Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 17, 2023

Existence of nonconstant CR-holomorphic functions of polynomial growth in Sasakian manifolds

  • Shu-Cheng Chang , Yingbo Han , Nan Li ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Chien Lin

Abstract

We show that there exists a nonconstant CR-holomorphic function of polynomial growth in a complete noncompact Sasakian manifold of nonnegative pseudohermitian bisectional curvature with the CR maximal volume growth property. This is the very first step toward the CR analogue of the Yau uniformization conjecture which states that any complete noncompact Sasakian manifold of positive pseudohermitian bisectional curvature is CR biholomorphic to the standard Heisenberg group. More precisely, we first construct CR-holomorphic functions with controlled growth in a sequence of exhaustion domains in Sasakian manifolds by applying the Cheeger–Colding theory. Secondly, via the CR analogue of a tangent cone at infinity and the three-circle theorem, we are able to take the subsequence to obtain a nonconstant CR-holomorphic function of polynomial growth.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11971415

Award Identifier / Grant number: #61533-00 49

Award Identifier / Grant number: #64365-00 52

Award Identifier / Grant number: KJQN202201165

Award Identifier / Grant number: QN2022035003L

Funding statement: Shu-Cheng Chang is partially supported in part by the MOST of Taiwan. Yingbo Han is partially supported by an NSFC 11971415 and Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of Xinyang Normal University. Nan Li is partially supported by the PSC-CUNY Research Award #61533-00 49, #64365-00 52. Chien Lin is partially supported by the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJQN202201165) and the Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. QN2022035003L).

A CR analogue of the Hörmander L 2 -estimate

Let 𝜙 be a ( p , q ) -form, denoted by

ϕ = ϕ α 1 α 2 α p β ̄ 1 β ̄ 2 β ̄ q θ α 1 θ α p θ β ̄ 1 θ β ̄ 2 θ β ̄ q .

For abbreviation, we denote ϕ = ϕ A B ̄ θ A θ B ̄ , where 𝐴 and B ̄ are multiple indices

A = ( α 1 , α 2 , , α p ) and B ̄ = ( β ̄ 1 , β ̄ 2 , , β ̄ q )

respectively. By taking the exterior derivative, we obtain

d ϕ = d b ϕ + T ϕ := b ϕ + ̄ b ϕ + T ϕ ,

where b ϕ is the ( p + 1 , q ) -form part of d b ϕ and ̄ b ϕ is the ( p , q + 1 ) -form part of d b ϕ , T ϕ is the form spanned by basis θ θ A θ B ̄ . Note that ̄ b 2 = 0 .

Before we go further, let us first recall the notion as in [22] for a Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold. Let { U α } α A be an open covering of the Sasakian manifold M 2 n + 1 with the adapted metric g λ and π α : U α V α C n submersion such that

π α π β 1 : π β ( U α U β ) π α ( U α U β )

is biholomorphic. On each V α , there is a canonical isomorphism d π α : D p T π α ( p ) V α for any p U α , where D = ker θ T M . Since 𝐓 generates isometries, the restriction of the Sasakian metric 𝑔 to 𝐷 gives a well-defined hermitian metric g α T on V α . This hermitian metric in fact is Kähler. More precisely, let ( z 1 , z 2 , , z n ) be the local holomorphic coordinates on V α . We pull these back to U α and still write the same. Let t ̃ be the coordinate along the leaves with T = / t ̃ . Then we have the local coordinate x = ( x ̃ , t ̃ ) = ( z 1 , z 2 , , z n , t ̃ ) on U α , and ( D C ) 1 , 0 is spanned by the form

(A.1) Z α = ( z α θ ( z α ) T ) , α = 1 , 2 , , n .

Since i ( T ) d θ = 0 ,

d θ ( Z α , Z β ̄ ) = d θ ( z α , z ̄ β ) .

