Abstract
Instructional methods incorporating metacognitive or open-ended elements have been gaining popularity, but synergies between the two have rarely been explored. Created with the aspiration to boost students’ knowledge of the knowledge creation process, a conceptually new and structurally open-ended instructional model is proposed here. For that purpose, the squares on Heer’s version of the Bloom taxonomy pyramid were turned into steps on which the class climbed from its base to the top. Each step stepped on opened the content initially hidden from view, but corresponding to cognitive and knowledge dimensions intersecting at it, thus turning the content coverage into an open-ended adventure. Both the students in undergraduate and graduate programs in bioengineering and the faculty peers were in favor of the open-ended model of instruction and, based on distributed online surveys, they preferred it over traditional lecturing. In agreement with the adventurous character of the instructional method, frequent detours and diversions from the straight path of the subject were demonstrated as vehicles for the creative thought. As the students ascended along the learning taxonomy pyramid, the content became less foundational and more in need of discussion, analysis and weighing of pros and cons. At the same time, the students would get increasingly connected with the ideas of broader epistemological and ontological relevance. The intellectual pinnacle of the class was achieved at the peak of the pyramid, where the metacognitive and the creative intersected. There, the students were acquainted with the penultimate learning objective, which is the necessity for a professional to question the premises of one’s profession through one’s professional output, alongside providing practical results therewith.
References
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Ashby, R. (1952). Design for a brain. London: Chapman & Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Ashby, R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.10.5962/bhl.title.5851Search in Google Scholar
Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition – a classroom study. European Journal of Science Education 8, 263-282.10.1080/0140528860080303Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A necessary unity (pp. 199). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Search in Google Scholar
Biggs, J. (1988). The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Australian Journal of Education 32, 127-138.10.1177/000494418803200201Search in Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435-459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: McKay.Search in Google Scholar
Cioran, E. M. (1973). The trouble with being born (pp. 12). New York: Arcade.Search in Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. (1925). The everlasting man. In: The collected works of G. K. Chesterton, Volume 2 (pp. 388). San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ende, M. (1974). Momo. London: Puffin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Ernest, J. B., Reinholz, D. L. (2018). Off topic but on point: student talk in an undergraduate geometry classroom. Journal for STEM Education Research 1, 103-118 (2018).10.1007/s41979-018-0003-5Search in Google Scholar
Erwin, R. W. (1985). Research currents for developmental reading educators: Metacognition. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education 2, 19-23.Search in Google Scholar
Feynman, R. P. (1998). The meaning of it all: Thoughts of a citizen scientist (pp. 47). Reading, MA: Helix Books.Search in Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In: L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. (2001). The art of looking sideways. London: Phaidon.Search in Google Scholar
Ford, J. K., Weissbein, D. A., Smith, E. M., Gully, S. M., Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology 83, 218-233.10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.218Search in Google Scholar
Fox, E., Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review 20, 373-389.10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2Search in Google Scholar
Friere, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.Search in Google Scholar
Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education 26, 85-99.10.1080/0950069032000070333Search in Google Scholar
Glanville, R. (2003). Machines of wonder and elephants that float through air. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 10, 91-105.Search in Google Scholar
Godard, J.-L. (1965). Alphaville. Paris: Athos.Search in Google Scholar
Godard, J.-L. (1998). Histoire(s) du cinema: The signs among us. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Gaumont.Search in Google Scholar
Gorgen, R., Huemer, S., Schulte-Korne, G., Moll K. (2020). Evaluation of a digital game-based reading training for German children with reading disorder. Computers & Education 150, 103834.10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103834Search in Google Scholar
Heer, R. (2012). A model of learning objectives-based on a taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Ames, IA: Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University.Search in Google Scholar
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hubbard, K. E., Brown, R., Deans, S., Garcia, M. P., Pruna, M.-G., Mason, M. J. (2017). Undergraduate students as co-producers in the creation of first-year practical class resources. Higher Education Pedagogies 2, 58-78.10.1080/23752696.2017.1338529Search in Google Scholar
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?, Memory 17, 471-479.10.1080/09658210802647009Search in Google Scholar
Kay, S., Janowitz, S. (2011). B: ‘If I Should Have a Daughter…’. New York: Hachette Books.Search in Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1891). Thus Spake Zarathustra (pp. 6). Mineola, NY: Dover.Search in Google Scholar
