A paradigm shift in studio pedagogy during pandemic times: An international perspective on challenges and opportunities teaching design online

References

1. Ahmad, L.,, Sosa, M., and Musfy, K.. ( 2020;), ‘ Interior design teaching methodology during the global COVID-19 pandemic. ’, Interiority, 3:2, pp. 163–84.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bazeley, P.. ( 2004;), ‘ Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. ’, in R. Buber,, J. Gadner, and L. Richards. (eds), Applying Qualitative Methods to Marketing Management Research, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 141–56.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blair, B.. ( 2006;), ‘ At the end of a huge crit in the summer, it was “crap”: I’d worked really hard but all she said was “fine” and I was gutted. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 5:2, pp. 83–95.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blythman, M.,, Orr, S., and Blair, B.. ( 2007), Critiquing the Crit, final report no. LTR – 021007, Brighton:: University of Brighton, School of Art, Design and Media;, www.academia.edu/586074/Critiquing_the_Crit. Accessed 22 June 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braun, V., and Clarke, V.. ( 2006;), ‘ Using thematic analysis in psychology. ’, Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Broadfoot, O., and Bennett, R.. ( 2003;), ‘ Design studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern Internet-based design studios. ’, in Apple University Consortium Academic and Developers Conference Proceedings, Adelaide, South Australia, 28 September–1 October 2003, Frenchs Forest:: Apple University Consortium;, pp. 9–21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, J. B.. ( 2021;), ‘ Making the studio smaller. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 256–68.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chamorro-Koc, M., and Kurimasuriyar, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Insights from studio teaching practices in a creative industries faculty in Australia. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19:2, pp. 172–85.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Corazzo, J., and Gharib, L.. ( 2021;), ‘ Everyday routines and material practices in the design studio: Why informal pedagogy matters. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 144–64.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crowther, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. ’, Journal of Learning Design, 6:3, pp. 18–28.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Daniel, R., and Fleischmann, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ Designing a learning space for creativity and collaboration: From studio to computer lab in design education. ’, in C. Nygaard,, J. Branch,, L. Scott-Webber, and P. Bartholomew. (eds), Learning Spaces in Higher Education, Oxford:: Libri Publishing;, pp. 45–58.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Danvers, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Towards a radical pedagogy: Provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design. ’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 22:1, pp. 47–57.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Day, P.. ( 2013;), ‘ The art group crit: How do you make a firing squad less scary?. ’, Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 5, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Desai, S.,, Stahl, I., and Chamorro-Koc, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Global design studio: Advancing cross-disciplinary experiential education during the COVID-19 pandemic. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 165–81.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dreamson, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Online design education: Meta-connective pedagogy. ’, iJADE, 39:3, pp. 483–97.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ellmers, G.. ( 2006;), ‘ Reflection and graphic design pedagogy: Developing a reflective framework to enhance learning in a graphic design tertiary environment. ’, in S. Baker, and S. Fereday. (eds), ACUADS 2006, Melbourne, Australia, 27–29 September 2006, Melbourne:: Monash University;, pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Filimowicz, M. A., and Tzankova, V. K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Creative making, large lectures, and social media: Breaking with tradition in art and design education. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 16:2, pp. 156–72.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Industry-driven design education: How much should market/industry dictate pedagogy?. ’, in G. Muratovski. (ed.), agIdeas Research: Design for Business, Melbourne:: agIdeas Press;, pp. 76–95.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Democratisation of design and design learning: How do we educate the next-generation designer. ’, International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 8:6, pp. 101–08.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Peer assessment: A learning opportunity for students in the creative arts. ’, in C. Nygaard,, J. Branch, and P. Bartholomew. (eds), Assessing Learning in Higher Education, Oxford:: Libri Publishing;, pp. 45–58.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Hype or help? Technology-enhanced learning in the design classroom: An experiment in online design collaboration. ’, International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 11:1, pp. 331–41.