Then the Kähler 2-form ω α T of the hermitian metric g α T on V α , which is the same as the restriction of the Levi form 1 2 d θ to D α ̃ , the slice { t ̃ = constant } in U α is closed. The collection of Kähler metrics { g α T } on { V α } is called a transverse Kähler metric. We often refer to 1 2 d θ on D ̃ as the Kähler form of the transverse Kähler metric g T in the leaf space 𝑉. Furthermore, since it is a Sasakian manifold, one observes that the relation between transverse Kähler Ricci curvature and pseudohermitian Ricci curvature is

Ric g α T ( X , Y ) = Ric ( X ̃ , Y ̃ ) + 2 g α T ( X , Y ) ,

where X , Y are vector fields on the local leaf spaces V α and X ̃ , Y ̃ are lifts to 𝐷.

As an example, { Z α = z α + i z ̄ α t } α = 1 n is exactly a local frame on in the ( 2 n + 1 ) -dimensional Heisenberg group H n = C n × R with the local coordinate ( z , t ) . Here

θ = d t + i α I n ( z α d z ̄ α z ̄ α d z α )

is a pseudohermitian contact structure on H n and T = / t ̃ .

Definition A.1

Let ( M , J , θ ) be a complete noncompact Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold.

  1. A 𝑝-form 𝛾 is called basic if i ( T ) γ = 0 and L T γ = 0 .

  2. Let Λ B p be the sheaf of germs of basic 𝑝-forms and let Ω B p be the set of all global sections of Λ B p .

It is easy to check that d γ is basic if 𝛾 is basic. Set d B = d | Ω B p . Then d B : Ω B p Ω B p + 1 , and the corresponding complex ( Ω B , d B ) is called the basic de Rham complex. The basic form of type ( p , q ) -form with respect to ( z 1 , z 2 , , z n , t ̃ 1 ) in U α ,

γ = γ i 1 i p j ̄ 1 j ̄ q d z i 1 d z i p d z ̄ j 1 d z ̄ j q ,

is also of type ( p , q ) -form with respect to ( w 1 , w 2 , , w n , t ̃ 2 ) in U β and does not depend on t ̃ . We then have the well-defined operators

B : Λ B p , q Λ B p + 1 , q and ̄ B : Λ B p , q Λ B p , q + 1 .

Now, for

d B = ̄ B + B and d B c = i 2 ( ̄ B B ) ,

we have

d B d B c = i B ̄ B and d B 2 = 0 = ( d B c ) 2 .

We also define the basic Laplacian Δ B = d B d B + d B d B . Here d B : Ω B p + 1 Ω B p is the adjoint operator of d B . As a result of El Kacimi-Alaoui [21], one has the expected isomorphisms between basic cohomology groups and the space of basic harmonic forms. Moreover, we can work out the basic Hodge theory in the local leaf space 𝑉 together with the transverse Kähler structure and the transverse Kähler metric g T .

More precisely, we consider a CR-holomorphic vector bundle ( E , ̄ b ) over a strictly pseudoconvex CR ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold ( M , T 1 , 0 ( M ) , θ ) and a unique Tanaka connection 𝐷 on 𝐸 due to N. Tanaka [45]. Define the global L 2 -norm for any L 2 section 𝑠 of 𝐸 by

M s ( x ) 2 d μ ,

where s ( x ) 2 = s ( x ) , s ( x ) L θ is the pointwise hermitian norm and d μ = θ ( d θ ) n . The sub-Laplace Beltrami operator associated to this connection is defined by Δ = D D + D D , where D is the adjoint of 𝐷 with respect to the L 2 -norm as above. The Tanaka connection D = D 1 , 0 + D 0 , 1 has decomposition with D 0 , 1 = ̄ b . We define the complex sub-Laplace operators Δ = ( D ) D + D ( D ) with D = D 1 , 0 and

Δ ̄ b = ̄ b ̄ b + ̄ b ̄ b .

Now we will work on a noncompact Sasakian manifold 𝑀. In fact, we consider all operators on the sheaf of germs of basic 𝑝-forms Λ B p and the set of all global sections Ω B p of Λ B p with the complex basic sub-Laplacian

Δ ̄ B = ̄ B ̄ B + ̄ B ̄ B .