Liuta, A. V., Perig, A. V., Afanasieva, M. A., Skyrtach, V. M. (2019). Didactic games as student-friendly tools for learning hydraulics in a technical university’s undergraduate curriculum. Industry and Higher Education 33, 198-213.10.1177/0950422218824507Search in Google Scholar
Maturana, H., Verden-Zöller, G. (2008). The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Search in Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. (1965). Embodiments of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moshman, D. (1990). The Development of metalogical understanding. In: W. F. Overton & L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Development perspectives (pp. 205-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Moshman, D. (2003). Intellectual freedom. Liberal Education 89, 30-37.Search in Google Scholar
Nakagawa, M., Yamanaka, S. (2010). Reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 695, 215-224.10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_14Search in Google Scholar
Perlis, A. J. (1982). Epigrams in programming. SIGPLAN Notices 17, 9.10.1145/947955.1083808Search in Google Scholar
Perry, J., Lundie, D., Golder, G. (2018). Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review 71, 483-500.10.1080/00131911.2018.1441127Search in Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice 41, 219-225.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3Search in Google Scholar
Pokay, P., Blumenfeld, P. C. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 41-50.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.41Search in Google Scholar
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 9, 1-6.10.1108/10748120110424816Search in Google Scholar
Rothko, M. (1934). Sketchbook. In: M. Lopez-Remiro (Ed.), Writings on Arts: Mark Rothko (pp. 14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Roud, R. (1968). Introduction. In: J. Narboni & T. Milne (Eds.), Godard on Godard (pp. 8). New York: Da Capo Press.Search in Google Scholar
Santamaria, C., Tse, P. P., Moreno-Rios, S., Garcia-Madruga, J. A. (2013). Deductive reasoning and metalogical knowledge in preadolescence: A mental model appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 192-200.10.1080/20445911.2012.743988Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, T. L. (2002). Climbing Parnassus: A new apologia for Greek and Latin (pp. 2). Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1996). Conclusion: Piaget’s epistemology: Psychological and educational assessment. In: L. Smith (Ed.), Critical Readings on Piaget (pp. 478-521). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE – Life Sciences Education 11, 113-120.10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033Search in Google Scholar
Stanley, A. (2006). Next Generation Leader (pp. 111). Colorado Springs, CO: Multmonah.Search in Google Scholar
Thoreau, H. D. (1854) Walden (pp. 130). Huntington, VW: Empire Books.Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V. (2009). On the light doves and learning on mistakes. Axiomathes: An International Journal in Ontology and Cognitive Systems 19, 17-50.10.1007/s10516-008-9052-1Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V. (2017). Rethinking active learning as the paradigm of our times: Towards poetization of education in the age of STEM. Journal of Materials Education 39, 241-258.Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V. (2018a). Flipping the flipped: The co-creational classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 13, 11.10.1186/s41039-018-0077-9Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V. (2018b). Revisiting the relevance of conceptualism of Godard’s film. Journal for Religion, Film and Media 4, 83-113.Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V., Lee, K., Lee, P. P., Fischer, K. E., Desai, T. A. (2012a). Shape effect in the design of nanowire-coated microparticles as epithelial drug delivery devices. ACS Nano 6, 7832-7841.10.1021/nn3019865Search in Google Scholar
Uskoković, V., Lee, P. P., Walsh, L., Fischer, K. E., Desai, T. A. (2012b). Silicon nanowire coated microparticles as epithelial drug delivery devices. The effect of PEGylation on particle-epithelium interactions. Biomaterials 33, 1663-1672.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.010Search in Google Scholar
Veldkamp, A., Daemen, J., Teekens, S., Koelewijn, S., Knippels, M. C. P. J., van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Escape boxes: Bringing escape room experience into the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12935.10.1111/bjet.12935Search in Google Scholar
von Foerster, H., Poerksen, B. (2002). The metaphysics of ethics: A conversation. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 9, 149-157.Search in Google Scholar
Winograd, T., Flores, F. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundations for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1918). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Worley, P. (2018). Plato, metacognition and philosophy in schools. Journal of Philosophy in Schools 5, 1.10.21913/JPS.v5i1.1486Search in Google Scholar
Wu, V. M., Tang, S., Uskoković, V. (2018). Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as intrinsic inorganic antimicrobials: The antibacterial effect. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 10, 34013-34028.10.1021/acsami.8b12784Search in Google Scholar
Yen, M. H., Wang, C. Y., Chang, W. H., Chen, S. F., Hsu, Y. S., Liu, T. C. (2018). Assessing metacognitive components in self-regulated reading of science texts in e-based environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16, 797-816.10.1007/s10763-017-9818-2Search in Google Scholar
Zawadzka, K., Simkiss, N., Hanczakowski, M. (2018). Remind me of the context: Memory and metacognition at restudy. Journal of Memory and Language 101, 1-17.10.1016/j.jml.2018.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist 30, 217-221.10.1207/s15326985ep3004_8Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Vuk Uskoković, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
