Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) November 19, 2015

Wer hat die Beweispflicht für die Allgüte Gottes?

  • Norbert Hoerster

Abstract

Is it rational to believe in the existence of a God who is not only omnipotent (and omniscient) but also good or morally perfect? This is the famous Problem of Evil, the Theodicy problem. Unlike many theologians and philosophers who feel convinced of either the existence or the non-existence of a good God, I defend a sceptical view based on the following two assumptions: 1. The believers have so far not been able to show that all the evils of the world, for which God is responsible, are logically necessary means for the attainment of higher values. 2. The burden of proof - contrary to what many theologians say - lies clearly on the believers in God’s goodness and not on the non-believers. Insofar we have at present no sufficient reason to believe in a God who is not morally indifferent.

Online erschienen: 2015-11-19
Erschienen im Druck: 2015-8-1

© 2015 Akademie Verlag GmbH, Markgrafenstr. 12-14, 10969 Berlin.

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2015-0052/html
Scroll to top button