Lemma A.1

Lemma A.1 (CR Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identity)

Suppose that ( M , T 1 , 0 ( M ) , θ ) is a strictly pseudoconvex Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold and 𝐷 is the Tanaka connection in a CR-holomorphic vector bundle 𝐸 over 𝑀. Then the complex sub-Laplace operators Δ and Δ ̄ B acting on 𝐸-valued basic forms satisfy the identity

(A.2) Δ ̄ B = Δ + [ i Θ ( E ) , Λ ] ,

where Δ ̄ B = ̄ B ̄ B + ̄ B ̄ B . Here Θ ( E ) := D 2 s is the curvature operator.

Proof

Let 𝐿 be the Lefschetz operator defined by L s = 1 2 d θ s and Λ = L its adjoint operator. It follows from [46] (see also [20]) that the following transverse Kähler identities hold:

[ ̄ B , L ] = i D , [ D , L ] = i ̄ B , [ Λ , ̄ B ] = i D , [ Λ , D ] = i ̄ B .

Hence we have

Δ ̄ B = [ ̄ B , ̄ B ] = i [ ̄ B , [ Λ , D ] ] .

On the other hand, by the Jacobi identity, we have

[ ̄ B , [ Λ , D ] ] = [ Λ , [ D , ̄ B ] ] + [ D , [ ̄ B , Λ ] ] = [ Λ , Θ ( E ) ] + i [ D , D ] ,

where we use [ D , ̄ B ] = D 2 = Θ ( E ) . Then we derive the CR analogue of the Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identity. ∎

Then, based on this CR Bochner–Kodaira–Nakano identity (A.2), it is straightforward from [27, 20] that one can derive the CR analogue of the Hörmander L 2 -estimate Proposition 2.1.

B Maximum principle for the CR heat equation

In order to prove Theorem 2.1, we derive several results by applying a method similar to our previous papers [1, 8].

Lemma B.1

Let ( M , J , θ ) be a complete noncompact Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold of nonnegative pseudohermitian Ricci curvature with 0 u ( x ) exp ( a r ( x ) + b ) for some a , b > 0 , u C c ( M ) . We denote

v ( x , t ) = M H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y )

on M × [ 0 , ) with the CR heat kernel H ( x , y , t ) . Then, for any positive numbers ϵ > 0 and T > 0 , there exist C 1 ( n , ϵ ) > 0 and C 2 ( n , a , b , ϵ , T ) > 0 such that

C 1 ( n , ϵ ) inf B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) u v ( x , t ) C 2 ( n , a , b , ϵ , T ) + sup B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) u .

Here ( x , t ) r 1 ( [ T , + ) ) × [ 0 , T ] , r ( x ) = d cc ( x , o ) is the Carnot–Carathéodory distance d cc between 𝑥 and 𝑜 for some fixed point o M and B ( x , r ) is the ball with respect to d cc .

Proof

If s ϵ r ( x ) , then

(B.1) | u ̂ | B ( x , s ) V o ( ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s ) V x ( s ) | u ̂ | B ( o , ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s ) C ( n , ϵ ) | u ̂ | B ( o , ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s ) ,

where we use the fact that

V o ( ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s ) V o ( ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s + r ( x ) ) V o ( ( 1 + 2 ϵ ) s ) C ( n ) ( 1 + 2 ϵ ) 2 C 9 ( n ) V x ( s ) = C ( n , ϵ ) V x ( s ) .

Here V x ( s ) and | u ̂ | B x ( s ) denote the volume of the Carnot–Carathéodory ball B ( x , s ) = B x ( s ) with respect to the volume element d μ = θ ( d θ ) n and the average of the absolute value of the function 𝑢 over B x ( s ) respectively. Due to r ( x ) T , we have

(B.2) V x ( s ) V x ( t ) V x ( s ϵ ) V x ( t ) C ( n , ϵ ) ( s t ) 2 C 9 ( n ) .

