ctv2tsxk1c.14Search in Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 2012. Thinking beyond trajectorism. In Michel Heinlein et al. (eds.), Futures of modernity: Challenges for cosmopolitical thought and practice, 25–31. Bielefeld: transcript.10.1515/transcript.9783839420768.25Search in Google Scholar
Assmann, Aleida. 2020. Is time out of joint? On the rise and fall of the modern time regime. Trans. Sarah Clift. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press & Cornell University Library.10.7591/9781501742446Search in Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 2000. The vital illusion. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/baud12100Search in Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan, Nicola Brauch & Chris Lorenz. (eds.) 2021. Analysing historical narratives: On academic, popular and educational framings of the past. New York & Oxford: Berghahn. 10.2307/j.ctv2tsxk1cSearch in Google Scholar
Boddice, Rob (ed.). 2011. Anthropocentrism: Humans, animals, environments. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004187948.i-348Search in Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. 2016. AI: Its nature and future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe & Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. 2016. The shock of the Anthropocene: The earth, history and us. Trans. David Fernbach. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2013. Experientiality. In Peter Hühn, Jan Christoph Meister, John Pier & Wolf Schmid (eds.), The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/experientiality (accessed 20 February 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2014. The experientiality of narrative: An enactivist approach. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110365658Search in Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2021. Emplotment beyond the human scale: On deep time and narrative nonlinearity. Poetics Today 42(3). 341–359.10.1215/03335372-9026131Search in Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2022. Storying the Anthropocene: Narrative challenges and opportunities in times of climate change. In Paul Dawson & Maria Mäkelä (eds.), The Routledge companion to narrative theory, 542–555. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003100157-50Search in Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35(2). 197–222.10.1086/596640Search in Google Scholar
Crist, Eileen & Helen Kopnina. 2014. Unsettling anthropocentrism. Dialectical Anthropology 38(4). 387–396. 10.1007/s10624-014-9362-1Search in Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1985. Narration and knowledge: Including the integral text of analytical philosophy of history. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Heather & Zoe Todd. 2017. On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16(4). 761–780.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Archive fever: A freudian impression. Diacritics 25(2). 9–63.10.2307/465144Search in Google Scholar
Domańska, Ewa. 2010. Beyond anthropocentrism in historical studies. Historein 10. 118–130.10.12681/historein.11Search in Google Scholar
Domańska, Ewa. 2018. The eco-ecumene and multispecies history: The case of abandoned protestant cemeteries in Poland. In Suzanne E. Pilaar Birch (ed.), Multispecies archaeology, 118–132. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315707709-8Search in Google Scholar
Dürbeck, Gabriele & Philip Hüpkes (eds.). 2021. Narratives of scale in the Anthropocene: Imagining human responsibility in an age of scalar complexity. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003136989Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a “natural” narratology. London & New York: Routledge.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2010. Experience, experientiality, and historical narrative: A view from narratology. In Thiemo Breyer & Daniel Creutz (eds.), Erfahrung und Geschichte: Historische Sinnbildung im Pränarrativen [Experience and history: Historical meaning constitution before the narrative], 40–72, Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240436.1.40Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. Trans. Donald F. Bouchard & Sherry Simon. In Paul Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault reader, 76–100. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2002. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Fudge, Erica. 2017. What was it like to be a cow? History and animal studies. In Linda Kalof (ed.), The Oxford handbook of animal studies, 258–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. 2016. The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226323176.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav. 2021. The nutmeg’s curse: Parables for a planet in crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226815466.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo. 1980. The cheese and the worms: The cosmos of a sixteenth-century miller. Trans. John Tedeschi & Anne Tedeschi. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Good, Irving John. 1965. Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. Advances in Computers 6. 31–88.10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60418-0Search in Google Scholar
Guldi, Jo & David Armitage. 2014. The history manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139923880Search in Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 1997. In 1926: At the edge of time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674038042Search in Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah. 2017. Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. New York: Harper.Search in Google Scholar
Hartog, François. 2015. Regimes of historicity: Presentism and experiences of time. Trans. Saskia Brown. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/columbia/9780231163767.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Heise, Ursula. 1997. Chronoschisms: Time, narrative, and postmodernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Hughes-Warrington, Marnie. 2013. Revisionist histories. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203769805Search in Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 1989. Historiographic metafiction: Parody and the intertextuality of history. In Patrick O’Donnel & Robert Con Davis (eds.), Intertextuality and contemporary American fiction, 3–32. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
