Abstract
The request for cesarean section without medical indication has become one of the dilemmas faced by the obstetrician. Most recent studies that compare vaginal delivery with elective cesarean section find them equally safe. This comparison is lacking in the option of trial of labor, which may result in an assisted vaginal delivery or intrapartum cesarean section, both with increased morbidity and mortality for the mother and newborn. When considering elective cesarean section, the obstetrician has to take into account improved anesthetic techniques and the decrease in morbidity and mortality after cesarean section with the trend toward patient autonomy to decide on her own treatment. On the other hand, the obstetrician has to advise his patient of the best treatment with respect to possible complications in future pregnancies, such as placental complications and increased morbidity and mortality resulting from repeated cesarean sections. The advantage of cesarean section for pelvic floor protection does not exist after three consecutive cesarean sections and equals the rate of urinary incontinence after consecutive three vaginal deliveries. In countries such as ours, where most women wish for several children, the risk-benefit balance is toward repeated spontaneous vaginal deliveries.
References
1 Adamson SJ, LM Alessandri, N Badawi, PR Burton, PJ Pemberton, F Stanley: Predictors of neonatal encephalopathy in full-term infants. Br Med J311 (1995) 598Search in Google Scholar
2 Al-Kadri H, Y Sabr, S Al-Saif, B Abulaimoun, H BaAqeel, A Saleh: Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complication. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand82 (2003) 642Search in Google Scholar
3 Annibale DJ, TC Hulsey, CL Wagner, WM Southgate: Comparative neonatal morbidity of abdominal and vaginal deliveries after uncomplicated pregnancies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med149 (1995) 862Search in Google Scholar
4 Barrett G, E Pendry, J Peacock, C Victor, R Thakar, I Manyonda: Women's sexual health after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol107 (2000) 186Search in Google Scholar
5 Bingham P, RJ Lilford: Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus CS for all cases. Obstet Gynecol69 (1987) 965Search in Google Scholar
6 Chattopadhyay S, H Kharif, J Sherbeeni: Placenta previa and accrete after previous CS. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol52 (1993) 151Search in Google Scholar
7 Clark S, P Koonings, J Phelan: Placenta previa/accrete and prior CS. Obstet Gynecol66 (1985) 89Search in Google Scholar
8 Cooke IE, B Annan, IZ MacKenzie: Has “changing childbirth” increased CS rates? Br J Obstet Gynaecol105(Suppl 17) (1998) 65Search in Google Scholar
9 Drife J, G Lewis: Why mothers die. Confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1997–1999. RCOG Press, London 2001Search in Google Scholar
10 Farrell SA, VM Allen, TF Baskett: Parturition and urinary incontinence in primiparas. Obstet Gynecol97 (2001) 350Search in Google Scholar
11 Gherman RB: Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol45 (2002) 34510.1097/00003081-200206000-00006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12 Gherman RB, JG Ouzounian, TM Goodwin: Obstetrical maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol178 (1998) 1126Search in Google Scholar
13 Gielchinsky Y, N Rojansky, J Fasouliotis, Y Ezra: Placenta accrete – summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta23 (2000) 210Search in Google Scholar
14 Glazener CM, M Abdalla, P Stroud, S Naji, A Templeton, IT Russell: Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, cause, prevention and treatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol102 (1995) 282Search in Google Scholar
15 Hannah ME, WJ Hannah, SA Hewson, ED Hodnett, S Saigal, AR Willan: Planned CS versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentre trial. Lancet356 (2000) 1375Search in Google Scholar
16 Hemminki E, J Merilainen: Long-term effects of CSs: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol174 (1996) 1569Search in Google Scholar
17 Hvidman L, A Foldspang, S Mommsen, JB Nielsen: Postpartum urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand82 (2003) 556Search in Google Scholar
18 Jackson NV, LM Irvine: The influence of maternal request on the elective CS rate. J Obstet Gynaecol18 (1998) 115Search in Google Scholar
19 Lilford RJ, HA Van Coeverden De Groot, PJ Moore, P Bingham: The relative risks of CS (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol97 (1990) 883Search in Google Scholar
20 Lo JY, CC Hartley, GD Wendal: Uterine evacuation complicated by hysterectomy: an association with prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol182(Suppl) (2000) s151Search in Google Scholar
21 Lydon-Rochelle M, VL Holt, DP Martin, TR Easterling: Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA283 (2000) 2411Search in Google Scholar
22 Marrison JJ, JM Rennie, PJ Milton: Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective CS. Br J Obstet Gynaecol102 (1995) 101Search in Google Scholar
23 Persson J, P Wolner-Hanseen, H Rydhstroem: Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol96 (2000) 440Search in Google Scholar
24 Rosenberg AA, JM Kennaugh, SG Moreland, LM Fashaw, KA Hale, FM Torielli, SH Abman, JP Kinsella: Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of newborn infants treated with inhaled nitric oxide for persistent pulmonary hypertension. J Pediatr131 (1997) 70Search in Google Scholar
25 Rortveit G, AK Daltveit, YS Hannestad, S Hunskaar: Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or CS. N Engl J Med348 (2003) 900Search in Google Scholar
26 Samueloff A, S Mor-Yosef, DS Seidman, D Navot, G Ohel, A Simon, R Robinoaitz, JG Schenker: The 1984 National Perinatal Census: design, organization and uses for assessing obstetric services in Israel. Isr J Med Sci25 (1989) 629Search in Google Scholar
27 Sultan AH, MA Kamm, CN Hudson, JM Thomas, CI Bartram: Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med329 (1993) 1905Search in Google Scholar
28 Thomas J, S Paranjothy: The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London, RCOG Press 2001Search in Google Scholar
29 Towner D, MA Castro, E Eby-Wilkens, WM Gilbert: Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med341 (1999) 1709Search in Google Scholar
30 Wilson PD, RM Herbison, CN Herbison: Obstetric practice and prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol103 (1996) 154Search in Google Scholar
©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