It follows from (B.1), (B.2) and

exp ( a ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s + b C 5 ( n ) 2 t s 2 ) C ( n , a , b , ϵ , T )

for s [ 0 , + ) that we are able to derive

| v ( x , t ) B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y ) | M \ B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y ) C ( n ) V x ( t ) ϵ r ( x ) + exp ( C 5 ( n ) s 2 t ) ( B x ( s ) | u | ) d s C ( n ) ϵ r ( x ) + V x ( s ) V x ( t ) ( | u | B ( x , s ) ) exp ( C 5 ( n ) s 2 t ) d ( s 2 t ) C ( n , ϵ ) ϵ r ( x ) + ( s t ) 2 C 9 ( n ) ( | u | B ( o , ( 1 + 1 ϵ ) s ) ) exp ( C 5 ( n ) s 2 t ) d ( s 2 t ) C ( n , a , b , ϵ , T )

by the CR heat kernel estimate and the CR volume doubling property [2]. This implies that

v ( x , t ) C ( n , a , b , ϵ , T ) + B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y ) C 2 ( n , a , b , ϵ , T ) + sup B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) u .

On the other hand, it is not difficult to deduce that

v ( x , t ) B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y ) C ( n ) V x ( t ) B ( x , ϵ t ) exp ( C 7 ( n ) d cc 2 ( x , y ) t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y ) C ( n , ϵ ) V x ( ϵ t ) V x ( t ) inf B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) u C 1 ( n , ϵ ) inf B ( x , ϵ r ( x ) ) u .

The proof is accomplished. ∎

Lemma B.2

Let ( M , J , θ ) be a complete noncompact Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold of nonnegative pseudohermitian bisectional curvature and let v ( x , t ) be a nonnegative solution to the CR heat equation on M × [ 0 , T ] . Then η α β ̄ ( x , t ) is a subsolution to the CR heat equation, where η α β ̄ = v α β ̄ + v β ̄ α . Furthermore, if

(B.3) M exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , 0 ) d μ ( x ) < + ,
(B.4) lim inf r + 0 T B o ( r ) exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) 2 d x d t < +
for any positive number a > 0 , then

(B.5) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) h ( x , t ) = M H ( x , y , t ) η α β ̄ ( y , 0 ) d μ ( y )

on M × [ 0 , T ] .

Remark B.1

It is not difficult to observe that the existence of the function h ( x , t ) is ensured by (B.3).

Proof

By [6, (3.5)] and the vanishing pseudohermitian torsion, we see that

( t Δ b ) v α β ̄ = 2 R δ γ ̄ α β ̄ v γ δ ̄ R α μ ̄ v μ β ̄ R μ β ̄ v α μ ̄ .

Therefore,

( t Δ b ) η α β ̄ = 2 R δ γ ̄ α β ̄ η γ δ ̄ R α μ ̄ η μ β ̄ R μ β ̄ η α μ ̄ .

By straightforward calculation, we have

( Δ b t ) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) 2 = ( η α β ̄ γ η α ̄ β + η α β ̄ η α ̄ β γ ) γ ̄ + conj. + t ( η α β ̄ η α ̄ β ) = 2 ( | η α β ̄ γ | 2 + | η α β ̄ γ ̄ | 2 ) + η α ̄ β ( Δ b t ) η α β ̄ + η α β ̄ ( Δ b t ) η α ̄ β = 2 ( | η α β ̄ γ | 2 + | η α β ̄ γ ̄ | 2 ) + 4 ( R δ γ ̄ α β ̄ η γ δ ̄ η α ̄ β R α μ ̄ η μ β ̄ η α ̄ β ) 2 ( | η α β ̄ γ | 2 + | η α β ̄ γ ̄ | 2 ) 4 | η α β ̄ γ η α ̄ β + η α β ̄ γ ̄ η α ̄ β 2 | η α β ̄ | | 2 = 4 | | η α β ̄ | γ | 2 = 2 | b η α β ̄ ( x , t ) | 2 .

That is to say that

( Δ b t ) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) 0 .

It is clear that η α β ̄ ( x , t ) h ( x , t ) is a subsolution to the CR heat equation. It follows from (B.4) and [3, Lemma 4.5] that η α β ̄ ( x , t ) h ( x , t ) . ∎

Lemma B.3

Let ( M , J , θ ) be a complete noncompact Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold of nonnegative pseudohermitian Ricci curvature with

S = M exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , 0 ) d μ ( x ) < +

for any positive number 𝑎. Here 𝜂 is chosen as in Lemma B.2. Then there is a positive function τ ( R ) with τ ( R ) 0 + as 𝑅 goes to infinity such that, for any positive number 𝑇,

h ( x , t ) τ ( R )

on A ( o ; R 2 , R ) × [ 0 , T ] . Here h ( x , t ) is chosen as in (B.5).

