Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 5, 2023

Learner autonomy and English achievement in Chinese EFL undergraduates: the mediating role of ambiguity tolerance and foreign language classroom anxiety

  • Lilan Chen EMAIL logo

Abstract

For Chinese EFL students, learning English has always been a great challenge, and research has shown that cognitive and affective factors increasingly become important issues in the field of foreign language learning and teaching (Naderifar and Esfandiari 2016). This study is designed to investigate the relationship between learner autonomy, ambiguity tolerance, foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA) and English achievement. It also explores the inner mechanism of the relationship between learner autonomy and English achievement in Chinese EFL undergraduates. A sample of 291 third and fourth grade undergraduates in China was assessed for their levels of learner autonomy, ambiguity tolerance and foreign language anxiety using the Learner Autonomy Questionnaire (LAQ), Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale (SLTAS) and Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS), respectively. Participants’ scores of the College English Test Band Four (CET-4) were used to measure their achievement in English. The results revealed a link between learner autonomy, ambiguity tolerance, FLCA, and English achievement. Ambiguity tolerance and FLCA mediated the relationship between learner autonomy and English achievement, accounting for 36.58 % of the total effect. These findings suggest a process through which ambiguity tolerance can decrease FLCA and identify the mediating effects of ambiguity tolerance and FLCA in the relationship between learner autonomy and English achievement in Chinese EFL undergraduates. Pedagogical implications of the study are presented and discussed.


Corresponding author: Lilan Chen, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Research Project on Education and Teaching Reform of Hainan Normal University

Award Identifier / Grant number: hsjg2020-29

References

Benson, Phil. 2001. Autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Benson, Phil. 2009. Making sense of autonomy in language learning. In Richard Pemberton, Sarah Toogood & Andy Barfield (eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning, 13–26. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.5790/hongkong/9789622099234.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Bochner, Stephen. 1965. Defining intolerance of ambiguity. Psychological Record 15. 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393605.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Douglas H. 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching. In White plains, 5th edn. New York: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Chapelle, Carol A. & Cheryl Roberts. 1986. Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning 36. 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Jianfeng, Sagaya Raj Gerard & Ai Tan Tjin Joanna. 2018. The correlations among learning motivation, autonomy and language proficiency in Chinese EFL context. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal 11(1). 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Dam, Leni. 2009. The use of logbooks – a tool for developing learner autonomy. In Richard Pemberton, Sarah Toogood & Andy Barfield (eds.), Maintaining control: Autonomy and language learning, 125–144. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.5790/hongkong/9789622099234.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Deng, Dafei. 2007. An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal 24(4). 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, Jean-Marc & Tsui Shan Ip. 2013. The link between foreign language classroom anxiety, second language tolerance of ambiguity and self-rated English proficiency among Chinese learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3(1). 47–66. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, Jean-Marc & Helen Thirtle. 2009. Why do some young learners drop foreign languages? A focus on learner-internal variables. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12. 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802549656.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2005. The Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine J., Susan G. Campbell, Meredith A. Mislevy, Michael F. Bunting, Anita R. Bowles & Joel T. Koeth. 2010. Predicting near-native ability: The factor structure and reliability of Hi-LAB. In Matthew T. Prior, Yukiko Watanabe & Sang-Ki Lee (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language research forum: Exploring SLA perspectives, positions, and practices, 10–31. Somerville: MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Elkoumy, Abdel Salam. 2000. Differences in FL reading comprehension among high-, middle-, and low-ambiguity tolerance students, vol. 3, 1–14: Social Science Electronic Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ely, Christopher M. 2002. Tolerance of ambiguity and the teaching of ESL. In Joy M. Reid (ed.), Leaning Styles in the ESL/EFL classroom, 87–95. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ely, Christopher M. 1989. Tolerance of ambiguity and use of second language strategies. Foreign Language Annals 22. 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02766.x.Search in Google Scholar

Frenkel-Brunswik, Else. 1949. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality 18. 108–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01236.x.Search in Google Scholar

