Abstract
This article argues against the claim by Emonds and Faarlund (2014, English: The language of the vikings. Palacký University: Olomouc) that English died out after the Norman Conquest, and was replaced by a North Germanic variety referred to as “Anglicised Norse”, which had been formed in the Danelaw area in a concerted effort by the Norse and Anglo-Saxon populations, presumably to overthrow the ruling French elite. Emonds and Faarlund base their claim on the existence of some 20–25 linguistic features which are said to have been absent from Old English, but which are present in Present-Day English and in Scandinavian languages. This article argues that genetic affiliation cannot be inferred from shared syntactic, morphological or lexical features, which may easily result from independent convergence in historically related languages. The main counter-argument, however, is chronological: the majority of the features adduced are indeed attested in Old English and often in other West Germanic languages also, and hence may not be attributed to Old Norse; nor can features which are not attested in English until late Middle English or early Modern English come from Old Norse. The continuity of English in the written record likewise renders the suggested scenario highly unlikely.
Acknowledgement
I am very grateful to Roger Lass and Meg Laing for reading an early draft of this paper and making numerous invaluable suggestions, for which it is much the better. Thanks are also due to two anonymous reviewers and to Muriel Norde for very useful comments and corrections. The remaining shortcomings are my responsibility.
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1985. The Semantic Development of Will. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics – historical word-formation, 11–21. Berlin, New York & Amsterdam: Mouton Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1997a. Middle English case loss and the creolization hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics 1(1). 63–89.10.1017/S1360674300000368Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1997b. The origins of the group genitive in English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95(1). 111–131.10.1111/1467-968X.00015Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 1998. Genitives and the creolization question. English Language and Linguistics 2(1). 129–135.10.1017/S1360674300000721Search in Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2000. Obsolescence and sudden death in syntax: The decline of verb-final order in early Middle English. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies. A dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 3–25. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110814699.3Search in Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th-century English. Lund: Liber Förlag.Search in Google Scholar
Antonsen, Elmer. 1965. On defining stages in prehistoric germanic. Language 41(1). 19–36.10.2307/411849Search in Google Scholar
Árnason, Kristjan. 1980. Quantity in historical phonology: Icelandic and related cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Askedal, John Ole. 2003. Typological reflections on loss of morphological case in Middle Low German and in the Mainland Scandinavian languages. In Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Historical linguistics 2003. Selected papers from the 16th international conference on historical linguistics, Copenhagen, 11–15 August 2003, 1–19. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.257.02askSearch in Google Scholar
Bagge, Sverre, Synnøve H. Smedsdal & Knut Helle (eds.). 1973. Norske middelalderdokumenter. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James & Karl Maroldt. 1977. The French lineage of English. In Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), Langues en contact: Pidgins, creoles; languages in contact, 21–53. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Bately, Janet. 1980. The old English Orosius. (Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 6.) London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. & Thomas Cable. 2005. A history of the English language. Oxford: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Bergen: University of Bergen PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin & Gjertrud F. Stenbrenden. 2013. English as a Scandinavian language? Learn to judge for yourself. Paper read at the Faglig-pedagogisk dag, University of Oslo, 31 October 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin & George Walkden. 2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39(1). 65–100.10.1017/S0332586515000219Search in Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 1992. Some new perspectives on the origins of standard written English. In J. A. van Leuvensteijn & Johannes B. Berns (eds.), Dialect and Standard Language/Dialekt und Standardsprache in the English, Dutch, German and Norwegian Language Areas, 71–105. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Search in Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael. 2002. Chancery Standard. In Christian Kay, Carole Hough & Irené Wotherspoon (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics. Selected papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002, 1–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.252.03benSearch in Google Scholar
Berndt, Rolf. 1965. The linguistic situation in England from the norman conquest to the loss of normandy. Philologica Pragensia 8(2–3). 145–63.Search in Google Scholar
Berndt, Rolf. 1972. The period of the final decline of French in medieval England (fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries). Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 4. 341–69.Search in Google Scholar
Berndt, Rolf. 1976. French and English in thirteenth-century England. An investigation into the linguistic situation after the loss of the duchy of normandy and other continental dominions. Aspekte der anglistischen Forschung in der DDR, Martin Lehnert zum 65. Geburtstag, 129–50. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Blair, Peter H. 1991. An introduction to Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Ans van Kemenade. 2003. Preverbs: an introduction. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2003, 1–11. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4020-1513-7Search in Google Scholar
Britton, Derek. 1991. On Middle English She, Sho: A Scots solution to an English problem. NOWELE 1991. 3–51.10.1075/nowele.17.01briSearch in Google Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth. 1996. English place names. London: Batsford.Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Claridge. Claudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333840Search in Google Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2014. Where did they come from? A native origin for they, their, them. Paper read at the 18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 14–18 July, 2014, University of Leuven, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar
Cuesta, Julia F. 2004. The (dis)continuity between old northumbrian and northern middle English. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49. 233–244.Search in Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1995. Middle English is a creole and its opposite: On the value of plausible speculation. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Linguistic change under contact conditions, 35–50. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Danchev, Andrei. 1986. Interlanguage simplification in Middle English vowel phonology? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 239–252. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Danchev, Andrei. 1997. The Middle English creolization hypothesis revisited. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, 79–108. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1986. Romance loans in Middle English: a re-assessment. In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.), Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. In honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday, 253–265. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English Language IV: 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.004Search in Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1999. Slow, slow, quick, quick, slow: The dance of language change. In Ana B. López, Dolores G. Álvarez, Esperanza R. Martínez & Eduardo V. Bravo (eds.), ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’, SELIM Studies in Medieval English Language, 51–64. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo.Search in Google Scholar
Dickins, Bruce & Richard M. Wilson (eds.), 1951. Early Middle English texts. London: Bowes and Bowes.Search in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 2011. English as a north Germanic language: From the norman conquest to the present. In Roman Trušník, Katarina Nemčoková & Gregory J. Bell (eds.), Theories and practice, 13–26. Zlin: Tomas Bata University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. & Jan Terje Faarlund. 2014. English: The language of the vikings. Olomouc: Palacký University.Search in Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2013. Er engelsk eit skandinavisk språk? – Svært sannsynleg [Is English a Scandinavian language? – Highly likely]. http://www.apollon.uio.no/artikler/2013/1_engelsk-skandinavisk-motsvar2.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1997. Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: Transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics, 109–134. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612312Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & Wim van der Wurff. 2006. Syntax. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 109–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791154.004Search in Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C. 1969. On the development of the structural use of word-order in modern English. In Roger Lass (ed.), Approaches to English historical linguistics, 303–310. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar
García, Luisa G. 1999. Tendencies in the use of the inflected genitive and the of-construction in Middle English. In Ana B. López, Dolores G. Álvarez, Esperanza R. Martínez & Eduardo V. Bravo (eds.), ‘Woonderous Ænglissce’. SELIM studies in medieval English language, 65–73. Vigo: Universidade de Vigo, Servicio de Publicacións.Search in Google Scholar
Geipel, John. 1971. The viking legacy. London: Newton Abbot.Search in Google Scholar
González-Díaz, Victorina. 2008. English adjective comparison. A historical perspective. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.299Search in Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio, Marina Dossena, Richard Dury, Roberta Facchinetti & Maria Lima (eds.). 2002. Variation in central modals: A repertoire of forms and types of usage in Middle English and Early Modern English. Bern: Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1986. Middle English – a creole? In Dieter Kastovsky & Aleksander Szwedek (eds.). Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday, 329–344. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian language structures. A comparative historical survey. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1983. The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the phrasal verb in English. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English language. Volume 1: The beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264747Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2016. Norse against Old English: 20–0. Language Dynamics and Change 6(1). 21–23.10.1163/22105832-00601004Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1974. Handbuch der mittelenglischen Grammatik: Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar
Kisbye, Torben. 1992. A short history of the English language. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kohonen, Viljo. 1978. On the development of English word order in religious prose around 1000 and 1200 A.D.: A quantitative study of word order in context. Turku: Abo Academi Foundation.Search in Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110820980Search in Google Scholar
Kusmenko, Jurij K. 2005. The history of quantity in the Scandinavian languages. TijdSchrift voor Skandinavistiek 26(2). 127–144.Search in Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret. (ed.). 1989. Middle English Dialectology: Essays on some principles and problems. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2014. On Middle English she, sho: a refurbished narrative. Folia Linguistica Historica 35. 201–240.10.1515/flih.2014.006Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 2009. On schwa: Synchronic prelude and historical fugue. In Donka Minkova (ed.), Phonological weakness in English. From old to present-day English, 47–77. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-29686-2_4Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger & John M. Anderson. 1975. Old English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis-Simpson, Shannon. 2011. Assimilation or hybridization? A study of personal names from the Danelaw. In Wendy M. Hoofnagle & Wolfram R. Keller (eds.), Other nations: The hybridization of insular mythology and identity, 13–44. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 2016. English: the Language of the Vikings by Joseph Embley Emonds and Jan Terje Faarlund (review). Language 92(2). 474–477.10.1353/lan.2016.0037Search in Google Scholar
Lorentz, Ove. 1996. Length and correspondence in Scandinavian. Nordlyd 24. 111–128.Search in Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2016. Rule 1: Know Your Stuff. Language Dynamics and Change 6(1). 31–33.10.1163/22105832-00601007Search in Google Scholar