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ De l’enseignement pratique en studio à l’enseignement en ligne: peut-on enseigner le design en ligne?. ’ (‘From studio practice to online design education: Can we teach design online?’), Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 41:1, pp. 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2020a;), ‘ Online design education: Searching for a middle ground. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 19:1, pp. 36–57.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2020b;), ‘ The online pandemic in design courses: Design higher education in digital isolation. ’, in L. Naumovska. (ed.), The Impact of COVID19 On the International Education System, London:: Proud Pen;, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2021a;), ‘ Hands-on versus virtual: Reshaping the design classroom with blended learning. ’, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 20:1, pp. 87–112.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fleischmann, K.. ( 2021b;), ‘ Is the design studio dead?: An international perspective on the changing shape of the physical studio across design domains. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 112–29.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fleischmann, K., and Daniel, R.. ( 2010;), ‘ Enhancing employability through the use of real-life scenarios in digital media design education. ’, in E. Errington. (ed.), Preparing Graduates for the Professions Using Scenario-Based Learning, Mt Gravatt:: PostPress;, pp. 85–96.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Galletta, A., and Cross, W. E.. ( 2013), Mastering the Semi-structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication, New York:: New York University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hart, J.,, Zamenopoulos, T., and Garner, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ The learningscape of a virtual design atelier. ’, Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich, 3, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hepburn, L. A., and Borthwick, M.. ( 2021;), ‘ Synchronicity in the online design studio: A study of two cases. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 86–95.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hettithanthri, U., and Hansen, P.. ( 2022;), ‘ Design studio practice in the context of architectural education: A narrative literature review. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32:4, pp. 2343–64.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ioannou, O.. ( 2018;), ‘ Opening up design studio education using blended and networked formats. ’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17:47, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Johnson, B., and Christensen, L.. ( 2008), Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, Los Angeles, CA:: SAGE Publications, Inc;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jones, D.. ( 2021;), ‘ Reflection: Making little things visible. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:1, pp. 8–11.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jones, D., and Lotz, N.. ( 2021;), ‘ Design education: Teaching in crisis. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 4–9.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Jones, D.,, Lotz, N., and Holden, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ A longitudinal study of virtual design studio (VDS) use in STEM distance design education. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31:4, pp. 839–65.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kaushik, V., and Walsh, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. ’, Social Sciences, 8:255, pp. 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
38. King, N.. ( 2004;), ‘ Chapter 21: Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. ’, in C. Cassell, and G. Symon. (eds), Essential Guide to Methods in Organizational Research, London:: SAGE Publications Ltd;, pp. 256–70.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Klebsedel, H., and Kornetsky, L.. ( 2009;), ‘ Critique as signature pedagogy in the arts. ’, in R. Gurung,, N. Chick, and A. Haynie. (eds), Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, Sterling, VA:: Stylus;, pp. 99–120.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kolb, D.. ( 1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:: Prentice-Hall;.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kvale, S.. ( 2007), Doing Interviews, London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Legg, C., and Hookway, C.. ( 2020;), ‘ Pragmatism. ’, in E. N. Zalta. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lehtonen, M.,, Khamisani, N., and Gatto, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ Playful absence/absence of play: Rethinking the design studio in online environments. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lotz, N.,, Jones, D., and Holden, G.. ( 2015;), ‘ Social engagement in online design pedagogies. ’, LearnxDesign 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, Aalto University, 28–30 June, http://oro.open.ac.uk/43592/. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Marshalsey, L., and Sclater, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Critical perspectives of technology-enhanced learning in relation to specialist communication design studio education within the UK and Australia. ’, Research in Comparative & International Education, 13:1, pp. 92–116.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Marshalsey, L., and Sclater, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Together but apart: Creating and supporting online learning communities in an era of distributed studio education. ’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 39:4, pp. 826–40.