Genç, Gülten. 2016. Can ambiguity tolerance, success in reading, and gender predict the foreign language reading anxiety? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 12(2). 135–151.Search in Google Scholar

Ghorbandordinejad, Farhad & Roghayyeh Moradian Ahmadabad. 2016. Examination of the relationship between autonomy and English achievement as mediated by foreign language classroom anxiety. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45. 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9371-5.Search in Google Scholar

Gudykunst, William B. 2005. An anxiety/Uncertainty Management (AUM) theory of strangers’ intercultural adjustment. In William B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 419–457. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Holec, Henri. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Börje. 1995. Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Horwitz, Elaine. K., Michael B. Horwitz & Joann. Cope. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 70(2). 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317.Search in Google Scholar

Kamran, Karbalaee Saeedeh & Parviz Maftoon. 2012. An analysis of the associations between ambiguity tolerance and EFL reading strategy awareness. English Language Teaching 5(3). 357–369.10.5539/elt.v5n3p188Search in Google Scholar

Kearsley, Greg. 2000. Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Haishan & Qingshun He. 2016. Ambiguity tolerance and perceptual learning styles of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching 9(6). 213–222. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p213.Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 2007. Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1(1). 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0.Search in Google Scholar

Littlewood, William. 1996. “Autonomy”: An anatomy and a framework. System 24(4). 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(96)00039-5.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Zhongshe & Meihua Liu. 2011. Foreign Language anxiety and strategy use: A study with Chinese undergraduate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2. 1298–1305. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1298-1305.Search in Google Scholar

Moon, Jennifer. 2008. Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Naderifar, Ali Asghar & Rajab Esfandiari. 2016. Relationships between Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, oral proficiency, autonomy, and ambiguity tolerance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 932–952.Search in Google Scholar

Orakci, Senol & Yücel Gelisli. 2019. The effect of the application of learning activities based on learner autonomy on the 6th grade students’ English achievements, attitudes, and learner autonomy. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 11(1). 269–292.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, Rebecca L. & Andrew D. Cohen. 1992. Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning 3(1). 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, Rebecca L. & Madeline Ehrman. 1992. Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13. 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500002464.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, Joan. 2008. Reflections. In Carol Griffiths (ed.), Lessons from good language learners, 10–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497667.003Search in Google Scholar

Sahragard, Rahman, Jokar Zahra & Soozandehfar Seyyed Mohammad Ali. 2011. The relationship among EFL Learners’ autonomy, academic performance, and motivation. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 8(11). 17–43.Search in Google Scholar

Sierens, Eline. 2010. Autonomy-supportive, structuring, and psychologically controlling teaching: Antecedents, mediators, and outcomes in late adolescents (Doktora Tezi). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Search in Google Scholar

Smock, Charles D. 1955. The influence of psychological stress on the “intolerance of ambiguity”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50. 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047951.Search in Google Scholar

Spratt, Mary, Humphreys Gillian & Victoria Chan. 2002. Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students’ attitudes and behaviors. Evaluation & Research in Education 16(1). 1–18.10.1080/09500790208667003Search in Google Scholar

Strickland, Bonnie R. 2001. The gale encyclopedia of psychology. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, Xia & Zhenghou Zhang. 2015. Relationships among language learning strategies, learner autonomy, and CET-4 scores. Foreign learning theory and practice, 1, 59–65. East China: Normal University.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Xuanxuan, Zhiwen Feng, Li Xiong & Huijie Zheng. 2019. The influence mechanism of ambiguity tolerance on senior high school students’ foreign language learning performance. Creative Education Studies 7(2). 199–206. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2019.72036.Search in Google Scholar

Ünal, Süleyman, Nadir Çeliköz & Irfan Sari. 2017. EFL proficiency in language learning and learner autonomy perceptions of Turkish learners. Journal of Education and Practice 8(11). 117–122.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Jinfen, Peng Renzhong & Wu Weiping. 2004. The investigation and analysis of non-English major students’ learner autonomy. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 36(1). 64–68. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0429.2004.01.010.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-30
Accepted: 2023-01-25
Published Online: 2023-06-05
Published in Print: 2023-05-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2023-2001/html
Scroll to top button