Proof

Fix T > 0 and let 𝑅 ( T ) be a sufficiently large positive number (we may assume supp ( u ) B ( o , R 8 ) ). Let x A ( o ; R 2 , R ) . We have, for a sufficiently small a > 0 ,

h ( x , t ) = B ( o , R 4 ) H ( x , y , t ) η α β ̄ ( y , 0 ) d μ ( y ) ( sup y B ( o , R 4 ) H ( x , y , t ) ) B ( o , R 4 ) η α β ̄ ( y , 0 ) d μ ( y ) C ( n ) V x ( t ) ( sup y B ( o , R 4 ) exp ( C 5 ( n ) d cc 2 ( x , y ) t ) ) × exp ( a 16 R 2 ) M exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , 0 ) d μ ( y ) C ( n ) ( R t ) 2 C 9 ( n ) S V o ( R ) exp ( C 5 ( n ) R 2 16 t + a 16 R 2 ) = τ ( R ) 0 + as R + .

Here we utilize the CR heat kernel estimate, the facts that d cc ( x , y ) R 2 16 and the CR volume doubling property V o ( R ) V x ( 3 R ) C ( n ) V x ( R ) . ∎

Lemma B.4

Let ( M , J , θ ) be a complete noncompact Sasakian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold of nonnegative pseudohermitian Ricci curvature and let v ( x , t ) be the solution to the CR heat equation with the initial condition

v ( x , 0 ) = u ( x ) for u C c ( M ) ,

u 0 = 0 and η α β ̄ = v α β ̄ + v β ̄ α . Then

lim inf r + 0 T B o ( r ) exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) 2 d x d t < + .

Proof

Because

v ( x , t ) = M H ( x , y , t ) u ( y ) d μ ( y )

and u C c ( M ) , we see that | v ( x , t ) | C in M × [ 0 , + ) . By the fact that

( Δ b t ) v 2 = 2 | b v | 2

and with the help of the cut-off function φ C c ( M ) satisfying 0 φ 1 , φ | B o ( r ) = 1 , φ | M \ B o ( 2 r ) = 0 and | Δ b φ ( x ) | 1 r 2 ( x ) for any positive number 𝑟, it is clear that, for any r 1 ,

(B.6) 0 T ( 1 V o ( r ) B o ( r ) | b v | 2 d μ ) d t C ( n ) ( 1 r 2 0 T ( 1 V o ( r ) B o ( 2 r ) v 2 d μ ) d t + 1 V o ( r ) B o ( r ) u 2 d μ ) C ( n ) ( T + 1 ) .

From the CR Bôchner formula and u 0 = 0 (this implies that v 0 = 0 ), we obtain

( Δ b t ) | b v | 2 2 | Hess b v | 2 .

With a method similar to the preceding, we have, for any r 1 ,

0 T ( 1 V o ( r ) B o ( r ) | Hess b v | 2 d μ ) d t C ( n ) ( 1 r 2 0 T ( 1 V o ( r ) B o ( 2 r ) | b v | 2 d μ ) d t + 1 V o ( r ) B o ( r ) | b u | 2 d μ ) C ( n ) ( T + 1 ) .

This enables us to deduce that

lim inf r + 0 T B o ( r ) exp ( a r 2 ( x ) ) η α β ̄ ( x , t ) 2 d x d t < + .

Remark B.2

We could drop the assumption of u 0 = 0 by estimating the integral

0 T ( 1 V o ( r ) B o ( r ) | J b v , b v 0 | 2 d μ ) d t b v L 2 b v 0 L 2 C ( n ) ( T + 1 )

by (B.6).

Now, we are going to prove Theorem 2.1 as follows.

