Abstract
Quantitative real-time PCR techniques are increasingly being used for the measurement of nucleic acids in research applications as well as in the clinical laboratory. It is therefore important that external quality control programs (EQA) are implemented for the evaluation of the analytical aspects common to molecular tests based on quantitative PCR. The aim of this study was the development of an Italian program of external quality control for quantitative assays based on real-time PCR with Taq-Man™ probes to compare the analytical performance of 42 laboratories. Participants were provided with a set of reagents (cDNA for reference curve preparation, primers-probe mix and three unknown samples) and requested to perform a conventional assay using the master mix employed in their laboratories. The quantitative results in unknown samples were analyzed. The results of our study showed clear heterogeneity in performance. Two of the 42 laboratories provided results indicating contamination during the experiment, whereas six did not provide values for at least one of the six standard points. Only 12 laboratories gave results that were both precise and accurate for all the samples tested. Regarding imprecision, 17 laboratories appeared to deviate in at least one result, whereas inaccuracy showed an inverse dose-dependent trend. Finally, 12 laboratories were not able to measure the sample with the lowest concentration. Ten of these laboratories were equipped with the same instruments. The results of this first round of analytical EQA of real-time PCR-based methods seem to indicate high variability among laboratories carrying out the same experimental protocol. These findings could have implications for any assay based on this type of technique. This survey demonstrates the importance of experimental EQAs of methodological proficiency testing. Our approach has proved useful for comparing the analytical aspects shared by all diagnostic laboratories applying quantitative assays for the measurement of nucleic acids based on the use of Taq-Man™ probes and real-time platforms.
References
1 Ohman S. Quality control for the clinical chemistry laboratory. Qual Assur 1997; 5: 79–93. Search in Google Scholar
2 Raggi CC, Pinzani P, Paradiso A, Pazzagli M, Orlando C. External quality assurance program for PCR amplification of genomic DNA: an Italian experience. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 782–91. 10.1373/49.5.782Search in Google Scholar
3 Braun A, Deufel T, Geilenkeuser WJ, Neumaier M, Rohle G, Roscher A, et al. External quality assessment of molecular biology-based methods used in laboratories of clinical chemistry and human genetics. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 231–4. 10.1515/CCLM.1998.039Search in Google Scholar
4 Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology 1993; 11: 1026–30. Search in Google Scholar
5 Orlando C, Pinzani P, Pazzagli M. Developments in quantitative PCR. Clin Chem Lab Med 1998; 36: 255–69. 10.1515/CCLM.1998.045Search in Google Scholar
6 Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 2000; 25: 169–93. 10.1677/jme.0.0250169Search in Google Scholar
7 Jung R, Soondrum K, Neumaier M. Quantitative PCR. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000; 38: 833–6. 10.1515/CCLM.2000.120Search in Google Scholar
8 Bustin SA. Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems. J Mol Endocrinol 2002; 29: 23–39. 10.1677/jme.0.0290023Search in Google Scholar
9 Klein D. Quantification using real-time PCR technology: applications and limitations. Trends Mol Med 2002; 8: 257–60. 10.1016/S1471-4914(02)02355-9Search in Google Scholar
10 Freeman WM, Walker SJ, Vrana KE. Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfalls and potential. Biotechniques 1999; 26: 112–22. 10.2144/99261rv01Search in Google Scholar
11 Technische Universitat München. http://www.wzw.tum.de/gene-quantification/ (accessed 26 May 2004; version 26.4). Search in Google Scholar
12 Yajima T, Yagihashi A, Kameshima H, Furuya D, Kobayashi D, Hirata K, et al. Establishment of quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays for human telomerase-associated genes. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 290: 117–27. 10.1016/S0009-8981(99)00188-6Search in Google Scholar
13 Verderio P, Orlando C, Casini Raggi C, Marubini E. Confidence interval estimation for DNA and mRNA concentration by real-time PCR: a new environment for an old theorem. Int J Biol Markers 2004; 19: 76–9. 10.1177/172460080401900111Search in Google Scholar
14 Stahlberg A, Aman P, Ridell B, Mostad P, Kubista M. Quantitative real-time PCR method for detection of B-lymphocyte monoclonality by comparison of kappa and lambda immunoglobulin light chain expression. Clin Chem 2003; 49: 51–9. 10.1373/49.1.51Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15 Paradiso A, Volpe S, Iacobacci A, Marubini E, Verderio P, Costa A, et al. Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers. Quality control for biomarker determination in oncology: the experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT). Int J Biol Markers 2002; 17: 201–14. 10.1177/172460080201700310Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