    [Google Scholar]
47. McLain, M.. ( 2022;), ‘ Towards a signature pedagogy for design and technology education: A literature review. ’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32:3, pp. 1629–48.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mohammed, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Blended e-learning in the architectural design studio: An experimental model. ’, International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, 32:sup1, pp. 73–81.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Morgan, D. L.. ( 2014;), ‘ Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. ’, Qualitative Inquiry, 20:8, pp. 1045–53.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Morkel, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ The social dimension of studio space: Face-to-face and beyond: Exploring the online learner experience. ’, Sixth International DEFSA Conference, Johannesburg, South Africa, 7–8 September.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Morse, J. M., and Niehaus, L.. ( 2009), Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures, Walnut Creek, CA:: Left Coast;.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Park, J. Y.. ( 2011;), ‘ Design education online: Learning delivery and evaluation. ’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30:2, pp. 22–33.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Poggenpohl, S. H.. ( 2012;), ‘ Envisioning a future design education: An introduction. ’, Visible Language, 46:1&2, pp. 8–19.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Punch, K.. ( 2009), Introduction to Research Methods in Education, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Saghafi, M. R.,, Franz, J., and Crowther, P.. ( 2012;), ‘ Perceptions of physical versus virtual design studio education. ’, International Journal of Architectural Research, 6:1, pp. 6–22.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Şalgamcıoğlu, B. K., and Gen, İ.. ( 2021;), ‘ The ones who have never been physically in a studio: Myths and hacks of first year basic design students in the pandemic. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 130–43.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sandbach, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ Graphic design and the aesthetics of place. ’, International Research Conference: agIdeas Design for Business and Industry, Melbourne, 2 May.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Schön, D.. ( 1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, CA:: Jossey-Bass;.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schrand, T., and Eliason, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Feedback practices and signature pedagogies: What can the liberal arts learn from the design critique?. ’, Teaching in Higher Education, 17:1, pp. 51–62.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Shreeve, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ The way we were? Signature pedagogies under threat. ’, in E. Bohemia,, B. Mozota, and L. Collina. (eds), Researching Design Education: 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers, Paris:: CUMULUS;, pp. 112–25.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Shreeve, A.,, Sims, E., and Trowler, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ “A kind of exchange”: Learning from art and design teaching. ’, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:2, pp. 125–38.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Shulman, L. S.. ( 2005;), ‘ Signature pedagogies in the professions. ’, Daedalus, 134:3, pp. 52–59.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Spruce, J.,, Thomas, P., and Moriarty, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ From sharing screens to sharing spaces. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 96–111.
    [Google Scholar]
64. STP ( 2009;), Curriculum Development in Studio Teaching. , STP final report, Kensington:: UNSW Studio Teaching Project;, https://ltr.edu.au/resources/STP%20Report%20Vol%201.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A.. ( 2009), Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in the Social and Behaviorial Sciences, Los Angeles, CA:: SAGE;.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Tessier, V., and Aubry-Boyer, M.-P.. ( 2021;), ‘ Turbulence in crit assessment: From the design workshop to online learning. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 86–95.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Thody, A.. ( 2006), Writing and Presenting Research, Thousand Oaks, CA:: SAGE Publications Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Thompson, J.,, Tregloan, K.,, Soccio, P., and Song, H.. ( 2021;), ‘ Dual delivery design studios: Exploring design learning for hybrid cohorts. ’, Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26:4, pp. 228–38.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wragg, N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Online communication design education: The importance of the social environment. ’, Studies in Higher Education, 45:11, pp. 2287–97.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wrighta, A., and Grovera, R.. ( 2020), National Design Studio Survey: Findings, Bath:: Bath University;, https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/national-design-studio-survey(7dbdf0cc-a865-4b67-b0e4-77bbd4232b70).html. Accessed 22 June 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Wrigley, C., and Mosely, G.. ( 2022), Design Thinking Pedagogy: Facilitating Innovation and Impact in Tertiary Education, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Wrigley, C.,, Mosely, G., and Tomitsch, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Design thinking education: A comparison of massive open online courses. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4:3, pp. 275–92.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Yorgancıoğlu, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Critical reflections on the surface, pedagogical and epistemological features of the design studio under the “new normal” conditions. ’, Journal of Design Studio, 2:1, pp. 25–36.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Fleischmann, Katja. ( 2022;), ‘ A paradigm shift in studio pedagogy during pandemic times: An international perspective on challenges and opportunities teaching design online. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 8:2, pp. 247–72, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00042_1
    [Google Scholar]