Reflective journals in music production pedagogy: A case study

References

1. Aggett, C. (2010), ‘Reflective journaling: A singer’s path to performance’, in CEPROM (ed.), CEPROM (Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician) Seminar, as part of the ISME World Conference, Shanghai, China, 27–30 July.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, M. and Castles, M. (2020), ‘Blogging, journaling and reflective writing: A snapshot of students’ preferences and perceptions from two Australian universities’, International Journal of Clinical Legal Education, 27:2, p. 155.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barton, G. (2015), ‘Reflective practice in music: A collaborative professional approach’, in M. E. Ryan (ed.), Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–76.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baruah, B., Ward, T. and Brereton, J. (2017), ‘An e-learning tool for reflective practice and enhancing employability among engineering students’, in IEEE (ed.), 27th European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering Annual Conference (EAEEIE), Grenoble, France, 7–9 June, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Xplore, pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/EAEEIE.2017.8768718.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Başaran, S. (2017), ‘Investigating ethical information sharing in Facebook within educational context through adopted PAPA framework’, TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10:INTE Special Issue, pp. 268–75.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baver, K. (2020), ‘Empire at 40: How Ben Burtt turned a bathtub of raccoons and industrial noise into a Star Wars soundscape’, Star Wars, 6 July, https://www.starwars.com/news/empire-at-40-ben-burtt-interview. Accessed 31 October 2022.
7. Bengtsson, M. (2016), ‘How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis’, Nursing Plus Open, 2:1, pp. 8–14.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Billen, M. (2020), ‘LearningToReflect: Preservice teachers’ reflections on Instagram’, Educational Renaissance, 9:1, pp. 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1956), Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Company.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Boehm, C., Hepworth-Sawyer, R., Hughes, N. and Ziemba, D. (2018), ‘The discipline that “became”: Developments in music technology in British higher education between 2007 and 2018’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 11:3, pp. 251–67.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Born, G. and Devine, K. (2015), ‘Music technology, gender, and class: Digitization, educational and social change in Britain’, Twentieth-Century Music, 12:2, pp. 135–72.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boud, D. and Walker, D. (1998), ‘Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context’, Studies in Higher Education, 23:2, pp. 191–206.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bowman, J. (1996), ‘Developing a pedagogy in music technology’, in Institute for Musical Research (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Technological Directions in Music Education Conference, San Antonio, Spain, 8–10 February, San Antonio: Institute of Musical Research, pp. 4–8.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bree, R. and Gallagher, G. (2016), ‘Using Microsoft Excel to code and thematically analyse qualitative data: A simple, cost-effective approach’, All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 8:2, http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/281. Accessed 1 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Broadbent, J. and Poon, W. L. (2015), ‘Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review’, The Internet and Higher Education, 27, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brodin, E. M. and Frick, L. (2011), ‘Conceptualizing and encouraging critical creativity in doctoral education’, International Journal for Researcher Development, 2:2, pp. 133–51.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brookfield, S. D. (1998), ‘Critically reflective practice’, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18:4, pp. 197–205.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Brown, J. S. and Adler, R. P. (2008), ‘Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail and learning2.0’, EDUCAUSE Review, 43:1, pp. 16–32, www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0811.pdf. Accessed 18 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Burnard, P. (2012), Musical Creativities in Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 132.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Butt, A. A., Anwar, S. and Menekse, M. (2022), ‘WIP: Role of digital nudging strategies on STEM students’ application engagement’, 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minnesota, USA, 26–29 June, https://peer.asee.org/41039.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carey, G., Harrison, S. and Dwyer, R. (2017), ‘Encouraging reflective practice in conservatoire students: A pathway to autonomous learning?’, Music Education Research, 19:1, pp. 99–110.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chan, C. K. and Wong, H. Y. (2021), ‘Students’ perception of written, audio, video and face-to-face reflective approaches for holistic competency development’, Active Learning in Higher Education, 19 November, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14697874211054449. Accessed 12 June 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cornish, M. M. and Cantor, P. A. (2008), ‘“Thinking about thinking: It’s not just for philosophers”: Using metacognitive journals to teach and learn about constructivism’, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29:4, pp. 326–39.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., Orsmond, P., Gomez, S. and Park, J. (2012), ‘The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?’, Computers & Education, 58:1, pp. 386–96.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Davis, R. and Parker, S. (2013), ‘Collaboration, creativity and communities of practice: Music technology courses as a gateway to the industry’, in Proceedings of the AES International Conference, Tennessee, USA, 25–27 July, New York: Audio Engineering Society, pp. 185–90.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dewey, J. ([1910] 1933), How We Think, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
    [Google Scholar]
28. DiCicco-Bloom, B. and Crabtree, B. F. (2006), ‘The qualitative research interview’, Medical Education, 40:4, pp. 314–21.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Draper, P. (2008), ‘Music two-point-zero: Music, technology and digital independence’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 1:2&3, pp. 137–52.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Enerson, D. M., Plank, K. M. and Neill Johnson, R. (2007),  ‘An introduction to classroom assessment techniques’, Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence, http://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/pdf/Classroom_Assessment_Techniques_Intro.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2019.
31. Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H. and Mazur, E. (2002), ‘Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms’, The Physics Teacher, 40:4, p. 206.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Finlayson, A. (2021), ‘The art of production: Krust’, Resident Advisor, 17 November, https://ra.co/features/3882. Accessed 31 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. and Schatz, S. (2012), ‘Applying the modality principle to real-time feedback and the acquisition of higher-order cognitive skills’, Educational Technology Research and Development, 60:2, pp. 223–38.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (2009), ‘Understanding student learning’, in H. Fry, S. Ketteridge and S. Marshall (eds), A Handbook for Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, London: Routledge, pp. 8–26.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Georgii-Hemming, E., Johansson, K. and Moberg, N. (2020), ‘Reflection in higher music education: What, why, wherefore?’, Music Education Research, 22:3, pp. 245–56.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gibbs, G. (1988), Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Methods, Oxford: Further Education Unit.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gilflores, J. and Alonso, C. G. (1995), ‘Using focus groups in educational research: Exploring teachers’ perspectives on educational change’, Evaluation Review, 19:1, pp. 84–101.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hatton, N. and Smith, D. (1994), ‘Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation’, Teaching and Teacher Education, 11:1, pp. 33–49.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Henderson, M., Johnson, N. F. and Auld, G. (2013), ‘Silences of ethical practice: Dilemmas for researchers using social media’, Educational Research and Evaluation, 19: 6, pp. 546–60.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hepworth-Sawyer, R. and Goulding, C. (2010), What Is Music Production?, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Holifield, D. and Pigott, J. (2012), ‘Enriching experiential learning in music technology’, Proceedings of the 6th Balkan Conference on Engineering & Business Education, Sibiu, Romania, 18–21 October, https://doi.org/10.2478/cplbu-2014-0022.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Jacobs, S. (2016), ‘Reflective learning, reflective practice’, Nursing, 46:5, pp. 62–64.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Jafarigohar, M. and Mortazavi, M. (2013), ‘The effects of different types of reflective journal writing on learners’ self-regulated learning’, Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16:1, pp. 59–78.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Jenkins, P. (2011), ‘Formal and informal music educational practices’, Philosophy of Music Education Review, 19:2, pp. 179–97.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Johnson, N., Henderson, M. and Auld, G. (2014), ‘Ethics of teaching with social media’, Australian Computers in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 30 September–3 October.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kapler, I., Weston, T. and Wiseheart, M. (2015), ‘Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: Long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning’, Learning and Instruction, 36, pp. 38–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V. and Sitzia, J. (2003), ‘Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15:3, pp. 261–66.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., Mckay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M. and Yeung, E. (1999), ‘Determining the level of reflective thinking from students’ written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18:1, pp. 18–30.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Kivestu, T. and Leijen, A. (2014), ‘A model for supporting students’ reflection in tertiary music education’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, pp. 199–208.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Lebler, D. (2008), ‘Popular music pedagogy: Peer learning in practice’, Music Education Research, 10:2, pp. 193–213.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L. and Simons, P. R. J. (2009), ‘Difficulties teachers report about students’ reflection: Lessons learned from dance education’, Teaching in Higher Education, 14:3, pp. 315–26.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Light, R. J. (2001), Making the Most of College: Students Speak Their Minds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lousberg, L., Rooij, R., Jansen, S., van Dooren, E., Heintz, J. and van der Zaag, E. (2020), ‘Reflection in design education’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30:5, pp. 885–97.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lunt, T. and Curran, J. (2010), ‘“Are you listening please?”: The advantages of electronic audio feedback compared to written feedback’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35:7, pp. 759–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977772.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Maguire, M. and Delahunt, B. (2017), ‘Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars’, All Ireland Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 9:3, http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335. Accessed 1 June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Maher, J., Markey, J. and Ebert-May, D. (2013), ‘The other half of the story: Effect size analysis in quantitative research’, CBE Life Sciences Education, 12:3, pp. 345–51.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Mann, K., Gordon, J. and MacLeod, A. (2009), ‘Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review’, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14:4, pp. 595–621.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Mezirow, J. and Taylor, E. W. (2009), Transformative Learning in Practice: Insights From Community, Workplace, and Higher Education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Moon, J. A. (2006), Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Moore, D. (2014), ‘Supporting students in music technology higher education to learn computer programming’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 7:1, pp. 75–92.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Moore, J. (2005), ‘Transformative mathematics pedagogy: From theory to practice, research and beyond’, in A. Rodriqez and R. S. Kitchen (eds), Preparing Mathematics and Science Teachers for Diverse Classrooms: Promising Strategies for Transformative Pedagogy, London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 183–202.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Nichol, D. (2010), The Foundation for Graduate Attributes: Developing Self-Regulation through Self and Peer Assessment, Glasgow: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Scotland, www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk. Accessed 29 April 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006), ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, pp. 199–218.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Oakley-Girvan, I., Yunis, R., Longmire, M. and Schwartz-Ouillon, J. (2022), ‘What works best to engage participants in mobile app interventions and e-health: A scoping review’, Telemedicine and e-Health, 28:6, pp. 768–80.
