Alternate Design forms for an Industrial Structure

International Journal of Civil Engineering

© 2022 by SSRG - IJCE Journal

Volume 9 Issue 8

Year of Publication : 2022

Authors : Kala Suresh Bhangennavar, Basavaraj Saunshi

10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V9I8P101

How to Cite?

Kala Suresh Bhangennavar, Basavaraj Saunshi, "Alternate Design forms for an Industrial Structure," SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 9,  no. 8, pp. 1-9, 2022. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V9I8P101

Abstract:

The development of fresh options for industrial structures is improved structural design. Based on their span, height, spacing, and potential alternate roofing systems, the structure has been reduced in cost in this research. This work offers various structural plans for long-span light-roof industrial structures. The traditional Pratt truss, pre-engineered building truss and lattice truss are the alternatives that are being investigated. They have been evaluated, and created following IS 800- 2007. An industrial building with a plan dimension of 24 m x 50 m, an eave height of 12 m, and practically viable roof slopes is considered for analysis and design in this study. An industrial building with the best alternative roofing system is proposed for its tonnage by retaining the same height and breadth of the frame for all alternative designs.

Keywords:

Alternate design form, Industrial building, Lattice truss, Pratt truss, Pre-engineered building.

References:

[1] Syed Firoz, Sarath Chandra Kumar B, and S.Kanakambara Rao, “Design Concept of Pre Engineered Building,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 267-272, 2012.
[2] G. Durga Rama Naidu, K. Srinivasa Vengala Rao, et al., “Comparative Study of Analysis and Design of Pre-Engineered Buildings and Conventional Frames,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 33-41, 2014.
[3] Milan Masani, and Dr Y. D. Patil, “Large Span Lattice Frame Industrial Roof Structure," IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering,(IOSRJMCE), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 01-07, 2015.
[4] Kamlesh Parihar, “Parametric Study of Framed Truss Systems for Large Span Industrial Structures,” International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD), vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 488-494, 2017.
[5] Quazi Syed Shujat, and Ravindra Desai, “Comparitive Study of Design of Industrial Warehouse Using CSB, PEB and Tubular Sections,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 8, no. 5, Part-I, pp. 53-57, 2018.
[6] Humanaaz Arif Qureshi, Dr. Kuldeep R. Dabhekar, et al., “Comparative Analysis of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Building,” Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), vol. 7, no. 5 , pp. 370-377, 2020. Crossref, http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23426.50888
[7] Bhupesh Kumar, Dr. Pankaj Singh, and Ravindra Gautam, “Comparative Study of Warehouse Structure in P.E.B. with C.S.B.” International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 277-284, 2020.
[8] Animesh Tripathi, Rituraj, Shezad Meman, and Nishant Patil, “Parametric Study on Design of Pre-Engineered Building using is 800– 2007 and AISC 360-10 13th Edition,” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 07-14 , 2020. Crossref, http://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1704040714
[9] Prasad. R. Vaidya, Sarika P. Gangurde, et al., “Comparative Study Between Framed Truss and Conventional Truss System for Industrial Building,” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, pp. 1010-1014, 2021.
[10] Mahen Mahendran, and Costin Moor, “Three-Dimensional Modelling of Steel Portal Frame Buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 125, no. 8, 1999. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:8(870)
[11] Jinsha MS, and Linda Ann Mathew, “Analysis of Pre-Engineered Building,” International Journal of Science and Research, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1049-1051, 2016.
[12] B K Raghu Prasad, Sunil Kumar, Amarnath K, “Optimization of Pre Engineered Buildings,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 2014.
[13] Neha R. Kolate, and Shipa Kewate, “Comparitive Study of Pre-Engineered and Conventional Steel Frames for Different Wind Zones”, International Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 51-59, 2015.
[14] S.D.Charka, and S. Sanklecha , “Economizing Steel Building Using Pre-Engineered Steel Sections,” International Journal of Research In Civil Engineering, Architecture and Design, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-10, 2014.
[15] Jatin D. Thakar, and Prof.P.G. Patel, “Comparitive Study of Pre-Engineered Steel Structure by Varying Width of the Structure”, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, pp. 56-62, 2013. 
[16] C. M. Meera, “Pre-Engineered Building Design of an Industrial Warehouse”, International Journal of Science and Emerging Technologies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75-82, 2013.
[17] Aijaz Ahmad Zende, Prof.A.V.Kulkarni, and Aslam Hutagi, “Comparitive Study of Analysis and Design of Pre-Engineered Buildings and Conventional Frames,” Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 32-43, 2013.
[18] IS 875 Part 1 – Code of Practice for Design Loads.
[19] IS 875 Part 2 – Code of Practice for Design Loads.
[20] IS 875 Part 3 – Code of Practice for Design Loads
[21] N. Subramanian, “Design of Steel Structures: Limit State Method,” 2018