James, Erin. 2020. Narrative in the Anthropocene. In Erin James & Eric Morel (eds.), Environment and narrative: New directions in econarratology, 183–202. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.10.26818/9780814214206Search in Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan. 2017. Haunting history: For a deconstructive approach to the past. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Critique and crisis: Enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Trans. Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray. 2004. The law of accelerating returns. In Christof Teuscher (ed.), Alan Turing: Life and legacy of a great thinker, 381–416. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-05642-4_16Search in Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, Ilkka. 2021. Transmedia history. Rethinking History 25(3). 281–306. 10.1080/13642529.2021.1963597Search in Google Scholar
Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel. 1978. Montaillou: Cathars and Catholics in a French village, 1294–1324. Trans. Barbara Bray, London: Scolar Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lianeri, Alexandra (ed.). 2016. Knowing future time in and through Greek historiography. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110430783Search in Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris, Stefan Berger & Nicola Brauch. 2021. Narrativity and historical writing: Introductory remarks. In Stefan Berger, Nicola Brauch & Chris Lorenz (eds.), Analysing historical narratives: On academic, popular and educational framings of the past, 1–25. New York & Oxford: Berghahn.10.2307/j.ctv2tsxk1c.5Search in Google Scholar
Louch, A. R. 1969. History as narrative. History and Theory 8(1). 54–70.10.2307/2504189Search in Google Scholar
Mathur, Nayanika. 2021. Crooked cats: Beastly encounters in the Anthropocene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226772080.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
McEwan, Cheryl. 2021. Decolonizing the Anthropocene. In David Chandler, Franziska Müller & Delf Rothe (eds.), International relations in the Anthropocene: New agendas, new agencies and new approaches, 77–94. Cham: Palgrave.10.1007/978-3-030-53014-3_5Search in Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O. 1987. Historical understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Rigney, Ann. 1990. The rhetoric of historical representation: Three narrative histories of the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511549946Search in Google Scholar
Rigney, Ann. 2010. When the monograph is no longer the medium: Historical narrative in the online age. History and Theory 49(4). 100–117.10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00562.xSearch in Google Scholar
Rigney, Ann. 2013. History as text: Narrative theory and history. In Nancy Partner & Sarah Foot (eds.), The SAGE handbook of historical theory, 183–201. Los Angeles: SAGE.10.4135/9781446247563.n12Search in Google Scholar
Robin, Libby. 2013. Histories for changing times: Entering the Anthropocene? Australian Historical Studies 44(3). 329–340.10.1080/1031461X.2013.817455Search in Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Trans. Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/rosa14834Search in Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut. 2020. The uncontrollability of the world. Trans. James C. Wagner. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Rockström, Johan. et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2). Article number 32.Search in Google Scholar
Satia, Priya. 2000. Time’s monster: How history makes history. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schliephake, Christopher & Evi Zemanek (eds.). 2023. Anticipatory environmental (hi)stories from antiquity to the Anthropocene. London: Lexington Books.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2019 a. History in times of unprecedented change: A theory for the 21st century. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350095083Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2019 b. The story of humanity and the challenge of posthumanity. History of the Human Sciences 32(2). 101–120.10.1177/0952695118779519Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár 2020 a. The epochal event: Transformations in the entangled human, technological, and natural worlds. Cham: Palgrave.10.1007/978-3-030-47805-6Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2020 b. The limits of Anthropocene narratives. European Journal of Social Theory 23(2). 184–199. 10.1177/1368431018799256Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár. 2021. Domesticating the future through history. Time & Society 30(4). 494–516.10.1177/0961463X211014804Search in Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár & Marek Tamm. 2021. Historical futures. History and Theory 60(1). 3–22.10.1111/hith.12190Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Bonnie G. 1998. The gender of history: Men, women, and historical practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephen R. Carpenter, Wim de Vries, Cynthia A. de Wit, Carl Folke, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Georgina M. Mace, Linn M. Persoon, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Belinda Reyers & Sverker Sörlin. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223). 1259855.10.1126/science.1259855Search in Google Scholar
Taillandier, Apolline. 2021. “Staring into the Singularity” and other posthuman tales: Transhumanist stories of future change. History and Theory 60(2). 215–233.10.1111/hith.12203Search in Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek. 2022. Future-oriented history. In Zoltán Boldizsár Simon & Lars Deile (eds.), Historical understanding: Past, present, and future, 131–140. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781350168640.ch-011Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney. 2014. History and biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of scale, problems of value. American Historical Review 119(5). 1587–1607. 10.1093/ahr/119.5.1587Search in Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney, Mark Williams & Jan Zalasiewicz. 2020. The Anthropocene: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Tokarczuk, Olga. 2019. The tender narrator. Nobel lecture. The Nobel Prize, 7 December. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/2018/tokarczuk/lecture (accessed 31 October 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Vattimo, Gianni. 1987. The end of (hi)story. Chicago Review 35(4). 20–30.10.2307/25305376Search in Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1996. The modernist event. In Vivian Sobchack (ed.), The persistence of history: Cinema, television, and the modern event, 17–38. London & New York: Routledge, Search in Google Scholar
Yusoff, Kathryn. 2018. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/9781452962054Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
