Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 18, 2014

Reply to the article entitled “Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D” by Farrell et al., Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1579–87

  • James Donnelly EMAIL logo , James Freeman , Kimberly Wilson , Victoria Shalhoub and Paul Sibley

Corresponding author: James Donnelly, PhD, DABCC, FCACB, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA, Phone: +1 914 524-2758, E-mail:

References

1. Farrell CJ, Soldo J, McWhinney B, Bandodkar S, Herrmann M. Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1579–87.10.1515/cclm-2014-0111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Farrell C, Soldo J, Williams P, Herrmann M. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D testing: challenging the performance of current automated immunoassays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1953–63.10.1515/cclm-2012-0522Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Farrell CJ, Martin S, McWhinney B, Straub I, Williams P, Herrmann M. State-of-the-art vitamin D assays: a comparison of automated immunoassays with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Clin Chem 2012;58:531–42.10.1373/clinchem.2011.172155Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Herrmann M. The measurement of 25-hydroxy vitamin D – an analytical challenge. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1873–5.10.1515/cclm-2012-0526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Moon HW, Cho JH, Hur M, Song J, Oh GY, Park CM, et al. Comparison of four current 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays. Clin Biochem 2012;45:326–30.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-8-25
Accepted: 2014-9-30
Published Online: 2014-10-18
Published in Print: 2015-4-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 7.6.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0856/html
Scroll to top button