Proof

We will apply the maximum principle to confirm the validity of this theorem. The detail is as below. For any small positive number ϵ > 0 , define

η ̃ α β ̄ ( x , t ) = η α β ̄ ( x , t ) + ( ϵ ϕ ( x , t ) λ ( x , t ) ) h α β ̄ ( x ) ,

where

ϕ ( x , t ) = e t M H ( x , y , t ) exp ( r ( y ) ) d μ ( y ) .

We observe that η ̃ α β ̄ ( x , 0 ) > 0 for any x M . By Lemma B.2 and Lemma B.3, η ̃ α β ̄ ( x , t ) > 0 on B o ( R ) × [ 0 , T ] for any sufficiently large number R > 0 . Suppose that there is a point ( x 0 , t 0 ) B o ( R ) × ( 0 , T ] such that η ̃ α β ̄ ( x 0 , t 0 ) < 0 . There is a number t 1 [ 0 , t 0 ) such that η ̃ α β ̄ ( x , t ) 0 on B o ( R ) × ( 0 , t 1 ] and the bottom spectrum of η ̃ α β ̄ ( x 1 , t 1 ) is

λ 1 ( η ̃ α β ̄ ( x 1 , t 1 ) ) = 0

for some x 1 B o ( R ) . We assume that η ̃ α β ̄ ( x 1 , t 1 ) is a diagonal matrix and η ̃ γ γ ̄ ( x 1 , t 1 ) = 0 for γ T x 1 1 , 0 ( M ) with γ = 1 . Here the vector field 𝛾 is chosen as one of the bases of the CR structure T x 1 1 , 0 ( M ) . Therefore, we have

(B.7) ( t Δ b ) η ̃ γ γ ̄ ( x 1 , t 1 ) 0 .

By the fact that η α β ̄ is a solution to the CR Lichnerowicz–Laplace heat equation, we see

( t Δ b ) η γ γ ̄ 0 .

Furthermore, with the help of

( t Δ b ) ϕ = ϕ ,

we obtain

( t Δ b ) η γ γ ̄ = ϵ ϕ h γ γ ̄ > 0

at the point ( x 1 , t 1 ) . However, this contradicts inequality (B.7). Let 𝑅 go to infinity, and then 𝜖 goes to zero. The proof is completed. ∎

References

[1] D.-C. Chang, S.-C. Chang, Y. Han and C. Lin, On the CR Poincaré–Lelong equation, Yamabe steady solitons and structures of complete noncompact Sasakian manifolds, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 34 (2018), no. 8, 1313–1344. 10.1007/s10114-018-7342-0Search in Google Scholar

[2] D.-C. Chang, S.-C. Chang, Y. Han and J. Tie, A CR analogue of Yau’s conjecture on pseudoharmonic functions of polynomial growth, Canad. J. Math. 71 (2019), no. 6, 1367–1394. 10.4153/CJM-2018-024-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] S.-C. Chang, T.-H. Chang and Y.-W. Fan, Linear trace Li–Yau–Hamilton inequality for the CR Lichnerowicz–Laplacian heat equation, J. Geom. Anal. 25 (2015), no. 2, 783–819. 10.1007/s12220-013-9446-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] S.-C. Chang and H.-L. Chiu, Nonnegativity of CR Paneitz operator and its application to the CR Obata’s theorem, J. Geom. Anal. 19 (2009), no. 2, 261–287. 10.1007/s12220-008-9060-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] S.-C. Chang and Y.-W. Fan, An optimal gap theorem in a complete strictly pseudoconvex CR ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifold, J. Geom. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 3, 2425–2449. 10.1007/s12220-015-9632-4Search in Google Scholar

[6] S.-C. Chang, Y.-W. Fan, J. Tie and C.-T. Wu, Matrix Li–Yau–Hamilton inequality for the CR heat equation in pseudohermitian ( 2 n + 1 ) -manifolds, Math. Ann. 360 (2014), no. 1–2, 267–306. 10.1007/s00208-014-1036-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] S.-C. Chang, Y. Han and C. Lin, On the three-circle theorem and its applications in Sasakian manifolds, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), no. 3, Paper No. 101. 10.1007/s00526-019-1538-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] S.-C. Chang, Y. Han and C. Lin, On the sharp dimension estimate of CR holomorphic functions in Sasakian manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2021 (2021), no. 17, 12888–12924. 10.1093/imrn/rnz164Search in Google Scholar