    [Google Scholar]
65. O’Connell, T. and Dyment, E. (2011), ‘The case of reflective journals: Is the jury still out?’, Reflective Practice, 12:1, pp. 47–59.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Panadero, E. (2017), ‘A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research’, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422. Accessed 6 January 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Pintrich, P. R. (2004), ‘A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students’, Educational Psychology Review, 16:4, pp. 385–407.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Prasetyawati, O. A. and Ardi, P. (2020), ‘Integrating Instagram into EFL writing to foster student engagement’, Teaching English with Technology, 20:3, pp. 40–62, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1264231.pdf. Accessed 16 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Procee, H. (2006), ‘Reflection in education: A – Kantian epistemology’, Education Theory, 56:3, pp. 237–362.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Queirós, A., Almeida, F. and Faria, D. (2017), ‘Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods’, European Journal of Education Studies, 3:9, pp. 369–87.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. and O’Connor, W. (2004), ‘Carrying out qualitative analysis’, in J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (eds), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage Publications, pp. 219–62.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Rovers, S. F. E., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., Bruin, A. B. H. de and Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2019), ‘Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning’, Metacognition Learning, 14:1, pp. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Ryan, M. and Ryan, M. (2013), ‘Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education’, Higher Education Research & Development, 32:2, pp. 244–57.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Schön, D. A. (2017), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Siegel, M. (1995), ‘More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning’, Canadian Journal of Education, 20:4, p. 455.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Slater, M. (2016), ‘Processes of learning in the project studio’, in A. King and E. Himonides (eds), Music, Technology & Education: Critical Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 9–26.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Small, C. (1998), Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening, Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, in association with University Press of New England.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Smyth, J. (1989), ‘Developing and sustaining critical reflection in teacher education’, Journal of Teacher Education, 40:2, pp. 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Tanner, K. (2012), ‘Promoting student metacognition’, Life Sciences Education, 11:2, pp. 113–99.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Théberge, P. (1997), Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology, Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Toulson, R. (2011), ‘Creation of media based learning material for audio and music technology’, Journal on the Art of Record Production, 5, n.pag.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Toulson, R. and Hepworth-Sawyer, R. (2018), ‘Connected learning journeys in music production education’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 11:3, pp. 269–86.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Unwin, L. (2013), ‘English apprenticeship from past to present: The challenges and consequences of rampant “community” diversity’, in J. Hughes, N. Jewson and L. Unwin (eds), Communities of Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 119–29.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Veletsianos, G. and Navarrete, C. C. (2012), ‘Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13:1, pp. 145–66.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Voss, B. (2016), ‘Information on demand in the recording studio: Building the case for teaching music technology with an interactive agenda’, Australian Journal of Music Education, 50:2, pp. 24–38.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Waldron, J. (2011), ‘Conceptual frameworks, theoretical models and the role of YouTube: Investigating informal music learning and teaching in online music community’, Journal of Music, Technology & Education, 4:2&3, pp. 189–200.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Walsh, S. and Mann, S. (2015), ‘Doing reflective practice: A data-led way forward’, ELT Journal, 69:4, pp. 351–62, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv018.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Walzer, D. A. (2015), ‘Sound exchange: Reframing music composition educational practice’, Leonardo Music Journal, 25, pp. 34–36.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Walzer, D. A. (2017a), ‘Independent music production: How individuality, technology and creative entrepreneurship influence contemporary music industry practices’, Creative Industries Journal, 10:1, pp. 21–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2016.1247626.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Walzer, D. A. (2017b), ‘The curricular soundtrack: Designing interdisciplinary music technology degrees through cognitive apprenticeship and situated learning’, in S. Fee, A. Holland-Minkley and T. Lombardi (eds), New Directions for Computing Education, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 143–60.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Wilkinson, J. (1999), ‘Implementing reflective practice’, Nursing Standard, 13:21, pp. 36–40.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Wolstencroft. P. and Main, L. de (2021), ‘“Why didn’t you tell me that before?”: Engaging undergraduate students in feedback and feedforward within UK higher education’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45:3, pp. 312–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1759517.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G.-J. and Paas, F. (2019), ‘Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review’, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35:4&5, pp. 356–73.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Zarestky, J., Bigler, M., Brazile, M., Lopes, T. and Bangerth, W. (2022), ‘Reflective writing supports metacognition and self-regulation in graduate computational science and engineering’, Computers and Education Open, 3, p. 100085.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000), ‘Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective’, in M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich and M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 13–39.
    [Google Scholar]