Machan, Tim W. 2013. What is English, and why should we care? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601257.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2008. Our magnificent bastard tongue: The untold history of English. New York: Gotham Books.Search in Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166591Search in Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 1982. The environment for open syllable lengthening in Middle English. Folia Linguistica Historica 3(1). 29–58.10.1515/flih.1982.3.1.29Search in Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 1985. Of rhyme and reason: some foot-governed quantity changes in English. In Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds.). Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 163–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.41.14minSearch in Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Search in Google Scholar
Myrvoll, Klaus Johan. 2015. Engelsk er ikkje skandinavisk likevel [English is not Scandinavian after all]. Dag og Tid, 10 July 2015.Search in Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2013. Tracing the origins of the Swedish group genitive. In Anne Carlier & Jean-Christophe Verstraete (eds.), The Genitive, 299–332. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cagral.5.11norSearch in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold. 1933. The phonology of a South Durham dialect. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Orton, Harold & Eugen Dieth. 1962. The survey of English dialects. Leeds: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Pelt, Joop. 1980. Vowel Shift and open syllable lengthening: a length conspiracy in Dutch. In John Anderson & Colin J. Ewen (eds.), Studies in dependency phonology. Ludwigsburg studies in language and linguistics 4, 61–101. Ludwigsburg: R.O.U. Strauch.Search in Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Ann Arbor: University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1984. The modals story retold. Studies in Language 8. 305–364.10.1075/sl.8.3.02plaSearch in Google Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1934. From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Poussa, Patricia. 1982. The evolution of early standard English: The creolization hypothesis. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 14. 69–85.Search in Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Yale University, The Linguistic Society of America.Search in Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language III: 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521264761.005Search in Google Scholar
Ritt, Nicolaus. 1994. Quantity adjustment. Vowel lengthening and shortening in early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597831Search in Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1984. Some historical and social dimensions of syntactic change in middle Scots relative clauses. In Norman F. Blake & Charles Jones (eds.), English historical linguistics: Studies in development, 101–122. Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Search in Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette, Dieter Stein & Letizia Vezzosi. 2000. On the history of the s-genitive. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, David Denison, Richard Hogg & C.B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies. A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, 183–210. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Rynell, Alarik. 1948. The rivalry of Scandinavian and native synonyms in Middle English: especially taken and nimen, with an excursus on nema and taka in Old Scandinavian. Lund: Gleerup.Search in Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael L. 1963. Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies 44. 81–94.10.1080/00138386308597155Search in Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael L. 1985. The great Scandinavian belt. In Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds.), Papers from the 4th international conference on English historical linguistics, Amsterdam, 10–13 April 1985, 269–281. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Laing 1989: 106–115.10.1075/cilt.41.20samSearch in Google Scholar
Serjeantson, Mary S. 1962 [1935]. The history of foreign words in English. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2013a. Er engelsk et skandinavisk språk? – Neppe [Is English a Scandinavian language? – Unlikely]. http://www.apollon.uio.no/artikler/2013/1_engelsk-skandinavisk-motsvar.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2013b. http://www.apollon.uio.no/artikler/2013/1_engelsk-skandinavisk-motsvar2.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2013c. The diphthongisation of ME ū: the spelling evidence. In Gisle Andersen & Kristin Bech (eds.), English corpus linguistics: variation in time, space and genre: Selected papers from Icame 32 (language and computers), 53–67. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401209403_005Search in Google Scholar
Stevick, Robert D. 1969. The morphemic evolution of Middle English She. In Roger Lass (ed.), Approaches to English historical linguistics: An anthology, 287–94. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar
Stiles, Patrick V. 2013. The Pan-West Germanic isoglosses and the sub-relationships of west Germanic to other branches. NOWELE 66(1). 5–38.10.1075/nowele.66.1.02stiSearch in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. & Donka Minkova. 1991. Subordination and word order change in the history of English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax (Topics in English Linguistics 2), 357–408. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. & Donka Minkova. 2001. English words: History and structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791161Search in Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry 1953. Sweet’s Anglo-Saxon primer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793Search in Google Scholar
Torp, Arne & Lars S. Vikør. 1993. Hovuddrag i norsk språkhistorie [Main developments in the history of Norwegian]. Ad Notam Gyldendal.Search in Google Scholar
Treharne, Elaine. 2012. Living through conquest: The politics of Early English, 1020–1220. (Oxford Textual Perspectives.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans. 2016. English: The extent of Viking impact remains open. Language Dynamics and Change 6(1). 24–26.10.1163/22105832-00601005Search in Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2011. Language myths and the history of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 95–195. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth M. Wright. 1925. Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth M. Wright. 1928. An elementary Middle English grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Laura. 1996. Sources of London English: Medieval Thames vocabulary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article (DOI: 10.1515/flih-2016-0008) offers supplementary material, available to authorized users.
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