[9] S.-C. Chang, T.-J. Kuo, C. Lin and J. Tie, CR sub-Laplacian comparison and Liouville-type theorem in a complete noncompact Sasakian manifold, J. Geom. Anal. 29 (2019), no. 2, 1676–1705. 10.1007/s12220-018-0056-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Chau and L.-F. Tam, On the complex structure of Kähler manifolds with nonnegative curvature, J. Differential Geom. 73 (2006), no. 3, 491–530. 10.4310/jdg/1146169936Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. Cheeger and T. H. Colding, Lower bounds on Ricci curvature and the almost rigidity of warped products, Ann. of Math. (2) 144 (1996), no. 1, 189–237. 10.2307/2118589Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Cheeger and T. H. Colding, On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. II, J. Differential Geom. 54 (2000), no. 1, 13–35. 10.4310/jdg/1214342145Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Cheeger, T. H. Colding and G. Tian, On the singularities of spaces with bounded Ricci curvature, Geom. Funct. Anal. 12 (2002), no. 5, 873–914. 10.1007/PL00012649Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Cheeger, W. Jiang and A. Naber, Rectifiability of singular sets of noncollapsed limit spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below, Ann. of Math. (2) 193 (2021), no. 2, 407–538. 10.4007/annals.2021.193.2.2Search in Google Scholar

[15] B.-L. Chen, X.-Y. Fu, L. Yin and X.-P. Zhu, Sharp dimension estimates of holomorphic functions and rigidity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), no. 4, 1435–1454. 10.1090/S0002-9947-05-04105-XSearch in Google Scholar

[16] B.-L. Chen, S.-H. Tang and X.-P. Zhu, A uniformization theorem for complete non-compact Kähler surfaces with positive bisectional curvature, J. Differential Geom. 67 (2004), no. 3, 519–570. 10.4310/jdg/1102091357Search in Google Scholar

[17] B.-L. Chen and X.-P. Zhu, On complete noncompact Kähler manifolds with positive bisectional curvature, Math. Ann. 327 (2003), no. 1, 1–23. 10.1007/s00208-003-0385-1Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. H. Colding and W. P. Minicozzi, II, Harmonic functions on manifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 146 (1997), no. 3, 725–747. 10.2307/2952459Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. H. Colding and W. P. Minicozzi, II, Weyl type bounds for harmonic functions, Invent. Math. 131 (1998), no. 2, 257–298. 10.1007/s002220050204Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. P. Demailly, Complex analytic and differential geometry, Université de Grenoble I, Grenoble 2012. Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. El Kacimi-Alaoui, Opérateurs transversalement elliptiques sur un feuilletage riemannien et applications, Compos. Math. 73 (1990), no. 1, 57–106. Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Futaki, H. Ono and G. Wang, Transverse Kähler geometry of Sasaki manifolds and toric Sasaki–Einstein manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 83 (2009), no. 3, 585–635. 10.4310/jdg/1264601036Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. Grauert, T. Peternell and R. Remmert, Several complex variables. VII, Encyclopaedia Math. Sci. 74, Springer, Berlin 1994. 10.1007/978-3-662-09873-8Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. E. Greene and H. Wu, Gap theorems for noncompact Riemannian manifolds, Duke Math. J. 49 (1982), no. 3, 731–756. 10.1215/S0012-7094-82-04937-7Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Gromov, Carnot–Carathéodory spaces seen from within, Sub-Riemannian geometry, Progr. Math. 144, Birkhäuser, Basel (1996), 79–323. 10.1007/978-3-0348-9210-0_2Search in Google Scholar

[26] W. He and S. Sun, Frankel conjecture and Sasaki geometry, Adv. Math. 291 (2016), 912–960. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.11.053Search in Google Scholar

[27] L. Hörmander, An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, 3rd ed., North-Holland Math. Libr. 7, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[28] J. M. Lee, Pseudo-Einstein structures on CR manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 110 (1988), no. 1, 157–178. 10.2307/2374543Search in Google Scholar

[29] P. Li and L.-F. Tam, Complete surfaces with finite total curvature, J. Differential Geom. 33 (1991), no. 1, 139–168. 10.4310/jdg/1214446033Search in Google Scholar

[30] G. Liu, Three circles theorem on Kahler manifolds and applications, preprint (2013), https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0710; to appear in Duke Math. J. Search in Google Scholar

[31] G. Liu, Gromov–Hausdorff limits of Kähler manifolds and the finite generation conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 184 (2016), no. 3, 775–815. 10.4007/annals.2016.184.3.4Search in Google Scholar

[32] G. Liu, On the volume growth of Kähler manifolds with nonnegative bisectional curvature, J. Differential Geom. 102 (2016), no. 3, 485–500. 10.4310/jdg/1456754016Search in Google Scholar

[33] G. Liu, Gromov–Hausdorff limits of Kähler manifolds with bisectional curvature lower bound, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71 (2018), no. 2, 267–303. 10.1002/cpa.21724Search in Google Scholar

[34] G. Liu, On Yau’s uniformization conjecture, Camb. J. Math. 7 (2019), no. 1–2, 33–70. 10.4310/CJM.2019.v7.n1.a2Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. Mok, An embedding theorem of complete Kähler manifolds of positive bisectional curvature onto affine algebraic varieties, Bull. Soc. Math. France 112 (1984), no. 2, 197–250. 10.24033/bsmf.2005Search in Google Scholar

[36] N. Mok, The uniformization theorem for compact Kähler manifolds of nonnegative holomorphic bisectional curvature, J. Differential Geom. 27 (1988), no. 2, 179–214. 10.4310/jdg/1214441778Search in Google Scholar

[37] N. Mok, Y. T. Siu and S.-T. Yau, The Poincaré–Lelong equation on complete Kähler manifolds, Compos. Math. 44 (1981), no. 1–3, 183–218. Search in Google Scholar

[38] L. Ni, Vanishing theorems on complete Kähler manifolds and their applications, J. Differential Geom. 50 (1998), no. 1, 89–122. 10.4310/jdg/1214510047Search in Google Scholar

[39] L. Ni, A monotonicity formula on complete Kähler manifolds with nonnegative bisectional curvature, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (2004), no. 4, 909–946. 10.1090/S0894-0347-04-00465-5Search in Google Scholar

[40] L. Ni, An optimal gap theorem, Invent. Math. 189 (2012), no. 3, 737–761. 10.1007/s00222-012-0375-6Search in Google Scholar

[41] L. Ni, Y. Shi and L.-F. Tam, Poisson equation, Poincaré–Lelong equation and curvature decay on complete Kähler manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 57 (2001), no. 2, 339–388. 10.4310/jdg/1090348114Search in Google Scholar

[42] L. Ni and L.-F. Tam, Plurisubharmonic functions and the structure of complete Kähler manifolds with nonnegative curvature, J. Differential Geom. 64 (2003), no. 3, 457–524. 10.4310/jdg/1090427001Search in Google Scholar

[43] L. Ni and L.-F. Tam, Kähler–Ricci flow and the Poincaré–Lelong equation, Comm. Anal. Geom. 12 (2004), no. 1–2, 111–141. 10.4310/CAG.2004.v12.n1.a7Search in Google Scholar

[44] L. Ni and L.-F. Tam, Poincaré–Lelong equation via the Hodge–Laplace heat equation, Compos. Math. 149 (2013), no. 11, 1856–1870. 10.1112/S0010437X12000322Search in Google Scholar

[45] N. Tanaka, A differential geometric study on strongly pseudo-convex manifolds, Kinokuniya, Tokyo 1975. 10.3792/pja/1195518896Search in Google Scholar

[46] A. M. Tievsky, Analogues of Kahler geometry on Sasakian manifolds, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-12-18
Revised: 2023-03-28
Published Online: 2023-08-17
Published in Print: 2023-09-01

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/crelle-2023-0046/html
Scroll to top button